Rehabilitation of reaching poststroke: A randomized pilot investigation of tactile versus auditory feedback for trunk control

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 138-144

  Thielman, Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

hemiplegia; reaching; recovery of function; rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSORY FEEDBACK; STROKE; TOUCH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGED; ARM; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARESIS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTURAL BALANCE; STROKE; TOUCH;

EID: 77956042323     PISSN: 15570576     EISSN: 15570584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181efa1e8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004;6:1844-1848.
2. Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, JohnstonMV, HughesM. Efficacy of modified constraint induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized control trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:14-18.
3. Thielman GT, Dean CM, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training vs. progressive resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1613-1618.
4. Ada L, Canning CG, Carr JH, Kilbreath SL, Shepherd RB. Task-specific training of reaching and manipulation. In: Bennet KM, Castiello U, eds. Insights Into the Reach to Grasp Movement. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 1994:239-264.
5. Gentile AM. Skill acquisition: action, movement, and neuromotor processes. In: Carr JH, Shepherd RB, eds. Movement Sciences: Foundation for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Gaithesburg, MD: sp; 2000;111-187.
6. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:409-417.
7. Dean CM, Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:722-728.
8. Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, Tickle-Degnen L. A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81: 95-101.
9. Michaelson SM, Levin MF. Short-term effects of practice with trunk restraint on reaching movements in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke. 2004;35:1914-1919.
10. Michaelson SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on armrecovery in stroke: randomized control trial. Stroke. 2006;37:186-192.
11. Richards L, Pohl P. Therapeutic interventions to improve upper extremity recovery and function. Clin Geriatr Med. 1999;15:819-832.
12. Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy. 1979;65:48-51.
13. Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000;123:940-953.
14. Thielman GT, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching post stroke: follow up assessment. Soc Neurosci Abstract. 2002; Orlando FL.
15. Thielman GT, Kaminski TR, Gentile AM. Training with trunk restraint during reaching for individuals post stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:697-705.
16. Gladstone DJ,Danells CJ,Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment ofmotor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232-240.
17. Magill AR. ed. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
18. Subramanian SK, Massie CL, Malcolm MP, Levin MF. Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:113-124.
19. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65: 175-180.
20. World Health Organization. International Classification of Function in Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
21. Michaelson SM, Jacobs S, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2004;57:162-173.
22. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(4):313-319.
23. Norkin C, WhiteD. Measurement of Joint Motion:AGuide to Goniometry. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company; 1995.
24. Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87(1):88-97.
25. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL,Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635-1639.
26. Schmidt R, Lee DL. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005.
27. Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:398-411.
28. Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF. Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1237-1242.
29. Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225-S239.
30. Ada L, Canning C, Carr J, et al. Task Specific training of reaching and manipulation. In: Bennett KMB, Castiello U, eds. Insights Into the Reach to Grasp Movement. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland; 1994:239-265.
31. Judd CM, McClelland GH. Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace College Publishers; 1989.
32. Portney LG,WatkinsMP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2008.
33. van Dijk H, Jannink MJA, Hermens HJ. Effect of augmented feedback of motor function of the affected upper extremity in rehabilitation patients: a systematic reviewof randomized controlled trials. JMed Rehabil. 2005;37:202-211.
34. LevinMF, Michaelson S, Cirstea CM, Roby-BramiA.Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143:171-180.
35. Roby-Brami A, Jacobs S, BennisN, LevinMF.Hand orientation for grasping and arm joint rotation patterns in healthy subjects and hemiparetic stroke patients. Brain Res. 2003;969:217-229.
36. Teasell R, Bayona N, Salter K, Hellings C, Bitensky J. Progress in clinical neurosciences: stroke recovery and rehabilitation. Can J Neurol Sci. 2006;33(4):357-364.
37. Levin MF. Should stereotypic movement synergies seen in hemiparetic patients be considered adaptive? Behav Brain Sci. 1997;19: 79-80.
38. Page SJ, Harnish SM, Larmy M, Eliassen JC, Szaflarski JP. Affected Arm Use and Cortical Change in Stroke Patient's exhibiting Minimal Hand Movement. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; June (5): 495-502.
39. Bonifer NM, Anderson KM, Arciniegas DB. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke:efficacy for patients with minimal upper extremity motor ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005. Sep;(86)9:1867-1873.