The politics of welfare state reform in continental Europe: Modernization in hard times

The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-280

  Häusermann, Silja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924551325     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750588     Document Type: Book

References (342)

1. Abrahamsen, Yngve, Jochen Hartwig and Bernd Schips (2003). Volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen verschiedener Demographieszenarien und Varianten zur langfristigen Finanzierung der Alterssicherung in der Schweiz. Forschungsbericht Nr. 12/03. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen. Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.
2. Abramovici, Gérard (2002). “Der Sozialschutz: Rentenausgaben”, Statistik kurz gefasst. Thema 3–6/2002. Luxembourg: Eurostat: 1–8.
3. Alber, Jens (1987). Der Sozialstaat in der Bundesrepublik 1950–1983. Frankfurt: Campus.
4. Alber, Jens (2001). “RecentDevelopments of theGermanWelfare State: Basic Continuity or Paradigm Shift,” ZeS Working Paper 6/2001. Bremen: Centre for Social Policy Research, University of Bremen.
5. Allmendinger, Jutta (2000). “Wandel von Erwerbs–und Lebensverläufen und die Ungleichheit zwischen den Geschlechtern im Alterseinkommen,” in Winfried Schmähl und KlausMichaelis (eds.), Alterssicherung von Frauen. Leitbilder, gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Reformen.Wiesbaden:Westdeutscher, Verlag, 61–80.
6. Amenta, Edwin (2003). “WhatWe Know about the Development of Social Policy: Comparative and Historical Research in Comparative and Historical Perspective,” in James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–130.
7. Anderson Karen (2007). “The Netherlands: Political competition in a proportional system,” in Ellen M. Immergut, Karen M. Anderson, and Isabelle Schulze (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 713–57.
8. Anderson Karen and Ellen M. Immergut (2007). “Sweden: After Social Democratic Hegemony,” in Ellen M. Immergut, Karen M. Anderson and Isabelle Schulze (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 349–95.
9. Anderson, Karen and Julia Lynch (2007). “Reconsidering Seniority Bias: Ageing, Internal Institutions, and Union Support for Pension Reform,” Comparative Politics 39(2): 189–208.
10. Anderson, Karen M. and Traute Meyer (2003). “Social Democracy, Unions and Pension Politics in Germany and Sweden,” Journal of Public Policy 23(1): 23–54.
11. Anderson, Karen and Traute Meyer (2004). “The Third Way in Welfare State Reform? Social Democratic Pension Politics in Germany and Sweden,” in Giuliano Bonoli and Martin Powell (eds.), Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe. London: Routledge, 141–60.
12. Anderson, KarenM. and Traute Meyer (2006). “New Social Risks and Pension Reform in Germany and Sweden: The Politics of Pension Rights for Childcare,” in Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge, 171–91.
13. Anderson, Robert and Jocelyn A. J. Evans (2003). “Values, Cleavages and Party Choice in France 1988–1995,” French Politics 1: 83–114.
14. Armingeon, Klaus (1988). Die Entwicklung der westdeutschen Gewerkschaften 1950–1985. Frankfurt: Campus, Verlag.
15. Armingeon, Klaus (2001). “Institutionalising the Swiss Welfare State,” West European Politics 24(2), 145–68.
16. Armingeon, Klaus (2004). “Institutional Change in OECD Democracies, 1970–2000,” Comparative European Politics 2(2): 212–38.
17. Armingeon, Klaus (2006). “Reconciling Competing Claims of the Welfare State Clientele,” in Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge, 100–122.
18. Armingeon, Klaus, Fabio Bertozzi, and Giuliano Bonoli (2004). “Swiss Worlds of Welfare,” West European Politics 27(1): 20–44.
19. Armingeon, Klaus and Michelle Beyeler (2000). “Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft: Beitrittsmotive und Fragmentierungen,” in Klaus Armingeon and Simon Geissbühler (eds.), Gewerkschaften in der Schweiz. Herausforderungen und Optionen. Zurich: Seismo, 39–69.
20. Armingeon, Klaus and Giuliano Bonoli (2006). The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge.
21. Baccaro, Lucio (2002). “Negotiating the Italian Pension Reform with the Unions: Lessons for Corporatist Theory,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 55(3): 413–31.
22. Baldwin, Peter (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare States 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Ballestri, Yuri and Giuliano Bonoli (2003). “L’état social suisse face aux nouveaux risques sociaux: Genèse et déterminants de l’adoption du programme de subventions pour les crèches,” Swiss Political Science Review 9(3): 35–58.
24. Balthasar, Andreas, Oliver Bieri, Peter Grau, Kilian Küenzi, and Jürg Guggisberg (2003). Der Übergang in den Ruhestand–Wege, Einflussfaktoren und Konsequenzen. Bericht im Rahmen des Forschungsprogrammes zur längerfristigen Zukunft der Alterssicherung.Forschungsbericht, Nr. 2/03. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen. Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.
25. Bartolini, Stefano (2000). The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860-1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Baumgartner, Frank and Bryan D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Baumgartner, Frank and Bryan D. Jones (2002). Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Bertozzi, Fabio, Giuliano Bonoli, and Benoît Gay-des-Combes (2005). La réforme de l’état social en Suisse. Vieillissement, Employ, Conflict Travail-Famille. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires, Romandes.
29. Binswanger, Peter (1987). Histoire de l’AVS. Bern: Pro, Senectute.
30. Birchfield, Vicki and Markus M. L. Crepaz (1998). “The Impact of Constitutional Structures and Collective and Competitive Veto Points on Income Inequality in Industrialized Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research 34: 175–200.
31. Bleses, Peter and Martin Seeleib-Kaiser (2004). The Dual Transformation of the German Welfare State. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
32. Bonoli, Giuliano (1997). “Pension Politics in France: Patterns of Co-operation and Conflict in Two Recent Reforms,” West European Politics 20(4): 160–81.
33. Bonoli, Giuliano (1999). “La 10e révision de l’AVS: une politique consensuelle de retranchement?” in André Mach (ed.), Globalisation, néo-libéralisme et politiques publiques dans la Suisse des années 1990. Zurich, Seismo, 191–216.
34. Bonoli, Giuliano (2000). The Politics of Pension Reform: Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Bonoli, Giuliano (2001a). “The Institutionalization of the Swiss Multipillar System,” paper presented at the conference Political Economy of Pension Reform, Institute for Advanced Studies, Delmenhorst (Germany), May 3–5.
36. Bonoli, Giuliano (2001b). “Political Institutions, Veto Points, and the Process of Welfare State Adaptation,” in Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 238–264.
37. Bonoli, Giuliano (2004). “The Institutionalisation of the Swiss Multipillar Pension System,” in Martin Rein and Winfried Schmähl (eds.), The Political Economy of Pension Reform. London: Edward Elgar- 102–22.
38. Bonoli, Giuliano (2005a). “The Politics of the New Social Policies: Providing Coverage against New Social Risks in Mature Welfare States,” Policy and Politics 33(3): 431–49.
39. Bonoli, Giuliano (2005b). “Switzerland: Negotiating a New Welfare State in a Fragmented Political System,” in Peter Taylor-Gooby (ed.), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–180.
40. Bonoli, Giuliano (2006a) “Les politiques sociales,” in Ulrich Klöti, Peter Knoepfel, Hanspeter Kriesi, Wolf Linder, Yannis Papadopoulos, and Pascal Sciarini (eds.), Handbuch der Schweizer Politik, 4th ed. Zurich: NZZ, Verlag.
41. Bonoli, Giuliano (2006b). “New Social Risks and the Politics of Post-Industrial Social Policies,” in Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli (eds.), The Politics of Post- Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks. London: Routledge.
42. Bonoli, Giuliano (2007). “TimeMatters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced IndustrialDemocracies,” Comparative Political Studies 40(5): 495–520.
43. Bonoli, Giuliano, Vic George, and Peter Taylor-Gooby (2000). European Welfare Futures: Towards a Theory of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Polity Press.
44. Bonoli, Giuliano and Benoît Gay-des-Combes (2003). “Prospektive Simulation der Altersvorsorge vor dem Zeithorizont 2040,” Soziale Sicherheit CHSS 3: 125–7.
45. Bonoli, Giuliano and André Mach (2000). “Switzerland: Adjustment Politics within Institutional Constraints,” in Fritz W. Scharpf and Vivien A. Schmidt (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131–174.
46. Bonoli, Giuliano and Bruno Palier (1998). “Changing the Politics of Social Programmes: Innovative Change in British and FrenchWelfare Reforms,” Journal of European Social Policy 8(4): 317–30.
47. Bonoli, Giuliano and Bruno Palier (2000). “How Do Welfare States Change? Institutions and Their Impact on the Politics of Welfare State Reform,” European Review 8(2): 333–52.
48. Bonoli, Giuliano and Bruno Palier (2007).“WhenPastReforms OpenNewOpportunities: Comparing Old Age Insurance Reforms in Bismarckian Welfare Systems,” Social Policy and Administration 41(6): 555–73.
49. Bornschier, Simon (2005). “Unis dans l’opposition à la mondialisation? Une analyse de la convergence programmatique des partis populistes de droite en Europe,” Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée 12(4): 415–32.
50. Bornschier, Simon (2010). Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
51. Boyer, Robert (1990). The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
52. Branger, Katja (2000). Lebensbedingungen älterer Menschen in der Schweiz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Dimension Geschlecht.Discussion Document for the UnitedNations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Working Session on Gender Statistics, Orvieto, Italy, October 11–13.
53. Bridgen, Paul and Traute Meyer (2008). “Politically Dominant but Socially Flawed: Projected Pension Levels for Citizens at Risk in Six European Multi-Pillar Pension Systems,” in Martin Seeleib-Kaiser (ed.), Welfare State Transformations: Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, 111–131.
54. Bruhnes, Bernard (1992). Rapport sur les retraites. Paris: La Documentation française.
55. Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Eric Tanenbaum, Richard C. Fording, Derek J. Hearl, Hee Min Kim, Michael McDonals, and Silvia Mendez (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen (1995). Bericht des eidgenössischen Departementes des Innern zur heutigen Ausgestaltung und Weiterentwicklung der schweizerischen 3-Säulen- Konzeption der Alters-, Hinterlassenen–und Invalidenvorsorge. Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.
57. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen (2003). Statistik der Ergänzungsleistungen zur AHV und IV 2002. Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.
58. Bundesamt für Statistik (2001). Szenarien zur Bevölkerungsentwicklung der Schweiz 2000–2060. Neuchˆatel: Bundesamt für Statistik.
59. Bundesamt für Statistik (2003). Die schweizerische Altersvorsorge im Spiegel der Einkommens –und Verbrauchserhebung 1998. Neuchˆatel: Bundesamt für Statistik.
60. Bundesamt für Statistik (2004). Die berufliche Vorsorge in der Schweiz. Pensionskassenstatistik 2002. Neuchˆatel: Bundesamt für Statistik.
61. Bunel, Jean (1995) La transformation de la representation patronale en France, CNPF et CGPME. Paris: Commissariat General du Plan.
62. Busemeyer, Marius R. (2005). “Pension Reform in Germany and Austria: System Change vs. Quantitative Retrenchment,” West European Politics 28(3): 569–91.
63. Campbell, Andrea L. and Julia Lynch (2000). “Whose ‘Gray Power’? Elderly Voters, Elderly Lobbies, andWelfare Reform in Italy and the United States,” Italian Politics and Society 53: 11–39.
64. Castles, Francis G. (2004). The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Cattacin, Sandro, Matteo Gianni, Marcus Mänz, and Véronique Tattini (2002). Retour au Travail! Le Workfare comme Instrument de Réforme. Fribourg: Presses Universitaires de Fribourg.
66. Cattell, Raymond B. (1978). The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral Sciences. NewYork: Plenum.
67. Charpin, Jean-Michel, Catherine Zaidman and Jean-Marc Aubert (1999). L’avenir de nos retraites. Rapport au Premier ministre. Paris: La Documentation française.
68. Chulià, Elisa (2007). “Spain: Between Majority Rule and Incrementalism,” in Ellen M. Immergut, Karen M. Anderson, and Isabelle Schulze (eds.), The Handbook ofWest European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 499–554.
69. Clasen, Jochen and Daniel Clegg (2006). “Beyond Activation: Reforming European Unemployment Protection Systems in Post-Industrial Labour Markets,” European Societies 8 (4): 527–53.
70. Clayton, Richard and Jonas Pontusson (1998). “Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies,” World Politics 51 (October): 67–98.
71. Clegg, Daniel (2007). “Continental Drift: On Unemployment Policy Change in BismarckianWelfare States,” Social Policy and Administration 41(6): 597–617.
72. Commaille, Jacques, Pierre Strobel, and Michel Villac (2002). La politique de la famille. Paris: Editions la Découverte.
73. Commissariat général du Plan (1991). Rapport de la mission Retraites, Mission Cottave. Paris: La Documentation française.
74. CONSOC Recherche (2003). Situation économique des rentiers. Analyse introductive et générale dans la perspective d’une 13ème rente AVS. Report byValérie Legrand-Germanier and Stéphane Rossini for the Swiss Union of Trade Unions. Bern: CONSOC Recherche.
75. Cooke, Lynn Prince (2001). “Impact ofDualCareers onAverage Family Size:Comparison of 11 Countries,” Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 267. Luxembourg: Luxembourg Income Study.
76. Da Conceiçao-Heldt, Eugénia (2006). “France: The Importance of the Electoral Cycle,” in Ellen M. Immergut, Karen M. Anderson, and Isabelle Schulze (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 150–201.
77. Dafflon, Bernard (2003). La politique familiale en Suisse: enjeux et défis. Lausanne: Réalités Sociales.
78. Deitch, C. (2004). “Gender and Popular Support for the Welfare State: Cross-National Trends in a Period of Restructuring,” paper prepared at the International Sociological Association Research Committee 19 conference Welfare State Restructuring: Processes and Social Outcomes, Paris, September 2–4.
79. Dienel, Christiane (2002). Familienpolitik. Eine praxisorientierte Gesamtdarstellung der Handlungsfelder und Probleme. Weinheim: Juventa.
80. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Jelle Visser (2000). The Societies of Europe: Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945. New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.
81. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2001). “When Labour and Capital Collude: The Political Economy of Early Retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA,” in Bernhard Ebbinghaus and Philip Manow (eds.), ComparingWelfare Capitalism. Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the USA. London: Routledge, 76–101.
82. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2006a). “From Path Dependence to Path Departure in Welfare Reform Analysis,” European Politics and Society Newsletter 5(2): 1–4.
83. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2006b). “Trade Union Movements in Post-Industrial Welfare States:Opening Up to New Social Interests?” in Klaus Armingeon andGiuliano Bonoli (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Policies To New Social Risks. London: Routledge, 123–142.
84. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Philip Manow (2001). Comparing Welfare Capitalism. Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the USA. London: Routledge.
85. Eidgenössische Finanzkontrolle (2004). Berufliche Vorsorge. Evaluation der Besteuerung und Vorsorgewirkung von Kapitalzahlungen aus den Säulen 2 und 3a. Bern: Eidgenössische Finanzkontrolle.
86. Engeli, Isabelle and Silja Häusermann (2009). “Government Strategies for Successful Reforms in Controversial Policy Fields,” EUIWorking Paper SPS No. 2009/1. European University Institute, Florence.
87. Erikson, R. and J. H. Goldthorpe (1993). The Constant Flux. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88. Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
89. Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1996a). “After the Golden Age? Welfare State Dilemmas in a GlobalEconomy,” in Gösta Esping-Andersen (ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage, 1–32.
90. Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1996b). “Welfare States without Work: The Impasse of Labour Shedding and Familialism in Continental European Social Policy,” in Gösta Esping- Andersen (ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage: 66–87.
91. Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1999a). “Politics without Class? Post-Industrial Cleavages in Europe and America,” in Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John D. Stephens (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 293–316.
92. Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1999b). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. Esping-Andersen, Gösta and Marino Regini (2000). Why Deregulate Labor Markets? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94. Estevez-Abe, Margarita (2006). “Gendering the Varieties of Capitalism: A Study of Occupational Segregation by Sex in Advanced Industrial Societies,” World Politics 59 (1): 142–75.
95. Estevez-Abe, Margarita, Torben Iversen, and David Soskice (2001). “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State,” in Peter A. Hall and David Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press, 145–183.
96. Fagnani, Jeanne and Marie-Thérèse Letablier (2005). “La politique familiale française,” in M. Maruani (ed.), Femmes, genre et société, 167–75, Collection l’É tat des Savoirs. Paris: La Découverte.
97. Ferrera, Maurizio (1996). “The Southern Model ofWelfare in Social Europe,” Journal of European Social Policy 6(1): 17–37.
98. Ferrera, Maurizio and Elisabetta Gualmini (2000). “Italy. Rescue fromWithout?” in Fritz W. Scharpf and Vivien A. Schmidt (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 351–398.
99. Ferrera, Maurizio and Elisabetta Gualmini (2004). Rescued by Europe? Social and Labour Market Reforms in Italy from Maastricht to Berlusconi. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
100. Ferrera, Maurizio, Anton Hemerijck, and Martin Rhodes (2004). The Future of European Welfare States: Recasting Welfare for a New Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
101. Ferrera, Maurizio and Matteo Jessoula (2007). “Italy: A Narrow Gate for Path-Shift,” in Ellen M. Immergut, Karen M. Anderson, and Isabelle Schulze (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 396–453.
102. Finlayson, Ann (1988). Whose Money Is It Anyway? The Showdown on Pensions. Markham: Penguin.
103. Flora, Peter and Jens Alber (1981). “Modernization, Democratization and the Development of Welfare States inWestern Europe,” in Peter Flora and Arnold Heidenheimer (eds.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
104. Fluder, Robert (1996). Interessenorganisationen und kollektive Arbeitsbeziehungen im öffentlichen Dienst der Schweiz: Entstehung, Mitgliedschaft, Organisation und Politik seit 1940. Zurich, Seismo.
105. Fluder, Robert, H. Ruf, W. Schöni, and M. Wicki (1991). Gewerkschaften und Angestelltenverb ände in der schweizerischen Privatwirtschaft: Entstehung, Mitgliedschaft, Organisation und Politik seit 1940. Zurich: Seismo.
106. Frey, Tim (2009). Die Christdemokratie in Westeuropa–Der schmale Grat zum Erfolg. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
107. Fuchs, Johann (2003). “Fachkräftemangel und demographischer Wandel. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Aktivierung heimischer Personalreserven,” in Seminar für Handwerkswesen an der Universität Göttingen (ed.), Fachkräftesicherung im Handwerk vor dem Hintergrund struktureller Wandlungen der Arbeitsmärkte. Dauderstadt: Mecke, 83–117.
108. Gees, Thomas (2004). “Successful as a ‘Go-between’: The Conservative People’s Party in Switzerland,” in Michael Gehler and Wolfram Kaiser (eds.), Christian Democracy in Europe since 1945. London: Routledge, 38–53.
109. Gerlach, Irene (2005). Familienpolitik. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
110. Gilliand, Pierre (1993). “Politique sociale,” in G. Schmidt (ed.), Handbuch Politisches System der Schweiz. Band 4. Politikbereiche. Bern: Haupt.
111. Gorsuch, Richard L. (1983). Factor Analysis, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
112. Gourevitch, Peter (1986). Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
113. Grunberg, Gérard (2006). “The French Party System and the Crisis of Representation,” in Pepper D. Culpepper, Peter A. Hall, and Bruno Palier (eds.), Changing France: The Politics That Markets Make. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 223–43.
114. Guillén, Ana (2010). “Defrosting the SpanishWelfare State: TheWeight of Conservative and Corporatist Traditions,” in Bruno Palier (ed.), A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics ofWelfare Reforms in Continental European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
115. Hacker, Jacob S. (1998). “The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development ofBritish, Canadian and U.S. Medical Policy,” Studies in American Political Development 12(1): 57–130.
116. Hacker, Jacob S. (2002). The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
117. Hacker, Jacob S. (2004). “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States,” American Political Science Review 98(2): 243–60.
118. Hacker, Jacob S. (2005). “PolicyDrift: TheHidden Politics ofUSWelfare StateRetrenchment,” in Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40–82.
119. Hall, Peter A. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
120. Hall, Peter A. (1993). “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain,” Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–96.
121. Hall, Peter A. (2006). “Introduction: The Politics of Social Change in France,” in Pepper D. Culpepper, Peter A. Hall, and Bruno Palier (eds.), Changing France: The Politics That Markets Make. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–28.
122. Hall, Peter A. and David Soskice (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
123. Hassenteufel, Patrick and Bruno Palier (2007). “Towards Neo-Bismarckian Health Care States? Comparing Health Insurance Reforms in BismarckianWelfare Systems,” Social Policy and Administration 41(6): 574–96.
124. Häusermann, Silja (2002). Flexibilisation des relations d’emploi et sécurité sociale. La réforme de la loi suisse sur la prévoyance professionnelle. Unpublished manuscript. Lausanne: Idheap.
125. Häusermann, Silja (2006). “Changing Coalitions in Social Policy Reforms: The Politics of New Social Needs and Demands,” Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 5–21.
126. Häusermann, Silja (2006b). “Different Paths of Family PolicyModernization in ContinentalWelfare States: Changing Dynamics of Reform in German and Swiss family policies since the mid-70s,” paper presented at the annual conference of the Swiss Political Science Association, Balsthal, November 2–3.
127. Häusermann, Silja (2008). “What Explains the “Unfreezing” of Continental European Welfare States?” paper presented at the annual conference of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 28–31.
128. Häusermann, Silja (2009). “Policy Flexibility vs. Policy Inertia: Coalitional Dynamics in German Pension Reform,” in Giliberto Capano and Michael Howlett (eds.), European and American Experiences in Policy Change: Policy Drivers and Policy Dynamics. London: Routledge, 43–67.
129. Häusermann, Silja (2010a). “Reform Opportunities in a Bismarckian Latecomer: Restructuring the Swiss Welfare State,” in Bruno Palier (ed.), A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics ofWelfare Reforms in Continental European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
130. Häusermann, Silja (2010b). “Solidarity with Whom? Why Organized Labor Is Losing Ground in Continental Pension Politics,” European Journal of Political Research.
131. Häusermann, Silja, André Mach, and Yannis Papadopoulos (2004). “From Corporatism to Partisan Politics: Social Policy Making under Strain in Switzerland,” Swiss Political Science Review 10(2): 33–59.
132. Häusermann, Silja and Hanna Schwander (2009). “Identifying Outsiders across Countries: Similarities andDifferences in Patterns ofDualisation,” RecwoweWorking Paper No. 09/09.
133. Heclo, Hugh (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
134. Hemerijck, Anton and Ive Marx (2010). “Redirecting Continental Welfare in Belgium and the Netherlands,” in Bruno Palier (ed.), A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
135. Hemerijck, Anton, Brigitte Unger, and Jelle Visser (2000). “How Small Countries Negotiate Change: Twenty-Five Years of Policy Adjustment in Austria, the Netherlands and Belgium,” in Fritz W. Scharpf and Vivien A. Schmidt (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–263.
136. Hering, Martin (2004a). Rough Transition: Institutional Change in Germany’s “Frozen” Welfare State. Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
137. Hering, Martin (2004b). “Turning Ideas into Policies: Implementing Modern Social Democratic Thinking in Germany’s Pension Policy,” in Giuliano Bonoli and Martin Powell (eds.), Social Democratic Party Policies inContemporary Europe. London:Routledge, 102–22.
138. Hinrichs, Karl (2000). “Auf demWeg zurAlterssicherungspolitik–Reformperspektiven in der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung,” in Stephan Leibfried and Uwe Wagschal (eds.), Der deutsche Sozialstaat. Bilanzen–Reformen–Perspektiven. Schriften des Zentrums für Sozialpolitik, Bd. 10, Bremen, 276–305.
139. Hinrichs, Karl (2005). “New Century–New Paradigm: Pension Reforms in Germany,” in Toshimitsu Shinkawa and Giuliano Bonoli (eds.), Ageing and Pension Reform around the World: Evidence from Eleven Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 47–73.
140. Hiscox, Michael J. (2001). “Class versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry FactorMobility and the Politics of Trade,” International Organization 55(1): 1–46.
141. Huber, Evelyne, Charles Ragin, and John D. Stephens (1993). “Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State,” American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 711–49.
142. Huber, Evelyne and John D. Stephens (1998). “Internationalization and the Social Democratic Model: Crisis and Future Prospects,” Comparative Political Studies 31(3): 353–97.
143. Huber, Evelyne and John D. Stephens (2001). Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
144. Huber, Evelyne and John D. Stephens (2006). “Combating Old and New Social Risks,” in Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge, 143–67.
145. IDA FiSo 1 (1996). Interdepartementale Arbeitsgruppe “Finanzierungsperspektiven der Sozialversicherungen”: Berichtüber die Finanzierungsperspektiven der Sozialversicherungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der demographischen Entwicklung. Bern: Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen.
146. IDA FiSo 2 (1997). Interdepartementale Arbeitsgruppe “Finanzierungsperspektiven der Sozialversicherungen”: Analyse der Leistungen der Sozialversicherungen; Konkretisierung möglicher Veränderungen für drei Finanzierungsperspektiven. Bern: Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen.
147. Immergut, Ellen M. (1992). Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
148. Immergut, EllenM. and KarenM. Anderson (2006). “Editor’s Introduction:The Dynamics of Pension Politics,” in Ellen M. Immergut, Karen M. Anderson, and Isabelle Schulze (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–47.
149. Inglehart, Ronald (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
150. Inglehart, Ronald and Pippa Norris (2000). “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’sVoting Behavior in Global Perspective,” International Political Science Review, 21(4): 441–63.
151. Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Bern (1970-2003). Année politique suisse. Bern: Universität Bern.
152. International Social Survey Program (1996). ISSP: Role of Government III, 1996 (ZACAT computer file). Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung (producer) and Mannheim, Germany: GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.
153. Iversen, Torben, Thomas Cusack, and Philipp Rehm (2006). “Risks atWork: The Demand and Supply Sides ofGovernment Redistribution,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(3): 365–89.
154. Iversen, Torben and Frances Rosenbluth (2006). “The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap,” American Journal of Political Science 50: 1–19.
155. Iversen, Torben and David Soskice (2001). “AnAssetTheory of SocialPolicyPreferences,” American Political Science Review 95(4): 875–93.
156. Iversen, Torben and David Soskice (2006). “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies RedistributeMore Than Others,” American Political Science Review, 100(2): 165–181.
157. Iversen, Torben and Anne Wren (1998). “Equality, Employment and BudgetaryRestraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy,” World Politics 50(July): 507–46.
158. Jacobs, Alan M. (2004). Governing for the Long Term: Democratic Politics and Policy Investment. Cambridge, MA: Department of Government, Harvard University.
159. Jaumotte, Florence (2003). “Female Labour Force Participation: Past Trends and Main Determinants in OECD Countries,” OECD Economics Department Working Papers ECO/WKP(2003)30, No. 376.
160. Jegher, Annina (1999). Bundesversammlung und Gesetzgebung. Bern: Haupt.
161. Jenson, Jane and Mariette Sineau (1994). “François Mitterrand and French Women: Un rendez-vous manqué,” French Politics and Society 12(4): 35–52.
162. Jenson, Jane and Mariette Sineau (2001). Who Cares?Women’s Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
163. Katzenstein, Peter J. (1987). Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
164. Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985). Small States inWorld Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
165. Kirchheimer, Otto (1966). “The Transformation of theWestern European Party Systems,” in Joseph La Palombara and Myron Weiner (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 177–200.
166. Kitschelt, Herbert (1994). The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
167. Kitschelt, Herbert (1997). The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
168. Kitschelt, Herbert (2001). “PartisanCompetition andWelfare StateRetrenchment:When Do Politicians Choose Unpopular Policies?,” in Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 265–302.
169. Kitschelt, Herbert (2003). “Political-Economic Context and Partisan Strategies in the German Federal Elections 1990–2002,” West European Politics 26(4): 125–52.
170. Kitschelt, Herbert and Philip Rehm (2005). “Work, Family and Politics: Foundations of Electoral PartisanAlignments in PostindustrialDemocracies,” paper prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September 1–4.
171. Kitschelt, Herbert and Philip Rehm (2006). “New Social Risk and Political Preferences,” in Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli (eds.), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Policies to New Social Risks. London: Routledge, 52–82.
172. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wolfgang Streeck (2003). “From Stability to Stagnation: Germany at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century,” West European Politics 26(4): 1–34.
173. Knight, Jack (1999). Explaining the Rise of Neo-Liberalism: The Mechanisms of Institutional Change. Unpublished manuscript, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
174. Kolinsky, Eva (1993). “Party Change andWomen’s Representation in UnifiedGermany,” in Joni Lovendusky and Pippa Norris (eds.), Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage, 113–46.
175. Korpi, Walter (1983). The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routeledge and Kegan.
176. Korpi, Walter and Joakim Palme (2003). “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization:Welfare StateRegress in 18 Countries. 1975–95,” American Political Science Review 97(3): 425–46.
177. Kriesi, Hanspeter (1980). Entscheidungsstrukturen und Entscheidungsprozesse in der Schweizer Politik. Frankfurt: Campus, Verlag.
178. Kriesi, Hanspeter (1986). “Einleitung,” in Peter Farago and Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.), Wirtschaftsverbände in der Schweiz. Organisation und Aktivitäten vonWirtschaftsverbänden in vier Sektoren der Industrie. Grüsch: Rüegger, 1–18.
179. Kriesi, Hanspeter (1998a). Le système politique suisse. Paris: Economica.
180. Kriesi, Hanspeter (1998b). “The Transformation of Cleavage Politics: The 1997 Stein Rokkan Lecture,” European Journal of Political Research 33(2): 165–88.
181. Kriesi, Hanspeter (1999). “Movements of the Left, Movements of the Right: Putting the Mobilization of Two New Types of Social Movements into Political Context,” in Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John D. Stephens (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 398–423.
182. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey (2006). “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared,” European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 1–36.
183. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheus Frey (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
184. Kuhnle, Stein (2000). Survival of the European Welfare State. London: Routledge.
185. Künzi, Kilian and Markus Schärrer (2004). Wer zahlt für die Soziale Sicherheit und wer profitiert davon? Eine Analyse der Sozialtransfers in der Schweiz. Zurich: Rüegger.
186. Laver, Michael and W. Ben Hunt (1992). Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.
187. Laver, Michael and Norman Schofield (1990). Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
188. Lehmbruch, Gerhard (2000). Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat. Regelsysteme und Spannungslagen im politischen System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag.
189. Leibfried, Stephan and Herbert Obinger (2003). “The State of the Welfare State:German Social Policy between Macroeconomic Retrenchment and Microeconomic Recalibration”, West European Politics 26(4): 199–218.
190. Leimgruber, Matthieu (2008). Solidarity without the State? Business and the Shaping of the Swiss Welfare State, 1890–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
191. Leitner, Sigrid and Herbert Obinger (1996). “Feminisierung der Armut im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Eine strukturelle Analyse weiblicher Armut am Beispiel der Alterssicherung in österreich und in der Schweiz,” Swiss Political Science Review 2(4): 1–35.
192. Leitner, Sigrid, Ilona Ostner, and Margrit Schratzenstaller (2004). Wohlfahrtsstaat und Geschlechterverhältnis im Umbruch. Was kommt nach dem Ernährermodell? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
193. Lepperhoff, Julia, Traute Meyer, and Barbara Riedmüller (2001). “Zur Alterssicherung der Frau in Deutschland und in der Schweiz,” Leviathan 29(2): 199–217.
194. Leu, Robert E., Stefan Burri, and Tom Priester (1997). Lebensqualität und Armut in der Schweiz. Bern: Haupt.
195. Leuzinger-Naef, Susanne (1998). “Flexibilisierte Arbeitsverhältnisse im Sozialversicherungsrecht,” Soziale Sicherheit 3: 125–43.
196. Levy, Jonah (1999). “Vice into Virtue? Progressive Politics and Welfare Reform in Continental Europe,” Politics and Society 27(2): 239–73.
197. Levy, Jonah (2000). “France: Directing Adjustment?” in Fritz W. Scharpf and Vivien Schmidt (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 308–50.
198. Lewis, Jane (1992). “Gender and the Development ofWelfare Regimes,” Journal of European Social Policy 2(3): 159–73.
199. Lewis, Jane (1993). Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
200. Lijphart, Arend (1999). Patterns ofDemocracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty- Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
201. Lipset, Seymour M. and Stein Rokkan (1985). “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments,” in Seymour M. Lipset (ed.), Consensus and Conflict. Essays in Political Sociology, 113–85. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
202. Lister, Ruth (2004). “The Third Way’s Social Investment State,” in Jane Lewis and Rebecca Surender (eds.), Welfare State Change: Towards a Third Way? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–82.
203. Luchsinger, Christine (1995). Solidarität, Selbständigkeit, Bedürftigkeit. Der schwierige Weg zu einer Gleichberechtigung der Geschlechter in der AHV 1939–1980. Zurich: Chronos.
204. Mach, André (2006). La Suisse entre internationalisation et changements politiques internes. La législation sur les cartels et les relations industrielles dans les années 1990. Zurich: Rüegger.
205. Mach, André and Daniel Oesch (2003). “Collective Bargaining between Decentralization and Stability: A Sectoral Model Explaining the Swiss Experience during the 1990s,” Industrielle Beziehungen 10(4): 160–82.
206. Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen (2010). “A Theory of Gradual Instituitional Change,” in James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–37.
207. Manow, Philip (2001). “Comparative Institutional Advantages of Welfare State Regimes and New Coalitions inWelfare State Reforms,” in Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 146–64.
208. Manow, Philip (2002). “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Esping-Andersens Sozialstaats- Typologie und die konfessionellenWurzeln des westlichenWohlfahrtsstaates,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 54(2): 203–25.
209. Manow, Philip (2002). Social Protection, Capitalist Production. The BismarckianWelfare State and the German Political Economy from the 1880s to the 1990s. Habilitationsschrift, Universit ät Konstanz.
210. Manow, Philip and Simone Burkhart (2004). “ Legislative Autolimitation under Divided Government–Evidence from the German Case 1976–2002,” Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung (MPIfG) Discussion Paper 04/11. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
211. Manow, Philip and Eric Seils (2000). “Adjusting Badly:The German Welfare State, Structural Change, and the Open Economy,” in Fritz W. Scharpf and Vivien A. Schmidt (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 264–307.
212. Mares, Isabela (2000). “Strategic Alliances and Social Policy Reform: Unemployment Insurance in Comparative Perspective,” Politics and Society 28(2): 223–44.
213. Mares, Isabela (2001a). “Enterprise Reorganisation and Social Insurance Reform: The Development of Early Retirement in France and Germany,” Governance 14(3): 295–317.
214. Mares, Isabela (2001b). “Firms and theWelfare State: When, Why and How Does Social Policy Matter to Employers?” in Peter A. Hall and David Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 184–212.
215. Mares, Isabela (2003a). The Politics of Social Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
216. Mares, Isabela (2003b). “The Sources of Business Interests in Social Insurance: Sectoral versus National Differences,” World Politics 55(2): 229–58.
217. Marques-Pereirea, Bérengère and Olivier Paye (2001). “Belgium: The Vices and Virtues of Pragmatism,” in Jane Jenson and Mariette Sineau (eds.), Who Cares? Women’s Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 56–87.
218. Martin, Cathie Jo (1995). “Nature or Nurture? Sources of Firm Preferences for National Health Reform,” American Political Science Review 89: 898–913.
219. Martin, Cathie Jo (1997). “Mandating Social Change: the Business Struggle over National Health Reform,” Governance 10(4): 397–428.
220. Meyer, Traute (1998). “Retrenchment, Reproduction, Modernization: Pension Politics and the Decline of the German Breadwinner Model,” Journal of European Social Policy 8(3): 212–27.
221. Morgan, Kimberly (2006). Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work-Family Policies in Western Europe and the United States. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
222. Mühlberger, Ulrike (2000). Neue Formen der Beschäftigung. Arbeitsflexibilisierung durch atypische Beschäftigung in österreich. Vienna: Braumüller.
223. Müller Hans-Peter and Manfred Wilke (2003). “Gewerkschaftsfusionen: Der Weg zu modernen Multibranchengewerkschaften,” in Wolfgang Schroeder and Bernhard Wessels (eds.), Die Gewerkschaften in Politik und Gesellschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden. Westdeutscher Verlag, 122–43.
224. Myles, John (1984). Old Age in the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Public Pensions. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
225. Myles, John and Paul Pierson (1997). “Friedman’s Revenge: The Reform of ‘Liberal’ Welfare States in Canada and the United States,” Politics and Society 25: 443–72.
226. Myles, John and Paul Pierson (2001). “The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform,” in Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 305–33.
227. Natali, David (2003). “The Role of Trade Unions in the Pension Reforms in France and Italy in the 1990s: New Forms of Political Exchange?” European University Institute Working Paper SPS, No. 2003/3. Florence: European University Institute.
228. Natali, David and Martin Rhodes (2004). “The ‘New Politics’ of the Bismarckian Welfare State: Pension Reforms in Continental Europe,” European University Institute Working Paper SPS, No. 2004/10. Florence: European University Institute.
229. Natali, David and Martin Rhodes (2008). “The ‘New Politics’ of Pension Reforms in Continental Europe,” in Camila Arza and Martin Kohli (eds.), Pension Reform in Europe. London: Routledge, 55–75.
230. Naumann, Ingela (2005). “Child Care and Feminism in West Germany and Sweden in the 1960s and 1970s,” Journal of European Social Policy 15(1): 47–63.
231. Neidhart, Leonhard (1970). Plebiszit und pluralitäreDemokratie. Eine Analyse der Funktionen des schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums. Bern: Francke.
232. Neuhold, Christine (1999). “Atypische Beschäftigung in Deutschland und Frankreich,” in Emmerich Talos (ed.), Atypische Beschäftigung. Internationale Trends und sozialstaatliche Regelungen. Vienna: Manz, 36–81.
233. Nova, Colette and Silja Häusermann (2005). Endlich existenzsichernde Renten. Erste Säule stärken–3000 Franken Rente für alle.Dossier 34, Bern: SchweizerischerGewerkschaftsbund.
234. Nullmeier, Frank and Friedbert W. Rüb (1993). Die Transformation der Sozialpolitik. Vom Sozialstaat zum Sicherungsstaat. Frankfurt: Campus.
235. Obinger, Herbert (1998). Politische Institutionen und Sozialpolitik in der Schweiz. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
236. O’Connor, Julia (1993). “Gender, Class and Citizenship in the Comparative Analysis of Welfare State Regimes: Theoretical and Methodological Issues,” British Journal of Sociology 44(3): 501–18.
237. Oesch, Daniel (2005). “Remodelling Class to Make Sense of Party Support: Class Voting in Britain, Germany and Switzerland,” paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, September 8-10, Budapest.
238. Oesch, Daniel (2006). Redrawing the Class Map: Stratification and Institutions in Germany, Britain, Sweden and Switzerland. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
239. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies across OECD Countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
240. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies across OECD Countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
241. Orloff, A. S. (2006). “From Maternalism to ‘Employment forAll’: StatePolicies toPromote Women’s Employment across the AffluentDemocracies,” in Jonah Levy (ed.), The State after Statism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 230–68.
242. Orloff, Ann Shola (1993). “Gender and the Social Rights ofCitizenship: TheComparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States,” American Sociological Review 58(3): 303–28.
243. Orloff, Ann Shola (1996). “Gender in the Welfare State,” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 51–78.
244. Orloff, Ann Shola and Theda Skocpol (1984). “Why Not Equal Protection? Explaining the Politics of Public Social Welfare in Britain and the United States, 1880s–1920s,” American Sociological Review 49: 726–50.
245. Palier, Bruno (2002). Gouverner la sécurité sociale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
246. Palier, Bruno (2003a). La réforme des retraites. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
247. Palier, Bruno (2003b). “Facing the Pension Crisis in France,” in Noel Whiteside and Gordon Clarke (eds.), Pension Security in the 21st Century: Redrawing the Public-Private Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–114.
248. Palier, Bruno (2005). “Ambiguous Agreement, Cumulative Change: French Social Policy in the 1990s,” in Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127–44.
249. Palier, Bruno (2006). “The Long Good Bye to Bismarck? Changes in the French Welfare State,” in Pepper D.Culpepper, Peter A. Hall, and Bruno Palier (eds.), Changing France: The Politics That Markets Make. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 107–28.
250. Palier, Bruno and Christelle Mandin (2004). “France: A New World of Welfare for New Social Risks?” in Peter Taylor-Gooby (ed.), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 111–31.
251. Palier, Bruno and Claude Martin (2007). “From a ‘Frozen Landscape’ to Structural Reforms: The Sequential Transformation of BismarckianWelfare Systems,” Social Policy and Administration 41(6): 535–54.
252. Palier, Bruno (2010). A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
253. Peacock, Alan R. and Jack Wiseman (1961). The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
254. Pfenning, Astrid and Thomas Bahle (eds) (2000). Families and Family Policies in Europe: Comparative Perspectives. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
255. Pierson, Paul (1996). “TheNewPolitics of the Welfare State,” World Politics 48(2): 143–79.
256. Pierson, Paul (2000a). “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–67.
257. Pierson, Paul (2000b). “Not Just What, but When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes,” Studies in American Political Development 14(1): 73–93.
258. Pierson, Paul (2000c). “Three Worlds of Welfare State Research,” Comparative Political Studies 33 (6-7): 791–821.
259. Pierson, Paul (2001). “Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies,” in Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 410–56.
260. Pierson, Paul (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
261. Poitry, Alain-Valéry (1989). La fonction d’ordre de l’Etat. Analyse des mécanismes et des déterminants sélectifs dans le processus législatif suisse. Bern: Lang.
262. Pontusson, Jonas and Peter Swenson (1996). “Labor Markets, Production Strategies and Wage Bargaining Institutions: The Swedish Employer Offensive in Comparative Perspective,” Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 223–50.
263. Powell, Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments ofDemocracy:Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
264. Queisser, Monika and Dimitri Vittas (2000). The Swiss Multi-Pillar Pension System: Triumph of Common Sense? Development Research Group, Washington: World Bank.
265. Rabinowitz, George and Stuart E. Macdonald (1989). “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting,” American Political Science Review 83(1): 93–121.
266. Rechsteiner, Rudolf (2002). Flexibilität und soziale Sicherung in der Schweiz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Alterssicherung. Basel: Selbstverlag.
267. Reinberg, Alexander and Markus Hummel (2003). “Steuert Deutschland langfristig auf einen Fachkräftemangel zu?” Institut für Arbeitsmarkt–und Berufsforschung der Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung Kurzbericht, 9, Nürnberg, 1–8.
268. Rhodes, Martin (2001). “The Political Economy of Social Pacts: ‘Competitive Corporatism’ and European Welfare Reform,” in Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–94.
269. Rhodes, Martin and David Natali (2004). “Trade-Offs and Veto Players: Reforming Pensions in France and Italy,” French Politics 2(1): 1–23.
270. Riedmüller, Barbara (2000). “Frauen–und familienpolitische Leitbilder im deutschen Alterssicherungssystem,” in Winfried Schmähl und Klaus Michaelis (eds.), Alterssicherung von Frauen–Leitbilder, gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Reformen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag, 36–45.
271. Riker, William H. (1986). The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
272. Riker, William H. (1987). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
273. Rokeach, Milton (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
274. Rueda, David (2005). “Insider-Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties,” American Political Science Review 99(1): 61–74.
275. Rueda, David (2006). Social Democracy Inside Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
276. Rusciano, Frank Louis (1992). “Rethinking the Gender Gap: The Case of West German Elections, 1949–1987,” Comparative Politics 24(3): 335–57.
277. Sabatier, Paul A. and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO:Westview.
278. Sainsbury, Diane (1994). “Women’s and Men’s Social Rights: Gendering Dimensions of Welfare States,” in D. Sainbury (ed.), Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage, 150–169.
279. Scharpf, FritzW. (2000). “The Viability of AdvancedWelfare States in the International Economy: Vulnerabilities and Options,” Journal of European Public Policy 7(2): 190–228.
280. Scharpf, Fritz W. and Vivien A. Schmidt (2000). Welfare and Work in the Open Economy: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
281. Schickler, Eric (2001). Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
282. Schludi, Martin (2005). The Reform of Bismarckian Pension Systems: A Comparison of Pension Politics in Austria, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
283. Schludi, Martin (2008). “Between Conflict and Consensus: The Reform of Bismarckian Pension Regimes,” in Camila Arza and Martin Kohli (eds.), Pension Reform in Europe. London: Routledge, 76–99.
284. Schluep, Kurt (2003). Finanzierungsbedarf in der AHV (inkl. EL). Forschungsbericht, Nr. 10/03. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen, Bern: Beiträge zur Sozialen, Sicherheit.
285. Schmähl, Winfried (1997). “The Public-Private Mix in Pension Provision in Germany,” in Martin Rein and EskilWadensj ö (eds.), Enterprise and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 99–148.
286. Schmähl, Winfried (2000). “Alterssicherung von Frauen im Prozessökonomischen, gesellschaftlichen und politischen Wandels,” in Winfried Schmähl and KlausMichaelis (eds.), Alterssicherung von Frauen–Leitbilder, gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Reformen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag, 9–35.
287. Schmähl, Winfried and Klaus Michaelis (2000). Alterssicherung von Frauen–Leitbilder, gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Reformen. Wiesbaden:Westdeutscher, Verlag.
288. Schmidt, Manfred (1998). Sozialpolitik in Deutschland. Historische Entwicklung und internationaler Vergleich. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
289. Schmidt, Manfred G. (2000). “Immer noch auf dem “mittleren Weg”? Deutschlands Politische ökonomie am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts,” in Roland Czada und Hellmut Wollmann (eds.), Von der Bonner zur Berliner Republik. 10 Jahre deutsche Einheit. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher, Verlag, 491–514.
290. Schmidt, Vivien (1999). “The Changing Dynamics of State-Society Relations in the Fifth Republic,” West European Politics 22(4): 141–65.
291. Schmitter, Philippe C. (1979). “Still the Century of Corporatism?” in Philippe C. Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch (eds.), Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, 7–48. London: Sage.
292. Schmitter, Philippe C. and Wolfgang Streeck (1981). “The Organization of Business Interests: A Research Design,” rev. discussion paper IIMV/LMP 81–13. Berlin, Wissenschaftszentrum.
293. Schroeder, Wolfgang and Stephen J. Silvia (2003). “Gewerkschaften und Arbeitgeberverb ände,” in Wolfgang Schroeder and Bernhard Wessels (eds.), Die Gewerkschaften in Politik und Gesellschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden. Westdeutscher, Verlag, 246–72.
294. Schroeder, Wolfgang and Bernhard Wessels (2003). “Das deutsche Gewerkschaftsmodell im Transformationsprozess: Die neue deutscheGewerkschaftslandschaft,” in Wolfgang Schroeder and Bernhard Wessels (eds.), Die Gewerkschaften in Politik und Gesellschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden:Westdeutscher, Verlag, 11–40.
295. Schulze, Isabelle (2007). Der Einfluss von Wahlsystemen auf Politikinhalte. Electoral Threat in der Rentenpolitik. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
296. Schulze, Isabelle and Sven Jochem (2007). “Germany: Beyond Policy Gridlock,” in Ellen M. Immergut, Karen M. Anderson, and Isabelle Schulze (eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 660–712.
297. Schulze, Isabelle and Martin Schludi (2007). “ Austria: From Electoral Cartels to Competitive Coalition-Building,” in Ellen M. Immergut, Karen M. Anderson, and Isabelle Schulze (eds.), The Handbook ofWest European Pension Politics. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 555–604.
298. Schwartz, Herman (2001). “Round Up the Usual Suspects! Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Welfare State Change,” in Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–44.
299. Sciarini, Pascal (1999). “La formulation de la décision,” in U. Klöti, Peter Knoepfel, HanspeterKriesi, Wolf Linder, and Yannis Papadopoulos (eds.), Handbuch der Schweizer Politik. Zurich: NZZ, Verlag, 491–528.
300. Sciarini, Pascal, Sarah Nicolet, andAlex Fischer (2002). “L’impact de l’internationalisation sur les processus de décision en Suisse: Une analyse quantitative des actes législatifs 1995–1999,” Swiss Political Science Review 8(3-4): 1–34.
301. Scott, J. (1992). Social Network Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
302. Senti, Martin (1994). Geschlecht als politischer Konflikt. Erfolgsbedingungen einer gleichstellungspolitischen Interessendurchsetzung. Bern: Haupt.
303. SGK-N (2002). Bericht der Kommission für soziale Sicherheit und Gesundheit (SGK-N)über den Vorsorgeschutz für Teilzeitbeschäftigte und Personen mit kleinen Einkommen,über die Anpassung des Umwandlungssatzes undüber die paritätische Verwaltung der Vorsorgeeinrichtungen, March. Bern: Vereinigte Bundesversammlung.
304. Shepsle, Kenneth A. (1979). “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models,” American Journal of Political Science 23(1): 27–59.
305. Siegel, Nico and Sven Jochem (2003). Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Das Modell Deutschland im Vergleich. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
306. Skocpol, Theda (1992). Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
307. Stephens, John D. (1979). The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.
308. Stephens, John D., Evelyne Huber and Leonard Ray (1999). “The Welfare State in Hard Times,” in Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John D. Stephens (eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–193.
309. Streeck, Wolfgang (1991). “On the Institutional Conditions of Diversified Quality Production”, in Egon Matzner and Wolfgang Streeck (eds.), Beyond Keynesianism: The Socio-Economics of Production and Employment. London: Edward Elgar, 21–61.
310. Streeck, Wolfgang and Kathleen Thelen (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
311. Suter, Christian and Marie-Claire Mathey (2000). “Wirksamkeit und Umverteilungseffekte staatlicher Sozialleistungen,” Info:social 3, 1–80.
312. Swank, Duane and Cathie Jo Martin (2001). “Employers and the Welfare State: The Political Economic Organization of Firms and Social Policy inContemporaryCapitalist Democracies,” Comparative Political Studies 34(8): 889–923.
313. Swenson, Peter A. (1991a). “BringingCapital Back In, or SocialDemocracy Reconsidered: Employer Power, Cross-Class Alliances, and Centralization of Industrial Relations in Denmark and Sweden,” World Politics 43(4): 513–44.
314. Swenson, Peter A. (1991b). “Labor and the Limits of the Welfare State: The Politics of Intraclass Conflict and Cross-Class Alliances in Sweden andWest Germany,” Comparative Politics 24(2): 379–99.
315. Swenson, Peter A. (2002). Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. New York: Oxford University Press.
316. Tabah, Léon (1986). Vieillir solidaires. Rapport du Commissariat général du Plan. Paris: La Documentation française.
317. Taddei, Dominique, Jean-Michel Charpin and Olivier Davanne (1999). Retraites choisies et progressives. Paris: Conseil d’analyse économique.
318. Talos, Emmerich (ed.) (1999). Atypische Beschäftigung. Internationale Trends und sozialstaatliche Regelungen. Vienna: Manz, Verlag.
319. Taylor-Gooby, Peter (2005). New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
320. Teulade, René (1989). Rapport de la Commission protection sociale. Paris: La Documentation française.
321. Teulade, René (1999). L’avenir de nos systèmes de retraite. Paris: Conseil économique et social, Direction des journaux officiels.
322. Thelen, Kathleen (2001). “Varieties of Labor Politics inDevelopedDemocracies,” in Peter A. Hall and David Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 71–103.
323. Thelen, Kathleen (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
324. Titmuss, Richard (1958). Essays on the Welfare State. London: Allen and Unwin.
325. Trampusch, Christine (2004). “Von Verbänden zu Parteien. Der Elitenwechsel in der Sozialpolitik,” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 35(4): 646–66.
326. Trampusch, Christine (2005). “Institutional Resettlement: The Case of Early Retirement in Germany,” in Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, 203–28.
327. Trechsel, Alexandre H. and Pascal Sciarini (1998). “Direct Democracy in Switzerland: Do Elites Matter?” European Journal of Political Research 38(1): 99–124.
328. Tsebelis, George (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
329. Vail, Mark I. (1999). “The Better Part of Valour:The Politics of FrenchWelfare Reform,” Journal of European Social Policy 9(4): 311–30.
330. Vail, Mark I. (2004). “The Myth of the Frozen Welfare State and the Dynamics of Contemporary French and German Social-Protection Reform,” French Politics 2: 151–83.
331. Vallat, Jean-Philippe (2002). La politique familiale en France (1945–2001). Construction des intérˆets sociaux et transformation de l’Etat-Providence. Ph.D. dissertation, Institut d’études politiques, Paris.
332. Van Kersbergen, Kees (1995). Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.
333. Van Kersbergen, Kees and Philip Manow (2009). Religion, Class Coalitions and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
334. Visser, Jelle (1987). In Search of Inclusive Unionism: A Comparative Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
335. Visser, Jelle, Patrick Dufour, René Mouriaux, and Françoise Subilieu (2000). “France,” in Bernhard Ebbinghaus and Jelle Visser (eds.), The Societies of Europe: Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945. London: Macmillan, 237–78.
336. Visser, Jelle and Anton Hemerijck (1997). A Dutch Miracle: Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
337. Wanner, Philippe and Antonella Ferrari (2001). La participation des femmes au marché du travail. Neuchaˆtel: Forum Suisse pour l’É tude des Migrations.
338. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust. (1994) Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
339. Wendt, Claus and Theresa Thompson (2004). “The Need for Social Austerity versus Structural Reform in European Health Systems:AFour-CountryComparison ofHealth Reforms,” International Journal of Health Services 34(3): 415–33.
340. Wessels, Bernhard (2004). “The German Party System: Developments after Unification,” in Werner Reutter (ed.), Germany on the Road to “Normalcy”: Policies and Politics of the Red-Green Federal Government (1998–2002). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
341. Wilensky, Harold (1975). The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley: University of California Press.
342. Zehnder Ernst (1988). Die Gesetzesüberprüfung durch die schweizerische Bundesversammlung: Untersuchung der parlamentarischen Veränderung von Vorlagen des Bundesrates in der Legislaturperiode 1971–1975. Entlebuch: Huber, Druck.