Effect of trunk-restraint training on function and compensatory trunk, shoulder and elbow patterns during post-stroke reach: A systematic review

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 553-562

  Pain, Liza M ^a   Baker, Ross ^b   Richardson, Denyse ^b,c   Agur, Anne M R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Compensatory movement; Constraint induced therapy; Kinematics; Postural control; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; CONVALESCENCE; ELBOW; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT DISORDERS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SHOULDER; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRUNK;

AGED; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; ELBOW JOINT; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; SHOULDER; STROKE; TORSO; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84924454830     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.932450     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. McCrea PH, Hodgson AJ. Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:534-41.
2. Carr J, Shepherd R. Reaching and manipulation. In: Carr J, Shepherd R, eds. Neurological rehabilitation, optimizing motor performance. Oxford: Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd; 1999:126-53.
3. Davies PM. Aspects of trunk control. In: Davis PM, ed. Right in the middle: selective trunk activity in the treatment of adult hemiplegia. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag;1990:16-30.
4. Cirstea MC, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Experiment Brain Res 2003;151:289-300.
5. Beer RF, Dewald JPA, Rymer WZ. Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics. Experiment Brain Res 2000; 131:305-19.
6. Sangani SG, Starsky AJ, McGuire JR, Schmit BD. Multijoint reflexes of the stroke arm: neural coupling of the elbow and shoulder. Muscle Nerve 2007;36:694-703.
7. Dewald JA, Beer RF, Given JD, et al. Reorganization of flexion reflexes in the upper extremity of hemiparetic subjects. Muscle Nerve 1999;22:1209-21.
8. Ellis MD, Acosta AM, Yao J, Dewald JPA. Position-dependent torque coupling and associated muscle activation in the hemiparetic upper extremity. Experiment Brain Res 2007;176:594-602.
9. Reisman DS, Scholz JP. Aspects of joint coordination are preserved during pointing in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis. Brain 2003; 126;2510-27.
10. Dipietro L, Krebs HI, Fasoli SE, et al. Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke. J Neurophysiol 2007;98:757-68.
11. Ellis MD, Holubar BH, Acosta AM, et al. Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke. Muscle Nerve 2005;32:170-8.
12. Dewald JPA, Pope PS, Given JD, et al. Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain 1995;118: 495-510.
13. Davies PM. Normal movement sequences and balance reactions. In: Davies PM, ed. Steps to follow: a guide to the treatment of adult hemiplegia. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1991:8-23.
14. Levin MF, Michaelsen SM, Cirstea CM, Roby-Brami A. Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Experiment Brain Res 2002;43:171-80.
15. Michaelsen SM, Luta A, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF. Effect of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2001;32:1875-83.
16. Bertrand AM, Bourbonnais D. Effects of upper limb unilateral isometric efforts on postural stabilization in subjects with hemipar-esis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:403-11.
17. Dickstein R, Shefi S, Marcovitz E, Villa Y. Anticipatory postural adjustment in selected trunk muscles in post stroke hemiparetic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:261-7.
18. Mark LS, Nemeth K, Gardner D, et al. Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. J Experiment Psychol: Human Percept Performance 1997;23:1365-79.
19. Fayad F, Hanneton S, Lefevre-Colau MM, et al. The trunk as a part of the kinematic chain for arm elevation in healthy subjects and in patients with frozen shoulder. Brain Res 2008;1191:107-15.
20. Messier S, Bourbonnais D, Desrosiers J, Roy Y. Kinematic analysis of upper limbs and trunk movement during bilateral movement after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1463-70.
21. Messier J, Adamovich S, Berkinblit M, et al. Influence of movement speed on accuracy and coordination of reaching movements to memorized targets in three-dimensional space in a deafferented subject. Experiment Brain Res 2003;150:399-416.
22. Roby-Brami A, Jacobs S, Bennis N, Levin MF. Hand orientation for grasping and arm joint rotation patterns in healthy subjects and hemiparetic stroke patients. Brain Res 2003;969: 217-29.
23. Reinkensmeyer DJ, McKenna Cole A, Kahn LE, Kamper DG. Directional control of reaching is preserved following mild/moderate stroke and stochastically constrained following severe stroke. Experiment Brain Res 2002; 143:525-30.
24. McCrea PH, Eng JJ, Hodgson AJ. Saturated muscle activation contributes to compensatory reaching strategies after stroke. J Neurophysiol 2005;94:2999-3008.
25. Teasell R, Foley N, Bhogal SK. EBRSR: Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation: Painful Hemiplegic Shoulder [Internet]. Updated 2012 July Available from: http://www.ebrsr.com/uploads/Module-11-hemiplegic-shoulder-001.pdf [last accessed 15 April 2013].
26. Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 2000;123:940-53.
27. Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, et al. Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurolog Scand 2003;107:369-81.
28. Archambault P, Pigeon P, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Experiment Brain Res 1999;126:55-67.
29. Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with subacromial impingement syndrome. Phys Ther 2000;80:276-91.
30. Lewis JS, Wright C, Green A. Subacromial impingement syndrome: the effect of changing posture on shoulder range of movement. J Orthopaedic Sports Phys Ther 2005;35:72-87.
31. Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:398-411.
32. Sunderland A, Tuke A. Neuroplasticity, learning and recoveryafter stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsycholog Rehabil 2005;15:81-96.
33. Kerr AL, Cheng S, Jones TA. Experience-dependent neural plasticity in the adult damaged brain. J Commun Disorders 2011; 44:538-48.
34. Thielman G, Kaminski T, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: comparing 2 training protocols utilizing trunk restraint. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:697-705.
35. deOliveira R, Cacho EWA, Borges G. Improvements in the upper limb of hemiparetic patients after reaching movements training. Int J Rehabil Res 2007;30:67-70.
36. Michaelsen SM, Levin MF. Short-term effects of practice with trunk restraint on reaching movements in patients with chronic stroke: a controlled trial. Stroke 2004;35:1914-19.
37. Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke. Stroke 2006;37: 186-92.
38. Woodbury ML, Howland DR, McGuirk TE, et al. Effects of trunk restraint combined with intensive task practice on post stroke upper extremity reach and function: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:78-91.
39. Wu C, Chen Y, Chen H, et al. Pilot trial of distributed constraint-induced therapy with trunk restraint to improve post stroke reach to grasp and trunk kinematics. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;26: 247-55.
40. Wu C, Chen Y, Lin K, et al. Constraint-induced therapy with trunk restraint for improving functional outcomes and trunk-arm control after stroke: a randomized control trial. Phys Ther 2012;92:483-92.
41. Wee SK, Hughes A, Warner M, Burridge JH. Trunk restraint to promote upper extremity recovery in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair; Online publication 10 Feb 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1545968314521011. Available from: http://nnr.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/02/06/1545968314521011. [last accessed 19 April 2014].
42. Barker RN, Gill TJ, Brauer SG. Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: a survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:981-9.
43. Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1213-23.
44. Disabil Rehabil, 2015; 37(7): 553-562
45. Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in Rehabilitation Medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:932-8.
46. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/[last accessed 1 April 2013].
47. Lemmens RJM, Timmermans AAA, Janssen-Potten YJM, et al. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol 2012;12:21.
48. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chapter 9. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
49. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chapter 8. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
50. Combs SA, Finley MA, Henss M, et al. Effects of a repetitive gaming intervention on upper extremity impairments and function in persons with chronic stroke: a preliminary study. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1291-8.
51. Lima RC, Teixeira-Salmela L, Michaelsen SM. Effects of trunk restraint in addition to home-based modified constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke 2012;7:258-64.
52. Schneiberg S, McKinley PA, Sveistrup H, et al. The effectiveness of task-oriented intervention and trunk restraint on upper limb movement quality in children with cerebral palsy. Develop Med Child Neurol 2010;52:e245-53.
53. Thielman G. Rehabilitation of reaching poststroke: a randomized pilot investigation of tactile versus auditory feedback for trunk control. J Neurologic Phys Ther 2010;34:138-44.
54. Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87: 962-6.
55. Cirstea MC, Ptito A, Levin MF. Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke. Experiment Brain Res 2003;152:476-88.
56. Timmons MK, Thigpen CA, Seitz AL, et al. Scapular kinematics and subacromial-impingement syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Sport Rehabil 2012;21:354-70.
57. Mercier C, Bertrand AM, Bourbonnais D. Differences in the magnitude and direction of forces during a submaximal matching task in hemiparetic subjects. Experiment Brain Res 2004;157:32-42.