Evaluating cognitive models of musical composition

Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 73-80

  Pearce, Marcus T ^a   Wiggins, Geraint A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE MODEL; CREATIVE SYSTEMS; LISTENING-IN; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; MUSICAL COMPOSITION; PERCEPTUAL MODEL;

EID: 79954522454     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
2. Ames, C. and Domino, M. (1992). Cybernetic Composer: An overview. In Balaban, M., Ebcioǧlu, K., and Laske, O., editors, Understanding Music with AI: Perspectives on Music Cognition, pages 186-205. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Baroni, M. (1999). Musical grammar and the cognitive processes of composition. Musicæ Scientiæ, 3(1):3-19.
4. Cleary, J. G. and Teahan, W. J. (1997). Unbounded length contexts for PPM. The Computer Journal, 40(2/3):67-75.
5. Conklin, D. (2003). Music generation from statistical models. In Proceedings of the AISB 2003 Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in the Arts and Sciences, pages 30-35, Brighton, UK. SSAISB.
6. Conklin, D. and Witten, I. H. (1995). Multiple viewpoint systems for music prediction. Journal of New Music Research, 24(1):51-73.
7. Eerola, T. and North, A. C. (2000). Expectancy-based model of melodic complexity. In Woods, C., Luck, G., Brochard, R., Seddon, F., and Sloboda, J. A., editors, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Keele, UK. Keele University.
8. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1991). Jazz improvisation: A theory at the computational level. In Howell, P., West, R., and Cross, I., editors, Representing Musical Structure, pages 291-325. Academic Press, London.
9. Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. MacKay, D. J. C. (1998). Introduction to Monte Carlo methods. In Jordan, M. I., editor, Learning in Graphical Models, NATO Science Series, pages 175-204. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
11. Manzara, L. C., Witten, I. H., and James, M. (1992). On the entropy of music: An experiment with Bach chorale melodies. Leonardo, 2(1):81-88.
12. Marsden, A. (2000). Music, intelligence and artificiality. In Miranda, E. R., editor, Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence, pages 15-28. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
13. Pearce, M. T. (2005). The Construction and Evaluation of Statistical Models of Melodic Structure in Music Perception and Composition. PhD thesis, Department of Computing, City University, London, UK.
14. Pearce, M. T., Meredith, D., and Wiggins, G. A. (2002). Motivations and methodologies for automation of the compositional process. Musicae Scientiae, 6(2):119-147.
15. Pearce, M. T. and Wiggins, G. A. (2006). Expectation in melody: The influence of context and learning. Music Perception, 23(5):377-406.
16. Ponsford, D., Wiggins, G. A., and Mellish, C. (1999). Statistical learning of harmonic movement. Journal of New Music Research, 28(2):150-177.
17. Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2):257-285.
18. Temperley, D. (1999). What's key for key? The Krumhansl-Schmuckler key-finding algorithm reconsidered. Music Perception, 17(1):65-100.
19. Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer, New York.
20. von Hippel, P. T. (2000). Redefining pitch proximity: Tessitura and mobility as constraints on melodic intervals. Music Perception, 17(3):315-127.