Methods for studying polyploid diversification and the dead end hypothesis: A reply to Soltis et al. (2014)

New Phytologist

Volumn 206, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 27-35

  Mayrose, Itay ^a   Zhan, Shing H ^b   Rothfels, Carl J ^b   Arrigo, Nils ^c   Barker, Michael S ^d   Rieseberg, Loren H ^b   Otto, Sarah P ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^d The University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary state speciation and extinction (BiSSE); Diversification; Extinction; Meta analysis; Polyploidy; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; EVOLUTION; FERN; GENETICS; POLYPLOIDY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

ANGIOSPERMS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; FERNS; GENETIC SPECIATION; POLYPLOIDY;

EID: 84923502767     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13192     Document Type: Letter

References (37)

1. Arrigo N, Barker MS. 2012. Rarely successful polyploids and their legacy in plant genomes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15: 140-146.
2. Bokma F. 2003. Testing for equal rates of cladogenesis in diverse taxa. Evolution 57: 2469-2474.
3. Escudero M, Martín-Bravo S, Mayrose I, Fernández-Mazuecos M, Fiz-Palacios O, Hipp AL, Pimentel M, Jiménez-Mejías P, Valcárcel V, Vargas P et al. 2014. Karyotypic changes through dysploidy persist longer over evolutionary time than polyploid phanges. PLoS ONE 9: e85266.
4. Fawcett JA, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2009. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 5737-5742.
5. Fedorov AA. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. Moscow, Russia: Academy of Science of USSR.
6. FitzJohn RG. 2012. Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 1084-1092.
7. FitzJohn RG, Maddison WP, Otto SP. 2009. Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. Systematic Biology 58: 595-611.
8. Goldberg EE, Igic B. 2008. On phylogenetic tests of irreversible evolution. Evolution 62: 2727-2741.
9. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, Tomsho LP, Hu Y, Liang H, Soltis PM et al. 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473: 97-100.
10. Kafer J, Mousset S. 2014. Standard sister-clade comparison fails when testing derived character states. Systematic Biology 63: 601-609.
11. Levin DA. 1983. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. The American Naturalist 122: 1-25.
12. Maddison WP. 2006. Confounding asymmetries in evolutionary diversification and character change. Evolution 60: 1743-1746.
13. Maddison WP, FitzJohn RG. 2015. The unsolved challenge to phylogenetic corre-lation tests for categorical characters. Systematic Biology. 64: 127-136.
14. Maddison WP, Midford PE, Otto SP. 2007. Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. Systematic Biology 56: 701-710.
15. Mayrose I, Barker MS, Otto SP. 2010. Probabilistic models of chromosome number evolution and the inference of polyploidy. Systematic Biology 59: 132-144.
16. Mayrose I, Zhan SH, Rothfels CJ, Magnuson-Ford K, Barker MS, Rieseberg LH, Otto SP. 2011a. Recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates. Science 333: 1257.
17. Mayrose I, Zhan SH, Rothfels CJ, Magnuson-Ford K, Barker MS, Rieseberg LH, Otto SP. 2011b. Data from: recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates. Dryad Digital Repository. [WWW document] URL http://datadryad.org/resource/doi:10.5061/dryad.6hf21 [accessed 10 August 2014].
18. Meyers LA, Levin DA. 2006. On the abundance of polyploids in flowering plants. Evolution 60: 1198-1206.
19. Moore MJ, Tye A, Jansen RK. 2006. Patterns of long-distance dispersal in Tiquilia subg. Tiquilia (Boraginaceae): implications for the origins of amphitropical disjuncts and Galapagos Islands endemics. American Journal of Botany 93: 1163-1177.
20. Mort M, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Francisco-Ortega J, Santos-Guerra A. 2002. Phylogenetics and evolution of the Macaronesian Clade (Crassulaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. Systematic Botany 27: 271-288.
21. Nee S. 2006. Birth-death models in macroevolution. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 37: 1-17.
22. Nee S, May RM, Harvey PH. 1994. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 344: 305-311.
23. Rabosky DL. 2010. Extinction rates should not be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Evolution 64: 1816-1824.
24. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 589-639.
25. Ree RH. 2005. Detecting the historical signature of key innovations using stochastic models of character evolution and cladogenesis. Evolution 59: 257-265.
26. Rodríguez NC, Bueno ML. 2006. Estudio de la diversidad citogenética de Physalis peruviana L. (Solanaceae). Acta Biológica Colombiana 11: 75-85.
27. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539-542.
28. Scarpino SV, Levin DA, Meyers LA. 2014. Polyploid formation shapes flowering plant diversity. The American Naturalist 184: 456-465.
29. Soltis DE, Segovia-Salcedo MC, Jordon-Thaden I, Majure L, Miles NM, Mavrodiev EV, Mei W, Cortez MB, Soltis PS, Gitzendanner MA. 2014. Are polyploids really evolutionary dead-ends (again)? A critical reappraisal of Mayrose et al. (2011) New Phytologist 202: 1105-1117.
30. Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
31. The Plant List, Version 1.1. 2013. [WWW document] URL http://www.theplantlist.org/ [accessed 23 June 2014].
32. Thorne JL, Kishino H, Painter IS. 1998. Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1647-1657.
33. Uhl CH. 1961. The chromosomes of the Sempervivoideae (Crassulaceae). American Journal of Botany 48: 114-123.
34. Vanneste K, Baele G, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2014. Analysis of 41 plant genomes supports a wave of successful genome duplications in association with the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Genome Research 24: 1334-1347.
35. Wahua C, Sam SM. 2013. Comparative chemotaxonomic investigations on Physalis angulata Linn. and Physalis micrantha Linn. (Solanaceae). Asian Journal of Applied Sciences 1: 220-228.
36. Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, Mayrose I, Greenspoon PB, Rieseberg LH. 2009. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 13 875-13 879.
37. Zhan SH, Glick L, Tsigenopoulos CS, Otto SP, Mayrose I. 2014. Comparative analysis reveals that polyploidy does not decelerate diversification in fish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27: 391-403.