Detecting the historical signature of key innovations using stochastic models of character evolution and cladogenesis

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 257-265

  Ree, Richard H ^a  

^a FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquilegia; Bayesian inference; Character mapping; Diversification rate; Macroevolution; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENETICS; STOCHASTICITY;

AQUILEGIA;

EID: 14844362161     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00986.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barraclough, T. G., and V. Savolainen. 2001. Evolutionary rates and species diversity in flowering plants. Evolution 55:677-683.
2. Chan, K. M. A., and B. R. Moore. 2002. Whole-tree methods for detecting differential diversification rates. Syst. Biol. 51:855-865.
3. de Queiroz, A. 2002. Contingent predictability in evolution: key traits and diversification. Syst. Biol. 51:917-929.
4. Drummond, A. J., and A. Rambaut. 2003. BEAST Ver. 1.0. Available from http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/beast/.
5. Drummond, A. J., G. K. Nicholls, A. G. Rodrigo, and W. Solomon. 2002. Estimating mutation parameters, population history and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data. Genetics 161:1307-1320.
6. Farrell, B. D., D. E. Dussourd, and C. Mitter. 1991. Escalation of plant defense: Do latex and resin canals spur plant diversification? Am. Nat. 138:881-900.
7. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies with a molecular clock. Syst. Zool. 34:152-161.
8. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
9. Hasegawa, M., H. Kishino, and T. Yano. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 21:160-174.
10. Heard, S. B., and D. L. Hauser. 1995. Key evolutionary innovations and their ecological mechanisms. Hist. Biol. 10:151-173.
11. Hey, J. 1992. Using phylogenetic trees to study speciation and extinction. Evolution 46:627-640.
12. Hodges, S. A. 1997. Floral nectar spurs and diversification. International J. Plant Sci. 158(Suppl. 6):S81-S88.
13. Hodges, S. A., and M. L. Arnold. 1994a. Columbines: a geographically widespread species flock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5129-5132.
14. _. 1994b. Floral and ecological isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2493-2496.
15. _. 1995. Spurring plant diversification: Are floral nectar spurs a key innovation? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 262:343-348.
16. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. R. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:745-755.
17. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Rannala, and J. P. Masly. 2000. Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies. Science 288:2349-2350.
18. Huelsenbeck, J., R. Nielsen, and J. Bollback. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52:131-158.
19. Johnson, S. D., and K. E. Steiner. 1997. Long-tongued fly pollination and the evolution of floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orchidaceae). Evolution 51:45-53.
20. Li, S. 1996. Phylogenetic tree construction using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH.
21. Mau, B. 1996. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
22. Mau, B., M. Newton, and B. Larget. 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics 55:1-12.
23. McConway, K. J., and H. J. Sims. 2004. A likelihood-based method for testing for nonstochastic variation of diversification rates in phylogenies. Evolution 58:12-23.
24. Mitter, C., B. Farrell, and B. Wiegmann. 1988. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification? Am. Nat. 132:107-128.
25. Moore, B. R., K. M. A. Chan, and M. J. Donoghue. 2004. Detecting diversification rate variation in supertrees. Pp. 487-533 in O. R. P. Bininda-Emons, ed. Phylogenetic supertrees: combining information to reveal the tree of life. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
26. Nee, S. 2001. Inferring speciation rates from phylogenies. Evolution 55:661-668.
27. Nee, S., A. O. Mooers, and P. H. Harvey. 1992. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:8322-8326.
28. Nee, S., R. M. May, and P. H. Harvey. 1994. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344:305-311.
29. Nielsen, R. 2002. Mapping mutations on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 51:729-739.
30. Nilsson, L. A. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature 334:147-149.
31. Paradis, E. 1997. Assessing temporal variations in diversification rates from phylogenies: estimation and hypothesis testing. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:1141-1147.
32. Rannala, B., and Z. Yang. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43:304-311.
33. Sanderson, M. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 1994. Shifts in diversification rate with the origin of angiosperms. Science 264:1590-1593.
34. _. 1996. Reconstructing shifts in diversification on phylogenetic trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:15-20.
35. Sargent, R. D. 2004. Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:603-608.
36. Sims, H. J., and K. J. McConway. 2003. Nonstochastic variation of species-level diversification rates within angiosperms. Evolution 57:460-479.
37. Slowinski, J. B., and C. Guyer. 1989. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: an improved null model. Am. Nat. 134(6):907-921.
38. _. 1993. Testing whether certain traits have caused amplified diversification: an improved method based on a model of random speciation and extinction. Am. Nat. 142:1019-1024.
39. Thorne, J., and H. Kishino. 2002. Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data. Syst. Biol. 51(5):689-702.
40. von Hagen, K. B., and J. W. Kadereit. 2003. The diversification of Halenia (Gentianaceae): ecological opportunity versus key innovation. Evolution 57:2507-2518.
41. Webster, A. J., R. J. H. Payne, and M. Pagel. 2003. Molecular phylogenies link rates of evolution and speciation. Science 301:478.
42. Wollenberg, K., J. Arnold, and J. C. Avise. 1996. Recognizing the forest for the trees: testing temporal patterns of cladogenesis using a null model of stochastic diversification. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:833-849.
43. Yang, Z., and B. Rannala. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724.
44. Yule, G. U. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution based on the conclusions of J. C. Willis, F. R. S. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 213:21-87.