Trait Agreeableness and Social Status Moderate Behavioral Responsiveness to Communal Behavior

Journal of Personality

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 191-201

  Yao, Qi ^a   Moskowitz, Debbie S ^b  

^a NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84924854219     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12094     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ahadi, S., & Rothbart, M. (1994). Temperament, development, and the Big Five. In C. F. Halverson, Jr., G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 189-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Albert, L. S., & Moskowitz, D. S. (2014). Quarrelsomeness in the workplace: An exploration of the interpersonal construct within the organizational context. Organizational Psychology Review, 4, 27-48.
3. Bluhm, C., Widiger, T. A., & Miele, G. M. (1990). Interpersonal complementarity and individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 464-471.
4. Carson, R. C. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine.
5. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
6. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2011). The five-factor model, five-factor theory, and interpersonal psychology. In L. M. Horowitz & S. N. Strack (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 91-104). New York: Wiley.
7. De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000). What people look for in others: Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on information selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 206-219.
8. Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 531-545.
9. Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2009). The interpersonal signature. Journal of Research Personality, 43, 155-162.
10. Graziano, W. G., Bruce, J. W., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Attraction, personality and prejudice: Liking none of the people most of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 565-582.
11. Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Finch, J. F. (1997). The self as a mediator between personality and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 392-404.
12. Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
13. Graziano, W. G., & Tobin, R. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46-61). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2005). The two faces of temptation: Differing motives for self-control. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51, 287-314.
15. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
16. Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185-214.
17. Kochanska, G., & Knaack, A. (2003). Effortful control as a personality characteristic of young children: Antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Personality, 71, 1087-1112.
18. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: Unified treatment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Moskowitz, D. S. (1994). Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 921-933.
20. Moskowitz, D. S., & Fournier, M. A. (in press). The interplay of persons and situations: Retrospect and prospect. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, volume 4: Personality processes and individual differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Moskowitz, D. S., Ho, R. M., & Turcotte-Tremblay, A. (2007). Contextual influences on interpersonal complementarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1051-1063.
22. Moskowitz, D. S., & Sadikaj, G. (2011). Event-contingent recording. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 160-175). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2005). Assessing interpersonal perceptions using the Interpersonal Grid. Psychological Assessment, 17, 218-230.
24. Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209-233.
25. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Rothbart, M. K., Ellis, L. K., Rueda, M. R., & Posner, M. (2003). Developing mechanisms of temperamental effortful control. Journal of Personality, 71, 1113-1143.
27. Sadikaj, G., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2011). Attachment-related affective dynamics: Differential reactivity to others' interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 905-917.
28. Sadler, P., Ethier, N., & Woody, E. (2011). Interpersonal complementarity. In L. M. Horowitz & S. N. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 123-142). New York: Wiley.
29. Sadler, P., & Woody, E. (2003). Is who you are who you're talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 80-96.
30. Strong, S., Hills, H., Kilmartin, C., DeVries, H., Lanier, K., Nelson, B., et al. (1988). The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementarity and anticomplementarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 798-810.
31. Tiedens, L. Z., Unzueta, M. M., & Young, M. J. (2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 402-414.
32. Tracey, T. J. (1994). An examination of the complementarity of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 864-878.
33. Tracey, T. J. G. (2005). Interpersonal rigidity and complementarity. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 592-614.
34. Van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19, 1315-1322.
35. Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul Everett Meehl (pp. 89-113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36. Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251-1263.
37. Wright, T. L., & Ingraham, L. J. (1986). A social relations model test of the interpersonal circle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1285-1290.