FragSeq: Transcriptome-wide RNA structure probing using high-throughput sequencing

Nature Methods

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 995-1001

  Underwood, Jason G ^a,b,e   Uzilov, Andrew V ^b   Katzman, Sol ^b   Onodera, Courtney S ^b   Mainzer, Jacob E ^c   Mathews, David H ^d   Lowe, Todd M ^b   Salama, Sofie R ^a,b   Haussler, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SINGLE STRANDED RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME; UNTRANSLATED RNA;

ARTICLE; FRAGMENTATION SEQUENCING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA PROCESSING; RNA SEQUENCE; RNA STRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; BASE PAIRING; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DNA PRIMERS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE LIBRARY; HISTONES; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NEURONS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; RNA; RNA, UNTRANSLATED;

EID: 78649690492     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1529     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Gesteland, R., Cech, T. & Atkins, J. (eds). The RNA World 3rd edn. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA, 2005).
2. Affymetrix/Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ENCODE Transcriptome Project. Post-transcriptional processing generates a diversity of 5′-modifed long and short RNAs. Nature 457, 1028-1032 (2009).
3. Guttman, M. et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458, 223-227 (2009).
4. Ambros, V. microRNAs: tiny regulators with great potential. Cell 107, 823-826 (2001).
5. Kapranov, P. et al. RNA maps reveal new RNA classes and a possible function for pervasive transcription. Science 316, 1484-1488 (2007).
6. Knapp, G. Enzymatic approaches to probing of RNA secondary and tertiary structure. Methods Enzymol. 2, 192-212 (1989).
7. Low, J.T. & Weeks, K.M. SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure prediction. Methods 52, 150-158 (2010).
8. Machado-Lima, A., del Portillo, H.A. & Durham, A.M. Computational methods in noncoding RNA research. J. Math. Biol. 56, 15-49 (2008).
9. Crawford, G.E. et al. Genome-wide mapping of DNase hypersensitive sites using massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS). Genome Res. 16, 123-131 (2006).
10. Ying, Q.-L., Stavridis, M., Griffths, D., Li, M. & Smith, A. Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectoDermal precursors in adherent monoculture. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 183-186 (2003).
11. Desai, N.A. & Shankar, V. Single-strand-specifc nucleases. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26, 457-491 (2003).
12. Cameron, V. & Uhlenbeck, O.C. 3′-phosphatase activity in T4 polynucleotide kinase. Biochemistry 16, 5120-5126 (1977).
13. Romier, C., Dominguez, R., Lahm, A., Dahl, O. & Suck, D. Recognition of single-stranded DNA by nuclease P1: high resolution crystal structures of complexes with substrate analogs. Proteins 32, 414-424 (1998).
14. Naik, A.K. & RaghaVan, S.C. P1 nuclease cleavage is dependent on length of the mismatches in DNA. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7, 1384-1391 (2008).
15. Parker, K.A. & Steitz, J.A. Structural analyses of the human U3 ribonucleoprotein particle reveal a conserved sequence available for base pairing with pre-rRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2899-2913 (1987).
16. Mougin, A., Gottschalk, A., Fabrizio, P., Lührmann, R. & Branlant, C. Direct probing of RNA structure and RNA-protein interactions in purifed HeLa cell's and yeast spliceosomal U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP particles. J. Mol. Biol. 317, 631-649 (2002).
17. Granneman, S. et al. Role of pre-rRNA base pairing and 80S complex formation in subnucleolar localization of the U3 snoRNP. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 8600-8610 (2004).
18. Kass, S., Tyc, K., Steitz, J.A. & Sollner-Webb, B. The U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein functions in the frst step of preribosomal RNA processing. Cell 60, 897-908 (1990).
19. Peculis, B.A. & Steitz, J.A. Disruption of U8 nucleolar snRNA inhibits 5.8S and 28S rRNA processing in the Xenopus oocyte. Cell 73, 1233-1245 (1993).
20. Tycowski, K., Shu, M. & Steitz, J. Requirement for intron-encoded U22 small nucleolar RNA in 18S ribosomal RNA maturation. Science 266, 1558-1561 (1994).
21. Wang, Z., Gerstein, M. & SnyDer, M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 57-63 (2009).
22. Kertesz, M. et al. Genome-wide measurement of RNA secondary structure in yeast. Nature 467, 103-107 (2010).
23. Reuter, J.S. & Mathews, D.H. RNAstructure: software for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 129 (2010).
24. Mandal, M. & Breaker, R.R. Gene regulation by riboswitches. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 451-463 (2004).
25. Maroney, P., Romfo, C. & Nilsen, T. Nuclease protection of RNAs containing site-specifc labels: a rapid method for mapping RNA-protein interactions. RNA 6, 1905-1909 (2000).
26. Kiss-László, Z., Henry, Y., Bachellerie, J.P., Caizergues-Ferrer, M. & Kiss, T. Site-specifc ribose methylation of preribosomal RNA: a novel function for small nucleolar RNAs. Cell 85, 1077-1088 (1996).
27. Beard, C., Hochedlinger, K., Plath, K., Wutz, A. & Jaenisch, R. Effcient method to generate single-copy transgenic mice by site-specifc integration in embryonic stem cells. Genesis 44, 23-28 (2006).
28. Skarnes, W.C. Gene trapping methods for the identifcation and functional analysis of cell surface proteins in mice. Methods Enzymol. 328, 592-615 (2000).
29. Sobczak, K., Michlewski, G., de Mezer, M., Krol, J. & Krzyzosiak, W.J. Trinucleotide repeat system for sequence specifcity analysis of RNA structure probing reagents. Anal. Biochem. 402, 40-46 (2010).
30. Mortazavi, A., Williams, B.A., Mccue, K., Schaeffer, L. & Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 5, 621-628 (2008).