Plasticity in ploidy: A generalized response to stress

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 165-175

  Scholes, Daniel R ^a   Paige, Ken N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Endopolyploidy; Endoreduplication; Environment; Plant; Response; Stress

Indexed keywords

ENDOREDUPLICATION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLOIDY;

ENDOREDUPLICATION; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PLANTS; PLOIDIES; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84924027067     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.11.007     Document Type: Review

References (139)

1. Nagl W. DNA endoreduplication and polyteny understood as evolutionary strategies. Nature 1976, 261:614-615.
2. D'Amato F. Role of polyploidy in reproductive organs and tissues. Embryology of angiosperms 1984, 519-566. Springer-Verlag. B.B. Jori (Ed.).
3. Leitch A.R., Leitch I.J. Ecological and genetic factors linked to contrasting genome dynamics in seed plants. New Phytol. 2012, 194:629-646.
4. Endopolyploidy and Polyteny in Differentiation and Evolution: Towards an Understanding of Quantitative and Qualitative Variation of Nuclear DNA in Ontogeny and Phylogeny 1978, North-Holland. W. Nagl (Ed.).
5. Edgar B.A., et al. Endocycles: a recurrent evolutionary innovation for post-mitotic cell growth. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15:197-210.
6. Galbraith D.W., et al. Systemic endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96:985-989.
7. Melaragno J.E., et al. Relationship between endopolyploidy and cell size in epidermal tissue of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1993, 5:1661-1668.
8. Barow M., Meister A. Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated systematics, organ, life strategy, and size. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26:571-584.
9. Barow M. Endopolyploidy in seed plants. Bioessays 2006, 28:271-281.
10. Maluszynska J., et al. Endopolyploidy in plants. Plant Genome Diversity. Vol. 2: Physical Structure, Behaviour and Evolution of Plant Genomes 2013, 99-119. Springer-Verlag. I.J. Leitch (Ed.).
11. Brodsky V.Y., Uryvaeva I.V. The biological significance of polyploidy and polyteny. Genome Multiplication in Growth and Development 1985, 175-233. Cambridge University Press. V.Y. Brodsky, I.V. Uryvaeva (Eds.).
12. Vlieghe K., et al. Physiological relevance and molecular control of the endocycle in plants. Cell Cycle Control and Plant Development 2007, 227-248. Blackwell. D. Inzé (Ed.).
13. Magyar Z., et al. Cell cycle modules in plants for entry into proliferation and for mitosis. Plant Genome Diversity. Vol. 2: Physical Structure, Behaviour and Evolution of Plant Genomes 2013, 77-97. Springer-Verlag. I.J. Leitch (Ed.).
14. Nagl W. Polytene chromosomes of plants. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1981, 73:21-53.
15. Schubert V., et al. Sister chromatids are often incompletely aligned in meristematic and endopolyploid interphase nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2006, 172:467-475.
16. Nagl W. Molecular and structural aspects of the endomitotic chromosome cycle in angiosperms. Chromosomes Today 1972, 3:17-23.
17. Nagl W. Gene amplification and related events. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry 11, Somaclonal Variation in Crop Improvement I 1990, 153-201. Springer-Verlag. Y.P.S. Bajaj (Ed.).
18. Biskup A., Izmaiłow R. Endosperm development in seeds of Echium vulgare L. (Boraginaceae) from polluted sites. Acta Biol. Cracov. Bot. 2004, 46:39-44.
19. Traas J., et al. Endoreduplication and development: rule without dividing?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998, 1:498-503.
20. Larkins B.A., et al. Investigating the hows and whys of DNA endoreduplication. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52:183-192.
21. Lee H.O., et al. Endoreplication: ploidy with purpose. Gene Dev. 2009, 23:2461-2477.
22. Breuer C., et al. Endocycling in the path of plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 17:78-85.
23. Bennett M.D. The duration of meiosis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 1971, 178:259-275.
24. Bennett M.D. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 1972, 181:109-135.
25. Bennett M.D. Variation in genomic form in plants and its ecological implications. New Phytol. 1987, 106:177-200.
26. Gregory T.R., Hebert P.D.N. The modulation of DNA content: proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Genome Res. 1999, 9:317-324.
27. Gregory T.R. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and C- value enigma. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2001, 76:65-101.
28. Gregory T.R. The C-value enigma in plants and animals: a review of parallels and an appeal for partnership. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 2005, 95:133-146.
29. Jovtchev G., et al. Nuclear DNA content and nuclear and cell volume are positively correlated in angiosperms. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2006, 114:77-82.
30. Beaulieu J.M., et al. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytol. 2008, 179:975-986.
31. Sugimoto-Shirasu K., Roberts K. 'Big it up': endoreduplication and cell-size control in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6:544-553.
32. Kondorosi E., et al. Plant cell-size control: growing by ploidy?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 3:488-492.
33. Skirycz A., Inzé D. More from less: plant growth under limited water. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21:197-203.
34. Edgar B.A., Orr-Weaver T.L. Endoreplication cell cycle: more for less. Cell 2001, 105:297-306.
35. Beemster G.T.S., et al. Variation in growth rate between Arabidopsis ecotypes is correlated with cell division and A-type cyclin-dependent kinase activity. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129:854-864.
36. Breuer C., et al. Developmental control of endocycles and cell growth in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13:654-660.
37. Tsukaya H. Does ploidy level directly control cell size? Counterevidence from Arabidopsis genetics. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e83729.
38. Butterfass T.H. A nucleotypic control of chloroplast reproduction. Protoplasma 1983, 118:71-74.
39. Bourdon M., et al. Evidence for karyoplasmic homeostasis during endoreduplication and a ploidy-dependent increase in gene transcription during tomato fruit growth. Development 2012, 139:3817-3826.
40. John P.C.L., Qi R. Cell division and endoreduplication: doubtful engines of vegetative growth. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:121-127.
41. Harashima H., Schnittger A. The integration of cell division, growth and differentiation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13:66-74.
42. Kudo N., Mii M. Endoreduplication cycles during hypocotyl growth of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) under light and dark conditions. Plant Biotechnol. 2004, 21:295-298.
43. Yamasaki S., et al. Continuous UV-B irradiation induces morphological changes and the accumulation of polyphenolic compounds on the surface of cucumber cotyledons. J. Radiat. Res. (Tokyo) 2007, 48:443-454.
44. Yamasaki S., et al. Continuous UV-B irradiation induces endoreduplication and peroxidase activity in epidermal cells surrounding trichomes on cucumber cotyledons. J. Radiat. Res. (Tokyo) 2010, 51:187-196.
45. Radziejwoski A., et al. Atypical E2F activity coordinates PHR1 photolyase gene transcription with endoreduplication onset. EMBO J. 2011, 30:355-363.
46. Hase Y., et al. A mutation in the uvi4 gene promotes progression of endo-reduplication and confers increased tolerance towards ultraviolet B light. Plant J. 2006, 46:317-326.
47. Gegas V.C., et al. Endopolyploidy as a potential alternative adaptive strategy for Arabidopsis leaf size variation in response to UV-B. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65:2757-2766.
48. Kinoshita I., et al. Difference in light-induced increase in ploidy level and cell size between adaxial and abaxial epidermal pavement cells of Phaseolus vulgaris primary leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:1419-1430.
49. Engelen-Eigles G., et al. DNA endoreduplication in maize endosperm cells is reduced by high temperature during the mitotic phase. Crop Sci. 2001, 41:1114-1121.
50. Pierre J., et al. Cellular changes during Medicago truncatula hypocotyl growth depend on temperature and genotype. Plant Sci. 2014, 217-218:18-26.
51. Schuppler U., et al. Effect of water stress on cell division and cdc2-like cell cycle kinase activity in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117:667-678.
52. cdc2 kinase activity in maize leaves grown at contrasting temperatures and soil water conditions. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124:1393-1402.
53. Setter T.L., Flannigan B.A. Water deficit inhibits cell division and expression of transcripts in cell proliferation and endoreduplication in maize endosperm. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52:1401-1408.
54. Cookson S.J., et al. Cell and leaf size plasticity in Arabidopsis: what is the role of endoreduplication?. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29:1273-1283.
55. Harb A., et al. Molecular and physiological analysis of drought stress in Arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:1254-1271.
56. Noir S., et al. Jasmonate controls leaf growth by repressing cell proliferation and the onset of endoreduplication while maintaining a potential stand-by mode. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161:1930-1951.
57. Dubois M., et al. ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR6 acts as a central regulator of leaf growth under water-limiting conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162:319-332.
58. Kaplan-Levy R.N., et al. The trihelix family of transcription factors - light, stress and development. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17:163-171.
59. de Rocher J.E., et al. Developmentally regulated systemic endopolyploidy in succulents with small genomes. Science 1990, 250:99-101.
60. Ceccarelli M., et al. Chromosome endoreduplication as a factor of salt adaptation in Sorghum bicolor. Protoplasma 2006, 227:113-118.
61. Maggio A., et al. Does proline accumulation play an active role in stress-induced growth reduction?. Plant J. 2002, 31:699-712.
62. Elmaghrabi A., et al. Enhanced tolerance to salinity following cellular acclimation to increasing NaCl levels in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2013, 114:61-70.
63. Fusconi A., et al. Effects of cadmium on meristem activity and nucleus ploidy in roots of Pisum sativum L. cv. Frisson seedlings. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006, 58:253-260.
64. Vinardell J.M., et al. Endoreduplication mediated by the anaphase-promoting complex activator CCS52A is required for symbiotic cell differentiation in Medicago truncatula nodules. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2093-2105.
65. Wildermuth M.C. Modulation of host nuclear ploidy: a common plant biotroph mechanism. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13:449-458.
66. Bainard L.D., et al. Mycorrhizal symbiosis stimulates endoreduplication in angiosperms. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34:1577-1585.
67. de Almeida Engler J., Gheysen G. Nematode-induced endoreduplication in plant host cells: why and how?. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013, 26:17-24.
68. Scholes D.R., Paige K.N. Chromosomal plasticity: mitigating the impacts of herbivory. Ecology 2011, 92:1691-1698.
69. Scholes D.R., et al. The genetic basis of overcompensation in plants: a synthesis. Int. J. Mod. Bot. 2013, 3:34-42.
70. Scholes D.R., Paige K.N. Plasticity in ploidy underlies plant fitness compensation to herbivore damage. Mol. Ecol. 2014, 23:4862-4870.
71. Siddappaji M.H., et al. Overcompensation in response to herbivory in Arabidopsis thaliana: the role of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and the oxidative pentose-phosphate pathway. Genetics 2013, 195:589-598.
72. Johnson H.B. Plant pubescence: an ecological perspective. Bot. Rev. 1975, 41:233-258.
73. Larkin J.C., et al. Insights into the endocycle from trichome development. Cell Cycle Control and Plant Development 2007, 249-268. Blackwell. D. Inzé (Ed.).
74. Li Z.H., et al. Phenolics and plant allelopathy. Molecules 2010, 15:8933-8952.
75. Ding J., et al. Physiological basis of different allelopathic reactions of cucumber and figleaf gourd plants to cinnamic acid. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:3765-3773.
76. Zhang Y., et al. Effects of phenylcarboxylic acids on mitosis, endoreduplication and expression of cell cycle-related genes in roots of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35:679-688.
77. Soltys D., et al. Phytotoxic cyanamide affects maize (Zea mays) root growth and root tip function: from structure to gene expression. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171:565-575.
78. Kruger N.J., von Schaewen A. The oxidative pentose phosphate pathway: structure and organisation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6:236-246.
79. Maeda H., Dudareva N. The shikimate pathway and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63:73-105.
80. Dixon R.A., Paiva N.L. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 1995, 7:1085-1097.
81. Crifò T., et al. Expression analysis in response to low temperature stress in blood oranges: implication of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Gene 2011, 476:1-9.
82. Sánchez-Rodríguez E., et al. Differential responses of five cherry tomato varieties to water stress: changes on phenolic metabolites and related enzymes. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:723-729.
83. Zhang Z.Z., et al. Three types of ultraviolet irradiation differentially promote expression of shikimate pathway genes and production of anthocyanins in grape berries. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 57:74-83.
84. Gajewska E., et al. Differential response of wheat roots to Cu, Ni and Cd treatment: oxidative stress and defense reactions. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 71:13-20.
85. Rejeb K.B., et al. How reactive oxygen species and proline face stress together. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 80:278-284.
86. Kwok D., Shetty K. Effect of proline and proline analogs on total phenolic and rosmarinic acid levels in shoot clones of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). J. Food Biochem. 1998, 22:37-51.
87. Yang R., Shetty K. Stimulation of rosmarinic acid in shoot cultures of oregano (Origanum vulgare) clonal line in response to proline, proline analog and proline precursors. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46:2888-2893.
88. McCue P., Shetty K. Clonal herbal extracts as elicitors of phenolic synthesis in dark-germinated mungbeans for improving nutritional value with implications for food safety. J. Food Biochem. 2002, 26:209-232.
89. Shetty P., et al. Effects of UV treatment on the proline-linked pentose phosphate pathway for phenolics and L-DOPA synthesis in dark germinated Vicia faba. Process Biochem. 2002, 37:1285-1295.
90. Shetty P., et al. Stimulation of total phenolics, L-DOPA and antioxidant activity through proline-linked pentose phosphate pathway in response to proline and its analogue in germinating fava beans (Vicia faba). Process Biochem. 2003, 38:1707-1717.
91. Seki M., et al. Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:296-302.
92. Sarkar D., Bhowmik P.C. Cold acclimation responses of three cool-season turfgrasses and the role of proline-associated pentose phosphate pathway. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2009, 134:210-220.
93. Szabados L., Savouré A. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15:89-97.
94. Shetty K. Biotechnology to harness the benefits of dietary phenolics; focus on Lamiaceae. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997, 6:162-171.
95. van Assche F. Induction of enzyme capacity in plants as a result of heavy metal toxicity: dose-response relations in Phaseolus vulgaris L., treated with zinc and cadmium. Environ. Pollut. 1988, 52:103-115.
96. Ślaski J.J., et al. Aluminum resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) is associated with rapid, Al-induced changes in activities of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase in root apices. Physiol. Plant. 1996, 98:477-484.
97. Nemoto Y., et al. Specific expression of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) gene by salt stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 2000, 158:53-60.
98. Liu Y., et al. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase plays a pivotal role in nitric oxide-involved defense against oxidative stress under salt stress in red kidney bean roots. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48:511-522.
99. Nieuwland J., et al. The plant cyclins. Cell cycle Control and Plant Development 2007, 31-61. Blackwell. D. Inzé (Ed.).
100. Dudits D., et al. The growing family of plant cyclin-dependent kinases with multiple functions in cellular and developmental regulation. Cell Cycle Control and Plant Development 2007, 1-30. Blackwell. D. Inzé (Ed.).
101. Bainard J.D., et al. A multivariate analysis of variation in genome size and endoreduplication in angiosperms reveals strong phylogenetic signal and association with phenotypic traits. New Phytol. 2013, 196:1240-1250.
102. Tschermak-Woess E. Karyologische Pflanzenanatomie. Protoplasma 1956, 46:798-834.
103. Vitousek P.M., et al. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20:5-15.
104. Šmarda P., et al. Effect of phosphorus availability on the selection of species with different ploidy levels and genome sizes in a long-term grassland fertilization experiment. New Phytol. 2013, 200:911-921.
105. Granier C., et al. Cell cycle and environmental stresses. Cell Cycle Control and Plant Development 2007, 335-355. Blackwell. D. Inzé (Ed.).
106. Adams K.L., Wendel J.F. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8:135-141.
107. Tate J.A., et al. Polyploidy in plants. The Evolution of the Genome 2011, 371-426. Academic Press. T.R. Gregory (Ed.).
108. Comai L. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6:836-846.
109. Sliwinska E., Lukaszewska E. Polysomaty in growing in vitro sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seedlings of different ploidy level. Plant Sci. 2005, 168:1067-1074.
110. Bainard J.D., et al. Nuclear DNA content variation and evolution in liverworts. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 68:619-627.
111. Bainard J.D., Newmaster S.G. Endopolyploidy in bryophytes: widespread in mosses and absent in liverworts. J. Bot. 2010, 2010:316356.
112. Bainard J.D., Villarreal J.C. Genome size increases in recently diverged hornwort clades. Genome 2013, 56:431-435.
113. Bainard J.D., et al. DNA content variation in monilophytes and lycophytes: large genomes that are not endopolyploid. Chromosome Res. 2011, 19:763-775.
114. Avanzi S., Cionini P.G. A DNA cytophotometric investigation on the development of the female gametophyte of Ginkgo biloba. Caryologia 1971, 24:105-116.
115. Barow M., Jovtchev G. Endopolyploidy in plants and its analysis by flow cytometry. Flow Cytometry with Plant Cells: Analysis of Genes, Chromosomes, and Genomes 2007, 349-372. Wiley. J. Doležel (Ed.).
116. Boudolf V., et al. The plant-specific cyclin-dependent kinase CDKB1;1 and transcription factor E2Fa-DPa control the balance of mitotically dividing and endoreduplicating cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16:2683-2692.
117. John P.C.L. Hormonal regulation of cell cycle progression and its role in development. Cell Cycle Control and Plant Development 2007, 311-334. Blackwell. D. Inzé (Ed.).
118. Kitsios G., Doonan J.H. Cyclin dependent protein kinases and stress responses in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6:204-209.
119. Tank J.G., et al. Phytohormones in regulation of the cell division and endoreduplication process in the plant cell cycle. R. Soc. Chem. Adv. 2014, 4:12605-12613.
120. Francis D., et al. A strong nucleotypic effect on the cell cycle regardless of ploidy level. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 2008, 101:747-757.
121. Evans G., et al. The relationship between nuclear DNA amount and the duration of the mitotic cycle. Chromosomes Today 1972, 3:24-31.
122. Price H.J., et al. Correlations between nuclear volume, cell volume and DNA content in meristematic cells of herbaceous angiosperms. Experientia 1973, 29:1028-1029.
123. Stebbins G.L. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher plants 1971, Addison-Wesley.
124. Knight C.A., et al. On the relationship between pollen size and genome size. J. Bot. 2010, 2010:612017.
125. Katsiotis A., Forsberg R.A. Pollen grain size in four ploidy levels of genus Avena. Euphytica 1995, 83:103-108.
126. Beaulieu J.M., et al. Correlated evolution of genome size and seed mass. New Phytol. 2007, 173:422-437.
127. Smith K.F., et al. The effects of ploidy and seed mass on the emergence and early vigour of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2003, 43:481-486.
128. Lemontey C., et al. Maternal genotype influences pea seed size by controlling both mitotic activity during early embryogenesis and final endoreduplication level/cotyledon cell size in mature seed. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51:167-175.
129. Guo M., et al. Dosage effects on gene expression in a maize ploidy series. Genetics 1996, 142:1349-1355.
130. Butterfass T.H. Control of plastid division by means of nuclear DNA amount. Protoplasma 1973, 76:167-195.
131. Butterfass T.H. Die Abhängigkeit der Plastidenvermehrung von der Reproduktion der Erbsubstanz im Kern. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 1963, 76:123-134.
132. Berg J.M. The Calvin cycle and the pentose phosphate pathway. Biochemistry 2006, 739-755. W.H. Freeman. J.M. Berg (Ed.).
133. Shetty K., Wahlqvist M.L. A model for the role of proline-linked pentose phosphate pathway in phenolic phytochemical biosynthesis and mechanism of action for human health and environmental applications. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 13:1-24.
134. Perassolo M., et al. Role of reactive oxygen species and proline cycle in anthraquinone accumulation in Rubia tinctorum cell suspension cultures subjected to methyl jasmonate elicitation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49:758-763.
135. Herrmann K.M., Weaver L.M. The shikimate pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Phys. 1999, 50:473-503.
136. Tzin V., Galili G. New insights into the shikimate and aromatic amino acids biosynthesis pathways in plants. Mol. Plant 2010, 3ssss:956-972.
137. Shetty K. Role of proline-linked pentose phosphate pathway in biosynthesis of plant phenolics for functional food and environmental applications: a review. Process Biochem. 2004, 39:789-804.
138. Balbiani E.G. Sur la structure du noyau des cellules salivaires chez les larves de Chironomus. Zool. Anz. 1881, 4:662-667.
139. Barlow P.W. Endopolyploidy: towards an understanding of its biological significance. Acta Biotheor. 1978, 27:1-18.