How are practices made to vary? Managing practice adaptation in a multinational corporation

Organization Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1313-1341

  Ansari, Shahzad Shaz ^a   Reinecke, Juliane ^b   Spaan, Amy ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^c BlueFinch BV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Adoption; Aerospace; Diffusion; Lean; Management innovation; Multinational corporations; Practices; Quality management; Standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924158985     PISSN: 01708406     EISSN: 17413044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0170840614539310     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16, 586-612.
2. Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (trans. A. Monaghan) (2002). The key to success in innovation. Part I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6, 187-206.
3. Alcouffe, S., Berland, N., & Levant, Y. (2008). Actor-networks and the diffusion of management accounting innovations: A comparative study. Management Accounting Research, 19, 1-17.
4. Ansari, S., Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2010). Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 67-92.
5. Baird, K., Hu, K. J., & Reeve, R. (2011). The relationships between organizational culture, total quality management practices and operational performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31, 789-814.
6. Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14, 312-330.
7. Beck, N., & Walgenbach, P. (2005). Technical efficiency or adaptation to institutionalized expectations? The adoption of ISO 9000 standards in the German mechanical engineering industry. Organization Studies, 26, 841-866.
8. Becker, S. Messner, M., & Schäffer, U. (2013). Management innovations and the problem of diverging interests: Insights from the case of Beyond Budgeting. Working Paper.
9. Benders, J., & Van Veen, K. (2001). What's in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions. Organization, 8, 33-53.
10. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238-256.
11. Bijker, W., & Law, J. (1994). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 825-845.
13. Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 203-224.
14. Boxenbaum, E., & Battilana, J. (2005). Importation as innovation: Transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization, 3, 355-383.
15. Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 78-98). London: SAGE Publications.
16. Bromley, P., Hwang, H., & Powell, W. (2012). Decoupling revisited: Common pressures, divergent strategies in the U. S. nonprofit sector. Mangement, 15, 468-501.
17. Businessweek (2004). The Unsung CEO. Available at www. businessweek. com/stories/2004-10-24/theunsung-ceo (accessed 18 February 2013).
18. Campbell, J. L. (2005). Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. In G. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. Zald (Eds.), Social movement and organization theory (pp. 41-68). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Canato, A., Ravasi, D., & Phillips, N. (2013). Coerced practice implementation in cases of low cultural fit: Cultural change and practice adaptation during the implementation of Six Sigma at 3M. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1724-1753.
20. Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15, 555-568.
21. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
22. Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter.
23. Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13, 675-688.
24. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
25. Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2011). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8, 423-454.
26. Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: a longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 650-675.
27. David, R. J., & Strang, D. (2006). When fashion is fleeting: Transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM Consulting. Academy of Management Journal 49, 215-233.
28. Detert, J. R., Schroeder, R. G., & Mauriel, J. J. (2000). A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 25, 850-863.
29. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Dooreward, H., & van Bijsterveld, M. (2001). The osmosis of ideas: An analysis of the integrated approach to IT management from a translation theory perspective. Organization, 8, 55-76.
31. Drori, G. S., Höllerer, M. A., & Walgenbach, P. (Eds.) (2013). Global themes and local variations in organization and management: Perspectives on glocalization. New York: Routledge.
32. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 17-37.
33. Fiss, P., Kennedy, M., & Davis, G. (2012). How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organization Science, 23, 1077-1099.
34. Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non) adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 501-534.
35. Frenkel, M. (2005). The politics of translation: How state level political relations affect the cross-national travel of ideas. Organization, 12, 275-301.
36. Garfield, E. (1980). The epidemiology of knowledge and the spread of scientific information. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4, 586-591.
37. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment. New York: Free Press.
38. Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7, 329-348.
39. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. (1988). Creation, adoption, and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 365-388.
40. Giroux, H. (2006). It was such a handy term: Management fashions and pragmatic ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1227-1260.
41. Gond, J.-P., & Boxenbaum, E. (2013). The glocalization of responsible investment: Contextualization work in France and Quebec. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 707-721.
42. Gondo, M., & Amis, J. (2013). Variations in practice adoption: The roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Academy of Management Review, 38, 229-247.
43. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317-371.
44. Gupta, A., Smith, K., & Shalley, C. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693-706.
45. Henricks, M. (1992). Quality makes a difference. Small Business Reports, 17, 29-38.
46. Heusinkveld, S., Benders, J., & Hillebrand, B. (2013). Stretching concepts: The role of competing pressures and decoupling in the evolution of organization concepts. Organization Studies, 34, 7-32.
47. Höllerer, M. (2013). From taken-for-granted to explicit commitment: The rise of CSR in a corporatist country. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 573-606.
48. Hutton, T. C. (2004). ACE vs. Six Sigma. Unpublished master's thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: http://dspace. mit. edu/handle/1721. 1/17898 (accessed 2 January 2013).
49. Jones, C. T., & Dugdale, D. (2002). The ABC bandwagon and the juggernaut of modernity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 121-163.
50. Kennedy, M. T., & Fiss, P. C. (2009). Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among US hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 897-918.
51. Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.
52. Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1055-1080.
53. Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 308-324.
54. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 215-233.
55. Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33, 994-1006.
56. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691-710.
57. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131-150.
58. Lillrank, P. (1995). The transfer of management innovations from Japan. Organization Studies, 16, 971-989.
59. Locke, K. (2011). Field research practice in management and organization studies: Reclaiming its tradition of discovery. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 613-652.
60. Love, G., & Cebon, P. (2008). Meanings on multiple levels: The influence of field-level and organizationallevel meaning systems on diffusion. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 239-267.
61. Lozeau, D., Langley, A., & Denis, J. L. (2002). The corruption of managerial techniques by organizations. Human Relations, 55, 537-564.
62. Mamman, A. (2002). The adoption and modification of management ideas in organizations: Towards an analytical framework. Strategic Change, 11, 379-389.
63. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
64. Mazza, C., & Alvarez, J. L. (2000). The popular press and the diffusion of management practices. Organization Studies, 21, 567-588.
65. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
66. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
67. Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Giant steps in management: Innovations that change the way we work. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
68. Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). Sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1269-1280.
69. Morris, M. (1993). Epidemiology and social networks: Modeling structured diffusion. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 99-126.
70. Newman, K. L., & Nollen, S. D. (1996). Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27, 753-779.
71. Nicolini, D. (2010). Medical innovation as a process of translation: A case from the field of telemedicine. British Journal of Management, 21, 1011-1026.
72. Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22, 602-620.
73. O'Mahoney, J. (2007). The diffusion of management innovations: The possibilities and limitations of memetics. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1324-1348.
74. Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563-588.
75. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404-428.
76. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13, 249-273.
77. Parast, M. (2011). The effect of six sigma projects on innovation and firm performance. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 45-55.
78. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
79. Pelz, D. C. (1985). Innovation complexity and the sequence of innovating stages. Science Communication, 6, 261-291.
80. Perez-Aleman, P. (2011). Collective learning in global diffusion: Spreading quality standards in a developing country cluster. Organization Science, 22, 173-189.
81. Pierce, J., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39, 313-338.
82. Pieterse, J. N. (1994). Globalization as hybridization, International Sociology, 9, 161-184.
83. Posen, H. E., Lee, J., & Yi, S. (2013). The power of imperfect imitation. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 149-164.
84. Qu, S. Q., Cooper, D. J., & Ezzamel, M. (2010). Creating and popularising a global management accounting idea: The case of the Balanced Scorecard. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, 6(13), 1-5.
85. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & Von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33, 791-814.
86. Rerup, C., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 577-610.
87. Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25-44). London; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
88. Robertson, M., Swan, J., & Newell, S. (1996). The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 333-359.
89. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
90. Rosenzweig, P. M., & Singh, J. V. (1991). Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, April, 340-361.
91. Roth, G. (2010). United Technologies Corporation Achieving Competitive Excellence (ACE) Operating System Case Study. MIT Lean Enterprise Change Research Case Study series. Available at http://dspace. mit. edu/bitstream/handle/1721. 1/81998/101130_Roth_UnitedTechnologiesCorp. pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 18 February 2013).
92. Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields and identities. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 69-92). Berlin: De Gruyter.
93. Saka, A. (2004). The cross-national diffusion of work systems: The translation of Japanese operations in the UK. Organization Studies, 25, 217-236.
94. Sanders, W. G., & Tuschke, A. (2007). The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 33-56.
95. Strang, D., & Kim, Y. (2004). Diffusion and domestication of managerial innovations: The spread of scientific management, quality circles, and TQM between the United States and Japan. In S. Ackroyd, P. Thompson, P. Tolbert, & R. Batt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and organization (pp. 177-199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
96. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
97. Sturdy, A. (2004). The adoption of management ideas and practices: Theoretical perspectives and possibilities. Management Learning, 35, 155-179.
98. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), 27-43.
99. Szulanski, G., & Winter, S. (2002). Getting it right the second time. Harvard Business Review, January, 62-69.
100. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
101. Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29, 28-45.
102. Turesky, E. F., & Connell, P. (2010). Off the rails: Understanding the derailment of a lean manufacturing initiative. Organization Management Journal, 7, 110-132.
103. UTC (2013). UTC-Quality. Available at www. utc. com/About+UTC/Quality (accessed 1 March 2013).
104. Vaccaro, I., Volberda, H., & Van Den Bosch, F. (2012). Management innovation in action: The case of self-managing teams. In T. S. Pitsis, A. Simpson, & E. Dehlin (Eds.), Handbook of organizational and managerial innovation (pp. 138-162). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
105. Volberda, H., Van Den Bosch, F., & Heij, C. (2013). Management innovation: Management as fertile ground for innovation. European Management Review, 10, 1-15.
106. Weber, K., Davis, G. F., & Lounsbury, M. (2009). Policy as myth and ceremony? The global spread of stock exchanges, 1980-2005. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1319-1347.
107. Westney, E. D. (1987). Imitation and innovation: The transformation of western organizational patterns to Meiji Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
108. Westney, E. (1993). Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In S. Ghoshal & E. Westney (Eds.), Organization theory and the multinational corporation (pp. 53-75). New York: St. Martin's Press.
109. Westphal, J., Gulati, R., & Shortell, S. (1997). Customization or conformity? An institutional network perspective on the content of consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 366-394.
110. Winter, S., Szulanski, G., Ringov, D., & Jensen, R. (2012). Reproducing knowledge: Inaccurate replication and failure in franchise organizations. Organization Science, 23, 672-685.
111. Wöcke, A., Bendixen, M., & Rijamampianina, R. (2007). Building flexibility into multi-national human resource strategy: A study of four South African multi-national enterprises. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 829-844.
112. Womack, J., & Jones, D. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Free Press.
113. Wright, C., Sturdy, A., & Wylie, N. (2012). Management innovation through standardization: Consultants as standardizers of organizational practice. Research Policy, 41, 652-662.
114. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
115. Yuan, Y. C., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. R. (2007). Access to information in connective and communal transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 34, 131-155.
116. Zbaracki, M. (1998). The rhetoric and reality of Total Quality Management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 602-636.
117. Zu, X., Robbins, T. L., & Fredendall, L. D. (2010). Mapping the critical links between organizational culture and TQM/Six Sigma practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 123, 86-106.