High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing

Nature Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 99-103

  Chiang, Derek Y ^a,b   Getz, Gad ^a   Jaffe, David B ^a   O'Kelly, Michael J T ^a   Zhao, Xiaojun ^c   Carter, Scott L ^a,d   Russ, Carsten ^a   Nusbaum, Chad ^a   Meyerson, Matthew ^a,b   Lander, Eric S ^a  

^a BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CANCER GENETICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; NUMERICAL CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BASE SEQUENCE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE DOSAGE; HUMANS;

EID: 58149218240     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1276     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Freeman, J.L. et al. Copy number variation: New insights in genome diversity. Genome Res. 16, 949-961 (2006).
2. McCarroll, S.A. & Altshuler, D.M. Copy-number variation and association studies of human disease. Nat. Genet. 39, S37-S42 (2007).
3. Beckmann, J.S., Estivill, X. & Antonarakis, S.E. Copy number variants and genetic traits: Closer to the resolution of phenotypic to genotypic variability. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 639-646 (2007).
4. Beroukhim, R. et al. Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: Methodology and application to glioma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20007-20012 (2007).
5. Pinkel, D. & Albertson, D.G. Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer. Nat. Genet. 37, S11-S17 (2005).
6. Kallioniemi, A. CGH microarrays and cancer. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19, 36-40 (2008).
7. Bailey, J.A. et al. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science 297, 1003-1007 (2002).
8. Korbel, J.O. et al. Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome. Science 318, 420-426 (2007).
9. Kidd, J.M. et al. Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes. Nature 453, 56-64 (2008).
10. Wang, T.L. et al. Digital karyotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16156-16161 (2002).
11. Shih, I. et al. Amplification of a chromatin remodeling gene, Rsf-1/HBXAP, in ovarian carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14004-14009 (2005).
12. Leary, R.J., Cummins, J., Wang, T.L. & Velculescu, V.E. Digital karyotyping. Nat. Protocols 2, 1973-1986 (2007).
13. Morozova, O. & Marra, M.A. From cytogenetics to next-generation sequencing technologies: Advances in the detection of genome rearrangements in tumors. Biochem. Cell Biol. 86, 81-91 (2008).
14. Campbell, P.J. et al. Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing. Nat. Genet. 40, 722-729 (2008).
15. Lai, W.R., Johnson, M.D., Kucherlapati, R. & Park, P.J. Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data. Bioinformatics 21, 3763-3770 (2005).
16. Bignell, G.R. et al. Architectures of somatic genomic rearrangement in human cancer amplicons at sequence-level resolution. Genome Res. 17, 1296-1303 (2007).
17. Yamaguchi, N. et al. NOTCH3 signaling pathway plays crucial roles in the proliferation of ErbB2-negative human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 68, 1881-1888 (2008).
18. Hekstra, D., Taussig, A.R., Magnasco, M. & Naef, F. Absolute mRNA concentrations from sequence-specific calibration of oligonucleotide arrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 1962-1968 (2003).
19. Zhao, X. et al. Homozygous deletions and chromosome amplifications in human lung carcinomas revealed by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis. Cancer Res. 65, 5561-5570 (2005).
20. Nagayama, K. et al. Homozygous deletion scanning of the lung cancer genome at a 100-kb resolution. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 46, 1000-1010 (2007).
21. Guttman, M. et al. Assessing the significance of conserved genomic aberrations using high resolution genomic microarrays. PLoS Genet. 3, e143 (2007).
22. Wiedemeyer, R. et al. Feedback circuit among INK4 tumor suppressors constrains human glioblastoma development. Cancer Cell 13, 355-364 (2008).
23. Brockman, W. et al. Quality scores and SNP detection in sequencing-by-synthesis systems. Genome Res. 18, 763-770 (2008).
24. Dohm, J.C., Lottaz, C., Borodina, T. & Himmelbauer, H. Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e105 (2008).
25. Mikkelsen, T.S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553-560 (2007).
26. Reich, M. et al. GenePattern 2.0. Nat. Genet. 38, 500-501 (2006).
27. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455, 1061-1068 (2008).
28. Venkatraman, E.S. & Olshen, A.B. A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 23 657-663 (2007).