Effects of trunk restraint in addition to home-based modified constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: A randomized controlled trial

International Journal of Stroke

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 258-264

  Lima, Renata Cristina ^a   Teixeira Salmela, Luci ^a   Michaelsen, Stella Maris ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b SANTA CATARINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Constraint induced movement therapy; Home based therapy; Protocols; Stroke; Therapy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRIP STRENGTH; HOME CARE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LIMB MOVEMENT; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MUSCLE STRENGTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STROKE; TRUNK; TRUNK RESTRAINT;

HUMANS; MOVEMENT; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84858241741     PISSN: 17474930     EISSN: 17474949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00736.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Feys H, De Weerdt W, Nuyens G, van de Winckel A, Selz B, Kiekens C. Predicting motor recovery of the upper limb after stroke rehabilitation: value of a clinical examination. Physiother Res Int 2000; 5:1-18.
2. Thielman GT, Dean CM, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85:1613-1618.
3. Lima RCM, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Magalhães LC, Gomes-Neto M. Pyschometric properties of the Stroke Specific Quality Of Life: application of the Rash model. Braz J Phys Ther 2008; 12:149-156.
4. Shummway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor learning and recovery of function; in Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH (eds): Motor control: Theory and practical applications. Maryland, Lippincott Willians & Wilkins, 1995:26-49.
5. Landau WM. Spasticity: what is it? What is it not?; in Feldman RG, Young RR, Koella WP (eds): Spasticity: Disorder of Motor Control. Chicago, year Book Medical, 1980:17-24.
6. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor Learning and Performance, 3rd edn. Champaign, Human Kinetics, 2004.
7. Warren WH. The dynamics of perception and action. Psychol Rev 2006; 113:358-389.
8. Withagen R, Michaels CF. On ecological conceptualizations of perceptual systems and action systems. Theory & Psychology 2005; 15:603-620.
9. Hakkennes S, Keating JL. Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Aust J Physiother 2005; 51:221-231.
10. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30:586-592.
11. Urton ML, Kohia M, Davis J, Neill MR. Systematic literature review of treatment interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis following stroke. Occup Ther Int 2007; 14:11-27.
12. Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 2006; 42:257-268.
13. Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: answers and questions after two decades of research. NeuroRehabilitation 2006; 21:93-95.
14. Dahl AE, Askim T, Stock R, Langorgen E, Lydersen S, Indredavik B. Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movementtherapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Clin Rehabil 2008; 22:436-447.
15. Page S, Levine P, Leonard A, Szaflarski JP, Kissela BM. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: results of a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2008; 88:333-340.
16. Lin KC, Wu CY, Wei TH, Lee CY, Liu JS. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21:1075-1086.
17. Morris DM, Taub E, Macrina DM, Coork EW, Geiger BF. A method for standardizing procedures in rehabilitation: use in the extremity constraint induced therapy evaluation multi-site randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90:663-668.
18. Wu CY, Chen CL, Tsai WC, Lin KC, Chou SH. A randomized controlled trial of modified constraint-induced movement therapy for elderly stroke survivors: changes in motor impairment, daily functioning, and quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88:273-278.
19. Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized control trial. Stroke 2006; 37:186-192.
20. Michaelsen SM, Levin MF. Short-term effects of practice with trunk restraint on reaching movements in patients with chronic stroke: a controlled trial. Stroke 2004; 35:1914-1919.
21. Mercier C, Bourbonnais D. Relative shoulder flexor and handgrip strength is related to upper limb function after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18:215-221.
22. Thompson AJ, Jarret L, Lockley L, Marsden J, Stevenson VL. Clinical management of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76:459-463.
23. Ratnasabapathy Y, Broad J, Baskett J, Pledger M, Marshall J, Bonita R. Shoulder pain in people with a stroke: a population-based study. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17:304-311.
24. Woodbury ML, Howland DR, McGuirk TE etal. Effects of trunk restraint combined with intensive task practice on post-stroke upper extremity reach and function: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 23:78-91.
25. Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90:571-579.
26. Michaelsen SM, Rocha AS, Knabben RJ, Rodrigues LP, Fernandes CGC. Translation, adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the administration manual for the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Braz J Phys Ther 2011; 15:80-88.
27. Saliba VA, Magalhães LC, Faria CDCM, Laurentino GE, Cassiano JG, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Transcultural adaptation and analysis of the Brazilian version of the motor activity log. Pan Am J Public Health 2011; 30:262-271.
28. Turner-Stokes L, Jackson D. Assessment of shoulder pain in hemiplegia: sensitivity of the Shoulder-Q. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28:389-395.
29. Brucki SMD, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PHF, Okamoto IH. Sugestões para o uso do Mini Exame do Estado Mental no Brasil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003; 61:777-781.
30. Blanton S, Morris DM, Prettyman MG etal. Lessons learned in participant recruitment and retention: the EXCITE trial. Phys Ther 2006; 86:1520-1533.
31. Brashear A, Zafonte R, Corcoran M etal. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Ashworth scale and the disability assessment scale in patients with upper-limb post-stroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83:1349-1354.
32. Saliba VA, Júnior IPF, Faria CDCM, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Psychometric properties of the motor activity log: a systematic review. Fisiot Mov 2008; 21:59-67.
33. Boissy P, Bourbonnais D, Carlotti MM, Gravel D, Arsenault BA. Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13:354-362.
34. Faria-Fortini I, Michaelsen SM, Cassiano JG, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Upper extremity function in stroke subjects: relationships between the international classification of functioning, disability and health domains. J Hand Ther 2011; 24:257-264.
35. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing the Wolf Motor Function Test as an outcome measure for research with patients post-stroke. Stroke 2001; 32:1635-1639.
36. Wolf SL, Newton H, Maddy D etal. The Excite Trial: relationship of intensity of constraint induced movement therapy to improvement in the Wolf Motor Function Test. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25:549-562.
37. Gueorguieva R, Krystal JH. Move over ANOVA - progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61:310-317.