Fundamentals of evidence-based health care and translational science

Fundamentals of Evidence-Based Health Care and Translational Science

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-394

  Chiappelli, Francesco ^a  

^a UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Level of evidence; Meta analysis; Research synthesis; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924297853     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41857-0     Document Type: Book

References (249)

1. Caplan RD. Person-environment fit: past, present, and future. In: Cooper CL, editor. Stress research. New York: Wiley; 1983. p. 35-78.
2. Caplan RD, Harrison RV. Person-environment fit theory: some history, recent developments, and future directions. J Soc Issues. 1993;49:253-75.
3. Chiappelli F, Manfrini E, Edgerton M, Rosenblum M, Kristine D, Cajulis KD, Prolo P. Clinical evidence and evidence-based dental treatment of special populations: patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006;34:439-47.
4. Duhigg C. The power of habit. New York: Random House; 2012.
5. Edwards JR. Person-job fit: a conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In: Cooper CL, Robertson IT, editors. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 6. New York: Wiley; 1991. p. 283-357.
6. Edwards JR, Cooper CL. The person-environment fit approach to stress: recurring problems and some suggested solutions. J Organ Behav. 1990;1990(11):293-307.
7. Edwards JR, Caplan RD, Harrison RV. Person-environment fit theory: conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In: Cooper CL, editor. Theories of organizational stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 28-67.
8. Fletcher AJ, Guthrie J, Steane P, Roos G, Pike S. Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization. J Intellect Capital. 2003;4:505-27.
9. Freeman RE. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman; 1984.
10. French Jr JRP, Rodgers WL, Cobb S. Adjustment as person-environment fit. In: Coelho G, Hamburg D, Adams J, editors. Coping and adaptation. New York: Basic Books; 1974. p. 316-33.
11. Giddens A. Social theory and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1987.
12. Goleman DP. Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ for character, health and lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books; 1995.
13. Kulka RA. Interaction as person-environment fit. In: Kahle LR, editor. New directions for methodology of behavioral science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1979. p. 55-71.
14. Renella R, Fanconi S. Decision-making in pediatrics: a practical algorithm to evaluate complementary and alternative medicine for children. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165:437-41.
15. Rounds JB, Dawis RW, Lofquist LH. Measurement of person-environment fit and prediction of satisfaction in the theory of work adjustment. J Vocational Behav. 1987;31:297-318.
16. Salovey P, Sluyter D, editors. Emotional development and emotional intelligence: implications for educators. New York: Basic Books; 2007.
17. Selby JV, Krumholz HM, Kuntz RE, Collins FS. Network news: powering clinical research. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:82fs13.
18. Spokane AR. A review of research on person-environment congruence in Holland’s theory of careers. J Vocational Behav. 1985;26:306-43.
19. Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, Chang S, Hartling L, McPheeters LM, Santaguida PL, Shamliyan T, Singh K, Tsertsvadze A, Treadwell JR. Assessing the risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions. AHRQ methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews. March 2012. AHRQ 12-EHC047-EF.
20. Bauer J, Chiappelli F. The translation evidence mechanism. The compact between researcher and clinician. TODENT J. 2010.
21. Bauer J, Spackman S, Chiappelli F, Prolo P. Model of evidence-based dental decision making. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2005;5:189-97.
22. Chevalier JM, Buckles DJ. Participatory action research: theory and methods for engaged inquiry. London: Routledge; 2013.
23. Chiappelli F. Evidence-based dental practice for special populations: obtaining person-environment fit evidence from patients with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Intern Dental Tribune, Asia Pacific Ed, 2007;10-2,14.
24. Chiappelli F, Cajulis OS. The logic model for evidence-based clinical decision making in dental practice. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2009;9:206-10.
25. Detsky AS, Laupacis A. Relevance of cost-effectiveness analysis to clinicians and policy makers. JAMA. 2007;298:221-4.
26. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Dds. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. 2nd ed. (Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc. d/b/a Outcome] under Contract HHSA29020050035I TO3.) AHRQ Pub. 10-EHC049. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.
27. Helfrich CD, Li YF, Sharp ND, Sales AE. Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARiHS) framework. Implement Sci. 2009;4:38.
28. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lefebvre C, Scherer R. Hand-searching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):MR000001.
29. Institute of Medicine. Knowing what works in health care: a road map for the nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008.
30. Institute of Medicine. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
31. Jeroslow RG. Logic-based decision support: mixed integer model formulation. Amsterdam/New York/North-Holland: Elsevier; 1989.
32. Kitson AL, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1.
33. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Introduction to CBPR: new issue and emphases. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 5-24.
34. Ogilvie D, Craig P, Griffin S, Macintyre S, Wareham NJ. A translational framework for public health research. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:116.
35. Parchman ML, Zeber JE, Palmer RF. Participatory decision-making, patient activation, medication adherence and intermediate clinical outcomes: a STARNet study. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8:410-7.
36. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390-5.
37. Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. Fuzzy-trace theory: an interim synthesis. Learn Individ Differ. 1995;7: 1-75.
38. Reyna VR, Brainerd CJ. The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learn Individ Differ. 2007;17: 147-59.
39. Roy-Byrne PP, Sherbourne CD, Craske MG, Stein MB, Katon W, Sullivan G, Means-Christensen A, Bystritsky A. Moving treatment research from clinical trials to the real world. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:327-32.
40. Shi H, Lyons-Weiler J. Clinical decision modeling system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:23-41.
41. Simpson M, Rahman MM, D Demner-Fushman D. Text-and content-based approaches to image retrieval for the ImageCLEF 2009 medical retrieval track/CLEF2009 Working Notes. CLEF 2009 Workshop, 2009.
42. Spangberg LSW. Systematic reviews in endodontics—examples of GIGO? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo. 2007;103:724-5.
43. Westfall JM, Mold JW, Fagnan LJ. Practice-based research-“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007;297:403-6.
44. Barrett B, Brown D, Mundt M, Brown R. Sufficiently important difference: expanding the framework of clinical significance. Med Decis Making. 2005;25:250-61.
45. Booth A, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, Stewart L. An international registry of systematic review protocols. Lancet. 2011;377:108-9.
46. Chalmers I, Hedges LV, Cooper H. A brief history of research synthesis. Eval Health Prof. 2002;25:12-37.
47. Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services. 2nd ed. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; 1972 (published 1989).
48. Dousti M, Ramchandani MH, Chiappelli F. Evidence-based clinical significance in health care: toward an inferential analysis of clinical relevance. Dent Hypotheses. 2011;2:165-77.
49. Hartling L, Hamm M, Milne A, Vandermeer B, Santaguida PL, Ansari M, Tsertsvadze A, Hempel S, Shekelle P, Dryden DM. Validity and inter-rater reliability testing of quality assessment instruments. Rockville: AHRQ; 2012.
50. Ip S, Kitsios GD, Chung M, Lau J. A process for robust and transparent rating of study quality: phase 1. Methods research report. (AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC004-EF). Rockville: AHRQ; 2011.
51. Janket SJ, Moles DR, Lau J, Needleman I, Niederman R. Caveat for a cumulative meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2005;84:487.
52. Kung J, Chiappelli F, Cajulis OS, Avezova R, Kossan G, Chew L, Maida CA. From systematic reviews to clinical recommendations for evidence-based health care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance. Open Dent J. 2010;4:84-91.
53. Lau J, Schmid CH, Chalmers TC. Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:45-57.
54. Littell JH, Corcoran J, Pillai V. Research synthesis reports and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
55. Moles DR, Needleman IG, Niederman R, Lau J. Introduction to cumulative meta-analysis in dentistry: lessons learned from undertaking a cumulative meta-analysis in periodontology. J Dent Res. 2005;84:345-9.
56. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10.
57. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1013-20.
58. Spángberg LSW. Systematic reviews in endodontics—examples of GIGO? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:724-5.
59. Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N. Identifying, selecting, and refining topics. In: Methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009.
60. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:18-23.
61. AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center approach to grading the strength of evidence in comparative effectiveness reviews. AHRQ report. 2012.
62. Ajaj RA, Barkhordarian A, Phi L, Giroux A, Chiappelli F. Evidence-based dentistry: the next frontier in translational and trans-national dental practice. Dent Hypotheses. 2011;2:55-62.
63. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637-9.
64. Bender R. Calculating confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. Control Clin Trials. 2001;22:102-10.
65. Beniger JR. The control revolution: technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1986.
66. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, Graham ID, Hanna SE, Makarski J. AGREE Next Steps Consortium. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:1045-52.
67. Brozek JL, Akl EA, Jaeschke R, Lang DM, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Helfand M, Ueffing E, Alonso-Coello P, Meerpohl J, Phillips B, Horvath AR, Bousquet J, Guyatt GH, Schunemann HJ. GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies. Allergy. 2009;64:1109-16.
68. Fang IE. A history of mass communication: six information revolutions. Boston: Focal Press; 1997.
69. Fletcher A, Guthrie J, Steane P, Roos G, Pike S. Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2003;4:505-27.
70. Lachin JM. Statistical considerations in the Intent-To-Treat principle. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:167-89.
71. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:2-7.
72. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000251.
73. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P. Moher D, Bouter LM. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10.
74. Sung L, et al. Seven items were identified for inclusion when reporting a Bayesian analysis of a clinical study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:261-8.
75. Thabane L. A closer look at the distribution of number needed to treat (NNT): a Bayesian approach. Biostatistics. 2003;4:365-70.
76. Bartolucci AA, Hillegas WB. Overview, strengths, and limitations of systematic reviews and metaanalyses, chapter 2. In: Chiappelli F, Brant XMC, Oluwadara OO, Neagos N, Ramchandani MH, editors. Understanding evidence-based practice: toward optimizing clinical outcomes. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
77. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088-101.
78. Boole G. An investigation of the laws of thought on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. London: Macmillan; 1854.
79. Chisholm H, editor. Boole, George. Encyclopedia Britannica. 11th ed. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press; 1911.
80. Deeks JJ et al., editors. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions; 2008.
81. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-88.
82. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J. 1997;315:629-34.
83. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001.
84. Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd; 1925.
85. Fulcher BD, Little MA, Jones NS. Highly comparative time-series analysis: the empirical structure of time series and their methods. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10:20130048.
86. Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res. 1976;5:3-8.
87. Gonzales R, Handley MA, Ackerman S, O’Sullivan PS. Increasing the translation of evidence into practice, policy, and public health improvements: a framework for training health professionals in implementation and dissemination science. Acad Med. 2012;87:271-8.
88. Hedges LV. Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. J Educ Stat. 1981;6:107-28.
89. Hedges LV, Pigott TD. The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods. 2001;6:203-17.
90. Hedges LV, Pigott TD. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods. 2004;9:426-45.
91. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J. 2003;327:557-60.
92. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.0.1. Updated Sept 2008.
93. Huque MF. Experiences with meta-analysis in NDA submissions. Proc Biopharm Section Am Stat Assoc. 1988;2:28-33.
94. Kontopantelis E, Reeves D. Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: a simulation study. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012;21:409-26.
95. L’Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O’Rourke K. Meta-analysis in clinical research. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:224-33.
96. Melani V. Itinerari Pistoiesi. Pistoia: Edizioni Tellini; 1970.
97. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896-900.
98. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264-9.
99. Schmid CH, Stark PC, Berlin JA, Landais P, Lau J. Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:683-97.
100. Simmonds MC, Higgins JP, Stewart LA, Tierney JF, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice. Clin Trials. 2005;2:209-17.
101. Tigri G. Pistoiaeilsuoterritorio. Pistoia: Tipografia Cino; 1853.
102. Valentine JC, Pigott TD, Rothstein HR. How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. J Educ Behav Stat. 2010;35:215-47.
103. Wheelan C. Naked statistics stripping the dread from the data. New York: Norton; 2013
104. Abdi H. Coefficients of correlation, alienation and determination. In: Salkind NJ, editor. Encyclopaedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.
105. Bordens KS, Abbott BB. Research design and methods: a process approach. Mountain View: Mayfield Pub. Co.; 1999.
106. Clatworthy J, Buick D, Hankins M, Weinman J, Horne R. The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:329-58.
107. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;196:37-46.
108. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: Allen &Unwin; 1940.
109. Detsky AS, Laupacis A. Relevance of cost-effectiveness analysis to clinicians and policy makers. JAMA. 2007;298:221-4.
110. Fisher RA. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika. 1915;10:507-21.
111. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. 2nd ed. (Prepared by Outcome DEclDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc. d/b/a Outcome] under Contract HHSA29020050035I TO3.) AHRQ Pub. 10-EHC049. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.
112. Kendall MG, Babington Smith B. Randomness and random sampling numbers. J R Stat Soc. 1938;101:147-66.
113. Kirk RE. Experimental design procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont: Wadsworth; 1968. Pearson K. On the dissection of asymmetrical frequency curves. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A. 1894;185:719-810.
114. Sheynin O. Fechner as a statistician. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2004;57:53-72.
115. Spearman C. General intelligence objectively determined and measured. Am J Psychol. 1904;15:201-93.
116. Wallace B, Ross A, Davies JB. Applied hermeneutics and qualitative safety data. Hum Relat. 2003;56:587-607.
117. Wilcox RR, Keselman HJ. Modern robust data analysis methods: measures of central tendency. Psychol Methods. 2003;8:254-74.
118. Yule GU, Kendal MG. An introduction to the theory of statistics. 14th ed. London: Griffin; 1950
119. Adèr HJ. Chapter 13: Missing data. In: Adèr HJ, Mellenbergh GJ, editors. Advising on research methods: a consultant’s companion. Huizen: Johannes van Kessel Publishing; 2008. p. 305-32.
120. Bayes T. Divine benevolence, or an attempt to prove that the principal end of the divine providence and government is the happiness of his creatures. 1731.
121. Brennan RL. Generalizability theory. New York: Springer; 2001.
122. Campbell DT. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959;56:81-105.
123. Cohen J. A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
124. Cournot AA. Exposition de la théorie des chances et des probabilités. Paris: L. Hachette; 1843.
125. Cronbach L, Meehl P. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52:281-302.
126. Cronbach LJ, Nageswari R, Gleser GC. Theory of generalizability: a liberation of reliability theory. Br J Stat Psychol. 1963;16:137-63.
127. Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Meas. 2004;64:391-418.
128. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;9:361-6.
129. Edwards W, Lindman H, Savage LJ. Bayesian statistical inference in statistical research. Psychol Res. 1963;70:193-242.
130. Enders CK. Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guildford Press; 2010.
131. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull. 1971;76:378-82.
132. Graham JW. Missing data analysis: making It work in the real world. Annu Rev Pyschol. 2009;60:549-76.
133. Guion RM. On trinitarian doctrines of validity. Prof Psychol. 1980;11:385-98.
134. Kendall MG. On the reconciliation of theories of probability. Biometrika. 1949;36:101-16.
135. Kirk RE. Experimental designs. Monterey: Brooks &Cole; 1968.
136. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychol. 1975;28:563-75.
137. Lee PM. Bayesian statistics: an introduction. London: Arnold; 1997.
138. Messick S. Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 1995;14:5-8.
139. Neyman J. Outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A. 1937;236:333-80.
140. Patrick D, Guyatt GH, Acquadro C. Chapter 17: Patient-reported outcomes. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
141. Rozeboom WW. Scaling theory and the nature of measurement. Synthese. 1966;16:170-233.
142. Saal FE, Downey RG, Lahey MA. Rating the ratings: assessing the psychometric quality of rating data. Psychol Bull. 1980;88:413-28.
143. Shavelson RJ, Webb NM. Generalizability theory: 1973-1980. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1981;34:133-66.
144. Stevens SS. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science. 1946;103:677-80.
145. Venn J. The logic of chance. New York: MacMillan &Co; 1866.
146. Wilkinson L. Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio typologies are misleading. Am Stat. 1993;47:65-72.
147. Wilson FR, Pan W, Schumsky DA. Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2012;45:197-210.
148. Wolfowitz J. Additive partition functions and a class of statistical hypotheses. Ann Math Stat. 1942;XIII:264.
149. Wolfowitz J. Coding theorems of information theory. New York: Springer; 1978
150. Asbdi H, Bonferroni CE, Sidak S. Corrections for multiple comparisons. In: Salkind NJ, editor. Encyclopaedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pubs; 2007.
151. Barlow RE, Bartholomew DJ, Bremner JM, Brunk HD. Statistical inference under order restrictions; the theory and, application of isotonic regression. New York: Wiley; 1972.
152. Berry WD, Feldman S. Multiple regression in practice. Beverly Hills: Sage University; 1985.
153. Bonferroni CE. Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilità. Pubblicazioni del Real Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze. 1936;8:3-62.
154. Box GEP. Non-normality and tests on variance. Biometrika. 1953;40:318-35.
155. Box GEP. Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, I: effect of inequality of variances in the one-way classification. Ann Math Stat. 1954;25:290-302.
156. Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1999.
157. Curran-Everett D. Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations. Am J Physiol. 2000; 279:R1-8.
158. Davis DJ. Flexibility and power in comparisons among means. Psychol Bull. 1969;71:441-4.
159. Dunnett CW. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:1096-211.
160. Fisher RA. The goodness of fit of regression formulae, and the distribution of regression coefficients. J Royal Stat Soc. 1922;85:597-612.
161. Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1925.
162. Geisser S. Predictive inference: an introduction. New York: CRC Press; 1993.
163. Good IJ. What are degrees of freedom? Am Statistician. 1973;27:227-8.
164. Gossett WS. The probable error of a mean. Biometrika. 1908;6:1-25.
165. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika. 1959;24:95-112.
166. Hotelling H. The generalization of student’s ratio. Ann Math Stat. 1931;2:360-78.
167. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York/Chichester: Wiley; 2000.
168. Jaccard J, Becker MA, Wood G. Pairwise multiple comparison procedures: a review. Psychol Bull. 1984;96:589-96.
169. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952a;47:583-634.
170. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Errata to use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952b;48:907-11.
171. Mann HB, Whitney DR. On a test of whether one of 2 random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat. 1947;18:50-60.
172. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. Multivariate analysis. London/New York: Academic; 1979.
173. Mauchly JW. Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann Math Stat. 1940;11:204-9.
174. Pearson K, Yule GU, Blanchar N, Lee A. The law of ancestral heredity. Biometrika. 1903; 27:2-12.
175. Ramsey PH. Multiple comparisons of independent means. In: Edwards LK, editor. Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science. Statistics: textbooks and monographs, vol. 137. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 1993. p. 25-62.
176. Shively TS, Sager TW, Walker SG. A Bayesian approach to non-parametric montone function estimation. J Royal Stat Soc B. 2009;71:159-75.
177. Snedecor G, Cochran W, Cox D. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Ames: The Iowa State University Press; 1989.
178. Storm L. Nested analysis of variance: review of methods. Metrika. 1962;5:158-83.
179. Tukey JW. The future of data analysis. Ann Math Stat. 1962;33:1-67.
180. Walker HW. Degrees of freedom. J Educ Psychol. 1940;31:253-69.
181. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for hetero-skedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817-38.
182. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bull. 1945;1:80-3.
183. Younger MS. A handbook of linear regression. North Scituate: Duxbury Press; 1979
184. Barkhordarian A, Pellionisz P, Dousti M, Lam V, Gleason L, Dousti M, Moura J, Chiappelli F. Assessment of risk of bias in translational science. J Transl Med. 2013;11(1):184.
185. Bartolucci AA, Hillegas WB. Chapter 2. Overview, strengths, and limitations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In: Chiappelli F, Brant XMC, Oluwadara OO, Neagos N, Ramchandani MH, editors. Understanding evidence-based practice: toward optimizing clinical outcomes. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
186. Casella G. An introduction to empirical bayes data analysis. Am Statistician. 1985;39:83-7.
187. Chiappelli F, Cajulis OS. Research in evidence-based dentistry for the dental practice (#81). World Dental Federation (Fédération dentaire internationale, FDI) Annual Dental Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 28-31 Aug. 2013.
188. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-88.
189. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:105-14.
190. Dousti M, Ramchandani MH, Chiappelli F. Evidence-based clinical significance in health care: toward an inferential analysis of clinical relevance. Dent Hypotheses. 2011;2:165-77.
191. Edwards W. The theory of decision making. Psychol Bull. 1954;51:380-417.
192. Edwards W, Fasolo B. Decision technology. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:581-606.
193. Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y, Dryden DM, Hooton N, Krebs Seida J, Klassen TP. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. Br Med J. 2009;339:b4012.
194. Hartling L, Hamm M, Milne A, Vandermeer B, Santaguida PL, Ansari M, Tsertsvadze A, Hempel S, Shekelle P, Dryden DM. Validity and inter-rater reliability testing of quality assessment instruments. AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC039-EF, Mar 2012.
195. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gptzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA, Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J. 2011;343:d5928.
196. Jacobson NS, Follette WC, Revenstorf D, Baucom DH, Hahlweg K, Margolin G. Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral marital therapy: a reanalysis of outcome data. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984;52:497-504.
197. Jacobson N, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59:12-9.
198. Jiang F, Zhang J, Wang X, Shen X. Important steps to improve translation from medical research to health policy. J Transl Med. 2013;11:33.
199. Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, Williamson PR. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2010;340:c365.
200. Pellionisz P, Barkhordarian A, Dousti M, Dousti M, Gleason L, Lam V, Chiappelli F. Revision and psychometric validation of the Risk of Bias instrument for assessing quality of reporting. 21st Cochrane Colloquium; Montreal. 2013;19-23 Sep.
201. Speer DC, Greenbaum PE. Five methods for computing significant individual client change and improvement rates: support for an individual growth curve approach. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995;63:1044-8.
202. Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, Chang S, Hartling L, McPheeters LM, Santaguida PL, Shamliyan T, Singh K, Tsertsvadze A, Treadwell JR. Assessing the risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions. AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC047-EF, Mar 2012
203. Aragon SJ. Commentary: a patient-centered theory of satisfaction. Am J Med Qual. 2003;18:225-8.
204. Clarke M, Stewart L, Pignon JP, Bijnens L. Individual patient data meta-analysis in cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:2036-44.
205. Crowther MJ, Riley RD, Staessen JA, Wang J, Gueyffier F, Lambert PC. Individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data using Poisson regression models. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:34.
206. Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver &Boyd; 1925.
207. Fisher RA. The arrangement of field experiments. J Ministry Agriculture Great Britain. 1926;33: 503-13.
208. Fisher RA. The design of experiments. 8th ed. Edinburgh/London: Hafner Pub. Co.; 1966.
209. Higgins JPT, Whitehead A, Turner RM, Omar RZ, Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients. Stat Med. 2001;20:2219-41.
210. Jones AP, Riley RD, Williamson PR, Whitehead A. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2009;6:16-27.
211. Mathew T, Nordstrom K. On the equivalence of meta-analysis using literature and using individual patient data. Biometrics. 1999;55:1221-3.
212. McDonald KM, Chang C, Schultz E. Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science. Summary report. AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)-E017. Jan 2013.
213. Olkin I, Sampson A. Comparison of meta-analysis versus analysis of variance of individual patient data. Biometrics. 1998;54:317-22.
214. Razali N, Wah YB. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. J Stat Model Analyt. 2011;2:21-33.
215. Robinson KA, Akinyede O, Dutta T, Sawin VI, Li T, Spencer MR, Turkelson CM, Weston C. Framework for determining research gaps during systematic review: evaluation. Methods research report. AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC019-EF. Feb 2013.
216. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52:591-611.
217. Stewart LA, Parmer MKB. Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient date: is there a difference? Lancet. 1993;341:418-22.
218. Stewart LA, Tierney JF, Clarke M. Reviews of individual patient data. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. Chichester: Wiley; 2008.
219. Stewart LA, Tierney JF, Clarke M. Chapter 19: Reviews of individual patient data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
220. Tudor Smith C, Williamson PR. Meta-analysis of individual patient data with time to event outcomes. Cardiff: International Conference of the Royal Statistical Society; 2005.
221. Whitehead A, Omar RZ, Higgins JPT, Savaluny E, Turner RM, Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of ordinal outcomes using individual patient data. Stat Med. 2001;20:2243-60
222. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Logic models: the foundation to implement, study, and refine patient-centered medical home models. AHRQ Publication No. 13-0029-EL Mar 2013.
223. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. AHRQ Publication No. 13-0028-EF. Mar 2013.
224. Colosi L, Dunifon R. What’s the difference? “Post then pre &pre then post”. Cornell Cooperative Extension. 2006.
225. Creswell J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches second editions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.
226. Fain J. Is there a difference between evaluation and research. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31:150-5.
227. Lamb T The retrospective pretest: an imperfect but useful tool. Eval Exchange. 2005;11:18.
228. Millar A, Simeone RS, Carnevale JT. Logic models: a systems tool for performance management. Eval Program Plann. 2001;24:73-81.
229. Scriven M. The theory behind practical evaluation. Evaluation. 1996;2:393-404
230. Altman DG, Hammerschlag R, Li Y, Wu T, White A, Moher D, STRICTA Revision Group. Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. Acupunct Med. 2010;28:83-93.
231. Boruch R, May H, Turner H, Lavenberg J, Petrosino A, De Moya D, Grimshaw J, Foley E. Estimating the effects of interventions that are deployed in many places: place-randomized trials. American Behavioral Science 2004;47:608-33.
232. Boruch RF. Place randomized trials: experimental tests of public policy. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005.
233. Chiappelli F. Cluster randomized controlled trials (CRCTs) in evidence-based dentistry. Dent Hypotheses. 2012;3:1-4.
234. Clancy C, Collins FS. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: the intersection of science and health care. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:37-8.
235. Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, McElwee N, Guise JM, Santa J, Conway PH, Daudelin D, Morrato EH, Leslie LK. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:985-91.
236. Eldridge S, Kerry S. A practical guide to cluster randomised trials in health services research. Chichester/West Sussex: Wiley; 2012.
237. Harris JA. On the calculation of intra-class and inter-class coefficients of correlation from class moments when the number of possible combinations is large. Biometrika. 1913;9:446-72.
238. Hart I. Best evidence medical education (BEME). Med Teach. 1999;21:453-4.
239. Hiss RG. Fundamental issues in translational research. Translational research—two phases of a continuum. In: From clinical trials to community: the science of translating diabetes and obesity research. Natcher Conference Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 2004, p. 11-4.
240. Iezzoni L. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes. 3rd ed. Paris: Éditions Lavoisier; 2003.
241. Killip S, Mahfoud Z, Pearce K. What is an intracluster correlation coefficient? Crucial concepts for primary care researchers. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:204-8.
242. Lansky D. The facts about FACCT (Foundation for Accountability). Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1996;4:211-2.
243. MacPherson H, White A, Cummings M, Jobst KA, Rose K, Niemtzow RC, STRICTA Group. Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: the STRICTA recommendations. J Altern Complement Med. 2002;8:85-9.
244. Murray DM. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
245. Narahari SR, Ryan TJ, Aggithaya MG, Bose KS, Prasanna KS. Evidence-based approaches for the Ayurvedic traditional herbal formulations: toward an Ayurvedic CONSORT model. J Altern Complement Med. 2008;14:769-76.
246. Rastogi S, Chiappelli F. Chapter 7. Bringing evidence basis to decision making in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): prakriti (constitution) analysis in Ayurveda. In: Chiappelli F, Brant XMC, Oluwadara OO, Neagos N, Ramchandani MH, editors. Understanding evidence-based practice: toward optimizing clinical outcomes. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
247. Shavelson RJ, Webb NM. Generalizability Theory: 1973-1980. British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology 1981;34:133-66.
248. Snapinn SM. Noninferiority trials. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2000;1:19-21.
249. Zelen M. A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1979; 300:1242-5