Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 1: Overview of the IDAC Model

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 92, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 997-1013

  Chang, Y H J ^a,b   Mosleh, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cognitive response; Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment; Human reliability analysis; Simulation

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

COGNITIVE RESPONSE; DYNAMIC PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS (HRA); INFORMATION DECISION AND ACTION IN CREW CONTEXT (IDAC);

NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENTS;

EID: 33847253818     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Chang YHJ, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents-part 2. IDAC performance influencing factors model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006; in press, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.010.
2. Chang YHJ, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents-part 4. IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006; in press, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.011.
3. Chang YHJ, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents-part 5. Dynamic probabilistic simulation of IDAC model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006; in press, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.012.
4. Chang YHJ, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents-part 3. IDAC operator response model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006; in press, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.013.
5. Reason J. Human error (1990), Cambridge University Press
6. Shen S.-H. IDA: a cognitive model of nuclear power plant operator response during abnormal conditions (1994), Materials and Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park
7. Smidts C., Shen S.H., and Mosleh A. The IDA cognitive model for the analysis of nuclear power plant operator response under accident condition. Part I: problem solving and decision making model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 55 (1997) 51-71
8. Mosleh A., and Chang Y.H. Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 2 (2004) 241-253
9. Chang YH, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents (ADS-IDACrew). CTRS-B6-06. College Park, Maryland: Center for Technology Risk Studies, University of Maryland; 1999.
10. Woods DD, Roth EM, Pople Jr HE, Embrey D. Cognitive environment simulation: an artificial intelligence system for human performance assessment, vols. 1-3. NUREG/CR-4862. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1987.
11. Dang V.N. Modeling operator cognition for accident sequence analysis: development of an operator-plant simulation, in Nuclear Engineering Department (1996), Massachusetts Institute of Technology
12. Corker K, Pisanich G, Bunzo M. A cognitive system model for human/automation dynamics in airspace management, 1997. http://caffeine.arc.nasa.gov/midas/Corker_et_al_97.html
13. Chang YH, Mosleh A. Dynamic PRA using ADS with RELAP5 code as its thermal hydraulic module. In: Probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM) 4, September 13-18. New York: Springer; 1998.
14. Chang YH, Mosleh A. ADS: a computer program for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment. In: International topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment, 6-9 October 2002, Detroit, Michigan: American Nuclear Society; 2002.
15. Chang YH, Mosleh A, Dang VN. Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment-framework, tool, and application. In: Society of risk analysis annual meeting 7-10 December 2003. Baltimore: 2003.
16. Carlson K.E., Rlemke R.A., Rouhani S.Z., Shumway R.W., and Weaver W.L. RELAP5/MOD3 code manual (Draft) (1990), EG&G Idaho Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho
17. Paris C.R., Salas E., and Cannon-Bowers J.A. Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics 43 8 (2000) 1052-1075
18. Jensen F.V. Bayesian networks and decision graphs (2001), Springer, New York
19. Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. 2nd ed. (2001), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Franciso, CA
20. Salas E., Dickinson T.L., Converse S.A., and Tannenbaum S.I. Toward an understanding of team performance and training, in teams: their training and performance. In: Swezey R.W., and Salas E. (Eds) (1992), Ablex Publishing Co., Norwood, NJ 3-29
21. Smith-Jentsch K.A., Zeisig R.L., Action B., and McPherson J.A. Team dimentional training: a strategy for guided team self-correction, in making decision under stress. In: Cannon-Bowers J.A., and Salas E. (Eds) (1998), American Psychology Association, Washington, DC
22. Connon-Bowers J.A., and Salas E. Reflections on shared cognition. J Org Behav 22 (2001) 195-202
23. Brannick M.T., and Prince C. An overview of team performance measurement. In: Brannick M.T., Salas E., and Prince C. (Eds). Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods, and applications (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 3-16
24. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Onsite analysis of the human factors of an event at LaSalle 2 April 20, (reactor water cleanup system isolation bypass). EGG-HFRU-10309, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory; 1992.
25. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Onsite analysis of the human factors of an event at Waterford Unit 3 on June 24, (manual reactor trip with excess steam Deman). EGG-HFRU-9823, Idaho Engineering National Laboratory; 1991.
26. Hegarty M. Knowledge and processes in mechanical problem solving. In: Sternberg R., and Frensch P.A. (Eds). Complex problem solving: principles and mechanisms (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ 253-285
27. Wagman M. Problem-solving processes in humans and computers: theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence (2002), Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT
28. Jeffries R., Turner A.A., Polson P.G., and Atwood M.E. The processes involved in designing software. In: Anderson J.R. (Ed). Cognitive skills and their acquisition (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
29. Newell A., and Simon H.A. Human problem solving (1972), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
30. In: Norman D.A. (Ed). Models of human memory (1970), Academic Press, New York
31. Tulving E. Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving E., and Donaldson W. (Eds). Organization of memory (1972), Academic Press, New York 381-403
32. Allport D.A. Visual attention. In: Posner M.I. (Ed). Foundations of cognitive science (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
33. Newell A., Rosenbloom P.S., and Laird J.E. Symbolic architectures for cognition. In: Posner M.I. (Ed). Foundations of cognitive science (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
34. Rasmussen J. Information processing and human-machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. In: Sage A.P. (Ed). System science and engineering (1986), North-Holland, New York
35. Reason J. Modeling the basic error tendencies of human operators. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 22 (1988) 137-153
36. Wickens C.D., and Hollands J.G. Engineering psychology and human performance. 3rd ed. (1999), Prentice-Hall Inc., UK
37. Baddeley A.D., and Hitch G. Working memory. In: Bower G.A. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation (1974), Academic Press, New York 47-89
38. Smyth M.M., and Pendleton L.R. Space and movement in working memory. Q J Exp Psychol 42A (1990) 291-304
39. Baddeley A.D. Recent developments in working memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8 2 (1998) 234-238
40. Baddeley A.D. The concept of episodic memory. In: Baddeley A.D., Conway M., and Aggleton J. (Eds). Episodic memory: new directions in research (2002), Oxford University Press, New York 1-10
41. Baddeley A.D. Working memory (1986), Clarendon Press
42. Rasmussen J. The role of error in organizing behavior. Ergonomics 33 (1990) 1185-1199
43. De Groot A.D. Perception and memory vs. though: some old ideas and recent findings. In: Kleinmuntz B. (Ed). Problem solving, research, method and theory (1966), New York, Krieger
44. Barriere M, Bley D, Cooper S, Forester J, Kolaczkowski A, Luckas W, et al., Technical basis and implementation guideline for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA). NUREG-1624, Rev. 1. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2000.
45. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974) 1124-1131
46. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychol 5 (1973) 207-232
47. Sloman S.A., and Rips L.J. Similarity as an explanatory construct. In: Sloman S.A., and Rips L.J. (Eds). Similarity and symbols in human thinking (1998), MIT Press 1-15
48. Lind M. Modeling goals and functions of complex industrial-plants. Appl Artif Intell 8 2 (1994) 259-283
49. Hansen E. Emotional processes: engendered by poetry and prose reading (1986), ACTA UNIVERSITATIS STOCKHOLMIENSIS: Stockholm Studies in Psychology IV, Sweden
50. Swain AD, Guttmann HE. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. NUREG/CR-1278, Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1983.
51. Hovden J. Models of organizations vs. safety management approaches: a discussion based on studies of the "internal control of SHE" reform in Norway. In: Hale A.R., and Baram M. (Eds). Safety management: the challenge of change (1998), Elsevier, Netherlands 23-41
52. Walden R.S., and Roues W.B. Queuing model of pilot decision making in a multi-task flight management situation. IEEE Trans Syst, Man Cybern 8 12 (1978) 867-875
53. Roues W.B. Human-computer interaction in the control of dynamic systems. Comput Surv 13 1 (1981) 71-99
54. Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). 1st ed. (1998), Elsevier
55. Hsueh K.-S. An integrated simulation model for plant/operator behavior in accident conditions. Materials and nuclear engineering (1992), University of Maryland, College Park, MD
56. Amendola A. Accident sequence dynamic simulation vs. event trees. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 22 1-4 (1988) 3-25
57. Acosta CG, Siu N. Dynamic event tree analysis method (DETAM) for accident sequence analysis. MITNE-295. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1991.
58. Hollnagel E. Human reliability analysis: context and control. In: Gaines B.R., and Monk A. (Eds). Computers and people series (1993), Academic Press, London
59. Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents (1997), Ashgate Publishing Company
60. Whittingham R.B. The blame machine: why human error causes accidents (2004), Elsevier, New York
61. Shen S.H., Smidts C., and Mosleh A. A methodology for collection and analysis of human data based on a cognitive model: IDA. Nucl Eng Des 172 1-2 (1997) 157-186
62. Gertman D., Blackman H.S., Marble J., Byers J., Haney L.N., and Smith C. The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. NUREG/CR-6883 (2005), US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
63. Kirwan B. Human error identification techniques for risk assessment of high risk system-part 1: review and evaluation of techniques. Appl Ergon 29 3 (1998) 157-177
64. Hollnagel E. Looking for errors of omission and commission or the hunting of the snark revisited. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 68 2 (2000) 135-145
65. Mosleh A, Shen SH, Smidts C. Application of a model-based taxonomy to analysis of accidents involving human error. UM-94-001, University of Maryland; 1993.