Protrusion force microscopy reveals oscillatory force generation and mechanosensing activity of human macrophage podosomes

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Labernadie, Anna ^a,b,c   Bouissou, Anaïs ^a,b   Delobelle, Patrick ^d   Balor, Stéphanie ^e   Voituriez, Raphael ^f   Proag, Amsha ^a,b   Fourquaux, Isabelle ^b   Thibault, Christophe ^b,c   Vieu, Christophe ^b,c   Poincloux, Renaud ^a,b   Charrière, Guillaume M ^a,b,g   Maridonneau Parini, Isabelle ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT DE PHARMACOLOGIE ET DE BIOLOGIE STRUCTURALE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^c LAAS CNRS   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

^e Institut d'Exploration Fonctionnelle des Genomes   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^g UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

F ACTIN; FIBRINOGEN; GLASS; INTEGRIN; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; POLYVINYL ACETATE; SILICON NITRIDE; SMALL INTERFERING RNA; ACTIN;

DEFORMATION; GERM CELL; OSCILLATION; POLYMERIZATION; STIFFNESS; SUBSTRATE;

ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR IMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; FLOW KINETICS; FORCE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; MACROPHAGE; MICROSCOPE; MICROSCOPY; MODEL; OSCILLATION; PODOSOME; PROTRUSION FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM; CELL CULTURE; CELL SURFACE; CYTOLOGY; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACTINS; BIOLOGICAL CLOCKS; CELL SURFACE EXTENSIONS; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; MACROPHAGES; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PODOSOMES;

EID: 84924772460     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6343     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Kraning-Rush, C. M., Carey, S. P., Califano, J. P. & Reinhart-King, C. A. Quantifying traction stresses in adherent cells. Methods Cell Biol. 110, 139-178 (2012).
2. Alexander, N. R. et al. Extracellular matrix rigidity promotes invadopodia activity. Curr. Biol. 18, 1295-1299 (2008).
3. Albiges-Rizo, C., Destaing, O., Fourcade, B., Planus, E. & Block, M. R. Actin machinery and mechanosensitivity in invadopodia, podosomes and focal adhesions. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3037-3049 (2009).
4. Collin, O. et al. Self-organized podosomes are dynamic mechanosensors. Curr. Biol. 18, 1288-1294 (2008).
5. Collin, O. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of actin-rich adhesion microdomains: influence of substrate flexibility. J. Cell Sci. 119, 1914-1925 (2006).
6. Fereol, S. et al. Sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate mechanical and adhesive properties. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 63, 321-340 (2006).
7. Linder, S., Wiesner, C. & Himmel, M. Degrading devices: invadosomes in proteolytic cell invasion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 185-211 (2011).
8. Labernadie, A., Thibault, C., Vieu, C., Maridonneau-Parini, I. & Charriere, G. M. Dynamics of podosome stiffness revealed by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21016-21021 (2010).
9. Linder, S. Invadosomes at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3009-3013 (2009).
10. van den Dries, K. et al. Dual-color superresolution microscopy reveals nanoscale organization of mechanosensory podosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 2112-2123 (2013).
11. Cox, S. et al. Bayesian localization microscopy reveals nanoscale podosome dynamics. Nat. Methods 9, 195-200 (2012).
12. Walde, M., Monypenny, J., Heintzmann, R., Jones, G. E. & Cox, S. Vinculin binding angle in podosomes revealed by high resolution microscopy. PLoS ONE 9, e88251 (2014).
13. Dovas, A. et al. Regulation of podosome dynamics by WASp phosphorylation: implication in matrix degradation and chemotaxis in macrophages. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3873-3882 (2009).
14. Luxenburg, C. et al. The architecture of the adhesive apparatus of cultured osteoclasts: from podosome formation to sealing zone assembly. PLoS ONE 2, e179 (2007).
15. Destaing, O., Saltel, F., Geminard, J. C., Jurdic, P. & Bard, F. Podosomes display actin turnover and dynamic self-organization in osteoclasts expressing actingreen fluorescent protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 407-416 (2003).
16. Evans, J. G., Correia, I., Krasavina, O., Watson, N. & Matsudaira, P. Macrophage podosomes assemble at the leading lamella by growth and fragmentation. J. Cell Biol. 161, 697-705 (2003).
17. Gawden-Bone, C. et al. Dendritic cell podosomes are protrusive and invade the extracellular matrix using metalloproteinase MMP-14. J. Cell Sci. 123, 1427-1437 (2010).
18. van den Dries, K. et al. Interplay between myosin IIA-mediated contractility and actin network integrity orchestrates podosome composition and oscillations. Nat. Commun. 4, 1412 (2013).
19. Yu, C. H. et al. Integrin-matrix clusters form podosome-like adhesions in the absence of traction forces. Cell Rep. 5, 1456-1468 (2013).
20. Roca-Cusachs, P., Iskratsch, T. & Sheetz, M. P. Finding the weakest link: exploring integrin-mediated mechanical molecular pathways. J. Cell Sci. 125, 3025-3038 (2012).
21. Chabadel, A. et al. CD44 and beta3 integrin organize two functionally distinct actin-based domains in osteoclasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 4899-4910 (2007).
22. Bhuwania, R. et al. Supervillin couples myosin-dependent contractility to podosomes and enables their turnover. J. Cell Sci. 125, 2300-2314 (2012).
23. Miserey-Lenkei, S. et al. Rab and actomyosin-dependent fission of transport vesicles at the Golgi complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 645-654 (2010).
24. Luxenburg, C., Winograd-Katz, S., Addadi, L. & Geiger, B. Involvement of actin polymerization in podosome dynamics. J. Cell Sci. 125, 1666-1672 (2012).
25. Trichet, L. et al. Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6933-6938 (2012).
26. Riveline, D. et al. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 153, 1175-1186 (2001).
27. Maruthamuthu, V., Sabass, B., Schwarz, U. S. & Gardel, M. L. Cell-ECM traction force modulates endogenous tension at cell-cell contacts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4708-4713 (2011).
28. Paszek, M. J. et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8, 241-254 (2005).
29. Lo, C. M., Wang, H. B., Dembo, M. & Wang, Y. L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 79, 144-152 (2000).
30. Ross, T. D. et al. Integrins in mechanotransduction. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25, 613-618 (2013).
31. Discher, D. E., Janmey, P. & Wang, Y. L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139-1143 (2005).
32. Lizarraga, F. et al. Diaphanous-related formins are required for invadopodia formation and invasion of breast tumor cells. Cancer Res. 69, 2792-2800 (2009).
33. Sage, P. T. et al. Antigen recognition is facilitated by invadosome-like protrusions formed by memory/effector T cells. J. Immunol. 188, 3686-3699 (2012).
34. Labrousse, A. M. et al. Frustrated phagocytosis on micro-patterned immune complexes to characterize lysosome movements in live macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2, 51 (2011).
35. Carman, C. V. et al. Transcellular diapedesis is initiated by invasive podosomes. Immunity 26, 784-797 (2007).
36. Kovacs, M., Toth, J., Hetenyi, C., Malnasi-Csizmadia, A. & Sellers, J. R. Mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of myosin II. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 35557-35563 (2004).
37. Mitrossilis, D. et al. Real-time single-cell response to stiffness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16518-16523 (2010).
38. Troegeler, A. et al. An efficient siRNA-mediated gene silencing in primary human monocytes, dendritic cells and macrophages. Immunol. Cell Biol. 92, 699-708 (2014).
39. Hutter, J. L. & Bechhoefer, J. Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 1868-1873 (1993).
40. Hertz, H. Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. J. Reine Angew. Math. 92, 156-171 (1881).
41. Sneddon, I. N. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47-57 (1965).
42. Tse, J. R. & Engler, A. J. Preparation of hydrogel substrates with tunable mechanical properties. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 10, Unit 10 16 (2010).
43. Boudou, T., Ohayon, J., Picart, C. & Tracqui, P. An extended relationship for the characterization of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of tunable polyacrylamide gels. Biorheology 43, 721-728 (2006).
44. Moore, S. W., Roca-Cusachs, P. & Sheetz, M. P. Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing. Dev. Cell 19, 194-206 (2010).
45. Artym, V. V., Zhang, Y., Seillier-Moiseiwitsch, F., Yamada, K. M. & Mueller, S. C. Dynamic interactions of cortactin and membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase at invadopodia: defining the stages of invadopodia formation and function. Cancer Res. 66, 3034-3043 (2006).
46. Soumpasis, D. M. Theoretical-analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery experiments. Biophys. J. 41, 95-97 (1983).