A function accounting for training set size and marker density to model the average accuracy of genomic prediction

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Erbe, Malena ^a   Gredler, Birgit ^b   Seefried, Franz Reinhold ^b   Bapst, Beat ^b   Simianer, Henner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b QUALITAS AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BREED DIFFERENCE; BROWN SWISS CATTLE; CATTLE BREED; CATTLE FARMING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN CATTLE; MARKER ASSISTED BREEDING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MILK YIELD; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; PREDICTION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOMATIC CELL GENETICS; ANIMAL; BOVINAE; BREEDING; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUE; MALE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

GENETIC MARKER;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84891906841     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081046     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Van Raden PM, Sullivan PG (2010) International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle. Gen Sel Evol 42:7. Available: http://www.gsejournal.org/ content/42/1/7. Accessed 30 June 2013.
2. Liu Z, Seefried FR, Reinhardt F, Rensing S, Thaller G, et al. (2011) Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Gen Sel Evol 43:19.
3. Luan T, Woolliams JA, Lien S, Kent M, Svendsen M, et al. (2009) The Accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian Red Cattle Assessed by Cross-Validation. Genetics 183:1119-1126.
4. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Verbyla K, Goddard ME (2009) Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Gen Sel Evol 41:51.
5. Legarra A, Robert-Granié C, Manfredi E, Elsen J-M (2008) Performance of Genomic Selection in Mice. Genetics 180:611-618.
6. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME (2009) Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci 92:433-443.
7. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (2008) Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach. PLoS ONE 3:e3395. Available: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone. 0003395. Accessed 30 June 2013.
8. Goddard M (2009) Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136:245-257.
9. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (2010) The Impact of Genetic Architecture on Genome-Wide Evaluation Methods. Genetics 185:1021-1031.
10. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, Meuwissen THE (2011) Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet 128:409-421.
11. Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD, Bowman P, Moser G, Tier B, et al. (2009) Accuracy of genomic selection: Comparing theory and results. Proc Assoc Advmt Anim Breed Genet 18:34-37.
12. Ober U, Ayroles JF, Stone EA, Richards S, Zhu D, et al. (2012) Using Whole-Genome Sequence Data to Predict Quantitative Trait Phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 8:e1002685. Available: http://www. plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen. 1002685. Accessed 30 June 2013.
13. Wientjes YCJ, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL (2013) The Effect of Linkage Disequilibrium and Family Relationships on the Reliability of Genomic Prediction. Genetics 193:621-631.
14. Van Raden PM (2008) Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions. J Dairy Sci 91:4414-4423.
15. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME (2009) Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res Camb 91:47-60.
16. Daetwyler HD (2009) Genome-Wide Evaluation of Populations. Ph. D. Thesis: Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2009). ISBN: 978-90-8585-528-6.
17. Browning SR, Browning BL (2007) Rapid and Accurate Haplotype Phasing and Missing-Data Inference for Whole-Genome Association Studies By Use of Localized Haplotype Clustering. Am J Hum Genet 81:1084-1097. (Pubitemid 47580259)
18. Sargolzaei M, Chesnais JP, Schenkel FS (2011) FImpute - An efficient imputation algorithm for dairy cattle populations. J Dairy Sci Suppl. 10:421 (333).
19. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
20. Dekkers JCM (2007) Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J Anim Breed Genet 124:331-341. (Pubitemid 350231125)
21. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591-611.
22. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available: http://www. R-project.org/.
23. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, et al. (2009) Development and Characterization of a High Density SNP Genotyping Assay for Cattle. PLoS ONE 4:e5350. Available: http://www.plosone.org/article/info: doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0005350. Accessed 30 June 2013.
24. Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, et al. (2012) Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J Dairy Sci 95:4114-4129.
25. Van Raden PM, Null DJ, Sargolzaei M, Wiggans GR, Tooker ME et al. (2013) Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes. J Dairy Sci 96:668-678.
26. Meuwissen THE (2009) Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genet Sel Evol 41:35.
27. Groeneveld E, v. d. Westhuizen B, Maiwashe A, Voordewind F, Ferraz JBS (2009) POPREP: a generic report for population management. Genet Mol Res 8:1158-1178.
28. Pérez-Enciso M (1995) Use of the uncertain relationship matrix to compute effective population size. J Anim Breed Genet 112:327-332.
29. Sved JA (1971) Linkage Disequilibrium and Homozygosity of Chromosome Segments in Finite Populations. Theor Pop Biol 2:125-141.
30. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, McPartlan HC, Goddard ME (2003) Novel Multilocus Measure of Linkage Disequilibrium to Estimate Past Effective Population Size. Genome Res 13:635-643. (Pubitemid 36511922)
31. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F-R, Lichtner P, Thaller G (2010) The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Gen Sel Evol 42:5. Available: http://www.gsejournal.org/ content/42/1/5. Accessed 30 June 2013.
32. de los Campos G, Vazquez AI, Fernando R, Klimentidis YC, Sorensen D (2013) Prediction of Complex Human Traits Using the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor. PLoS Genet 9:e1003608. Available: http://www.plosgenetics.org/ article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen. 1003608. Accessed 03 October 2013.