Computational Modeling of Music Cognition and Musical Creativity

The Oxford Handbook of Computer Music

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Wiggins, Geraint A ^a   Pearce, Marcus T ^a   Müllensiefen, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational modeling; Human behavior; Musical composition; Musical phrase segmentation; Tonal melodies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925014791     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199792030.013.0019     Document Type: Chapter

References (96)

1. Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. Ames, C., and M. Domino. 1992. Cybernetic Composer: An overview. In Understanding Music with AI: Perspectives on Music Cognition, ed. M. Balaban, K. Ebcioglu and O. Laske. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 186-205.
3. Baroni, M. 1999. Musical grammar and the cognitive processes of composition. Musicoe Scientioe 3(1): 3-19.
4. Baroni, M., R. Dalmonte, and C. Jacoboni. 1992. Theory and analysis of European melody. In Computer Representations and Models in Music, ed. A. Marsden and A. Pople. London: Academic Press, pp. 187-206.
5. Bharucha, J. J. 1987. Music cognition and perceptual facilitation: A connectionist framework. Music Perception 5(1): 1-30.
6. Bharucha, J. J., and K. Stoeckig. 1986. Reaction time and musical expectancy: Priming of chords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12(4): 403-410.
7. Bharucha, J. J., and K. Stoeckig. 1987. Priming of chords: Spreading activation or overlapping frequency spectra?. Perception and Psychophysics 41(6): 519-524.
8. Boden, M. 1998. Creativity and artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 103(2): 347-356.
9. Boden, M. 2003. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Routledge.
10. Boltz, M. G., and M. R. Jones. 1986. Does rule recursion make melodies easier to reproduce? If not, what does?. Cognitive Psychology 18(4): 389-431.
11. Bown, O., and G. A. Wiggins. 2009. From maladaptation to competition to cooperation in the evolution of musical behaviour. Musicae Scientiae. Special issue on evolution of music.
12. Bregman, A. S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Brent, M. R. 1999. An efficient, probabilistically sound algorithm for segmentation and word discovery. Machine Learning 34(1-3): 71-105.
14. Cambouropoulos, E. 1996. A formal theory for the discovery of local boundaries in a melodic surface. In Proceedings of the III Journées d'Informatique Musicale, Caen, France.
15. Cambouropoulos, E. 2001. The local boundary detection model (LBDM) and its application in the study of expressive timing. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco: ICMA, pp. 17-22.
16. Cohen, P. R., N. Adams, and B. Heeringa. 2007. Voting experts: An unsupervised algorithm for segmenting sequences. Intelligent Data Analysis 11(6): 607-625.
17. Conklin, D. 2002. Representation and discovery of vertical patterns in music. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Music and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2445, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. C. Anagnostopoulou, M. Ferrand, and A. Smaill. Berlin: Springer, pp. 32-42.
18. Conklin, D. 2003. Music generation from statistical models. In Proceedings of the AISB 2003 Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in the Arts and Sciences, Brighton, UK: SSAISB, pp. 30-35.
19. Conklin, D., and I. H. Witten. 1995. Multiple viewpoint systems for music prediction. Journal of New Music Research, 24: 51-73.
20. Cope, D. 2005. Computer Models of Musical Creativity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
21. Cross, I. 2007. Music and cognitive evolution. In Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, ed. R. Dunbar and L. Barrett. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 649-667.
22. Cuddy, L. L., and C. A. Lunny. 1995. Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: Perceptual judgements of continuity. Perception and Psychophysics 57: 451-462.
23. Cutting, J. E., N. Bruno, N. P. Brady, and C. Moore. 1992. Selectivity, scope, and simplicity of models: A lesson from fitting judgements of perceived depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121(3): 364-381.
24. Deliège, I. 1987. Grouping conditions in listening to music: An approach to Lerdahl and Jackendoff's grouping preference rules. Music Perception 4(4): 325-360.
25. Deliège, I., and G. A. Wiggins. 2006. Musical Creativity: Current Research in Theory and Practice. Hove, UK:Psychology Press.
26. Deutsch, D. 1980. The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences. Perception and Psychophysics 28(5): 381-389.
27. Deutsch, D., and J. Feroe. 1981. The internal representation of pitch sequences in tonal music. Psychological Review 88(6): 503-522.
28. Ebcioglu, K. 1988. An expert system for harmonizing four-part chorales. Computer Music Journal 12(3): 43-51.
29. Eerola, T., and A. C. North. 2000. Expectancy-based model of melodic complexity. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, ed. C. Woods, G. Luck, R. Brochard, F. Seddon, and J. A. Sloboda. Keele, UK: Keele University.
30. Elman, J. L. 1990. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14: 179-211.
31. Hall, M., and L. Smith. 1996. A computer model of blues music and its evaluation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(2): 1163-1167.
32. Hiller, L., and L. Isaacson. 1959. Experimental Music. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Honing, H. 2006. Computational modeling of music cognition: A case study on model selection. Music Perception 23(5): 365-376.
34. Huron, D. 2001. Tone and voice: A derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Perception 19(1): 1-64.
35. Huron, D. 2006. Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. Cambridge: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
36. Jackendoff, R. 1987. Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
37. Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1991. Jazz improvisation: A theory at the computational level. In Representing Musical Structure, ed. P. Howell, R. West, and I. Cross. London: Academic Press, pp. 291-325.
38. Jurafsky, D., and J. H. Martin. 2000. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39. Justus, T., and J. J. Hutsler. 2005. Fundamental issues in the evolutionary psychology of music: Assessing innateness and domain specificity. Music Perception 23(1): 1-27.
40. Koestler, A. 1964. The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson.
41. Krumhansl, C. L. 1990. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Krumhansl, C. L. 1995a. Effects of musical context on similarity and expectancy.. Systematische Musikwissenschaft 3(2): 211-250.
43. Krumhansl, C. L. 1995b. Music psychology and music theory: Problems and prospects. Music Theory Spectrum 17:53-90.
44. Krumhansl, C. L., P. Toiviainen, T. Eerola, T. Järvinen, and J. Louhivuori. 2000. Cross-cultural music cognition:Cognitive methodology applied to North Sami yoiks. Cognition 76(1): 13-58.
45. Large, E. W., C. Palmer, and J. B. Pollack. 1995. Reduced memory representations for music. Cognitive Science 19(1): 53-96.
46. Lerdahl, F. 1988. Cognitive constraints on compositional systems. In Generative Processes in Music: The Psychology of Performance, Improvisation and Composition, ed. J. A. Sloboda. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 231-259.
47. Lerdahl, F., and R. Jackendoff. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48. MacKay, D. J. C. 1998. Introduction to Monte Carlo methods. In Learning in Graphical Models, NATO Science Series, ed. M. I. Jordan. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 175-204.
49. Manning, C. D., and H. Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
50. Manzara, L. C., I. H. Witten, and M. James. 1992. On the entropy of music: An experiment with Bach chorale melodies. Leonardo 2(1): 81-88.
51. Marr, D. 1982. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
52. Marsden, A. 2000. Representing Musical Time: A Temporal-Logic Approach. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
53. McClamrock, R. 1991. Marr's three levels: A re-evaluation. Minds and Machines 1: 185-196.
54. Meredith, D. 2006. The ps13 pitch spelling algorithm. Journal of New Music Research 35(2): 121-159.
55. Meyer, L. B. 1957. Meaning in music and information theory. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15(4): 412-424.
56. Mithen, S. J. 2006. The Singing Neanderthals: The Origins of Music, Language, Mind, and Body. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
57. Müllensiefen, D., M. T. Pearce, and G. A. Wiggins. 2008. Melodic segmentation: A new method and a framework for model comparison. In Proceedings of ISMIR 2008. http://www.ismir.net, accessed March 17, 2009.
58. Narmour, E. 1990. The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication-Realisation Model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Narmour, E. 1992. The Analysis and Cognition of Melodic Complexity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. Palmer, C., and C. L. Krumhansl. 1990. Mental representations for musical metre. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16(4): 728-741.
61. Pearce, M. T. 2005. "The construction and evaluation of statistical models of melodic structure in music perception and composition." Ph.D. thesis, City University, London.
62. Pearce, M. T., D. Conklin, and G. A. Wiggins. 2005. Methods for combining statistical models of music. In Computer Music Modelling and Retrieval, ed. U. K. Wiil. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 295-312.
63. Pearce, M. T., D. Meredith, and G. A. Wiggins. 2002. Motivations and methodologies for automation of the compositional process. Musicae Scientiae 6(2): 119-147.
64. Pearce, M. T., D. Müllensiefen, D. Lewis, and C. S. Rhodes. 2007. David Temperley, Music and Probability. Cambridge: MIT Press. Empirical Musicology Review 2(4): 155-163.
65. Pearce, M. T., and G. A. Wiggins. 2004. Improved methods for statistical modelling of monophonic music. Journal of New Music Research 33(4): 367-385.
66. Pearce, M. T., and G. A. Wiggins. 2006. Expectation in melody: The influence of context and learning. Music Perception 23(5): 377-406.
67. Pearce, M. T., and G. A. Wiggins. 2007. Evaluating cognitive models of musical composition. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity, ed. A. Cardoso and G. A. Wiggins. http://www.doc.gold.ac.uk/~mas02gw/isms/CC07/, accessed March 17, 2009.
68. Pollack, J. B. 1990. Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence 46(1): 77-105.
69. Ponsford, D., G. A. Wiggins, and C. S. Mellish. 1999. Statistical learning of harmonic movement. Journal of New Music Research 28(2): 150-177.
70. Potter, K., G. A. Wiggins, and M. T. Pearce. 2007. Towards greater objectivity in music theory: Information-dynamic analysis of minimalist music. Musicae Scientiae 11(2): 295-324.
71. Rabiner, L. R. 1989. A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 77(2): 257-285.
72. Ritchie, G. 2007. Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity to a computer program. Minds and Machines 17(1): 67-99.
73. Robertson, J., A. de Quincey, T. Stapleford, and G. A. Wiggins. 1998. Real-time music generation for a virtual environment. In Proceedings of the ECAI'98 Workshop on AI/Alife and Entertainment, ed. F. Nack. Brighton, UK.
74. Rutherford, J., and G. A. Wiggins. 2002. An experiment in the automatic creation of music which has specific emotional content. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. AMPS and Causal Productions, Sydney, Australia.
75. Saffran, J. R. 2003. Absolute pitch in infancy and adulthood: The role of tonal structure. Developmental Science 6(1): 37-49.
76. Saffran, J. R., and G. J. Griepentrog. 2001. Absolute pitch in infant auditory learning: Evidence for developmental reorganization. Developmental Psychology 37(1): 74-85.
77. Saffran, J. R., E. K. Johnson, R. N. Aslin, and E. L. Newport. 1990. Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition 70: 27-52.
78. Schaffrath, H. 1995. The Essen folksong collection. Database containing 6,255 folksong transcriptions in the Kern format and a 34-page research guide [computer database], ed. D. Huron. Menlo Park, CA: CCARH.
79. Schellenberg, E. G. 1996. Expectancy in melody: Tests of the implication-realisation model. Cognition 58(1): 75-125.
80. Schellenberg, E. G. 1997. Simplifying the implication-realisation model of melodic expectancy. Music Perception 14(3): 295-318.
81. Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3): 379-423, 623-656.
82. Simon, H. A., and R. K. Sumner. 1968. Pattern in music. In Formal Representation of Human Judgement, ed. B. Kleinmuntz. New York: Wiley, pp. 219-250.
83. Sloboda, J. 1985. The Musical Mind: The Cognitive Psychology of Music. Oxford: Oxford Science Press.
84. Temperley, D. 1999. What's key for key? The Krumhansl-Schmuckler key-finding algorithm reconsidered. Music Perception 17(1): 65-100.
85. Temperley, D. 2001. The Cognition of Basic Musical Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.
86. Temperley, D. 2003. Communicative pressure and the evolution of musical styles. Music Perception 21(3): 313-337.
87. Temperley, D. 2007. Music and Probability. Cambridge: MIT Press.
88. Thompson, W. F., L. L. Cuddy, and C. Plaus. 1997. Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: Evaluation of principles of melodic implication in a melody-completion task. Perception and Psychophysics 59(7): 1069-1076.
89. Triviño-Rodriguez, J. L., and R. Morales-Bueno. 2001. Using multi-attribute prediction suffix graphs to predict and generate music. Computer Music Journal 25(3): 62-79.
90. Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York: Springer.
91. von Hippel, P. T. 2000. Redefining pitch proximity: Tessitura and mobility as constraints on melodic intervals. Music Perception 17(3): 315-327.
92. Wallas, G. 1926. The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
93. Wiggins, G. A. 2006a. A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems.. Journal of Knowledge Based Systems 19(7): 449-458.
94. Wiggins, G. A. 2006b. Searching for computational creativity.. New Generation Computing 24(3): 209-222.
95. Wiggins, G. A. 2007. Models of musical similarity. Musicae Scientiae, Discussion Forum 4a, pp. 315-337.
96. Wiggins, G. A., E. Miranda, A. Smaill, and M. Harris. 1993. A framework for the evaluation of music representation systems. Computer Music Journal 17(3): 31-42. Machine Tongues series no. 17; also Edinburgh, DAI Research Paper no. 658.