A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA)

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 139, Issue , 2015, Pages 17-32

  Di Pasquale, Valentina ^a   Miranda, Salvatore ^a   Iannone, Raffaele ^a   Riemma, Stefano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Human error probability; Human Reliability Analysis; Modelling; Performance shaping factor; Simulation

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ERRORS; MODELS; PROBABILITY;

ERROR PROBABILITIES; HUMAN ERROR PROBABILITY; HUMAN RELIABILITY; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE SHAPING FACTORS; SIMULATION; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84924777744     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. B. Kirwan A guide to practical human reliability assessment 1994 Taylor & Francis London
2. P.C. Cacciabue Modelling and simulation of human behaviour for safety analysis and control of complex systems Saf Sci 28 1998 97 110
3. Reason J. Human factors: a personal perspective. In: Human factors seminar, Helsinki, Finland; February 13, 2006.
4. C.D. Griffith, and S. Mahadevan Inclusion of fatigue effects in Human Reliability Analysis Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 11 2011 1437 1447
5. M. Madonna, G. Martella, L. Monica, E. Pichini Maini, and L. Tomassini Il fattore umano nella valutazione dei rischi: confronto metodologico fra le tecniche per l'analisi dell'affidabilità umana Prev Oggi 5 2009 67 83
6. F. De Felice, A. Petrillo, A. Carlomusto, and U. Romano A review of human reliability analysis: management practices and techniques Glob J Manag Sci Technol 1 4 2012 131 147
7. V. Di Pasquale, R. Iannone, S. Miranda, and S. Riemma An overview of human reliability analysis techniques in manufacturing operations Massimiliano Schiraldi Operations management 2013 InTech-Open Access Publisher 221 240 10.5772/55065
8. Iannone R., Miranda S., Riemma S. Proposta di un modello simulativo per la determinazione automatica delle pause di lavoro in attività manifatturiere a prevalente contenuto manuale. In: Atti del XXXI Convegno Nazionale Animp, Treviso; October 14-15, 2004, p. 46-60.
9. E. Hollnagel Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) 1998 Elsevier Amsterdam
10. R.L. Boring Dynamic Human Reliability Analysis: benefits and challenges of simulating human performance Risk Reliab Soc Saf 2 2007 1043 1049
11. P. Trucco, and M.C. Leva A probabilistic cognitive simulator for HRA studies (PROCOS) Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 8 2007 1117 1130
12. M.C. Leva, M. De Ambroggi, D. Grippa, R. De Garis, and P. Trucco Quantitative analysis of ATM safety issues using retrospective accident data: The Dynamic Risk Modelling Project Saf Sci 47 2009 250 264
13. Y.H.J. Chang, and A. Mosleh Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 1: overview of the IDAC model Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 2006 997 1013
14. Y.H.J. Chang, and A. Mosleh Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 2: IDAC performance influencing factors model Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 2007 1014 1040
15. Y.H.J. Chang, and A. Mosleh Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 3: IDAC operator response model Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 2006 1041 1060
16. Y.H.J. Chang, and A. Mosleh Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 4: IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 2006 1061 1075
17. Y.H.J. Chang, and A. Mosleh Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 5: dynamic probabilistic simulation of IDAC model Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 2006 1076 1101
18. A. Mosleh, and Y.H. Chang Model-based Human Reliability Analysis: prospects and requirements Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 2004 241 253
19. B. Kirwan The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques - THERP, HEART and JHEDI: Part 1: technique descriptions and validation issues Appl Ergon 27 6 1996 359 373
20. E. Calixto Comparing SLIM, SPAR-H and Bayesian network methodologies Open J Saf Sci Technol 3 2013 31 41
21. B. Kirwan The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques - THERP, HEART, and JHEDI: Part 3: practical aspects of the usage of the techniques Appl Ergon 28 1 1997 27 39
22. J. Bell, and J. Holroyd Review of human reliability assessment methods 2009 Health and Safety Executive Research Report RR679 London, UK
23. P.C. Cacciabue Human error risk management for engineering systems: a methodology for design, safety assessment, accident investigation and training Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 2 2004 229 240
24. M.C. Kim, P.H. Seong, and E. Hollnagel A probabilistic approach for determining the control mode in CREAM Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 2 2006 191 199
25. Schemeleva K, Nguyen C, Duriex S, Caux C. Human error probability computation for manufacturing system simulation using CREAM. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference of modeling, optimization and simulation, Bordeaux, France; June 6-8, 2012.
26. Le Y, Qiang S, Liangfa S. A novel method of analyzing quality defects due to human errors in engine assembly line. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering; October 2012. p. 154-7.
27. Yang Z, Wang J, Rochdi M, Belkacem O. Bayesian modelling for human error probability analysis in CREAM. In: Proceedings of the international conference on quality, reliability, risk, maintenance, and safety engineering, Xi'an, China; June 17-19, 2011.
28. M. Konstandinidou, Z. Nivolianitou, C. Kiranoudis, and N. Markatos A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for Human Reliability Analysis Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 6 2006 706 716
29. Galyean WJ, Whaley AM, Kelly DL, Boring RL. SPAR-H step-by-step guidance. Idaho National Laboratory (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States); 2011.
30. Blackman HS, Gertman DI, Boring RL. Human error quantification using performance shaping factors in the SPAR-H method. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. SAGE Publications; 2008: 52(21).
31. Boring RL, Blackman HS. The origins of the SPAR-H method's performance shaping factor multipliers. In: 13th annual meeting on human factors and power plants and HPRCT., Sage Publications; August, 2007. p. 177-84.
32. Gould KS, Ringstad AJ,Van de Merwe K. Human Reliability Analysis in major accident risk analyses in the Norwegian petroleum industry. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting; 2012.
33. Van de Merwe K, ie S, Gould KS. The application of the SPAR-H method in managed-pressure drilling operations. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting; 2012.
34. Boring RL. How many performance shaping factors are necessary for Human Reliability Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 10th international probabilistic safety assessment and management conference (PSAM10), Seattle, US; 2010.
35. D. Gertman, H. Blackman, J. Marble, J. Byers, and C. Smith The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis method 2005 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC: US [NUREG/CR-6883]
36. E.L. Droguett, and R. Menezes Análise da confiabilidade humana via redes Bayesianas: uma aplicação à manutenção de linhas de transmissão Produção 17 1 2007 162 185
37. Droguett EL, Menezes R. Uma metodologia para analise de confiabilidade de sistemas complexos. In: Proceedings of the XXXVIII Simposio brasileiro de Pesquisa operacional; 2006.
38. Droguett EL, Menezes R, Firmino P. Analise de confiabilidade humana via redes bayesianas. In: Proceedings of the ENEGEP 2005 XXV Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção; 2005.
39. Bye A, Laumann K, Braarud P, Massaiu S. Methodology for improving HRA by simulator studies (PSAM-0391). In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM). ASME Press; 2006.
40. Boring RL. Modeling Human Reliability Analysis using MIDAS. In: In: Proceedings of the fifth international topical meeting on nuclear plant instrumentation, controls, and human machine interface technology; 2006. p. 1270-4.
41. E. Hollnagel Reliability analysis and operator modelling Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52 3 1996 327 337
42. P.C. Cacciabue, F. Decortis, B. Drozdowicz, M. Masson, and J.P. Nordvik COSIMO: a cognitive simulation model of human decision making and behaviour in accident management of complex plants IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22 5 1992 1058 1074
43. Gore BF, Jarvis PA. New integrated modeling capabilities: MIDAS'recent Behavioral Enhancements. SAE Technical Paper; 2005.
44. B. Kirwan Human error identification techniques for risk assessment of high risk system - part 1: review and evaluation of techniques Appl Ergon 29 3 1998 157 177
45. Boring R, Griffith C, Joe JC. The measure of human error: direct and indirect performance shaping factors. In: Proceedings of the joint 8th annual IEEE conference on human factors and power plants and 13th annual workshop on human performance/root cause/trending/operating experience/self assessment, Monterey, CA; August 26-31, 2007.
46. Woods DD, Roth EM, People HE. Cognitive environment simulation: an artificial intelligence system for human performance assessment. Washington DC: US: US Regulatory Commission; 1987 [NUREG-CR-4862].
47. Sasou K, Takano K, Yoshimura S, Haroko K, Kitamura M. Modelling and simulation of operator team behaviour in nuclear power plants. In: Proceedings of the HCI international, Tokyo; 1995