Chromosomal plasticity: Mitigating the impacts of herbivory

Ecology

Volumn 92, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1691-1698

  Scholes, Daniel R ^a   Paige, Ken N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis; Chromosomal plasticity; Compensation; DNA content; Endoreduplication; Fitness

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; APICAL DOMINANCE; CHROMOSOME; COMPENSATION; DICOTYLEDON; ECOTYPE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FITNESS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HERBIVORY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; POLYPLOIDY; REGROWTH; SEED PRODUCTION;

ADAPTATION; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ARABIDOPSIS; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; EUKARYOTA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 79961037669     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/10-2269.1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agrawal, A. A. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279:1201-1202. (Pubitemid 28164370)
2. Agrawal, A. A. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294:321-326. (Pubitemid 32963392)
3. Alward, R. D., and A. Joern. 1993. Plasticity and overcompensation in grass responses to herbivory. Oecologia 95:358-364.
4. Barow, M. 2006. Endopolyploidy in seed plants. BioEssays 28:271-281.
5. Barow, M., and A. Meister. 2003. Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated systematics, organ, life strategy, and size. Plant, Cell and Environment 26:571-584. (Pubitemid 36521863)
6. Berenbaum, M. R., A. R. Zangerl, and J. K. Nitao. 1986. Constraints on chemical coevolution: wild parsnips and the parsnip webworm. Evolution 40:1215-1228.
7. Brodsky, W. Y., and I. V. Uryvaeva. 1977. Cell polyploidy: its relation to tissue growth and function. International Review of Cytology 50:275-332. (Pubitemid 8173563)
8. Ceccarelli, M., E. Santantonio, F. Marmottini, G. N. Amzallag, and P. G. Cionini. 2006. Chromosome endoreduplication as a factor of salt adaptation in Sorghum bicolor. Protoplasma 227:113-118. (Pubitemid 43807443)
9. Cookson, S. J., A. Radziejwoski, and C. Granier. 2006. Cell and leaf size plasticity in Arabidopsis: what is the role of endoreduplication? Plant, Cell and Environment 29:1273-1283. (Pubitemid 43855744)
10. Dudley, S. A., and J. Schmitt. 1996. Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 147:445-465.
11. Engelen-Eigles, G., R. J. Jones, and R. L. Phillips. 2001. DNA endoreduplication in maize endosperm cells is reduced by high temperature during the mitotic phase. Crop Science 41:1114-1121. (Pubitemid 32773805)
12. Galbraith, D. W., K. R. Harkins, J. M. Maddox, N. M. Ayres, D. P. Sharma, and E. Firoozabady. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049-1051. (Pubitemid 13090141)
13. Hougen-Eitzman, D., and M. D. Rausher. 1994. Interactions between herbivorous insects and plant-insect coevolution. American Naturalist 143:677-697.
14. Ishida, T., S. Adachi, M. Yoshimura, K. Shimizu, M. Umeda, and K. Sugimoto. 2010. Auxin modulates the transition from the mitotic cycle to the endocycle in Arabidopsis. Development 137:63-71.
15. Juenger, T., and J. Bergelson. 2000. The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata; herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54:764-777. (Pubitemid 30466420)
16. Kowles, R. V., and R. L. Phillips. 1988. Endosperm development in maize. International Review of Cytology 112:97-136.
17. Lee, H. O., J. M. Davidson, and R. J. Duronio. 2009. Endoreplication: ploidy with purpose. Genes and Development 23:2461-2477.
18. Lennartsson, T., P. Nilsson, and J. Tuomi. 1997. Evidence for an evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). American Naturalist 149:1147-1155. (Pubitemid 127738308)
19. Lowenberg, G. J. 1994. Effects of floral herbivory on maternal reproduction in Sanicula arctopoides (Apiaceae). Ecology 75:359-369.
20. Maschinski, J., and T. G. Whitham. 1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. American Naturalist 134:1-19. (Pubitemid 20420692)
21. Mauricio, R., and M. D. Rausher. 1997. Experimental manipulation of putative selective agents provides evidence for the role of natural enemies in the evolution of plant defense. Evolution 51:1435-1444. (Pubitemid 27491142)
22. Mauricio, R., M. D. Rausher, and B. S. Burdick. 1997. Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistant and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301-1311.
23. Melaragno, J. E., B. Mehrotra, and A. W. Coleman. 1993. Relationship between endopolyploidy and cell size in epidermal tissue of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 5:1661-1668. (Pubitemid 2021821)
24. Nagl, W. 1976. Endoreduplication and polyteny understood as evolutionary strategies. Nature 261:614-615.
25. Nilsson, P., J. Tuomi, and M. Astrom. 1996. Even repeated grazing may select for overcompensation. Ecology 77:1942-1946.
26. Paige, K. N. 1992. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: from mutualistic to antagonistic interactions. Ecology 73:2076-2085. (Pubitemid 23399505)
27. Paige, K. N. 1994. Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: differences in response and differences in experimental protocol, a reply to Bergelson and Crawley. American Naturalist 143:739-749.
28. Paige, K. N. 1999. Regrowth following ungulate herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: geographic evidence for overcompensation. Oecologia 118:316-323. (Pubitemid 29150695)
29. Paige, K. N., and T. G. Whitham. 1987. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. American Naturalist 129:407-416.
30. Rautio, P., A. P. Huhta, S. Piippo, J. Tuomi, T. Juenger, M. Saari, and J. Aspi. 2005. Overcompensation and adaptive plasticity of apical dominance in Erysimum strictum (Brassicaceae) in response to simulated browsing and resource availability. Oikos 111:79-191.
31. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
32. Stowe, K. A., R. J. Marquis, C. G. Hochwender, and E. L. Simms. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:565-595. (Pubitemid 32122413)
33. Sugimoto-Shirasu, K., and K. Roberts. 2003. "Big it up": endoreduplication and cell-size control in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6:544-553. (Pubitemid 37435965)
34. Taft, R. J., K. C. Pang, T. R. Mercer, M. Dinger, and J. S. Mattick. 2010. Non-coding RNAs: regulators of disease. Journal of Pathology 220:126-139.
35. Tiffin, P., and M. D. Rausher. 1999. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. American Naturalist. 154:700-716. (Pubitemid 30071195)
36. Weinig, C., J. R. Stinchcombe, and J. Schmitt. 2003. Evolutionary genetics of resistance and tolerance to natural herbivory in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 57:1270-1280. (Pubitemid 36821239)