Short inverted repeats are hotspots for genetic instability: Relevance to cancer genomes

Cell Reports

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1674-1680

  Lu, Steve ^a   Wang, Guliang ^a   Bacolla, Albino ^a   Zhao, Junhua ^a   Spitser, Scott ^a   Vasquez, Karen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXCISION REPAIR CROSS COMPLEMENTING PROTEIN 1; POLYDEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE SYNTHASE; PROTEIN XPF; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CANCER GENETICS; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA CLEAVAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; INVERTED REPEAT; MAMMAL CELL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CLEAVAGE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; YEAST CELL;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84925096261     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22111247     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.039     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agostinho A., Meier B., Sonneville R., Jagut M., Woglar A., Blow J., Jantsch V., Gartner A. Combinatorial regulation of meiotic holliday junction resolution in C. elegans by HIM-6 (BLM) helicase, SLX-4, and the SLX-1, MUS-81 and XPF-1 nucleases. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003591.
2. Akgün E., Zahn J., Baumes S., Brown G., Liang F., Romanienko P.J., Lewis S., Jasin M. Palindrome resolution and recombination in the mammalian germ line. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17:5559-5570.
3. Ashton T.M., Mankouri H.W., Heidenblut A., McHugh P.J., Hickson I.D. Pathways for Holliday junction processing during homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31:1921-1933.
4. Butler D.K., Gillespie D., Steele B. Formation of large palindromic DNA by homologous recombination of short inverted repeat sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2002, 161:1065-1075.
5. Castor D., Nair N., Déclais A.C., Lachaud C., Toth R., Macartney T.J., Lilley D.M., Arthur J.S., Rouse J. Cooperative control of holliday junction resolution and DNA repair by the SLX1 and MUS81-EME1 nucleases. Mol. Cell 2013, 52:221-233.
6. Cunningham L.A., Coté A.G., Cam-Ozdemir C., Lewis S.M. Rapid, stabilizing palindrome rearrangements in somatic cells by the center-break mechanism. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:8740-8750.
7. Froelich-Ammon S.J., Gale K.C., Osheroff N. Site-specific cleavage of a DNA hairpin by topoisomerase II. DNA secondary structure as a determinant of enzyme recognition/cleavage. J.Biol. Chem. 1994, 269:7719-7725.
8. Gordenin D.A., Lobachev K.S., Degtyareva N.P., Malkova A.L., Perkins E., Resnick M.A. Inverted DNA repeats: a source of eukaryotic genomic instability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993, 13:5315-5322.
9. Ho B., Baker P.M., Singh S., Shih S.J., Vaughan A.T. Localized DNA cleavage secondary to genotoxic exposure adjacent to an Alu inverted repeat. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2012, 51:501-509.
10. Inagaki H., Ohye T., Kogo H., Tsutsumi M., Kato T., Tong M., Emanuel B.S., Kurahashi H. Two sequential cleavage reactions on cruciform DNA structures cause palindrome-mediated chromosomal translocations. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1592.
11. Krasilnikova M.M., Mirkin S.M. Replication stalling at Friedreich's ataxia (GAA)n repeats invivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24:2286-2295.
12. Kurahashi H., Emanuel B.S. Long AT-rich palindromes and the constitutional t(11;22) breakpoint. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10:2605-2617.
13. Kurahashi H., Inagaki H., Yamada K., Ohye T., Taniguchi M., Emanuel B.S., Toda T. Cruciform DNA structure underlies the etiology for palindrome-mediated human chromosomal translocations. J.Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:35377-35383.
14. Kuraoka I., Kobertz W.R., Ariza R.R., Biggerstaff M., Essigmann J.M., Wood R.D. Repair of an interstrand DNA cross-link initiated by ERCC1-XPF repair/recombination nuclease. J.Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:26632-26636.
15. Lambert S., Watson A., Sheedy D.M., Martin B., Carr A.M. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell 2005, 121:689-702.
16. Lewis S.M., Coté A.G. Palindromes and genomic stress fractures: bracing and repairing the damage. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2006, 5:1146-1160.
17. Lilley D.M. The inverted repeat as a recognizable structural feature in supercoiled DNA molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77:6468-6472.
18. Lobachev K.S., Rattray A., Narayanan V. Hairpin- and cruciform-mediated chromosome breakage: causes and consequences in eukaryotic cells. Front. Biosci. 2007, 12:4208-4220.
19. Losch F.O., Bredenbeck A., Hollstein V.M., Walden P., Wrede P. Evidence for a large double-cruciform DNA structure on the X chromosome of human and chimpanzee. Hum. Genet. 2007, 122:337-343.
20. Mankouri H.W., Ashton T.M., Hickson I.D. Holliday junction-containing DNA structures persist in cells lacking Sgs1 or Top3 following exposure to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:4944-4949.
21. McVey M., Lee S.E. MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet. 2008, 24:529-538.
22. Mizuno K., Lambert S., Baldacci G., Murray J.M., Carr A.M. Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:2876-2886.
23. Nag D.K., Kurst A. A 140-bp-long palindromic sequence induces double-strand breaks during meiosis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1997, 146:835-847.
24. Nasar F., Jankowski C., Nag D.K. Long palindromic sequences induce double-strand breaks during meiosis in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20:3449-3458.
25. Oh S.D., Lao J.P., Taylor A.F., Smith G.R., Hunter N. RecQ helicase, Sgs1, and XPF family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4, resolve aberrant joint molecules during meiotic recombination. Mol. Cell 2008, 31:324-336.
26. Owen B.A., Yang Z., Lai M., Gajec M., Badger J.D., Hayes J.J., Edelmann W., Kucherlapati R., Wilson T.M., McMurray C.T. (CAG)(n)-hairpin DNA binds to Msh2-Msh3 and changes properties of mismatch recognition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12:663-670. Corrected in Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005;12:824 (Gajek, Maciez [corrected to Gajec, Maciej]).
27. Pearson C.E., Zorbas H., Price G.B., Zannis-Hadjopoulos M. Inverted repeats, stem-loops, and cruciforms: significance for initiation of DNA replication. J.Cell. Biochem. 1996, 63:1-22.
28. Popescu N.C. Genetic alterations in cancer as a result of breakage at fragile sites. Cancer Lett. 2003, 192:1-17.
29. Schroth G.P., Ho P.S. Occurrence of potential cruciform and H-DNA forming sequences in genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23:1977-1983.
30. Tanaka H., Tapscott S.J., Trask B.J., Yao M.C. Short inverted repeats initiate gene amplification through the formation of a large DNA palindrome in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:8772-8777.
31. Tanaka H., Bergstrom D.A., Yao M.C., Tapscott S.J. Large DNA palindromes as a common form of structural chromosome aberrations in human cancers. Hum. Cell 2006, 19:17-23.
32. *Mre11 complex. J.Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:35458-35464.
33. VanHulle K., Lemoine F.J., Narayanan V., Downing B., Hull K., McCullough C., Bellinger M., Lobachev K., Petes T.D., Malkova A. Inverted DNA repeats channel repair of distant double-strand breaks into chromatid fusions and chromosomal rearrangements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27:2601-2614.
34. Vasquez K.M., Wang G. The yin and yang of repair mechanisms in DNA structure-induced genetic instability. Mutat. Res. 2013, 743-744:118-131.
35. Voineagu I., Narayanan V., Lobachev K.S., Mirkin S.M. Replication stalling at unstable inverted repeats: interplay between DNA hairpins and fork stabilizing proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:9936-9941.
36. Wang Y., Leung F.C. Long inverted repeats in eukaryotic genomes: recombinogenic motifs determine genomic plasticity. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580:1277-1284.
37. Wang G., Vasquez K.M. Naturally occurring H-DNA-forming sequences are mutagenic in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:13448-13453.
38. Wang G., Vasquez K.M. Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability. Mutat. Res. 2006, 598:103-119.
39. Wang G., Christensen L.A., Vasquez K.M. Z-DNA-forming sequences generate large-scale deletions in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:2677-2682.
40. Wang G., Zhao J., Vasquez K.M. Methods to determine DNA structural alterations and genetic instability. Methods 2009, 48:54-62.
41. Wu Y., Zacal N.J., Rainbow A.J., Zhu X.D. XPF with mutations in its conserved nuclease domain is defective in DNA repair but functions in TRF2-mediated telomere shortening. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2007, 6:157-166.
42. Zhou Z.H., Akgūn E., Jasin M. Repeat expansion by homologous recombination in the mouse germ line at palindromic sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:8326-8333.