Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: Evaluation of principles of melodic implication in a melody-completion task

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 1069-1076

  Thompson, William Forde ^a   Cuddy, Lola L ^b   Plaus, Cheryl ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC;

EID: 0031243592     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03205521     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. CARLSEN, J. C. (1981). Some factors which influence melodic expectancy. Psychomusicology, 1, 12-29.
2. CARLSEN, J. C. (1990). Preface. Psychomusicology, 9, 119-121.
3. CUDDY, L. L., & LUNNEY, C. A. (1995). Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: Perceptual judgments of melodic continuity. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 451-462.
4. JONES, M. R. (1981). Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part 1. Some determinants of expectancies. Psychomusicology, 1, 34-51.
5. JONES, M. R. (1982). Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part 2. An expectancy model. Psychomusicology, 2, 1-13.
6. JONES, M. R. (1990). Learning and the development of expectancies: An interactionist approach. Psychomusicology, 9, 193-228.
7. KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1991). Melodic structure: Theoretical and empirical descriptions. In J. Sundberg, L. Nord, & R. Carlson (Eds.), Music, language, speech and brain (pp. 269-283). London: Macmillan.
8. KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1995). Music psychology and music theory: Problems and prospects. Music Theory Spectrum, 17, 53-80.
9. KRUMHANSL, C. L., & KESSLER, E. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation ot musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334-368.
10. MEYER, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. NARMOUR, E. (1989). The "genetic code" of melody: Cognitive structures generated by the implication-realization model. Contemporary Music Review, 4, 45-63.
12. NARMOUR, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. NARMOUR, E. (1992). The analysis and cognition of melodic complexity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. PALMER, C. (1992). The role of interpretive preferences in music performance. In M. R. Jones & S. Holleran (Eds.), Cognitive bases of musical communication (pp. 249-262). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. SCHELLENBERG, E. G. (1996). Expectancy in melody: Tests of the implication-realization model. Cognition, 58, 75-125.
16. SCHMUCKLER, M. A. (1989). Expectation in music: Investigation of melodic and harmonic processes. Music Perception, 7, 109-150.
17. SCHMUCKLER, M. A. (1990). The performance of global expectations. Psychomusicology, 9, 122-147.
18. THOMPSON, W. F. (1996). Eugene Narmour: The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures (1990) and The analysis and cognition of melodic complexity (1992): A review and empirical assessment. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 49, 127-145.
19. THOMPSON, W. F., & STAINTON, M. (1995/1996). Using humdrum to analyze melodic structure: An assessment of Narmour's implication-realization model. Computing in Musicology, 10, 24-33.
20. UNYK, A. M., & CARLSEN, J. C. (1987). The influence of expectancy on melodic perception. Psychomusicology, 7, 3-23.