Are We on the Same Page? Knowledge Boundaries and Transactive Memory System Development in Cross-Functional Teams

Communication Research

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 319-344

  Kotlarsky, Julia ^a   van den Hooff, Bart ^b   Houtman, Leonie ^b  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

and pragmatic knowledge boundaries; cross functional team; semantic; syntactic; transactive memory system

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924952052     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650212469402     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Agarwal R.,Karahanna E.Time flies when you are having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage.MIS Quarterly. 2000;24:665-694
2. Anand V.,Manz C. C.,Glick W. H.An organizational memory approach to information management.Academy of Management Review. 1998;23:796-809
3. Barrett M.,Oborn E.Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams.Human Relations. 2010;63:1199-1221
4. Bechky B. A.Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor.Organization Science. 2003;14:312-330
5. Boland R. J.,Tenkasi R. V.Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing.Organization Science. 1995;6:350-372
6. Bourdieu P.The logic of practice. Cambridge, England: Polity Press; 1990:
7. Brown J. S.,Duguid P.Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation.Organization Science. 1991;2:40-57
8. Brown J. S.,Duguid P.Organizing knowledge.California Management Review. 1998;40 (3): 90-111
9. Brown J. S.,Duguid P.Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective.Organization Science. 2001;12:198-213
10. Canon-Bowers J. A.,Salas E.,Converse S.Current issues in individual and group decision making. Castellan N. J., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993:221-247.
11. Carlile P.A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development.Organization Science. 2002;13:442-455
12. Carlile P.Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries.Organization Science. 2004;15:555-568
13. Child J. T.,Shumate M.The impact of communal knowledge repositories and people-based knowledge management on perceptions of team effectiveness.Management Communication Quarterly. 2007;21:29-54
14. Chin W. W.Modern methods for business research. Marcoulides G. A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998:295-336.
15. Cook S.,Brown J. S.Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organization knowing.Organization Science. 1999;10:381-400
16. De Vries R. E.,Van den Hooff B. J.,De Ridder J. A.Explaining knowledge sharing: The role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs.Communication Research. 2006;33:115-135
17. Dougherty D.Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms.Organization Science. 1992;3:179-202
18. Edmondson A. C.,Nembhard I. M.Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits.Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2009;26:123-138
19. Ellis A. P. J.System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance.Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49:576-589
20. Faraj S.,Xiao Y.Coordination in fast-response organizations.Management Science. 2006;52:1155-1169
21. Fornell C.,Larcker D. F.Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18:39-50
22. Galbraith J. R.Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1973:
23. Gasson S.A genealogical study of boundary-spanning.European Journal of Information Systems. 2006;15:26-41
24. Gino F.,Argote L.,Miron-Spektor E.,Todorova G.First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2010;111:102-115
25. Gupta N.,Hollingshead A. B.Differentiated versus integrated transactive memory effectiveness: It depends on the task.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2010;14:384-398
26. Hair J. F.,Black W. C.,Babin B. J.,Anderson R. E.,Tatham R. L.Multivariate data analysis. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2006:
27. Hislop D.Knowledge management in organizations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2009:
28. Hollingshead A. B.Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1998;34:423-442
29. Hollingshead A. B.Perceptions of expertise and transactive memory in work relationships.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2000;3:257-267
30. Hollingshead A. B.Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;81:1080-1089
31. Hollingshead A. B.,Brandon D. P.Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems.Human Communication Research. 2003;29:607-615
32. Hollingshead A. B.,Brandon D. P.,Yoon K.,Gupta N.Communication and organizational knowledge: Contemporary issues for theory and practice. Canary H. E.McPhee R. D., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:133-150.
33. Hollingshead A. B.,Fraidin S. N.Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2003;39:355-363
34. Jackson P.,Klobas J.Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories.Decision Support Systems. 2008;44:409-424
35. Jarvenpaa S. L.,Keating E.Hallowed grounds: The role of cultural values, practices, and institutions in TMS in an offshored complex engineering services project.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2011;58:786-798
36. Jarvenpaa S. L.,Majchrzak A.Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks.Organization Science. 2008;19:260-276
37. Kanawattanachai P.,Yoo Y.The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time.MIS Quarterly. 2007;31:783-808
38. Kellogg K. C.,Orlikowski W. J.,Yates J.Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations.Organization Science. 2006;17:22-44
39. Kotlarsky J.,Van den Hooff B.,Huysman M. H.Bridging knowledge boundaries in cross-functional groups: The role of a transactive memory system.Paper presented at the 30th International Conference of Information Systems; 2009Phoenix, AZ; 2009.
40. Lawrence P.,Lorsch J.Organizations and environments: Managing differentiation and interation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1967:
41. Levina N.,Vaast E.The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems.MIS Quarterly. 2005;29:335-363
42. Levina N.,Vaast E.Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration.MIS Quarterly. 2008;32:307-332
43. Lewis K.Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88:587-604
44. Lewis K.Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems.Management Science. 2004;50:1519-1533
45. Lewis K.,Belliveau M.,Herdon B.,Keller J.Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2007;103:159-178
46. Lewis K.,Herndon B.Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions.Organization Science. 2011;22:1254-1265
47. Liang D. W.,Moreland R.,Argote L.Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995;21:384-393
48. Liao J.,Jimmieson N. L.,O’Brien A. T.,Restubog S. L. D.Developing transactive memory systems: Theoretical contributions from a social identity perspective.Group & Organization Management. 2012;37:204-240
49. Majchrzak A.,Jarvenpaa S. L.,Hollingshead A. B.Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters.Organization Science. 2007;18:147-161
50. MajchrzakA.MalhotraA. (2004). Virtual workspace technology use and knowledge-sharing effectiveness in distributed teams: The influence of a team’s transactive memory. Retrieved from http://knowledgemanagement.ittoolbox.com/documents/document.asp?i=3164
51. MajchrzakA.MoreP. H. B.FarajS. (2012). Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organization Science, 23, 951-970. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0677. Retrieved from https://msbfile03.usc.edu/digitalmeasures/pmore/intellcont/Transcending%20Knowledge%20Differences%20for%20companies-1-2.pdf
52. Mathieu J. E.,Heffner T. S.,Goodwin G. F.,Salas E.,Cannon-Bowers J. A.The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000;85:273-283
53. Mitchell R. J.,Parker V.,Giles M.When do interprofessional teams succeed? Investigating the moderating roles of team and professional identity in interprofessional effectiveness.Human Relations. 2011;64:1321-1343
54. Moreland R. L.Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge. Thompson L.Messick D.Levine J., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999:3-31.
55. Moreland R. L.,Argote L.Leading and managing people in the dynamic organization. Peterson R.Mannix E., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2003:135-162.
56. Moreland R. L.,Argote L.,Krishnan T.What’s so social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups. Nye J. L.Brower A. M., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996:57-84.
57. Moreland R. L.,Myaskovsky L.Exploring the performance benefits of groups training: Transactive memory or improved communication?.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2000;82:117-133
58. Nevo D.,Benbasat I.,Wand Y.Understanding technology support for organizational transactive memory: Requirements, application, and customization.Journal of Management Information Systems. 2012;28 (4): 69-98
59. Oborn E.,Dawson S.Knowledge and practice in multidisciplinary teams: Struggle, accommodation and privilege.Human Relations. 2010;63:1835-1857
60. Orlikowski W. J.Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing.Organization Science. 2002;13:249-273
61. Oshri I.,van Fenema P. C.,Kotlarsky J.Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: The role of transactive memory.Information Systems Journal. 2008;18:593-616
62. Palazzolo E. T.Organizing for information retrieval in transactive memory systems.Communication Research. 2005;32:726-761
63. Podsakoff P. M.,Organ D. W.Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects.Journal of Management. 1986;12:531-544
64. Ren Y.,Argote L.Transactive memory systems 1985-2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences.Academy of Management Annals. 2011;5:189-229
65. Shannon C.,Weaver W.The mathematical theory of communication. Champaign: University of Illinois Press; 1949:
66. Su C.Who knows what in the group? The effects of communication network centralities, use of digital knowledge repositories, and work remoteness on organizational members’ accuracy of expertise recognition.Communication Research. 2012;39:614-640
67. Swan J.,Bresnen M.,Newell S.,Robertson M.The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation.Human Relations. 2007;60:1809-1837
68. Wegner D. M.Theories of group behavior. Mullen G.Goethals G., ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1986:185-205.
69. Wegner D. M.A computer network model of human transactive memory.Social Cognition. 1995;13:319-339
70. Wegner D. M.,Erber R.,Raymond P.Transactive memory in close relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;61:923-929
71. Wegner D. M.,Guiliano T.,Hertel P. T.Compatible and incompatible relationships. Ickes W. J., ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1985:253-276.
72. Wenger E.Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1998:
73. Yoo Y.,Kanawattanachai P.Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams.International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 2001;9:187-208
74. Yuan Y. C.,Fulk J.,Monge P. R.,Contractor N. S.Expertise directory development, shared task interdependence, and strength of communication network ties as multilevel predictors of expertise exchange in transactive memory work groups.Communication Research. 2010;37:20-47