Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 5: Dynamic probabilistic simulation of the IDAC model

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 92, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1076-1101

  Chang, Y H J ^a,b   Mosleh, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cognitive simulation; Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment; Human reliability analysis

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; NUCLEAR REACTOR SIMULATORS; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

COGNITIVE SIMULATION; DYNAMIC PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (DPRA); HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS (HRA); INFORMATION DECISION AND ACTION IN CREW (IDAC);

NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENTS;

EID: 33847316861     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Chang YHJ, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents-part 1. Overview of the IDAC model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006, in press.
2. Chang YHJ, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents-part 2. IDAC performance influencing factors model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006, in press.
3. Chang YHJ, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents-part 3. IDAC operator response model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006, in press.
4. Chang YHJ, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents-part 4. IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006, in press.
5. Chang Y.H., and Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents (ADS-IDACrew), CTRS-B6-06 (1999), Center for Technology Risk Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
6. Chang Y.H., and Mosleh A. ADS: a computer program for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment. In: Proceedings of the international topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment (2002), American Nuclear Society, Detroit, MI
7. Hsueh K.-S. An integrated simulation model for plant/operator behavior in accident conditions, in materials and nuclear engineering (1992), University of Maryland, College Park, MD
8. Devooght J., and Smidts C. Probabilistic reactor dynamics-1: the theory of continuous event trees. Nucl Eng Design 111 3 (1992) 229-240
9. Matsuoka T., and Kobayashi M. GO-flow: a new reliability analysis methodology. Nucl Sci Eng 98 1 (1988) 64-78
10. Swaminathan S., and Smidts C. The event sequence diagram framework for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 63 1 (1999) 73-90
11. Cepin M., and Mavko B. A dynamic fault tree. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75 (2002) 83-91
12. Amendola A. Accident sequence dynamic simulation versus event trees. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 22 1-4 (1988) 3-25
13. Acosta C.G., and Siu N. Dynamic event tree analysis method (DETAM) for accident sequence analysis. MITNE-295 (1991), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
14. Hsueh K.-S., and Ali M. The development and application of the accident dynamic simulator for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52 (1996) 297-314
15. Chang Y.H., and Mosleh A. Dynamic PRA using ADS with RELAP5 code as its thermal hydraulic module. In Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM) 4 (1998), Springer, New York
16. Chang Y.H. Use of RELAP5 as the thermal-hydraulic model of the Accident Dynamic Simulator (ADS) for dynamic probabilistic risk assessments of nuclear power plants, in materials and nuclear engineering (1995), University of Maryland, College Park, MD
17. Carlson K.E., Rlemke R.A., Rouhani S.Z., Shumway R.W., and Weaver W.L. RELAP5/MOD3 Code Manual (Draft) (1990), EG&G Idaho, Idaho Falls, ID
18. Hollnagel E. Human reliability analysis: context and control. In: Gaines B.R., and Monk A. (Eds). Computers and people series (1993), Academic Press, London
19. Mosleh A., and Chang Y.H. Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 2 (2004) 241-253
20. Wickens C.D. Engineering psychology and human performance. 2nd ed (1992), Harper Collins, New York
21. Decortis F. Operator strategies in a dynamic environment in relation to an operator model. Ergonomics 36 11 (1993) 1291-1304
22. Kaempf G.L., Klein G., Thordsen M.L., and Wolf S. Decision making in complex naval command-and-control environments. Hum Fact 38 2 (1996) 220-231