Ulysses: Accurate detection of low-frequency structural variations in large insert-size sequencing libraries

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 801-808

  Gillet Markowska, Alexandre ^a,b   Richard, Hugues ^a,b   Fischer, Gilles ^a,b   Lafontaine, Ingrid ^a,b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UMR 7238   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LIBRARY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; INTERSPERSED REPEAT; PROCEDURES;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENE LIBRARY; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMIC STRUCTURAL VARIATION; HUMANS; INTERSPERSED REPETITIVE SEQUENCES; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84925262596     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu730     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abyzov, A. and Gerstein, M. (2011) AGE: defining breakpoints of genomic structural variants at single-nucleotide resolution, through optimal alignments with gap excision. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 27, 595-603.
2. Alkan, C. et al. (2009) Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Genet., 41, 1061-1067.
3. Campbell, P.J. et al. (2008) Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing. Nat. Genet., 40, 722-729.
4. Chen, K. et al. (2009) Breakdancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nat. Methods, 6, 677-681.
5. Chiang, D.Y. et al. (2009) High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing. Nat. Methods 6, 99-103.
6. Conrad, D.F. and Hurles, M.E. (2007) The population genetics of structural variation. Nat. Genet., 39(Suppl. 7), S30-S36.
7. Fanciulli, M. et al. (2007) Fcgr3b copy number variation is associated with susceptibility to systemic, but not organ-specific, autoimmunity. Nat. Genet., 39, 721-723.
8. Girirajan, S. et al. (2011) Relative burden of large CNVs on a range of neurodevelopmental phenotypes. PLoS Genet., 7, e1002334.
9. Handsaker, R.E. et al. (2011) Discovery and genotyping of genome structural polymorphism by sequencing on a population scale. Nat. Genet., 43, 269-276.
10. Hart, S.N. et al. (2013) SoftSearch: integration of multiple sequence features to identify breakpoints of structural variations. PLoS One, 8, e83356.
11. Hollox, E.J. et al. (2008) Psoriasis is associated with increased beta-defensin genomic copy number. Nat. Genet., 40, 23-25.
12. Hormozdiari, F. et al. (2009) Combinatorial algorithms for structural variation detection in high-throughput sequenced genomes. Genome Res., 19, 1270-1278.
13. Hormozdiari, F. et al. (2010) Next-generation VariationHunter: combinatorial algorithms for transposon insertion discovery. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 26, i350-i357.
14. Inaki, K. et al. (2014) Systems consequences of amplicon formation in human breast cancer. Genome Res., 11, 1-13.
15. Jacobs, K.B. et al. (2012) Detectable clonal mosaicism and its relationship to aging and cancer. Nat. Genet., 44, 651-658.
16. Jiang, Y. et al. (2012) PRISM: pair-read informed split-read mapping for base-pair level detection of insertion, deletion and structural variants. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 28, 2576-2583.
17. Kidd, J.M. et al. (2008) Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes. Nature, 453, 56-64.
18. Korbel, J.O. et al. (2007) Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome. Science, 318, 420-426.
19. Korbel, J.O. et al. (2009) PEMer: a computational framework with simulationbased error models for inferring genomic structural variants from massive paired-end sequencing data. Genome Biol., 10, R23.
20. Lam, H.Y.K. et al. (2010) Nucleotide-resolution analysis of structural variants using BreakSeq and a breakpoint library. Nat. Biotechnol., 28, 47-55.
21. Laurie, C.C. et al. (2012) Detectable clonal mosaicism from birth to old age and its relationship to cancer. Nat. Genet., 44, 642-650.
22. Lee, S. et al. (2008) A robust framework for detecting structural variations in a genome. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 24, i59-i67.
23. Lee, S. et al. (2009) MoDIL: detecting small indels from clone-end sequencing with mixtures of distributions. Nat. Publ. Group, 6, 473-474.
24. Li, H. et al. (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and samtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078-2079.
25. Marschall, T. et al. (2012) Clever: clique-enumerating variant finder. Bioinformatics, 28, 2875-2882.
26. McConnell, M.J. et al. (2013) Mosaic copy number variation in human neurons. Science, 342, 632-637.
27. Medvedev, P. et al. (2010) Detecting copy number variation with mated short reads. Genome Res., 20, 1613-1622.
28. Mills, R.E. et al. (2011) Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing. Nature, 470, 59-65.
29. Pinto, D. et al. (2010) Functional impact of global rare copy number variation in autism spectrum disorders. Nature, 466, 368-372.
30. Qi, J. and Zhao, F. (2011) inGAP-sv: a novel scheme to identify and visualize structural variation from paired end mapping data. Nucleic Acids Res., 39(Web Server issue), W567-W575.
31. Quinlan, A.R. et al. (2010) Genome-wide mapping and assembly of structural variant breakpoints in the mouse genome. Genome Res., 20, 623-635.
32. Rausch, T. et al. (2012) Delly: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics, 28, I333-I339.
33. Sindi, S. et al. (2009) A geometric approach for classification and comparison of structural variants. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 25, i222-i230.
34. Sindi, S.S. et al. (2012) An integrative probabilistic model for identification of structural variation in sequencing data. Genome Biol., 13, R22.
35. Singer, T. et al. (2010) Line-1 retrotransposons: mediators of somatic variation in neuronal genomes? Trends Neurosci., 33, 345-354.
36. Stephens, P.J. et al. (2009) Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature, 462, 1005-1010.
37. Storey, J.D. et al. (2004) Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Statist. Methodol., 66, 187-205.
38. Voet, T. et al. (2013) Single-cell paired-end genome sequencing reveals structural variation per cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, 6119-6138.
39. Wang, J. et al. (2011) CREST maps somatic structural variation in cancer genomes with base-pair resolution. Nat. Methods, 8, 652-654.
40. Yang, L.X. et al. (2013) Diverse mechanisms of somatic structural variations in human cancer genomes. Cell, 153, 919-929.
41. Ye, K. et al. (2009) Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 25, 2865-2871.
42. Yoon, S. et al. (2009) Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res., 19, 1586-1592.
43. Zeitouni, B. et al. (2010) SVDetect: a tool to identify genomic structural variations from paired-end and mate-pair sequencing data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 26, 1895-1896.
44. Zhang, Z.D. et al. (2011) Identification of genomic indels and structural variations using split reads. BMC Genomics, 12, 375.