Hegel’s practical philosophy: Rational agency as ethical life

Hegel's Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-308

  Pippin, Robert B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925182974     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808005     Document Type: Book

References (349)

1. Allison, H. (1990), Kant’s Theory of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
2. Allison, H. (1997), “We Can Only Act Under the Idea of Freedom,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 39–50
3. Alston, W.P. (1967), “Wants, Actions, and Causal Explanation,” in Intentionality, Minds, and Perception, ed. H.N. Castanéeda (Detroit: Wayne state University Press), pp. 30–41
4. Alznauer, M. (2008), Hegel’s Defense of Moral Responsibility (PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago)
5. Ameriks, K. (2002), “Pure Reason of Itself Alone Suffices to Determine the Will,” in Immanuel Kant: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, ed. O. Höffe (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag), pp. 99–114
6. Anscombe, G.E.M. (1971), Causality and Determination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
7. Anscombe, G.E.M.(2000), Intention (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
8. Aquinas, T. (1964), Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, trans. C.I. Litzinger (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
9. Arato, A. (1991), “A Reconstruction of Hegel’s Theory of Civil Society,” in Hegel and Legal Theory, ed. D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, and D.G. Carlson (London: Routledge, 1991), pp. 301–20.
10. Audi, R. (1971), “Intentionalistic Explanations of Action,” Metaphilosophy, vol. 2, pp. 241–50
11. Audi, R. (1974), “Moral Responsibility, Freedom, and Compulsion,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 11, pp. 1–14
12. Avineri, S. (1972), Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
13. Avineri, S. (1975), “The Dialectics of Civil Society in Hegel’s Thought,” Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 78–82
14. Baier, K. (1965), “Action and Agent,” The Monist, vol. 49, pp. 183–95
15. Bartuschat, W. (1987), “Zum Status des abstrakten Rechts in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 41, pp. 19–42
16. Beck, L.W. (1965), “Agent, Actor, Spectator, and Critic,” The Monist, vol. 49, pp. 167–82
17. Beck, L.W. (1974), The Actor and the Spectator (New Haven: Yale University Press).
18. Becker, W. (1972), “Hegels Dialektik von Herr und Knecht,” in W. Becker, Selbstbewußtsein und Spekulation: Zur Kritik der Transzendentalphilosophie (Freiburg: Rombach), pp. 110-23.
19. Beiser, F. (2007), “Dark Days: Anglophone Scholarship since the 1960s,” in Hammer (2007), pp. 70–90
20. Benhabib, S. (1981), “The ’Logic’of Civil Society: A Reconstruction of Hegel and Marx,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 8, pp. 153ff.
21. Benhabib, S. (1984), “Obligation, Contract and Exchange: On the Significance of Hegel’s Abstract Right,” in Pelczynski (1984), pp. 159–77
22. Bennett, J. (1995), The Act Itself (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
23. Berlin, I. (1997), “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in The Proper Study of Mankind, ed. H. Hardy (New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux), pp. 191-242.
24. Bernstein, J. (1984), “From Self-Consciousness to Community: Act and Recognition in the Master–Slave Relationship,” in Pelczynski (1984), pp. 14–39
25. Bernstein, J. (1996) “Confession and Forgiveness: Hegel’s Poetics of Action,” in Beyond Representation: Philosophy and Poetic Imagination, ed. R. Eldridge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 34–6
26. Bienenstock, M. (1989) “The Logic of Political Life: Hegel’s Conception of Political Philosophy,” in Knowledge and Politics, ed. M. Dascal and O. Gruengard (Boulder, CO: Westview Press), pp. 145–170.
27. Blasche, S. (1984-1985), “Liebe und Vernunft, Familie und bu¨rgerliche Gesellschaft: Bemerkungen zu zwei Vermittlungskonzepten in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie,” Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 107-114.
28. Bobzien, S. (1998), “The Inadvertent Conception and Late Birth of the Free Will Problem,” Phronesis, vol. XLIII no. 2, pp. 133–75
29. Bowie, A. and Hammer, E. (2007) “German Idealism’s Contested Heritage,” in Hammer (2007), pp. 309–30
30. Bradley, F.H. (1927), Ethical Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
31. Brand, M. (1979), “The Fundamental Question in Action Theory,” Nous, vol. 13, pp. 131–51
32. Brandom, R. (1977), “Freedom as Constraint by Norms,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 187–96
33. Brandom, R. (1994), Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
34. Brandom, R. (1996), “Perception and Rational Constraint: McDowell’s Mind and World,” in Perception, ed. E. Villanueva (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company), pp. 241–59
35. Brandom, R. (1997), “Study Guide,” in W. Sellars, Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, ed. R. Rorty and R. Brandom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 119-81.
36. Brandom, R. (1998), “Actions, Norms, and Practical Reason,” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 12, pp. 1–13
37. Brandom, R. (2000), Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
38. Brandom, R. (2002), Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
39. Brandom, R. (2004), “Selbstbewusstsein und Selbst-Konstitution,” in Halbig, Quante, and Siep (2004), pp. 46–77
40. Brandom, R. (2005), “Sketch of a Program for a Critical Reading of Hegel: Comparing Empirical and Logical Concepts,” Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus, vol. 3, pp. 131–61
41. Brandom, R. (2007), “Self-Consciousness and Self-Constitution: The Structure of Desire and Recognition,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 33, pp. 127–50
42. Bratman, M. (1987), Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reasons (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
43. Brauer, S. (2007) Natur und Sittlichkeit: Die Familie in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie (Freiburg and Munich: Verlag Karl Alber).
44. Broad, C.D. (1925), The Mind and its Place in Nature (London: Kegan Paul)
45. Bubner, R. (1973), Dialektik und Wissenschaft (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)
46. Bubner, R. (1989), “Rousseau, Hegel und die Dialektik der Aufklärung,” in Aufklärung und Gegenaufklärung in der europäischen Literatur, Philosophie und Politik von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, ed. J. Schmidt (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), pp. 404–20
47. Burke, K. (1969), A Grammar of Motives (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)
48. Buss, S. and Overton, L. (2002), Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
49. Butler, J. (1987), Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in 20th-Century France (New York: Columbia University Press)
50. Cavell, S. (1976), “A Matter of Meaning It,” in S. Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 213-37.
51. Chisholm, R.M. (1970), “The Structure of Intention,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 67, no. 19, pp. 633–47
52. Collingwood, R.G. (1937-1938), “On the So-Called Idea of Causation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 38, pp. 85-111.
53. Cramer, W. (1973), “Kausalität und Freiheit,” Philosophische Perspektiven, vol. 5, pp. 53–61
54. Dahlstrom, D.O. (1991), “Die schöne Seele bei Schiller und Hegel,” Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 147–56
55. Danto, A.C. (1973), Analytical Philosophy of Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
56. Davidson, D. (1980a), “Actions, Reasons, and Causes,” in D. Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 3-19.
57. Davidson, D. (1980b), “How is Weakness of the Will Possible?,” in D. Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 21-42.
58. Davidson, D. (1980c), “Agency,” in D. Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 43-61.
59. Davidson, D. (1980d), “Intending,” in D. Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 83-102.
60. Davidson, D. (1986), “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge,” in Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, ed. E. LePore (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 307–19
61. Deligiorgi, K. (2006), Hegel: New Directions (Chesham: Acumen)
62. Derbolav, J. (1974) “Hegels Theorie der Handlung,” in Riedel (1974a), pp. 201–16
63. Devries, W. (1988), Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)
64. Devries, W. (1991), “The Dialectic of Teleology,” Philosophical Topics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 51–70
65. Dews, P. (1995), “Modernity, Self-Consciousness, and the Scope of Philosophy: Ju¨rgen Habermas and Dieter Henrich in Debate,” in P. Dews, The Limits of Disenchantment: Essays on Contemporary European Philosophy (London: Verso), pp. 169-93.
66. Dilthey, W. (1990) Die Jugendgeschichte Hegels und andere Abhandlungen zur Geschichte des Deutschen Idealismus, in Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 4 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht)
67. Donagan, A. (1975), “Determinism and Freedom: Sellars and the Reconciliationist Thesis,” in Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Critical Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars, ed. H.N. Castanéeda (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill), pp. 55–82
68. Donougho, M. (1989-1990), “The Woman in White: On the Reception of Hegel’s Antigone,” The Owl of Minerva, vol. 1, pp. 65-89.
69. Dreyfus, H. (2005), “Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit from the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise,” APA Pacific Division Presidential Address (manuscript)
70. Dreyfus, H. (2007a), “The Return of the Myth of the Mental,” Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 338–51
71. Dreyfus, H. (2007b), “Response to McDowell,” Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 371–7
72. Durkheim, E. (1950), The Rules of Sociological Method (8th edn.), ed. George E.G. Catlin, trans. S. A. Solovay and J. H. Mueller (Glencoe, IL: Free Press)
73. Fackenheim, E. (1969), “On the Actuality of the Rational and the Rationality of the Actual,” The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 89, pp. 690–8
74. Feinberg, J. (1970), Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
75. Fessard, G. (1947), “Deux interprètes de la Phénoménologie de Hegel: Jean Hyppolite et Alexandre Kojève,” Études, vol. 255, pp. 368–73
76. Fessard, G. (1967), “Les relations familiales dans la philosophie du droit de Hegel,” Hegel- Jahrbuch, pp. 34–63
77. Fischbach, F. (1999) Du commencement en philosophie: étude sur Hegel et Schelling (Paris: Vrin)
78. Fischbach, F. (2002), L’être et l’acte: enquête sur les fondements de l’ontologie moderne de l’agir (Paris: Vrin)
79. Forster, M. (1998) Hegel’s Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
80. Foster, M. (1935), The Political Philosophies of Plato and Hegel (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
81. Franco, P. (2002), Hegel’s Philosophy of Freedom (New Haven: Yale University Press)
82. Frank, M. (1991), “Wider den apriorischen Intersubjektivismus: Gegenvorschläge aus Sartrescher Inspiration,” in Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit, ed. M. Brumlik and H. Brunkhorst (Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer), pp. 273–89
83. Frankfurt, H.G. (1971), “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68, pp. 5–20
84. Frankfurt, H.G. (1975), “Three Concepts of Free Action: Part 2,” The Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 49, pp. 113–25
85. Frankfurt, H.G. (1978), “The Problem of Action,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 14, pp. 157–62
86. Frankfurt, H.G. (1988), The Importance of What We Care About (New York: Cambridge University Press)
87. Fulda, H.-F. (1968), Das Recht der Philosophie in Hegels Philosophie de Rechts (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann)
88. Fulda, H.-F.(1982), “Zum Theorietypus der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie,” in Henrich and Horstmann (1982), pp. 393–427
89. Fulda, H.-F.(1996), “Freiheit als Vermögen der Kausalität und als Weise, bei sich selbst zu sein,” in Inmitten der Zeit, ed. T. Grethlen and H. Leitner (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann)
90. Fulda, H.-F. and Henrich, D. (eds.) (1973), Materialen zu Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)
91. Gadamer, H.-G. (1991) Plato’s Dialogical Ethics, trans. R. Wallace (New Haven: Yale University Press)
92. Geuss, R. (1995a), “Auffassungen der Freiheit,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 49, pp. 1–14
93. Geuss, R. (1995b), “Freedom as an Ideal,” The Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 40, (1995), pp. 87–100.
94. Geuss, R. (2005), Outside Ethics (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
95. Gilbert, M. (1989), On Social Facts (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
96. Goldman, A.I. (1970), A Theory of Human Action (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall)
97. Gram, M.S. (1978), “Moral and Literary Ideals in Hegel’s Critique of ’The Moral View of the World,’” Clio, vol. 7, pp. 375–402
98. Habermas, J. (1973), “Labor and Interaction. Remarks on Hegel’s Jena Philosophy of Mind,” in J. Habermas, Theory and Practice, trans. J. Viertel (Boston: Beacon Press), pp. 142-69.
99. Habermas, J. (1987), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. F. Lawrence (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
100. Halbig, C., Quante, M., and Siep, L. (eds.) (2004), Hegels Erbe (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag)
101. Hammer, E. (ed.) (2007), German Idealism: Contemporary Perspectives (New York: Routledge)
102. Hampshire, S. (1959), Thought and Action (London: Chatto & Windus)
103. Hampshire, S. (1965), Freedom of the Individual (London: Chatto & Windus)
104. Hampshire, S. (1971), Freedom of Mind and Other Essays (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
105. Hardimon, M. (1994), Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
106. Hare, R.M. (1952), The Language of Morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
107. Hare, R.M. (1981), Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
108. Hare, R.M. (1989), “Principles,” in M. Hare, Essays in Ethical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 48-65.
109. Harris, H.S. (1972) Hegel' s Development: Toward the Sunlight 1770–1801 (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
110. Harris H.S. (1980), “The Concept of Recognition in Hegel's Jena Manuscripts,” Hegel-Studien: Beiheft 20, Hegel in Jena, ed. D. Henrich and K. Düsing (Bonn: Bouvier), pp. 229–248.
111. Harris H.S. (1985), “Les influences platoniciennes sur la théorie de la vie et du désir dans la Phénoménologie de l' esprit de Hegel,” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne vol. 3, pp. 59–84.
112. Hartmann, K. (1976), “Ideen zu einem neuen systematischen Verständnis der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie,ä Perspektiven der Philosophie, vol. 2, —pp. 167–200.
113. Henrich, D. (1971), Hegel im Kontext (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)
114. Henrich, D. (1982), “Logische Form und reale Totalität,” in Henrich and Horstmann (1982), pp. 428–519
115. Henrich, D. (1994), The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy, ed. Richard Velkley, trans. J. Edwards (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
116. Henrich, D. and Horstmann, R.-P. (1982), Hegels Philosophie des Rechts: Die Theorie der Rechtsformen und ihre Logik (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta)
117. Hinchman, L.P. (1984), Hegel' s Critique of the Enlightenment (Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press)
118. Hollis, M. (1998), Trust within Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
119. Honderich, T. (ed.) (1973), Essays on Freedom and Action (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul)
120. Honneth, A. (1996), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, trans. J. Anderson (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
121. Honneth, A. (2000), Suffering from Indeterminacy: An Attempt at a Reactivation of Hegel' s Philosophy of Right, trans. J. Ben-Levi (Assen: Van Gorcum)
122. Honneth, A. (2002), “Grounding Recognition: A Rejoinder to Critical Questions,” Inquiry, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 499–520
123. Honneth, A. (2007), “Rejoinder,” in van den Brink and Owen (2007), pp. 348–70.
124. Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (1998), Social Action and Human Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
125. Hornsby, J. (1980), Actions (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul)
126. Horstmann, R.-P. (1974), “The Role of Civil Society in Hegel's Political Philosophy,” in Pippin and Höffe (2004), pp. 208–40
127. Hösle, V. (1984), Die Vollendung der Tragödie im Spätwerk des Sophokles (Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog)
128. Hösle, V. (1987a), Hegels System: Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität (Hamburg: Felix Meiner)
129. Hösle, V. (1987b), “Das abstrakte Recht,” in Anspruch und Leistung von Hegels Rechtsphilosophie, ed. C. Jermann (Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog), pp. 55–99
130. Hudson, H. (1994), Kant' s Compatibilism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)
131. Hyppolite, J. (1940), “Préface aux principe de la philosophie du droit,” in J. Hyppolite, Figures de la pensée philosophique: écrits (1931–1968), Tome 1 (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France), pp. 73–91
132. Hyppolite, J. (1955), “La signification de la Re´volution franc¸aise dans la Phe´nome´nologie de Hegel,” in J. Hyppolite, E ´ tudes sur Marx et Hegel (Paris: Librairie Marcel Rivière et Cie), pp. 45-81.
133. Ikäheimo, H. and Laitinen, A. (2007), “Analyzing Recognition: Identification, Acknowledgement, and Recognitive Attitudes Towards Persons,” in van den Brink and Owen (2007), pp. 33–56.
134. Ilting, K.-H. (1963-1964), “Hegels Auseinandersetzung mit der aristotelischen Politik,” Philosophisches Jahrbuch, vol. 71. pp. 38.
135. Inwood, M. (1982). “Hegel on Action,” in Vesey (1982), pp. 141–54
136. Irwin, T. (1992), “Who Invented the Will?,” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 6 (1992), pp. 453–73
137. Jaeggi, R. (2005). Entfremdung: Zur Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Problems (Frankfurt a.M.: Campus)
138. Janke, W. (1972), “Herrschaft und Knechtschaft und der absolute Herr,” Philosophische Perspektiven, vol. 4, pp. 211–31
139. Jauss, H.R. (1984), “Le Neveu de Rameau: Dialogue et Dialectique,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, vol. 89, pp. 145–81
140. Joas, H. (1985), G.H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of his Thought (Cambridge: Polity Press)
141. Joas, H. (1996), The Creativity of Action (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
142. Kaan, A. (1971), “L'honnêté et l'imposture dans la société civile (à propos du chapitre V. C. de la Phénoménologie: le règne animal de l'esprit),” Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 45–49.
143. Kane, R. (1998), The Significance of Free Will (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
144. Kelley, G. A. (1978), Hegel's Retreat From Eleusis: Studies in Political Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
145. Kenny, A. (1966), “Intention and Purpose,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 63, no. 20, pp. 642–51.
146. Kenny, A. (1975), Will, Freedom, and Power (Oxford: Blackwell)
147. Kern, W. (1971), “Die Aristotelesdeutung Hegels: Die Aufhebung des Aristotelischen ‘Nous’ in Hegels ‘Geist,’” Philosophisches Jahrbuch, vol. 78, pp. 237–259.
148. Kervégan, J.-F. (1992), Hegel, Carl Schmitt: la politique entre speculation et positivité (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France)
149. Kervégan, J.-F. (2008) L'effectif et le rationel: Hegel et l'espirit objectif (Paris: Vrin)
150. Knowles, D. (2002) Hegel and the Philosophy of Right (London: Routledge).
151. Köhler, D. and Pöggeler, O. (1998), G.W.F. Hegel: Die Phänomenologie des Geistes (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag)
152. Korsgaard, C. (1996a), Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
153. Korsgaard, C. (1996b), The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
154. Korsgaard, C. (1997), “The Normativity of Instrumental Reason,” in Ethics and Practical Reason, ed. G. Cullity and B. Gaut (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 215–254
155. Korsgaard, C., Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity (The “Locke Lectures”), www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~korsgaar/#publications
156. Kreines, J. (2004), “Hegel's Critique of Pure Mechanism and the Philosophical Appeal of the Logic Project,” European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 38–74
157. Kreines, J. (2007), “Between the Bounds of Experience and Divine Intuition: Kant’s Epistemic Limits and Hegel's Ambitions,” Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 306–334
158. Labarriére, P.-J. (1968), Structures et mouvement dialectique dans la Phénoménologie de l'esprit de Hegel (Paris: Aubier)
159. Labarriére, P.-J. (1982a), “Belle âme, mal et pardon,” Concordia, vol. 1, pp. 11–15.
160. Labarriére, P.-J. (1982b), “Le savior absolu de l'esprit,” in The Meaning of Absolute Spirit, ed. T. Geraets (Ottawa: Éditions de l'université d'Ottawa), pp. 499–507
161. Labarriére, P.-J., and Jarczyk, G. (1987), Les premiers combats de la reconnaissance, maıˆtrise et servitude dans la Phe´nome´nologie de Hegel (Paris: Aubier).
162. Laden, A. (2005), “Evaluating Social Reasons: Hobbes vs. Hegel,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 327–356.
163. Laitinen, A. (2002), “Interpersonal Recognition: A Response to Value or a Precondition of Personhood,” Inquiry, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 463–478
164. Laitinen, A. (2004), “Hegel on Intersubjective and Retrospective Determination of Intention,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, 49-72
165. Lewis, C.I. (1929), Mind and the World-Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons)
166. Löwith, K. (1984), From Hegel to Nietzsche (New York: Garland)
167. MacIntyre, A. (1976), “Hegel on Faces and Skulls,” in Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. A. MacIntyre (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 219–236
168. Makkreel, R. (1990) Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the “Critique of Judgment” (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
169. Malcolm, N. (1968), “The Conceivability of Mechanism,” The Philosophical Review, vol. 77, pp. 45–72
170. Markell, P. (2003), Bound by Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
171. Markell, P. (2007), “The Potential and the Actual: Mead, Honneth, and the ‘I’,” in van den Brink and Owen (2007), pp. 100–32
172. Márkus, G. (1978), Marxism and “Anthropology”: The Concept of Human Essence in the Philosophy of Marx (Assen: Van Gorcum)
173. Marquard, O. (1973), “Hegel und das Sollen,” in O. Marquard, Schwierigkeiten mit der Geschichtsphilosophie (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)
174. McDowell, J. (1994), Mind and World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
175. McDowell, J. (1996), “Reply to Brandom,” in Perception, ed. E. Villanueva (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company), pp. 290–300
176. McDowell, J. (1998a), “Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 95, no. 9, pp. 431–91
177. McDowell, J. (1998b), “Virtue and Reason,” in J. McDowell, Mind, Value, and Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 50-76.
178. McDowell, J. (2002), “Reply to Robert B. Pippin,” in Reading McDowell: On “Mind and World,” ed. N. Smith (London: Routledge), pp. 274-279.
179. McDowell, J. (2005), “Self-Determining Subjectivity and External Constraint,” in Deutscher Idealismus und die gegenwärtige analytische Philosophie/German Idealism and Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, vol. 3, ed. K. Ameriks and J. Stolzenberg (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 21–37
180. McDowell, J. (2006), “Conceptual Capacities in Perception,” in Kreativität, ed. G. Abel (Hamburg: Felix Meiner), pp. 1065–79
181. McDowell, J. (2007a), “What Myth?” Inquiry, vol. 50. no. 4, pp. 338–51
182. McDowell, J. (2007b), “Response to Dreyfus,” Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 366–70
183. McDowell, J. (2007c), “On Pippin's Postscript,” European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 395–410
184. McDowell, J. (forthcoming a), “Brandom on Observation”.
185. McDowell, J. (forthcoming b), “Hegel’s Idealism as Radicalization of Kant”.
186. McDowell, J. (forthcoming c), “Towards a Reading of Hegel on Action in the ‘Reason’ Chapter of the Phenomenology”.
187. McDowell, J. (forthcoming d), “Why is Sellars’s Essay Called ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’?”.
188. Mead, G.H. (1934), Mind, Self, and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
189. Meerbote, R. (1984), –Kant on the Nondeterminate Character of Human Actions,— in Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity, ed. W.L. Harper and R. Meerbote (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 138-163.
190. Meerbote, R. (1991), –Kant’s Functionalism,— in Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science, ed. J.C. Smith (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 161-187.
191. Meier, H. (1998), The Lesson of Carl Schmitt: Four Chapters on the Distinction between Political Theology and Political Philosophy, trans. M. Brainard (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
192. Miller, M. (1978), –The Attainment of the Absolute of Hegel’s Phenomenology,— Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, vol. 7, pp. 195-219
193. Moran, R. (2001) Authority and Estrangement. An Essay on Self-Knowledge (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
194. Nagel, T. (1979), The Possibility of Altruism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
195. Neuhouser, F. (1986), –Deducing Desire and Recognition in the Phenomenology of Spirit,— Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 24, pp. 243-262.
196. Neuhouser, F. (2000), Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
197. Nicolaus, H. (2002). Hegels Theorie der Entfremdung (Heidelberg: Manutius).
198. Nietzsche, F. (1988) Zur Genealogie der Moral, in Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. G. Colli and M. Montinari, vol. 5 (Berlin: de Gruyter).
199. Nisbet, R.A. (1969), Social Change and History (New York: Oxford University Press)
200. Nowell-Smith, P.H. (1948), –Free Will and Moral Responsibility,— Mind, vol. 57, pp.45-61.
201. Nowell-Smith, P.H. (1976), –Action and Responsibility,— in Action Theory: Proceedings of the Winnipeg Conference on Human Action, ed. M. Brand and D. Walton (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. 311-322.
202. Okrent, M.B. (1980), –Consciousness and Objective Spirit in Hegel’s Phenomenology,— Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 18, pp. 39-55
203. O’Shaughnessy, B. (1991), –Searle’s Theory of Action,— in John Searle and His Critics, ed. E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 271-287.
204. O’Shaughnessy, B. (2003), –The Epistemology of Physical Action,— in Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology, ed. J. Roessler and N. Eilan (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 345-357.
205. Ottmann, H. (1979), –Hegel und die Politik,— Zeitschrift fur Politik, vol. 25, pp. 235-253
206. Ottmann, H. (1982), –Hegelsche Logik und Rechtsphilosophie. Unzulangliche Bemer-kungen zu einem ungelosten Problem,— in Henrich and Horstmann (1982), pp. 382-393.
207. Ottmann, H. (1973), Das Scheitern einer Einleitung in Hegels Philosophie: Eine Analyse der Phanomenologie des Geistes (Munich: Verlag Anton Pustet).
208. Ottmann, H. (1986), –Burgerliche Gesellschaft und Staat: Uberlegungen zur Logik ihrer Vermittlung,— Hegel-Jahrbuch, pp. 339-348.
209. Parkinson, G.H.R. (1985), –Hegel’s Concept of Freedom,— in Hegel, ed. M. Inwood (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 153-173.
210. Patten, A. (1999), Hegel’s Idea of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
211. Pears, D.F. (1967), –Are Reasons for Actions Causes?,— in Epistemology: New Essays in the Theory of Knowledge, ed. A. Stroll (New York: Harper & Row), pp. 204-228.
212. Pelczynski, Z.A. (1971) Hegel’s Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
213. Pelczynski, Z.A. (1984) The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
214. Peperzak, A. (1987a), Selbsterkenntnis des Absoluten: Grundlinien der Hegeleschen Philosophie des Geistes (Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog).
215. Peperzak, A. (1987b), Philosophy and Politics: A Commentary on the Preface to Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff).
216. Peperzak, A. (1991), Hegels praktische Philosophie (Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog).
217. Perry, R.B. (1953), –What Does It Mean To Be Free?,— The Pacific Spectator, vol. 7, pp. 124-141.
218. Pinkard, T. (1994), Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
219. Pinkard, T. (2002), German Philosophy 1760-1860: The Legacy of Idealism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
220. Pippin, R. (1979), –The Rose and the Owl: Some Remarks on the Theory-Practice Problem in Hegel,— Independent Journal of Philosophy, vol. 3, pp. 7-16.
221. Pippin, R. (1981a), Kant’s Theory of Form (New Haven: Yale University Press).
222. Pippin, R. (1981b), –Hegel’s Political Argument and the Problem of Verwirklichung,— Political Theory, vol. 9, pp. 509-532.
223. Pippin, R. (1987), –Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind,— in Pippin (1997a), pp. 29-55.
224. Pippin, R. (1988), –Apperception and the Difference Between Kantian and Hegelian Idealism,— in Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress, ed. G. Funke and T. Seebohm (Washington, DC: University Press ofAmerica), pp. 535-550.
225. Pippin, R. (1989), Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
226. Pippin, R. (1991a), –Idealism and Agency in Kant and Hegel,— Journal of Philosophy, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 532-541.
227. Pippin, R. (1991b). Modernism as a Philosophical Problem: On the Dissatisfactions of European High Culture, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Blackwell).
228. Pippin, R. (1993a), –You Can’t Get There from Here: Transition Problems in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit,— in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, ed. F. Beiser (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 58-63.
229. Pippin, R. (1993b), Review of A. Wood, Hegel’s Ethical Thought,’ Zeitschrift fur Philo-sophische Forschung, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 489-495.
230. Pippin, R. (1997a), Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
231. Pippin, R. (1997b), –Hegel on Historical Meaning: For Example, the Enlightenment,— Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, vol. 35, pp. 1-17.
232. Pippin, R. (1997c), –Hegel’s Ethical Rationalism,— in Pippin (1997a), pp. 417-450.
233. Pippin, R. (2000a), Henry James and Modern Moral Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
234. Pippin, R. (2000b), –Kant’s Theory of Value: On Allen Wood’s Kant’s Ethical Thought,— Inquiry, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 239-265.
235. Pippin, R. (2000c), –Fichte’s Alleged One-Sided, Subjective, Psychological Idealism,— in Sedgwick (2000), pp. 147-170.
236. Pippin, R. (2001a), –’Rigorism’ and the new Kant,— in Kant und die Berliner AufkUarung: Akten des IXth Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. V. Gerhardt, R.-P. Horstmann, and R. Schumaker (New York: de Gruyter), pp. 313-326.
237. Pippin, R. (2001b), Review of Alan Patten, Hegel’s Idea of Freedom," History of Political Thought, vol. 22, no. 3.
238. Pippin, R. (2002a), –Leaving Nature Behind: Two Cheers for Subjectivism,— in Reading McDowell: On Mind and World, ed. N. Smith (London: Routledge), pp. 58-75.
239. Pippin, R. (2002b), –What was Abstract Art? (From the Point of View of Hegel),— Critical Inquiry, vol. 29, no.1, pp. 1-24.
240. Pippin, R. (2005a), The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
241. Pippin, R. (2005b) –Postscript: On McDowell’s Response to Leaving Nature Behind,— in Pippin (2005a), pp. 206-220.
242. Pippin, R. (2005c), –Agent and Deed in Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals,— in A Companion to Nietzsche, ed. K. A. Pearson (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005).
243. Pippin, R. (2005d), –Brandom’s Hegel,— European Journal ofPhilosophy, vol. i3, no. 3, pp. 381-408.
244. Pippin, R. (2006), –Mine and Thine: The Kantian State,— in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. P. Guyer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
245. Pippin, R. (2007), –McDowell’s Germans: Response to ’On Pippin’s Postscript’,— European Journal of Philosophy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 411-434.
246. Pippin, R. and Hoffe, O. (2004), Hegel on Ethics and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
247. Pothast, U. (1978), Seminar: Freies Handeln und Determinismus (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp).
248. Pothast, U. (1980), Die Unzulanglichkeit der Freiheitsbeweise: Zu einigen Lehrstu’cken aus der neueren Geschichte von Philosophie und Recht (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp).
249. Potter, N.T. (1972), –The Social and the Causal Concepts ofResponsibility,— The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 10, pp. 97-99.
250. Quante, M. (1993), Hegels Begriff der Handlung (Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog).
251. Quante, M. (1997), –Personal Autonomy and the Structure of the Will,— in Right, Morality, Ethical Life: Studies in G.W.F. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, ed. J. Kotkavirta (Jvaskyla: Publications of Social and Political Science and Philosophy), pp. 45-74.
252. Rawls, J. (1971), A TheoryofJustice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
253. Rawls, J. (1999) –The Idea ofPublic Reason Revisited,— in J. Rawls, CollectedPapers, ed. S. Freeman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 573-615.
254. Ricoeur, P. (1940–1960), Philosophie de la volontä, 2 vols. (Paris: Aubier Montaigne)
255. Ricoeur, P. (2005), The Course of Recognition, trans. D. Pellauer (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
256. Riedel, M. (1969–82), Zwischen Tradition und Revolution. Studien zu Hegels Rechtphilosophie (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta)
257. Riedel, M. (1974a), Materialen zu Hegels Rechtsphilosophie, 2 vols. (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp)
258. Riedel, M. (1974b), “Der Begriff der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft und das Problem seines geschichtlichen Ursprungs,” in Riedel (1974a), pp. 135–66
259. Riedel, M. (1984), “Hegel's Criticism of Natural Law Theory,” in M. Riedel, Between Tradition and Revolution: The Hegelian Transformation of Political Philosophy, trans. W. Wright (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 76–104.
260. Ripstein, A. (1994), “Universal and General Wills: Hegel and Rousseau,” Political Theory vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 444–67
261. Ritter, J. (1962), “Person und Eigentum: Zu Hegels Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts 34–81,” Marxismusstudien, vol. 4, pp. 169–218
262. Ritter, J. (1974), Subjektivität: Sechs Aufsätze (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp).
263. Rorty, R. (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
264. Rose, G. (1981), Hegel contra Sociology (London: Athlone Press).
265. Rosen, S. (1974), “Self-Consciousness and Self-Knowledge in Plato and Hegel,” Hegel-Studien, vol. 9, pp. 109–29.
266. Ross, A. (1971), “He Could Have Acted Otherwise,” in Festschrift für Hans Kelsen zum 90. Geburtstag, ed. A. J. Merkl et al. (Vienna: Deuticke), pp. 242–61.
267. Roth, M.S. (1988), Knowing and History: Appropriations of Hegel in Twentieth Century France (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
268. Rousseau, J.-J. (1986), The First and Second Discourses, ed. And trans. V. Gourevitch (New York: Harper & Row).
269. Rousseau, J.-J. (1997), The Social Contract and Later Political Writings, ed. and trans. V. Gourevitch (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
270. Rovane, C. (1998), The Bounds of Agency: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
271. Ryan, A. (1984) “Hegel on Work, Ownership, and Citizenship,” in Pelczynski (1984), pp. 178–96
272. Sandel, M. (1998), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
273. Schacht, R. (1976), “Hegel on Freedom,” in Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Alasdair MacIntyre (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).
274. Schmitt, C. (1926), Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus, 2nd edn. (Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot).
275. Schneewind, J.B. (1998), The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
276. Searle, J. (1983), Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
277. Searle, J. (1991), “Response: The Background of Intentionality and Action,” in John Searle and His Critics, ed. E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 289–99
278. Searle, J. (2001), Rationality in Action (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
279. Sedgwick, S. (1988), “Hegel's Critique of the Subjective Idealism of Kant's Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 26, pp. 89–105
280. Sedgwick, S. (ed.) (2000), The Reception of Kant's Critical Philosophy. Fichte, Schelling and Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
281. Sedgwick, S. (2001), “The State as Organism: The Metaphysical Basis of Hegel's Philosophy of Right,” in The Southern Journal of Philosophy (Spindel Conference Supplement), pp. 171–88.
282. Segal, J. (1991), Agency and Alienation: A Theory of Human Presence (Savage, MD: Rowan & Littlefield)
283. Sellars, W. (1963a), “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man,” in W. Sellars, Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 1-40.
284. Sellars, W. (1963b), “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,” in W. Sellars, Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 127-96.
285. Sellars, W. (1963c), “Some Reflections on Language Games,” in W. Sellars, Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 321-58.
286. Sellars, W. (1966), “Thought and Action,” in Freedom and Determinism, ed. K. Lehrer (New York: Random House), pp. 105–39.
287. Sellars, W. (1968), Science and Metaphysics, Variations on Kantian Themes (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
288. Shapiro, G. (1979), “Notes on the Animal Kingdom of Spirit,” Clio, vol. 8, pp. 332–38
289. Shklar, J. (1974), “The Phenomenology: Beyond Morality,” The Western Political Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 527–623.
290. Shklar, J. (1976), Freedom and Independence: A Study of the Political Ideas of Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
291. Siep, L. (1983), “Das Problem einer philosophischen Begründung des Rechts bei Fichteund Hegel,” Giornale de Metafisica, vol. 5, pp. 264–79.
292. (1988a), “’Gesinnung’ und ’Verfassung’: Bemerkungen zu einem nicht nur Hegelschen Problem,” in Philosophie und Poesie, vol. 1, ed. A. Gethmann-Siefert (Stuttgart–Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog); also in Siep (1992a), pp. 270–84.
293. Siep, L. (1988b), “Hegels Metaphysik der Sitten,” in Metaphysik nach Kant?, ed. D. Henrich and R.-P. Horstmann (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta), pp. 263–74
294. Siep, L. (1992a), Praktische Philosophie im Deutschen Idealismus (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp).
295. Siep, L. (1992b), “Personbegriff und praktische Philosophie bei Locke, Kant, und Hegel,” in Siep (1992a), pp. 81–115.
296. Siep, L. (1992c), “Hegels Theorie der Gewaltenteilung,” in Siep (1992a), pp. 240–69.
297. Siep, L. (ed.) (1997), Hegel: Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag).
298. Siep, L. (1998), “Die Bewegung des Anerkennens in der Phänomenologie des Geistes,” in Köhler and Pöggeler (1998), pp. 107–27
299. Siep, L. (2000), Der Weg der Phänomenologie des Geistes. Ein einführender Kommentar zu Hegels “ Differenzschrift” und “Phänomenologie des Geistes” (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp).
300. Siep, L. (2006), “The Contemporary Relevance of Hegel's Practical Philosophy,” in Deligiorgi (2006), pp. 143–58.
301. Smith, S. (1989), Hegel's Critique of Liberalism: Rights in Context (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
302. Speight, A. (2001), Hegel, Literature and the Problem of Agency (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press).
303. Steinberger, P. (1988), Logic and Politics: Hegel's Philosophy of Right (New Haven: Yale University Press).
304. Stillman, P. (1981), “Hegel's Idea of the Modern Family,” Thought, vol. 56, pp. 342–52
305. Strauss, L. (2006), “Notes on Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political,” in H. Meier, Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue, trans. H. Lomax (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 91–119.
306. Strawson, P.F. (1974), “Freedom and Resentment,” in P.F. Strawson, Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays (London: Methuen), pp. 1-25.
307. Taylor, C. (1975), Hegel (New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
308. Taylor, C. (1985a), Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers, vol. I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
309. Taylor, C. (1985b), “Hegel*#x0027;s Philosophy of Mind,” in Taylor (1985a), pp. 77–96
310. Taylor, C. (1985c), “What is Human Agency?,” in Taylor (1985a), pp. 15–44.
311. Theunissen, M. (1970), Hegels Lehre vom absoluten Geist als theologisch-politischerTraktat (Berlin: de Gruyter).
312. Theunissen, M. (1984), The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber, trans. Christopher Macann (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
313. Theunissen, M. (1978), “Begriff und Realität: Aufhebung des metaphysischen Wahrheitsbegriff,” in Seminar: Dialektik in der Philosophie Hegels, ed. R.-P. Horstmann(Frankfurt: Suhrkamp), pp. 324–59.
314. Theunissen, M. (1982), “Die verdrängte Intersubjektivität in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts,” in Henrich and Horstmann (1982), pp. 317–81
315. Thompson, M. (1995), “The Representation of Life,” in Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory, ed. R. Hursthouse, G. Lawrence, and W. Quinn (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 247–97.
316. Thompson, M. (2004a), “Apprehending Human Form,” in Modern Moral Philosophy, ed. A. O'Hear (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 47–74.
317. Thompson, M. (2004b), “What is it to Wrong Someone? A Puzzle about Justice,” in Reason and Value, eds. R. J. Wallace, P. Pettit, S. Scheffler, and M. Smith (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 333–84.
318. Thompson, M. (forthcoming), “Naı¨ve Action Theory”.
319. Trilling, L. (1969) Sincerity and Authenticity (New York: Norton).
320. Tunick, M. (1993), Hegel's Political Philosophy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
321. Van den Brink, B. and Owen, D. (2007), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
322. Vesey, G. (1982), Idealism Past and Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
323. Vogler, C. (2001a), “Anscombe on Practical Inference,” in Varieties of Practical Reasoning, ed. E. Millgram (Cambridge, MA: MIT), pp. 437–64
324. Vogler, C. (2001b), “We Were Never in Paradise,” in Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, ed. A. Ripstein and C. Morris (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 209–31.
325. Vogler, C. (2002), Reasonably Vicious (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
326. Vogler, C. (2006), “Modern Moral Philosophy Again: Isolating the Promulgation Problem,” in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 345–62.
327. Wahl, J. (1951), La Malheur de la Conscience dans la philosophie de Hegel (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).
328. Wallace, R.J.(2006), Normativity and the Will (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
329. Wallace, R.M. (2005) Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
330. Walsh, W.H. (1969), Hegelian Ethics (London: Macmillan).
331. Warnke, C. (1972), “Aspekte des Zwecksbegriff in Hegels Biologieverständnis,” in Zum Hegelverständnis unserer Zeit, ed. H. Ley (Berlin, Deutsche Verlag der Wissenschaften), pp. 224–52
332. Watson, G. (1975), “Free Agency,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 72, pp. 205–20
333. Weil, E. (1950), Hegel et l'Etat (Paris: Vrin).
334. Weil, E. (ed.) (1979) Hegel et la philosophie du droit (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).
335. Wiggins, D. (1973), “Towards a Reasonable Libertarianism,” in Honderich (1973), pp. 33–61.
336. Wildt, A. (1974), “Hegels Kritik des Jakobinismus,” in Hegel-Studien: Beiheft 11, Stuttgarter Hegel-Tage 1970 ed. H.-G. Gadamer (Bonn: Bouvier), pp. 417-27.
337. Wildt, A. (1982), Autonomie und Anerkennung: Hegels Moralitätskritik im Lichte seiner Fichte Rezeption (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta)
338. Williams, B. (1981), “Internal and External Reasons,” in B. Williams, Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 101-13.
339. Williams, B. (1994), Shame and Necessity (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)
340. Williams, B. (2005), In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, sel., ed., and with an Introduction by G. Hawthorn (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press)
341. Williams, R. (1997), Hegel’ s Ethics of Recognition (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)
342. Wilson, G. (1989), The Intentionality of Human Action (Stanford: Stanford University Press)
343. Wolf, D. (1980) Hegels Theorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft: Eine materialistische Kritik (Hamburg: VSA-Verlag)
344. Wolff, C. (1976), Gesammelte Schriften (New York: Olms)
345. Wolff, M. (1992), Das Körper-Seele Problem: Kommentar zu Hegel, Enzyklopädie (1830), #389 (Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann)
346. Wolff, M. (2004), “Hegel’s Organicist Theory of the State: On the Concept and Method of Hegel’s ’Science of the State’,” in Pippin and Höffe (2004), pp. 291–322
347. Wood, A. (1990), Hegel’ s Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
348. Wood, A. (1999), Kant’ s Ethical Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
349. Young, R. (1971), “Reasons as Causes,” The Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 49, pp. 90–5