When security community meets balance of power: Overlapping regional mechanisms of security governance

Globalising the Regional, Regionalising the Global

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 59-84

  Adler, Emanuel ^a   Greve, Patricia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924127170     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139087339.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (94)

1. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society (London: MacMillan, 1977).
2. David Lake, ‘Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations’, International Organization, 50 (1996), pp. 1-33:
3. Jack Donnelly, ‘Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society’, European Journal of International Relations, 12 (2006), pp. 139-70.
4. Stuart Kaufman, Richard Little and William C. Wohlforth (eds), The Balance of Power in World History (Houndmills, Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
5. Steven Lee Myers, ‘Bush Supports Ukraine’s Bid to Join NATO’, New York Times, 2 April 2008. URL http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/02/world/europe/02prexy.html, accessed 2 April 2008.
6. Ulrich Speck, ‘Back on Track? Germany and the Georgian and Ukrainian NATO Bids’, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 3 April 2008. URL (http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2008/04/3efa63ba-287b-4d84-b41b-8ad74dfca8ce.html), accessed 19 April 2008.
7. Karl W. Deutsch et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957);
8. Emanuel Adler and Michael N. Barnett (eds), Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
9. Seng Tan, ‘Betwixt Balance and Community: America, ASEAN, and the Security of Southeast Asia’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 6 (2006), pp. 37-59;
10. G. John Ikenberry and Jitsuo Tsuchiyama, ‘Between Balance of Power and Community: The Future of Multilateral Security Co-operation in the Asia-Pacific’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2 (2002), pp. 69-94;
11. Amitav Acharya, Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order (London; New York: Routledge, 2001);
12. Ralf Emmers, Cooperative Security and the Balance of Power in ASEAN and the ARE (London; New York: Routledge, 2003).
13. Emanuel Adler, F. Bicchi, B. Crawford and R. Del Sarto (eds), The Convergence of Civilizations: Constructing a Mediterranean Region (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006).
14. John G. Ruggie, ‘Territorially and Beyond. Problematizing Modernity in International-Relations’, International Organization, 47 (1993), pp. 139-74.
15. Robert A. Pape, ‘Soft Balancing against the United States’, International Security, 30 (2005), pp. 7-45.
16. Daniel Deudney, Bounding Power. Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007), p. 50.
17. Barry Buzan and Ole Waever, Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 53f.
18. Max Singer and Aaron Wildavsky, The Real World Order: Zones of Peace, Zones of Turmoil (Chatham: Chatham House, 1993);
19. Arie M. Kacowicz, Zones of Peace in the Third World. South America and West Africa in Comparative Perspective (New York: SUNY Press, 1998);
20. James M. Goldgeier and Michael McFaul, ‘A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era’, International Organization, 46 (1992), pp. 467-91.
21. Etel Solingen, Regional Orders at Century’s Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998);
22. Etel Solingen, ‘Pax Asiatica versus Bella Levantina: The Foundations of War and Peace in East Asia and the Middle East’, American Political Science Review, 101 (2007), pp. 757-80.
23. Andrew Hurrell, ‘One World? Many Worlds? The Place of Regions in the Study of International Society’, International Affairs, 83 (2007), pp. 127-46 at p. 143f.
24. Patrick M. Morgan, ‘NATO and European Security: The Creative Use of an International Organization’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 26 (2003), pp. 49-74;
25. David A. Lake and Patrick M. Morgan (eds), Regional Orders. Building Security in a New World (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003).
26. Patrick M. Morgan, ‘Regional Security Complexes and Regional Orders’, in Lake and Morgan (eds), Regional Orders. Building Security in a New World.
27. R. A. W. Rhodes, ‘The New Governance: Governing without Government’, Political Studies, 44 (1996), pp. 652-67.
28. Vincent Pouliot, ‘The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities’, International Organization, 62 (2008), pp. 257-88;
29. Emanuel Adler, Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations (London and New York: Routledge, 2005).
30. Iver B. Neumann, ‘Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy’, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 31 (2002), pp. 627-51.
31. Emanuel Adler, ‘The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation’, European Journal of International Relations, 14 (2008), pp. 195-230.
32. Thomas Risse-Kappen, Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).
33. Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979), p. 117.
34. Ernst B. Haas, ‘The Balance of Power as a Guide to Policy-Making’, The Journal of Politics, 15 (1953), pp. 370-98;
35. Robert Jervis, ‘Cooperation under the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, 30 (1978), pp. 167-214;
36. John H. Herz, Political Realism and Political Idealism (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1951).
37. Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall, ‘Power in International Polities’, International Organization, 59 (2005), pp. 39-75 at p. 40.
38. Stephen M. Walt, The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987).
39. Per Maurseth, ‘Balance-of-Power Thinking From the Renaissance to the French Revolution’, Journal of Peace Research, 1 (1964), pp. 120-36.
40. Louiza Odysseos and Fabio Petito (eds), The International Political Thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, Liberal War and the Crisis of Global Order (London: Routledge, 2007).
41. Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993 [1948]), p. 197
42. Glenn H. Snyder, Alliance Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).
43. Richard Little, The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths, and Models (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 66-8.
44. G. John Ikenberry (ed.), America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002);
45. T. V. Paul, James J. Wirtz and Michael Fortmann (eds), Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004).
46. Jack S. Levy, ‘Balances and Balancing: Concepts, Propositions, and Research Design’, in John A. Vasquez and Colin Elman (eds), Realism and the Balancing of Power. A New Debate (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003).
47. Aaron M. Hoffman, ‘A Conceptualization of Trust in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 8 (2002), pp. 375-401.
48. Randall L. Schweller, Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006), p. 9.
49. Charles A. Kupchan, ‘The Atlantic Order in Transition: The Nature of Change in U.S.-European Relations’, in Jeffrey Anderson, G. John Ikenberry and Thomas Risse (eds), The End of the West? Crisis and Change in the Atlantic Order (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008).
50. Stephen G. Brooks and William C. Wohlforth, ‘Hard Times for Soft Balancing’, International Security, 30 (2005), pp. 72-108;
51. Keir A. Lieber and Gerard Alexander, ‘Waiting for Balancing. Why the World Is Not Pushing Back’, International Security, 30 (2005), pp. 109-39.
52. Vincent Pouliot, ‘“Sobjectivism”: Toward a Constructivist Methodology’, International Studies Quarterly, 51 (2007), pp. 359-84 at p. 375.
53. Janice Bially Mattern, Ordering International Politics. Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force (New York: Routledge, 2005);
54. Harald Mueller, ‘A Theory of Decay of Security Communities with an Application to the Present State of the Atlantic Alliance’. Working Paper, Institute of European Studies. University of California, Berkeley (2006). URL (http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=ies), accessed 2 May 2008;
55. Corneliu Bjola and Markus Kornprobst, ‘Security communities and the habitus of restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq’, Review of International Studies, 33 (2007), pp. 285-305;
56. Corneliu Bjola, ‘Public Spheres and Legitimacy: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Conflict within Security Communities’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Association, Vancouver, 4 June 2008;
57. Thomas Risse, ‘The Crisis of the Transatlantic Community’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 2 September 2004.
58. Ole Waever, ‘Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in the West European Non-War Community’, in Emanuel Adler and Michael N. Barnett (eds), Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
59. Janice Bially Mattern, ‘Taking Identity Seriously’, Cooperation and Conflict, 35 (2000), pp. 299-308 at p. 303.
60. Bially Mattern, Ordering International Politics. Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force, p. 20.
61. M. J. Reese, ‘Destructive Double Standards: Great Powers and the Security Community Paradox’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, 22-25 March 2006.
62. Alex J. Bellamy, Security Communities and their Neighbours: Regional Fortresses or Global Integrators? (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004);
63. Adler, ‘The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation’; Emanuel Adler, ‘Condition(s) of Peace’, Review of International Studies, 24 (1998), pp. 165-91.
64. Robert Jervis, ‘A Political Science Perspective on the Balance of Power and t he Concert’, American Historical Review, 97 (1992), pp. 716-724 at p. 717.
65. Alexandra Gheciu, NATO in the ‘New Europe’: The Politics of International Socialization after the Cold War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005).
66. Jan Zielonka, Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
67. Paul W. Schroeder, The Transformation of European Politics, 1763-1848 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
68. Martha Finnemore, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996);
69. Jeffrey T. Checkel, ‘International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework’, International Organization, 59 (2005), pp. 801-26;
70. Alastair Iain Johnston, ‘Treating International Institutions as Social Environments’, International Studies Quarterly, 45 (2001), pp. 487-515;
71. Alastair Iain Johnston, ‘Conclusions and Extensions: Toward Mid-Range Theorizing and Beyond Europe’, International Organization, 59 (2005), pp. 1013-44.
72. Donald K. Emmerson, ‘What Do the Blind-Sided See? Reapproaching Regionalism in Southeast Asia’, The Pacific Review, 18 (2005), pp. 1-21 at p. 16
73. Vincent Pouliot, ‘Security Community in a nd through Practice: The Power Politics of Russia-NATO Diplomacy’, Dissertation, University of Toronto (2008).
74. Felix Ciuta, ‘The End(s) of NATO: Security, Strategic Action and Narrative Transformation’, Contemporary Security Policy, 23 (2002), pp. 35-62 at p. 47.
75. Andreas Behnke, ‘Geopolitics and its Shadows. The Concept of Geopolitik in German Post-Unification Foreign Policy Discourse’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco, 26-29 March 2008;
76. Helga Haftendorn, Coming of Age: German Foreign Policy after 1945 (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006).
77. Joseph S. Nye, The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).
78. David M. Jones and Michael L. R. Smith, ‘ASEAN’s Imitation Community’, Orbis, (2002), pp.93-109.
79. Knut Kirste and Hanns W. Maull, ‘Zivilmacht und Rollentheorie’, Zeitschrift fur Internationale Beziehungen, 3 (1996), pp. 283-312;
80. Henning Tewes, Germany, Civilian Power and the New Europe (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2002);
81. Thomas U. Berger, ‘Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan’, in Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).
82. Charles A. Kupchan, The End of the American Era: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-First Century (New York: Knopf, 2002);
83. Elke Krahmann, ‘Conceptualizing Security Governance’, Cooperation and Conflict, 38 (2003), pp. 5-26.
84. Elke Krahmann, ‘American Hegemony or Global Governance? Competing Visions of International Security’, International Studies Review, 7 (2005), pp. 531-45 at p. 542.
85. Fotios Moustakis and Michael Sheehan, ‘Democratic Peace and the European Security Community: The Paradox of Greece and Turkey’, Mediterranean Quarterly, 13 (2002), pp. 69-85.
86. Thomas Diez (ed.), The EU and the Cyprus Conflict: Modern Conflict, Postmodern Union (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002);
87. Thomas Diez and Nathalie Tocci (eds), Cyprus: A Conflict at the Crossroads (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008).
88. Inis L. Claude, Power and International Relations (New York: Random House, 1962), p. 46.
89. Evelyn Goh, ‘Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies’, International Security, 32 (2007/2008), pp. 113-57 at p. 139.
90. G. John Ikenberry, After Victory. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).
91. Emanuel Adler, ‘Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations’, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 26 (1997), pp. 249-77.
92. Daniel W. Drezner, ‘Lost in Translation: The Transatlantic Divide Over Diplomacy’, in Jeffrey Kopstein and Sven Steinmo (eds), Growing Apart? America and Europe in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).
93. Randall L. Schweller, Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).
94. Amitav Acharya, ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’, International Organization, 58 (2004), pp. 239-75