Contextual influences on interpersonal complementarity

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1051-1063

  Moskowitz, D S ^a   Ho, Moon Ho Ringo ^a,b   Turcotte Tremblay, Anne Marie ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Agreeable behavior; Dominance submissiveness; Interpersonal behavior; Interpersonal complementarity; Interpersonal process; Quarrelsome behavior; Social role status

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; SINGAPORE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL DOMINANCE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; DOCUMENTATION; DOMINANCE-SUBORDINATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; SINGAPORE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 34547291160     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167207303024     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Billings, A. (1979). Conflict resolution in distressed and nondistressed married couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 368-376.
2. Brown, K.W., Moskowitz, D.S. (1998). Dynamic stability of behavior: The rhythms of our interpersonal lives. Journal of Personality, 66, 105-134.
3. Carson, R.C. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine.
4. Ct, S., Moskowitz, D.S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1032-1046.
5. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., Haga, W.J. (1975). A vertical-dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
6. Dryer, D.C., Horowitz, L.M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 592-603.
7. Ellyson, S., Dovidio, J.F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Estroff, S.D., Nowicki, S. (1992). Interpersonal complementarity, gender of interactants, and performance on puzzle and word tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 351-356.
9. Guinote, A., Judd, C.M., Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 708-721.
10. Holtgraves, T., Lasky, B. (1999). Linguistic power and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 196-205.
11. Humphrey, R.H., Ashforth, B.E. (2000). Buyer-supplier alliances in the automobile industry: How exit-voice strategies influence interpersonal relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 713-730.
12. Johns, G. (1991). Substantive and methodological constraints on behavior and attitudes in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 80-104.
13. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
14. Kiesler, D.J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185-214.
15. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
16. Markey, P.M., Funder, D.C., Ozer, D.J. (2003). Complementarity of interpersonal behaviors in dyadic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1082-1090.
17. Markey, P.M., Kurtz, J.E. (2006). Increasing acquaintanceship and complementarity of behavioral styles and personality traits among college roommates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 907-916.
18. Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson D. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Moskowitz, D.S. (1986). Comparison of self-reports, reports by knowledgeable informants, and behavioral observation data. Journal of Personality, 54, 294-317.
20. Moskowitz, D.S. (1994). Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 921-933.
21. Moskowitz, D.S. (2004). Does elevated power lead to approach and reduced power to inhibition ? Psychological Review, 111, 808-811.
22. Moskowitz, D.S. (2005). Unfolding interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality, 73, 1607-1632.
23. Moskowitz, D.S., Ct, S. (1995). Do interpersonal traits predict affect? A comparison of three models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 915-924.
24. Moskowitz, D.S., Suh, E.J., Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-761.
25. Moskowitz, D.S., Young, S.N. (2006). Ecological momentary assessment: What it is and why it is a method of the future in clinical psychopharmacology. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 31, 13-20.
26. Moskowitz, D.S., Zuroff, D.C. (2005). Interpersonal perceptions of agency and communion. Psychological Assessment, 17, 218-230.
27. Orford, J. (1986). The rules of interpersonal complementarity: Does hostility beget hostility and dominance, submission ? Psychological Review, 93, 365-377.
28. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheung, Y.F., Congdon, R. (2004). Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling (Version 6) Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
29. Sadler, P., Woody, E. (2003). Is who you are who you are talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 80-95.
30. Shannon, J., Guerney, B., Jr. (1973). Interpersonal effects of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 142-150.
31. Snyder, M., Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3 rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 883-948). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32. Tiedens, L.Z., Fragale, A.R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 558-568.
33. Tracey, T.J. (1993). An interpersonal stage model of the therapeutic process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 396-409.
34. Tracey, T.J.G. (2004). Levels of interpersonal complementarity: A simplex representation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1211-1225.
35. Wheeler, L., Reis, H.T. (1991). Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, 59, 339-354.
36. Wiggins, J.S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. Grove D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul Everett Meehl (pp. 89-113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.