Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: Diagnostic performance of an on-site clinicianoperated computational fluid dynamics algorithm

Radiology

Volumn 274, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 674-683

  Coenen, Adriaan ^a   Lubbers, Marisa M ^a   Kurata, Akira ^a   Kono, Atsushi ^a   Dedic, Admir ^a   Chelu, Raluca G ^a   Dijkshoorn, Marcel L ^a   Gijsen, Frank J ^a   Ouhlous, Mohamed ^a   Van Geuns, Robert Jan M ^a   Nieman, Koen ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84924303276     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140992     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS. The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(10):957-965
2. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005;293(20): 2471-2478
3. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: A prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(25):2135-2144
4. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: The Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter resolution (CACTUS) trial. Eur Heart J 2007;28(24):3034-3041
5. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(21):1724-1732
6. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359(22): 2324-2336
7. Dewey M. Coronary CT versus MR angiography: pro CT-The role of CT angiography. Radiology 2011;258(2):329-339
8. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334(26):1703-1708
9. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367(11):991-1001
10. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: Computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52(8):636-643
11. Ko BS, Wong DT, Cameron JD, et al. 320-row CT coronary angiography predicts freedom from revascularisation and acts as a gatekeeper to defer invasive angiography in stable coronary artery disease: A fractional flow reserve-correlated study. Eur Radiol 2014; 24(3):738-747
12. Kim HJ, Vignon-Clementel IE, Coogan JS, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38(10):3195-3209
13. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58(19):1989-1997
14. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 2012; 308(12):1237-1245
15. Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: The NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63(12):1145-1155
16. Task Force Members, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34(38):2949-3003
17. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3(2):122-136
18. Choy JS, Kassab GS. Scaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteries. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2008;104(5):1281-1286
19. Murray CD. The physiological principle of minimum work. I. The vascular system and the cost of blood volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1926;12(3):207-214
20. Sharma P, Itu L, Zheng X, et al. A framework for personalization of coronary flow computations during rest and hyperemia. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012; 2012:6665-6668
21. Mantero S, Pietrabissa R, Fumero R. The coronary bed and its role in the cardiovascular system: A review and an introductory single- branch model. J Biomed Eng 1992;14(2): 109-116
22. van de Vosse FN, Stergiopulos N. Pulse wave propagation in the arterial tree. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2011;43(1):467-499
23. Itu L, Sharma P, Mihalef V, Kamen A, Suciu C, Comaniciu D. A patient-specific reduced-order model for coronary circulation. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 2012; 832-835
24. Wilson RF, Wyche K, Christensen BV, Zimmer S, Laxson DD. Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation 1990;82(5):1595-1606
25. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44(3):837-845
26. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Radiology 2003;226(1):24-28
27. Schaap J, Kauling RM, Boekholdt SM, et al. Incremental diagnostic accuracy of hybrid SPECT/CT coronary angiography in a population with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14(7):642-649
28. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, et al. Incremental value of adenosineinduced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010;254(2):410-419
29. Groothuis JG, Beek AM, Brinckman SL, et al. Combined non-invasive functional and anatomical diagnostic work-up in clinical practice: The magnetic resonance and computed tomography in suspected coronary artery disease (MARCC) study. Eur Heart J 2013;34(26):1990-1998
30. Kirschbaum SW, Nieman K, Springeling T, et al. Non-invasive diagnostic workup of patients with suspected stable angina by combined computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Circ J 2011;75(7):1678-1684
31. Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/ computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 2010;122(6):603-613.