Comparing the effects of traditional vs. misconceptions-based instruction on student understanding of the greenhouse effect

Journal of Geoscience Education

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 445-459

  McCuin, John L ^a   Hayhoe, Katharine ^b   Hayhoe, Douglas ^c  

^a Dallas Baptist University   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Tyndale University College and Seminary   (Canada)

Author keywords

Global warming; Greenhouse effect; Misconceptions; Radiation; Reading based instruction

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; STUDENT; TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84924756199     PISSN: 10899995     EISSN: 21581428     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5408/13-068.1     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Andersson, B., and Wallin, A. 2000. Students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect, the societal consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and the problem of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10):1096-1111.
2. Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J.D., and Hanesian, H. 1978. Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
3. Barna Group. 2007. Born Again Christians Remain Skeptical, Divided About Global Warming. Available at http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/20-donorscause/95-born-again-christians-remain-skeptical-divided-about-global-warming (accessed 1 June 2013).
4. Barna Group. 2008. Evangelicals Go ‘‘Green’’ with Caution. Available at http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/13-culture/23-evangelicals-go-qgreenq-with-caution (accessed 1 June 2013).
5. Boon, H. 2009. Climate change? When? Where? The Australian Educational Researcher, 36(3):43-64.
6. Boyes, E., Chuckran, E.D., and Stanisstreet, M. 1993. How do high school students perceive global climatic change: What are its manifestations? What are its origins? What corrective action can be taken? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2(4):541-557.
7. Boyes, E., and Stanisstreet, M. 1992. Students’ perceptions of global warming. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 42(4):287-300.
8. Boyes, E., and Stanisstreet, M. 1993. The ‘Greenhouse Effect’: Children’s perceptions of causes, consequences and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15(5):531-552.
9. Boyes, E., and Stanisstreet, M. 1997. Children’s models of understanding of two major global environmental issues (ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(1):19-28.
10. Boyes, E., and Stanisstreet, M. 2001. Global warming: What do high school students know 10 years on? World Resource Review, 13(2):221-238.
11. Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., and Daniel, B. 2004. High school students’ beliefs about the extent to which actions might reduce global warming. Presented at the 15th Global Warming International Conference and Expo, San Francisco, CA. Available at http://www.climatechangeeducation.org/pdf/Boyes.pdf (accessed 1 June 2013).
12. Braten, I., and H. Stromso. 2010. Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 47:1-31.
13. Brulle, R.J., Carmichael, J., and Jenkins, J.C. 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002-2010. Climatic Change, 114(2):169-188.
14. Clark, D., Ranney, M.A., and Felipe, J. 2013. Knowledge helps: Mechanistic information and numeric evidence as cognitive levers to overcome stasis and build public consensus on climate change. In Knauff, M., Pauen, M., Sebanz, N., and Wachsmuth, I., eds., Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, p. 2070-2075.
15. Cook, J. and Lewandowsky, S. 2011. The debunking handbook. St. Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland. ISBN 978-0-646-56812-6. Available at http://sks.to/debunk (accessed 1 May 2013).
16. Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S.A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P., and Skuce, A. 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2):1-7.
17. Corbett, J.B., and Durfee, J.L. 2004. Testing public (un) certainty of science: media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26(2):129.
18. Doran, P., and Zimmerman, M.K. 2009. Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90(3):22-23.
19. Driver, R. 1973. Representation of conceptual frameworks in young adolescent science students. [Ph.D. thesis]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
20. Driver, R. 1983. The Pupil as Scientist? New York: Taylor and Francis.
21. Dunlap, R.E. 1998. Lay perceptions of global risk: Public views of global warming in cross-national context. International Sociology, 13(4):473.
22. Evans, D.L., Gray, G.L., Krause, S., Martin, J., Midkiff, D., Notaros, B.M., Pavelich, M., Rancour, D., Reed-Rhoads, T., and Steif, P. 2003. Progress on concept inventory assessment tools. Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. T4G1-T4G8. Available at http://www.esm.psu.edu/dci/papers/FIE-DCI-Boulder.pdf (accessed 1 June 2013).
23. Fisher, B. 1998a. Australian students’ appreciation of the green- house effect and the ozone hole. Australian Science Journal, 44(33):46-55.
24. Fisher, B. 1998b. There’s a hole in my greenhouse effect. School Science Review. 79 (288):93-99.
25. Fortner, R.W., Lee, J.Y., Corney J.R., Romanello, S., Bonnell, J., Luthy, B., Figuerido, C., and Ntsiko, N. 2000. Public understanding of climate change: Certainty and willingness to act. Environmental Education Research, 6(2):127-141.
26. Francis, C., Boyes, E., Qualter, A., and Stanisstreet, M. 1993. Ideas of elementary students about reducing the greenhouse effect. Science Education, 77(4):375-392.
27. Gautier, C., Deutsch, K., and Rebich, S. 2006. Misconceptions about the greenhouse effect. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(3):386-395.
28. Gautier, C., and Solomon, R. 2005. A preliminary study of students’ asking quantitative scientific questions for inquiry-based climate model experiments. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4):432.
29. Gowda, M.V.R., Fox, J.C., and Magelky, R.D. 1997. Students’ understanding of climate change: Insights for scientists and educators. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(10):2232-2240.
30. Groves, F.H., and Pugh, A.F. 1999. Elementary pre-service teacher perceptions of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1):75-81.
31. Hansen, P. 2010. Comparing knowledge about greenhouse effect and ozone layer among Norwegian pupils finishing compulsory education in 1989, 1993 and 2005-What now? International Journal of Science Education, 32(3):397-419.
32. Hayhoe, D., Bullock, S., and Hayhoe, K. 2012. A kaleidoscope of understanding: Comparing real with random data, using binary choice items to study preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of climate change. Weather, Climate and Society, 3:254-260.
33. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., and Swackhamer, G. 1992. Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3):141-158.
34. Heywood, D. 2007. Problematizing science subject matter knowledge as a legitimate enterprise in primary teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(4):519-542.
35. Huertas, A., and Adler, D. 2012. Is News Corp. Failing Science? Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.
36. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley, eds., Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Jeffries, H., Stanisstreet, M., and Boyes, E. 2001. Knowledge about the’Greenhouse Effect’: Have college students improved? Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(2):205-221.
38. Keller, J.M. 2006. Development of a concept inventory addressing students’ beliefs and reasoning difficulties regarding the greenhouse effect. University of Arizona, AAT, 3237466.
39. Kendeou, P., and P.v.d. Broek. 2007. The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on compehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7):1567-1577.
40. Koulaidis, V., and Christidou, V. 1999. Models of students’ thinking concerning the greenhouse effect and teaching implications. Science Education, 83(5):559-576.
41. Kuhn, T.S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
42. Leiserowitz, A. 2007. American opinions on global warming. A Yale University/Gallup/ClearVision Institute Poll.
43. McCaffrey, M.S., and Buhr, S.M. 2008. Clarifying climate confusion: Addressing systemic holes, cognitive gaps, and misconceptions through climate literacy. Physical Geography. 29(6):512-528.
44. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 2011. Climate stabilization targets: Emissions, concentrations, and impacts over decades to millennia. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45. Nagle, J.C. 2008. The evangelical debate over climate change. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 5:7-46.
46. Notaros, B.M. 2002. Concept inventory assessment instruments for electromagnetics education. In Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2002. IEEE 1:684-687.
47. Osterlind, K. 2005. Concept formation in environmental education: 14-year olds’ work on the intensified greenhouse effect and the depletion of the ozone layer. International Journal of Science Education, 27(8):891-908.
48. Piaget, J. 1954. The construction of reality in the child (1937). Translated by M. Cook. New York: Basic Books.
49. Pruneau, D., Gravel, H., Bourque, W., and Langis, J. 2003. Experimentation with a socio-constructivist process for climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 9(4):429-446.
50. Pruneau, D., Liboiron, L., Vrain, E., Gravel, H., Bourque, W., and Langis, J. 2001. People’s ideas about climate change: A source of inspiration for the creation of educational programs. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(1):121-138.
51. Ranney, M.A., Clark, D., Reinholz, D., and Cohen, S. 2012. Improving Americans’ modest global warming knowledge in the light of RTMD (Reinforced Theistic Manifest Destiny) theory. In van Aalst, J., Thompson, K., Jacofson, M.M., and Reimann, P., eds., The future of learning: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc., p. 2-481-2-482.
52. Rebich, S., and Gautier, C. 2005. Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge and conceptual change in a mock summit course on global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4):355.
53. Saad, L. 2003. Giving global warming the cold shoulder. Gallup News Service. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/8227/giving-global-warming-cold-shoulder.aspx (accessed 1 June 2013).
54. Saad, L. 2006. Americans still not highly concerned about global warming. The Gallup Institute April 7. Available at http://www.gallup.com/poll/22291/americans-still-highly-concerned-about-global-warming.aspx (accessed 1 June 2013).
55. Saad, L. 2009. Increased Number Think Global Warming Is ‘‘Exaggerated’’. Gallup News Service. Available at http://www.gallup.com/poll/116590/increased-number-think-global-warming-exaggerated.aspx (accessed 1 June 2013).
56. Savinainen, A., and Viiri, J. 2008. The force concept inventory as a measure of students conceptual coherence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(4):719-740.
57. Skamp, K., Boyes, E., and Stanisstreet, M. 2004. Students’ ideas and attitudes about air quality. Research in Science Education, 34(3):313-342.
58. Somerville, R. and Hassol, S. 2011. Communicating the science of climate change. Physics Today, 64(10):43-53.
59. Sterman, J.D., and Sweeney, L.B. 2002. Cloudy skies: Assessing public understanding of global warming. System Dynamics Review, 18(2):207-240.
60. Sterman, J.D., and Sweeney, L.B. 2007. Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change, 80(3):213-238.
61. Sundblad, E.L., Biel, A., and Garling, T. 2009. Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons. Environment and Behavior, 41(2):281.
62. U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). 2009. Global climate change impacts in the United States. T. Karl, J. Melillo and T. Peterson (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
63. Walsh, J., Wuebbles, D., Hayhoe, K., Kossin, J., Kunkel, K., Stephens, G., Thorne, P., Vose, R., Wehner, M., Willis, J., Anderson, D., Doney, S., Feely, R., Hennon, P., Kharin, V., Knutson, T., Landerer, F., Lenton, T., Kennedy, J., and Somerville, R. 2014. Our changing climate. In Melillo, J.M., Richmond, T.C., and Yohe, G.W., eds., Climate change impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, p. 19-67. doi:10.7930/J0KW5CXT.
64. Whitmarsh, L. 2009. What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of ‘‘climate change’’ and ‘‘global warming.’’ Public Understanding of Science, 18(4):401.
65. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. 2013. Climate change in the Texan mind. Available at http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Texas_Climate_Change_Report.pdf (accessed 1 June 2013).
66. Yeung, S., Boyes, E. and Stanisstreet, M. 2004. Air Pollution: The knowledge and attitudes of secondary school students in Hong Kong. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 13(1):21-37.
67. Zhao, X. 2009. Media use and global warming perceptions a snapshot of the reinforcing spirals. Communication Research, 36(5):698-723.