Human reliability analysis through Bayesian networks: An application in maintenance of transmission lines;Análise da confiabilidade humana via redes Bayesianas: Uma aplicação à manutenção de linhas de transmissão

Producao

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 162-185

  Droguett, Enrique López ^a   Menêzes, Regilda da Costa Silva ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bayesian belief neotworks; Human analysis; Performance shaping factors

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748826277     PISSN: 01036513     EISSN: 19805411     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-65132007000100012     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. CHANG, Y. H.; MOSLEH, A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents (ADS-IDACrew). Center for Technology Risk Studies. University of Maryland, 1999.
2. COMER, M. K.; SEAVER, D. A.; STILLWELL, W. G.; GADDY, C. D. General human reliability estimates using expert judgment (NUREG/CR-3688). Washington, DC: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1984.
3. COOPER, S. E.; RAMEY-SMITH, A. M., WREATHALL, J.; PARRY, G. W., BLEY, D.,C.; LUCKAS, W. J.; TAYLOR, J. H.; BARRIERE, M. T. A technique for human error analysis (ATHEANA) (NUREG/CR-6350) Washington, DC:US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1996.
4. DESAULNIERS, D. R. Stress in the control room: effects and solutions. Washington, D.C. 20555: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1997.
5. DROGUETT, E. L.; GROEN, F.; MOSLEH, A. The combined use data and expert estimates in population variability analysis. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety. v. 83, p. 311-321, 2004.
6. EMBREY, D.E.; HUMPHREYS, P.; ROSA, E. A.; KIRWAN, B.; REA, K. SLIM-MAUD. An approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgment (NUREG/CR-3518). Washington, D.C.: USNRC, 1984.
7. FIRMINO, P. R.; DROGUETT, E. L. Redes Bayesianas para a parametrização da confiabilidade em sistemas complexos. Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Tecnologia e Geociências, 2004.
8. FIRMINO, P. R.; MENÊZES, R. C.; DROGUETT, E. L.; DUARTE, D. L. Eliciting Engineering Judgments in Human Reliability Assessment. Artigo submetido e aceito para o Annual Reliability & Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) 2006. California - EUA, 2006.
9. GERTMAN, D. I.; BLACKMAN, H. S.; HANEY, L. N.; SEIDLER, K, S.; SULLIVAN, C.; HAHN, H. A. INTENT: A method for estimating human error probabilities for errors of intention (EGG-SRE 9178). Idaho Falls, ID: Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, 1990.
10. GERTMAN, D. I. Representing cognitive activities and error in HRA tree (EGG-HFRU-10026). Idaho Falls, ID: Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, 1992.
11. GERTMAN, D. I. Representing cognitive activities and error in HRA tree. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, v. 39, p. 25-34, 1993.
12. GERTMAN, D. I.; BLACKMAN, H. S. Human reliability & safety analysis data handbook. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994.
13. HAMMOND, J. S.; KEENEY, R. L; RAIFFA, H. Somos movidos a decisões, decisões inteligentes: como avaliar alternativas e tomar a melhor decisão. 5.ed. Rio de Janeiro, Campus, 1999.
14. HANEY, L. N.; BLACKMAN, H. S.; BELL, B. J.; ROSE, S. E.; HESSE, D.J.; MINTON, L. A.; JENKINS, J. P. Comparison and application of quantitative human reliability analysis methods for the risk method integration and evaluation program (RMIEP) (NUREG/CR-4835). Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1989.
15. HANNAMAN, G. W.; SPURGIN, A. J.; LUKIC, Y. D. Human cognitive reliability model for PRA analysis (NUS-4531). Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute, 1984.
16. HOLLNAGEL, E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method. England: Elsevier Science, 1998.
17. KIM, I. S. Human reliability analysis in the man-machine interface design review. Annals of Nuclear Energy. v. 28, p. 1069-1081, 2001.
18. KIRWAN, B. A guide to practical human reliability assessment. London: Taylor & Francis, 1994.
19. KIRWAN, B.; AINSWORTH, L. K. A Guide to Task Analysis. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1993.
20. KORB, K. B.; NICHOLSON, A. E. Bayesian artificial intelligence. Florida: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2003.
21. LUCAS, D. State of the art review of qualitative modelling techniques. Dalton, Lancs., UK: Human Reliability Associates, 1988.
22. MACWAN, A.; MOSLEH, A. A methodology for modelling operator errors of commission in probabilistic risk assessment. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety. v. 45, p. 139-157, 1994.
23. MENÊZES, R. C., DROGUETT, E. L. Uma metodologia para a Avaliação da Confiabilidade Humana em atividades de substituição de cadeias de isoladores em linhas de transmissão. Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Tecnologia e Geociências, 2005.
24. MENÊZES, R. C.; FIRMINO, P. R.; DROGUETT, E. L. Análise de confiabilidade humana via redes Bayesianas. Artigo completo submetido e aceito para a SBPO 2005. Rio Grande do Sul, 2005.
25. MOSLEH, A.; CHANG, Y. H. Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. v. 83, p. 241-253, 2004.
26. PARRY, G. W.; MOSLEH, A. Control room crew operations research project (EPRI TR105280). Palo Alto, CA: Electrical Power Research Institute, 1995.
27. PEARL, J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. 2.ed. California: Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.
28. PHILLIPS, L. D.; HUMPHREYS, P. C.; EMBREY D. E. A socio-technical approach to assessing human reliability (83-4). OAK Ridge, TN: OAK Ridge National Laboratory, 1983.
29. POTASH, L. M.; DIETZ, P. E.; LEWIS, C. M.; DOUGHERTY, E. M. Jr. Experience in integrating the operator contributions in the PRA of actual operating plants. (ANS/ENS Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Risk Assessment, Port Chester, NY) LaGrange, IL: American Nuclear Society, 1981.
30. SIEGEL, A. I.; BARTTER, W. D.; WOLFF, J. J.; KNEE, H. E.; HAAS, P. M. Maintenance personnel performance simulation (MAPPS) model (NUREG/ CR-3626). Washington, DC: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1984.
31. SPURGIN, A. J.; MOIENI, P. An evaluation of current human reliability assessment methods. In G. APOSTOLAKIS (Ed), Probabilistic safety assessment and management. New York: Elsevier, 1991.
32. SWAIN, A. D. Comparative evaluation of methods for human reliability analysis (CRS-71). Garching, FRC: Gesellschaft fur Reaktorsicherheit, 1989.
33. SWAIN, A. D; GUTTMANN, H. E. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Washington: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983.
34. WICKENS, C.D.; HOLLANDS, J. G. Engineering, Psychology and Human Performance. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 2000.
35. WOODS, D. D.; ROTH, E. M.; POPLE, H. JR. Modeling human Intention formation for human reliability assessment. In G. E. APOSTOLAKIS, P. K.; MANCINI, G. (Eds.), Accident sequence modelling Human actions, system response, intelligent decision support. London: Elsevier Applied Science, 1988.
36. WREATHALL, J. Operator action trees. An approach to quantifying operator error probability during accident sequences, NUS-4159. San Diego, CA: NUS Corporation, 1982.