Formative feedback in digital lofts: Learning environments for real world innovation

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 1009, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Easterday, Matthew W ^a   Rees Lewis, Daniel ^a   Gerber, Elizabeth ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Civic innovation; Digital lofts; Feedback; Online learning environments

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BUILDINGS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; FEEDBACK; INNOVATION; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); TEACHING;

DIGITAL LOFTS; FORMATIVE FEEDBACKS; GROUP INSTRUCTIONS; INNOVATION WORKS; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; OPEN-ENDED PROBLEMS; SOCIETAL PROBLEMS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84925014523     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (70)

1. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2011). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: ABET.
2. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/uploadedFiles/Accreditation/Accreditation -Process/Accreditation-Documents/Current/eac-criteria-2012-2013.pdf
3. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. New York: Springer.
5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
6. Beausaert, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2011). The use of a personal development plan and the undertaking of learning activities, expertise-growth, flexibility and performance: The role of supporting assessment conditions. Human Resource Development International, 14(5), 527-543.
7. Beckman, S. L., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking. California Management Review, 50(1), 25.
8. Bell, P., Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (1995). The knowledge integration environment: Theory and design. In The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 14-21).
9. Blackboard Inc. (2012). Blackboard [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://www.blackboard.com/
10. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-322). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Canvas. (2012). Instructure [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://www.instructure.com/
12. Clark, R. E. (2008). Design document for A guided experiential learning course. Submitted to satisfy contract DAAD 19-99-D- 0046-0004 from TRADOC to the Institute for Creative Technologies and the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California. (Original work published 2004) Retrieved from http://www.cogtech.usc.edu/publications/gel-design-document.pdf
13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037
14. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668.
15. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Salhey (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 525-552). New York: Springer.
16. Dong, A. (2005). The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication. Design Studies, 26(5), 445-461.
17. Dubberly, H. (2005). How Do You Design? Retrieved from http://www.dubberly.com/wpcontent/ uploads/2008/06/ddo-designprocess.pdf
18. Duncan, A. (2011, September 15). Digital badges for learning: Remarks by secretary duncan at 4th annual launch of the macarthur foundation digital media and lifelong learning competition. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/digital-badges-learning
19. Easterday, M. W. (2012). Matthew easterday: Cyber-Civics 101. Presentation at the NSF cyberlearning summit, jan 18, 2012, washington D.C. Retrieved from from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBPeDVR2nOo&feature=y outu.be
20. Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-Use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities . Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385.
21. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3-4), 391-450.
22. ETR Associates. (2012). What is service-learning? [Web page] Retrieved from http://www.servicelearning.org/what-servicelearning.
23. Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. Expanding Boundaries: Serving and Learning, 1, 1-6.
24. Gall, S. N. -L. (1981). Help-seeking: An understudied problemsolving skill in children. Developmental Review, 1(3), 224-246. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(81)90019-8
25. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393.
26. Gerber, E. M., Marie Olson, J., & Komarek, R. L. D. (2012). Extracurricular design-based learning: Preparing students for careers in innovation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 317.
27. Hardiman, P. T., Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1986). Learning to understand the balance beam. Cognition and Instruction, 3(1), 63-86.
28. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 metaanalyses relating to achievement.
29. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
30. Khan, S. (2012). The khan academy. [Web page] Retrieved from http://www.khanacademy.org/
31. Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., Resnick, P., & Kittur, A. (2012). Regulating behavior in online communities. In P. Resnick & R. Kraut (Eds.), Evidence-based social design: Mining the social sciences to build online communities (pp. 125-178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
33. Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 239-264.
34. Kolodner, J. L. (ed.) (1993). Case-based learning. Boston: Springer.
35. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologis, 52(1), 57.
36. Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 16-22.
37. Kolodner, J. L., Owensby, J. N., & Guzdial, M. (2004). Casebased learning aids. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 829-861).
38. Kraut, R., & Resnick, P. (2012). Encouraging contribution to online communities. In P. Resnick & R. Kraut (Eds.), Evidencebased social design: Mining the social sciences to build online communities (pp. 21-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
40. Lore. (2012). Lore. [Computer Software] Retrieved from http://lore.com/
41. Lovett, M., Meyer, O., & Thille, C. (2008). The open learning initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/2008/14
42. Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Massachusetts. Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf
43. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2012). MIT opencourseware [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm
44. Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
45. Owen, C. L. (1998). Design research: Building the knowledge base. Design Studies, 19(1), 9-20.
46. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
47. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In Constructionism (pp. 1-11).
48. Peters, V. L., & Slotta, J. D. (2010). Scaffolding knowledge communities in the classroom: New opportunities in the web 2.0 era. In Designs for learning environments of the future (pp. 205-232). New York: Springer.
49. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
50. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185-217.
51. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273-304.
52. Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In Cognition and instruction (Vol. 25, pp. 263-306).
53. Resnick, M. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67. doi:10.1145/1592761.159277
54. Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why? Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 93-114.
55. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
56. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peergrading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.
57. Sakai Foundation. (2012). Sakai [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://www.sakaiproject.org/
58. Salden, R. J. C. M., Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., Renkl, A., & Schwonke, R. (2009). Worked examples and tutored problem solving: Redundant or synergistic forms of support? Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 203-213. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01011.x
59. Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345-372.
60. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Steinbach, R. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8(2), 173-190.
61. Scheines, R., Leinhardt, G., Smith, J., & Cho, K. (2005). Replacing lecture with web-based course materials. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(1), 1-26.
62. Severance, C. (2012). Teaching the world: Daphne koller and coursera. Computer, 45(8), 8-9.
63. Shaffer, D. W., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thick" authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(2), 195-215.
64. Slotta, J. D. (2004). The web-based inquiry science environment (WISE): Scaffolding knowledge integration in the science classroom. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 203-232). Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ.
65. Songer, N. B. (2006). BioKIDS: An animated conversation on the development of complex reasoning in science. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.), The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 355-370). New York: Cambridge University Press.
66. Thompson, L., Gentner, D., & Loewenstein, J. (2000). Avoiding missed opportunities in managerial life: Analogical training more powerful than individual case training. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 60-75.
67. Velmahos, G. C., Toutouzas, K. G., Sillin, L. F., Chan, L., Clark, R. E., Theodorou, D., & Maupin, F. (2004). Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory. American Journal of Surgery, 187(1), 114-9.
68. Von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2004). Labeling images with a computer game. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 319-326).
69. Ward, M., & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition and Instruction, 7(1), 1-39.
70. White, B., Frederiksen, J., Frederiksen, T., Eslinger, E., Loper, S., & Collins, A. (2002). Inquiry island: Affordances of a multiagent environment for scientific inquiry and reflective learning. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.