Epigenetic inheritance: Histone bookmarks across generations

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 664-674

  Campos, Eric I ^a   Stafford, James M ^a   Reinberg, Danny ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Epigenetic; Gamete; Histone; Inheritance; Polycomb; Replication

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; DNA; HELICASE; HISTONE; CHROMATIN; POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN;

CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA REPLICATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EPIGENETICS; GENE SEGREGATION; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; REVIEW; SOMATIC CELL GENETICS; SPERMATOGENESIS; ZYGOTE; ANIMAL; CHROMATIN; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; DNA REPLICATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; HISTONES; HUMANS; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MALE; POLYCOMB-GROUP PROTEINS; SPERMATOGENESIS;

EID: 84925267221     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.08.004     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Heard E., Martienssen R.A. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell 2014, 157:95-109.
2. Margueron R., Reinberg D. Chromatin structure and the inheritance of epigenetic information. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:285-296.
3. Kar S., et al. An insight into the various regulatory mechanisms modulating human DNA methyltransferase 1 stability and function. Epigenetics 2012, 7:994-1007.
4. Annunziato A.T. Assembling chromatin: The long and winding road. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819:196-210.
5. Herman T.M., et al. Structure of chromatin at deoxyribonucleic acid replication forks: location of the first nucleosomes on newly synthesized simian virus 40 deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 1981, 20:621-630.
6. Sogo J.M., et al. Structure of replicating simian virus 40 minichromosomes. The replication fork, core histone segregation and terminal structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1986, 189:189-204.
7. Smith D.J., Whitehouse I. Intrinsic coupling of lagging-strand synthesis to chromatin assembly. Nature 2012, 483:434-438.
8. Eickbush T.H., Moudrianakis E.N. The histone core complex: an octamer assembled by two sets of protein-protein interactions. Biochemistry 1978, 17:4955-4964.
9. Annunziato A.T. Split decision: what happens to nucleosomes during DNA replication?. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:12065-12068.
10. Xu M., et al. Partitioning of histone H3-H4 tetramers during DNA replication-dependent chromatin assembly. Science 2010, 328:94-98.
11. English C.M., et al. Structural basis for the histone chaperone activity of Asf1. Cell 2006, 127:495-508.
12. Campos E.I., et al. The program for processing newly synthesized histones H3.1 and H4. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17:1343-1351.
13. Alvarez F., et al. Sequential establishment of marks on soluble histones H3 and H4. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:17714-17721.
14. Tagami H., et al. Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis. Cell 2004, 116:51-61.
15. Filipescu D., et al. Developmental roles of histone H3 variants and their chaperones. Trends Genet. 2013, 29:630-640.
16. Tyler J.K., et al. Interaction between the Drosophila CAF-1 and ASF1 chromatin assembly factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:6574-6584.
17. Shibahara K., Stillman B. Replication-dependent marking of DNA by PCNA facilitates CAF-1-coupled inheritance of chromatin. Cell 1999, 96:575-585.
18. Liu W.H., et al. CAF-1-induced oligomerization of histones H3/H4 and mutually exclusive interactions with Asf1 guide H3/H4 transitions among histone chaperones and DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:11229-11239.
19. Winkler D.D., et al. Yeast CAF-1 assembles histone (H3-H4)2 tetramers prior to DNA deposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:10139-10149.
20. Verreault A., et al. Nucleosome assembly by a complex of CAF-1 and acetylated histones H3/H4. Cell 1996, 87:95-104.
21. Franco A.A., et al. Histone deposition protein Asf1 maintains DNA replisome integrity and interacts with replication factor C. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1365-1375.
22. Groth A., et al. Regulation of replication fork progression through histone supply and demand. Science 2007, 318:1928-1931.
23. Voigt P., et al. Asymmetrically modified nucleosomes. Cell 2012, 151:181-193.
24. MacAlpine D.M., Almouzni G. Chromatin and DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5:a010207.
25. Huang C., et al. H3.3-H4 tetramer splitting events feature cell-type specific enhancers. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003558.
26. Foltman M., et al. Eukaryotic replisome components cooperate to process histones during chromosome replication. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:892-904.
27. Moyer S.E., et al. Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:10236-10241.
28. Kang Y.H., et al. Properties of the human Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS helicase complex and its action with DNA polymerase epsilon in rolling circle DNA synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:6042-6047.
29. Ishimi Y., et al. Binding of human minichromosome maintenance proteins with histone H3. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271:24115-24122.
30. Belotserkovskaya R., et al. FACT facilitates transcription-dependent nucleosome alteration. Science 2003, 301:1090-1093.
31. Stuwe T., et al. The FACT Spt16 'peptidase' domain is a histone H3-H4 binding module. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:8884-8889.
32. Ranjith P., et al. Nucleosome hopping and sliding kinetics determined from dynamics of single chromatin fibers in Xenopus egg extracts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:13649-13654.
33. Petruk S., et al. TrxG and PcG proteins but not methylated histones remain associated with DNA through replication. Cell 2012, 150:922-933.
34. Alabert C., et al. Nascent chromatin capture proteomics determines chromatin dynamics during DNA replication and identifies unknown fork components. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:281-293.
35. Kuzmichev A., et al. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:2893-2905.
36. Cao R., et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 2002, 298:1039-1043.
37. Laible G., et al. Mammalian homologues of the polycomb-group gene enhancer of zeste mediate gene silencing in Drosophila heterochromatin and at S. cerevisiae telomeres. EMBO J. 1997, 16:3219-3232.
38. Margueron R., et al. Role of the polycomb protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks. Nature 2009, 461:762-767.
39. Lachner M., et al. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 2001, 410:116-120.
40. Strahl-Bolsinger S., et al. SIR2 and SIR4 interactions differ in core and extended telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. Genes Dev. 1997, 11:83-93.
41. McManus K.J., et al. Dynamic changes in histone H3 lysine 9 methylations: identification of a mitosis-specific function for dynamic methylation in chromosome congression and segregation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:8888-8897.
42. Zee B.M., et al. Origins and formation of histone methylation across the human cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32:2503-2514.
43. Xu M., et al. A model for mitotic inheritance of histone lysine methylation. EMBO Rep. 2012, 13:60-67.
44. Sarraf S.A., Stancheva I. Methyl-CpG binding protein MBD1 couples histone H3 methylation at lysine 9 by SETDB1 to DNA replication and chromatin assembly. Mol. Cell 2004, 15:595-605.
45. Loyola A., et al. The HP1alpha-CAF1-SetDB1-containing complex provides H3K9me1 for Suv39-mediated K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10:769-775.
46. Loyola A., et al. PTMs on H3 variants before chromatin assembly potentiate their final epigenetic state. Mol. Cell 2006, 24:309-316.
47. Pinheiro I., et al. Prdm3 and Prdm16 are H3K9me1 methyltransferases required for mammalian heterochromatin integrity. Cell 2012, 150:948-960.
48. Petruk S., et al. Stepwise histone modifications are mediated by multiple enzymes that rapidly associate with nascent DNA during replication. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2841.
49. Gao Z., et al. PCGF homologs, CBX proteins, and RYBP define functionally distinct PRC1 family complexes. Mol. Cell 2012, 45:344-356.
50. Cooper S., et al. Targeting polycomb to pericentric heterochromatin in embryonic stem cells reveals a role for H2AK119u1 in PRC2 recruitment. Cell Rep. 2014, 7:1456-1470.
51. Blackledge N.P., et al. Variant PRC1 complex-dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and polycomb domain formation. Cell 2014, 157:1445-1459.
52. Kalb R., et al. Histone H2A monoubiquitination promotes histone H3 methylation in polycomb repression. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21:569-571.
53. Morey L., et al. RYBP and Cbx7 define specific biological functions of polycomb complexes in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:60-69.
54. Tavares L., et al. RYBP-PRC1 complexes mediate H2A ubiquitylation at polycomb target sites independently of PRC2 and H3K27me3. Cell 2012, 148:664-678.
55. Francis N.J., et al. Polycomb proteins remain bound to chromatin and DNA during DNA replication in vitro. Cell 2009, 137:110-122.
56. Francis N.J., et al. Chromatin compaction by a polycomb group protein complex. Science 2004, 306:1574-1577.
57. Vestner B., et al. Histone octamer dissociation is not required for in vitro replication of simian virus 40 minichromosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:8190-8195.
58. Lo S.M., et al. A bridging model for persistence of a polycomb group protein complex through DNA replication in vitro. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:784-796.
59. Murzina N., et al. Heterochromatin dynamics in mouse cells: interaction between chromatin assembly factor 1 and HP1 proteins. Mol. Cell 1999, 4:529-540.
60. Quivy J.P., et al. A CAF-1 dependent pool of HP1 during heterochromatin duplication. EMBO J. 2004, 23:3516-3526.
61. Cowieson N.P., et al. Dimerisation of a chromo shadow domain and distinctions from the chromodomain as revealed by structural analysis. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10:517-525.
62. Brasher S.V., et al. The structure of mouse HP1 suggests a unique mode of single peptide recognition by the shadow chromo domain dimer. EMBO J. 2000, 19:1587-1597.
63. Lim J.P., Brunet A. Bridging the transgenerational gap with epigenetic memory. Trends Genet. 2013, 29:176-186.
64. Bohacek J., Mansuy I.M. Epigenetic inheritance of disease and disease risk. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38:220-236.
65. Gapp K., et al. Implication of sperm RNAs in transgenerational inheritance of the effects of early trauma in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17:667-669.
66. Dias B.G., Ressler K.J. Parental olfactory experience influences behavior and neural structure in subsequent generations. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17:89-96.
67. Smith Z.D., Meissner A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14:204-220.
68. Recht J., et al. Histone chaperone Asf1 is required for histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation, a modification associated with S phase in mitosis and meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:6988-6993.
69. Trostle-Weige P.K., et al. Isolation and characterization of TH3, a germ cell-specific variant of histone 3 in rat testis. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259:8769-8776.
70. Rathke C., et al. Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1839:155-168.
71. Montellier E., et al. Chromatin-to-nucleoprotamine transition is controlled by the histone H2B variant TH2B. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:1680-1692.
72. Govin J., et al. Histone acetylation-mediated chromatin compaction during mouse spermatogenesis. Ernst Schering Res. Found. Workshop 2006, 155-172.
73. LeRoy G., et al. The double bromodomain proteins Brd2 and Brd3 couple histone acetylation to transcription. Mol. Cell 2008, 30:51-60.
74. Dhar S., et al. Insights into role of bromodomain, testis-specific (Brdt) in acetylated histone H4-dependent chromatin remodeling in mammalian spermiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:6387-6405.
75. Shang E., et al. Identification of unique, differentiation stage-specific patterns of expression of the bromodomain-containing genes Brd2, Brd3, Brd4, and Brdt in the mouse testis. Gene Expr. Patterns 2004, 4:513-519.
76. Meistrich M.L., et al. Roles of transition nuclear proteins in spermiogenesis. Chromosoma 2003, 111:483-488.
77. Brunner A.M., et al. Epigenetic marking of sperm by post-translational modification of histones and protamines. Epigenetics Chromatin 2014, 7:2.
78. Seligman J., et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation, thiol status, and protein tyrosine phosphatase in rat epididymal spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 71:1009-1015.
79. Gatewood J.M., et al. Sequence-specific packaging of DNA in human sperm chromatin. Science 1987, 236:962-964.
80. Wykes S.M., Krawetz S.A. The structural organization of sperm chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:29471-29477.
81. Hammoud S.S., et al. Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature 2009, 460:473-478.
82. Erkek S., et al. Molecular determinants of nucleosome retention at CpG-rich sequences in mouse spermatozoa. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:868-875.
83. Brykczynska U., et al. Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17:679-687.
84. Carone B.R., et al. High-resolution mapping of chromatin packaging in mouse embryonic stem cells and sperm. Dev. Cell 2014, 30:11-22.
85. Samans B., et al. Uniformity of nucleosome preservation pattern in mammalian sperm and its connection to repetitive DNA elements. Dev. Cell 2014, 30:23-35.
86. Saitou M., Kurimoto K. Paternal nucleosomes: are they retained in developmental promoters or gene deserts?. Dev. Cell 2014, 30:6-8.
87. Carone B.R., et al. Paternally induced transgenerational environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene expression in mammals. Cell 2010, 143:1084-1096.
88. Li W., et al. Chd5 orchestrates chromatin remodelling during sperm development. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3812.
89. Paul S., et al. Chd5 requires PHD-mediated histone 3 binding for tumor suppression. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:92-102.
90. Egan C.M., et al. CHD5 is required for neurogenesis and has a dual role in facilitating gene expression and polycomb gene repression. Dev. Cell 2013, 26:223-236.
91. Ihara M., et al. Paternal poly (adp-ribose) metabolism modulates retention of inheritable sperm histones and early embryonic gene expression. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10:e1004317.
92. Govin J., et al. Proteomic strategy for the identification of critical actors in reorganization of the post-meiotic male genome. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2012, 18:1-13.
93. Doyen C.M., et al. Subunits of the histone chaperone CAF1 also mediate assembly of protamine-based chromatin. Cell Rep. 2013, 4:59-65.
94. Ray-Gallet D., et al. Dynamics of histone H3 deposition in vivo reveal a nucleosome gap-filling mechanism for H3.3 to maintain chromatin integrity. Mol. Cell 2011, 44:928-941.
95. Banaszynski L.A., et al. Hira-dependent histone H3.3 deposition facilitates PRC2 recruitment at developmental loci in ES cells. Cell 2013, 155:107-120.
96. Santenard A., et al. Heterochromatin formation in the mouse embryo requires critical residues of the histone variant H3.3. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:853-862.
97. Loppin B., et al. The histone H3.3 chaperone HIRA is essential for chromatin assembly in the male pronucleus. Nature 2005, 437:1386-1390.
98. Voigt P., et al. A double take on bivalent promoters. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:1318-1338.
99. Santos F., et al. Dynamic chromatin modifications characterise the first cell cycle in mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 2005, 280:225-236.
100. Puschendorf M., et al. PRC1 and Suv39h specify parental asymmetry at constitutive heterochromatin in early mouse embryos. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:411-420.
101. Zhao R., et al. Gene bookmarking accelerates the kinetics of post-mitotic transcriptional re-activation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1295-1304.
102. Byun J.S., et al. Dynamic bookmarking of primary response genes by p300 and RNA polymerase II complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:19286-19291.
103. Messerschmidt D.M., et al. DNA methylation dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the germline and preimplantation embryos. Genes Dev. 2014, 28:812-828.
104. Rechtsteiner A., et al. The histone H3K36 methyltransferase MES-4 acts epigenetically to transmit the memory of germline gene expression to progeny. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001091.
105. Hammoud S.S., et al. Chromatin and transcription transitions of mammalian adult germline stem cells and spermatogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 15:239-253.
106. Ng J.H., et al. In vivo epigenomic profiling of germ cells reveals germ cell molecular signatures. Dev. Cell 2013, 24:324-333.
107. Lesch B.J., et al. A set of genes critical to development is epigenetically poised in mouse germ cells from fetal stages through completion of meiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:16061-16066.
108. McConnell M.J., et al. Mosaic copy number variation in human neurons. Science 2013, 342:632-637.
109. Dietz D.M., et al. Paternal transmission of stress-induced pathologies. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 70:408-414.
110. Arico J.K., et al. Epigenetic patterns maintained in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos can be established by gene activity in the parental germ cells. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1001391.
111. Dubinin N.P., Sidorov B.N. The position effect of the hairy gene. Biol. Zhur. 1935, 4:555-568.
112. Panshin I.B. New Evidence for the position effect hypothesis. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S. N. S. 1935, 4:85-88.
113. Kayne P.S., et al. Extremely conserved histone H4N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast. Cell 1988, 55:27-39.
114. Pillus L., Rine J. Epigenetic inheritance of transcriptional states in S. cerevisiae. Cell 1989, 59:637-647.
115. Hathaway N.A., et al. Dynamics and memory of heterochromatin in living cells. Cell 2012, 149:1447-1460.