Motivations and methodologies for automation of the compositional process

Musicae Scientiae

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 119-147

  Pearce, Marcus ^a   Meredith, David ^a   Wiggins, Geraint ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990379670     PISSN: 10298649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/102986490200600203     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ames C. (1987). Automated composition in retrospect: 1956–1986. Leonardo, 20 (2), 169–85.
2. Ames C. (1992). Quantifying musical merit. Interface, 21, 53–93.
3. Ames C. Domino M. (1992), Cybernetic Composer: an overview. In Balaban M., Ebcioglu K. and Laske O. (eds), Understanding Music with AI: Perspectives on Music Cognition (pp. 186–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Assayag G. Rueda C. Laurson M. Agon C. Delerue O. (1999). Computer assisted composition at IRCAM: from PatchWork to OpenMusic. Computer Music Journal, 23 (3), 59–72.
5. Baroni M. (1999). Musical grammar and the cognitive processes of composition. Musicæ Scientiæ, 3 (1), 3–19.
6. Baroni M. Dalmonte R. Jacoboni C. (1992). Theory and analysis of European melody. In Marsden A. and Pople A. (eds), Computer Representations and Models in Music (pp. 187–206). London: Academic Press.
7. Berg P. (1987). PILE — a language for sound synthesis. In Roads C. and Strawn J. (eds), Foundations of Computer Music (pp. 64–108). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8. Berlyne D. E. (1971). The new experimental aesthetics. In Berlyne D. E.,(ed. ), Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Towards an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation (pp. 1–25). Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Co.
9. Biles J. A. (1994). Genjam: a genetic algorithm for generating jazz solos. In Proceedings of the 1994 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 131–7). San Francisco: ICMA.
10. Bundy A. (1990). What kind of field is AI? In Partridge D. and Wilks Y. (eds), The Foundations of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 215–22). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Camilleri L. (1992). Computational theories of music. In Marsden A. and Pople A. (eds), Computer Representations and Models in Music (pp. 171–85). London: Academic Press.
12. Chalmers D. J. (1994). On implementing a computation. Minds and Machines, 4, 391–402.
13. Chomsky N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Colley A. Banton L. Down J. Pither A. (1992). An expert-novice comparison in musical composition. Psychology of Music, 20, 124–37.
15. Cope D. (1991). Computers and Musical Style. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Davidson L. Welsh P. (1988). From collections to structure: the developmental path of tonal thinking. In Sloboda J. A.,(ed. ), Generative Processes in Music: the Psychology of Performance, Improvisation and Composition (pp. 260–85). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Desain P. Honing H. van Thienen H. Windsor L. (1998). Computational modelling of music cognition: problem or solution. Music Perception, 16 (1), 151–66.
18. Ebcioglu K. (1987). Report on the CHORAL project: An expert system for harmonizing four-part chorales. Technical Report RC 12628, IBM, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.
19. Ebcioglu K. (1988). An expert system for harmonising four-part chorales. Computer Music Journal, 12 (3), 43–51.
20. Ebcioglu K. (1992). An expert system for harmonising chorales in the style of J. S. Bach. In Balaban M., Ebciogcar;lu K. and Laske O. (eds), Understanding Music with AI: Perspectives on Music Cognition (pp. 294–333). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Folkestad G. Hargreaves D. J. Lindström B. (1990). A typology of compositional styles in computer-based music making. In Gabrielsson A.,(ed. ), Proceedings of the Third Triennial ESCOM Conference (pp. 147–52). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University Press.
22. Gjerdingen R. (1999). An experimental music theory? In Cook N. and Everist M. (eds), Rethinking Music (pp. 161–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Hild H. Feulner J. Menzel D. (1992). HARMONET: a neural net for harmonising chorales in the style of J.S. Bach. In Lippmann R. P., Moody J. E. and Touretzky D. S. (eds), Advances in Neural Information Processing 4 (pp. 267–74). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
24. Hiller L. Isaacson L. (1959). Experimental Music. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Hodgson P. W. (1999). Modelling cognition in musical improvisation through evolution. In Proceedings of the AISB′99 Symposium on Musical Creativity (pp. 15–9). Brighton, UK: SSAISB.
26. Hörnel D. Olbrich F. (1999). Comparative style analysis with neural networks. In Proceedings of the 1999 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 433–6). San Francisco: ICMA.
27. Johanson B. Poli R. (1998). GP-Music: an interactive genetic programming system for music generation with automated fitness raters. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Programming (pp. 181–6). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
28. Johnson-Laird P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Johnson-Laird P. N. (1991). Jazz improvisation: a theory at the computational level. In Howell P., West R. and Cross I. (eds), Representing Musical Structure (pp. 291–325). London: Academic Press.
30. Kohonen T. Laine P. Tiits K. Torkkola K. (1991). A nonheuristic composing method. In Todd P. and Loy D. G. (eds), Music and Connectionism (pp. 229–42). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Lakatos I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos I. and Musgrave A. (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Laske O. (1988). Introduction to cognitive musicology. Computer Music Journal, 12 (1), 43–57.
33. Laske O. (1992). The OBSERVER tradition of knowledge acquisition. In Balaban M., Ebcioglu K. and Laske O. (eds), Understanding Music with AI: Perspectives on Music Cognition (pp. 258–89). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Leman M. (1992). Artificial neural networks in music research. In Marsden A. and Pople A. (eds), Computer Representations and Models in Music (pp. 265–301). London: Academic Press.
35. Longuet-Higgins H. C. (1981). Artificial intelligence — a new theoretical psychology? Cognition, 10, 197–200.
36. Marr D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
37. McClamrock R. (1991). Marr’s three levels: a re-evaluation. Minds and Machines, 1, 185–96.
38. Meredith D. (1996). The Logical Structure of an Algorithmic Theory of Tonal Music. PhD thesis, Faculty of Music, University of Oxford. Submitted. Available online at http://www.titanmusic.com/papers/public/thesis1996.pdf.
39. Mozer M. C. (1994). Neural network music composition by prediction: Exploring the benefits of psychoacoustic constraints and multi-scale processing. Connection Science, 6 (2–3), 247–80.
40. Newell A. Simon H. A. (1976). Computer science as empirical enquiry: symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19 (3), 113–26.
41. Pearce M. T. Wiggins G. A. (2001). Towards a framework for the evaluation of machine compositions. In Proceedings of the AISB′01 Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in the Arts and Sciences (pp. 22–32). Brighton, UK: SSAISB. Available online at http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/-ek735/papers/aisb01.pdf.
42. Pfleeger S. L. (1991). Software Engineering: The Production of Quality Software (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
43. Polfreman R. Loomes M. (2001). A TKS framework for understanding music composition processes and its application in interactive system design. In Proceedings of the AISB′01 Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity in the Arts and Sciences (pp. 75–83). Brighton, UK: SSAISB.
44. Popper K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson and Co.
45. Pylyshyn Z. (1989). Computing in cognitive science. In Posner M. I.,(ed. ), Foundations of Cognitive Science (pp. 51–91). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Ramalho G. Pachet F. (1994). What is needed to bridge the gap between real book and real jazz performance? In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 349–50). Liège, Belgium: ESCOM.
47. Reis B. Y. (1999). Simulating music learning: on-line, perceptually guided pattern induction of context models for multiple-horizon prediction of melodies. In Proceedings of the AISB′99 Symposium on Musical Creativity (pp. 58–63). Brighton, UK: SSAISB.
48. Roads C. (1985). Research in music and artificial intelligence. ACM Computing Surveys, 17 (2), 163–90.
49. Simon H. A. Kaplan C. A. (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In Posner M. I.,(ed. ), Foundations of Cognitive Science (pp. 1–47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Sloboda J. (1985). The Musical Mind: the Cognitive Psychology of Music. Oxford: Oxford Science Press.
51. Steedman M. (1984). A generative grammar for jazz chord sequences. Music Perception, 2 (1), 52–77.
52. Sundberg J. Lindblom B. (1976). Generative theories in language and music descriptions. Cognition, 4, 99–122.
53. Sundberg J. Lindblom B. (1991). Generative theories for describing musical structure. In Howell P., West R. and Cross I. (eds), Representing Musical Structure (pp. 245–72). London: Academic Press.
54. Widmer G. (2000). On the potential of machine learning for music research. In Miranda E. R.,(ed. ), Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 69–84). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
55. Wiggins G. A. Smaill A. (2000). What can artificial intelligence bring to the musician? In Miranda E. R.,(ed. ), Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 29–46). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers. Available online at http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/-geraint/papers/miranda_collection.pdf.
56. Xenakis I. (1971). Formalised Music. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.