Infill Development: Perspectives and Evidence from Economics and Planning

The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  McConnell, Virginia ^a   Wiley, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b Housing Assistance Council   (United States)

Author keywords

Economics; Infill development; Local property values; Opposition; Planning; Policy; Urban projects

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923472471     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195380620.013.0022     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Blanchard, Christopher, Elaine Clegg, and Leslie Martin. 2008. The Consequences of Residential Infill Development on Existing Neighborhoods in the Treasure Valley. Project report. Boise, ID: Urban Land Institute, Idaho/Smart Growth, Idaho.
2. Burchell, Robert W., Anthony Downs, Barbara McCann, and Sahan Mukherji. 2006. Sprawl Costs: Economic Impacts of Unchecked Development. Washington, DC: Island Press.
3. Burchell, Robert W., David Listokin, and Catherine C. Galley. 2000. "Smart Growth: More Than a Ghost of Urban Policy Past, Less Than a Bold New Horizon." Housing Policy Debate 11:821-879.
4. Cadiz, Laura. 2004. "County Board Rejects Rouse's Downtown Plan." Baltimore Sun, January 22, B1.
5. Carruthers, John I. 2003. "Growth at the Fringe: The Influence of Political Fragmentation in United States Metropolitan Areas." Papers in Regional Science 82:475-499.
6. Carruthers, John I., and Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson. 2002. "Fragmentation and Sprawl: Evidence from Interregional Analysis." Growth and Change 33:312-340.
7. Colwell, Peter F., Carolyn A. Dehring, and Nicholas A. Lash. 2000. "The Effect of Group Homes on Neighborhood Property Values." Land Economics 76:615-637.
8. Colwell, Peter F., Surinder S. Gujral, and Christopher Coley. 1985. "The Impact of a Shopping Center on the Value of Surrounding Properties." Real Estate Issues 10 (Spring/Summer):35-39.
9. Congress for the New Urbanism. 2001. The Coming Demand. San Francisco, CA: Congress for New Urbanism.
10. Cooper, Mary H. 2004. "Can Managed Growth Reduce Sprawl?" Congressional Quarterly Researcher 14:469-492.
11. Danielson, Michael N. 1976. The Politics of Autonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.
12. Deitrick, Sabina, and Cliff Ellis. 2004. "New Urbanism in the Inner City." Journal of the American Planning Association 710:426-442.
13. Denver Regional Council of Governments. 2006. Regulatory Strategies for Encouraging Infill and Redevelopment. Denver, CO: Denver Regional Council of Governments.
14. Ding, Chengri, Robert Simons, and Esmail Baku. 2000. "Effect of Residential Investment on Nearby Property Values: Evidence from Cleveland, Ohio." Journal of Real Estate Research 19:23-48.
15. Downs, Anthony. 2000. Dealing Effectively with Fast Growth. Brookings Institute Policy Brief 67.
16. Downs, Anthony. 2001. "What Does Smart Growth Really Matter?" Planning 67 (4):20-25.
17. Downs, Anthony. 2005. "Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More Than We Do It." Journal of the American Planning Association 71:367-378.
18. Duany, Andres, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck. 2001. Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press.
19. Ellen, Ingrid Gould, and Ioan Voicu. 2006. "Nonprofit Housing and Neighborhood Spillovers." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 25:31-52.
20. Ellman, Tara. 1997. Infill: The Cure for Sprawl? Goldwater Institute. Arizona Issue Analysis 146.
21. Evans, Alan W. 2004. Economic and Land Use Planning. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Farris, J. Terrence. 2001. "The Barriers to Using Urban Infill Development to Achieve Smart Growth." Housing Policy Debate 12:1-30.
23. Fischel, William A. 2000. "Zoning and Land Use Regulation." In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume II. Civil Law and Economics , ed. Boudeqijn Bouchkaert and Gerrit De Geest, 403-442. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
24. Fischel, William A. 2001a. The Home Voter Hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Fischel, William A. 2001b. "Why Are There NIMBYs?" Land Economics 77:144-152.
26. Flint, Anthony. 2005. "The Density Dilemma: Appeal and Obstacles for Compact and Transit-Oriented Development." Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper WP05AF1.
27. Galster, George C., Peter Tatian, and Kathryn Pettit. 2004. "Supportive Housing and Neighborhood Property Value Externalities." Land Economics 80:33-54.
28. Grether, David M., and Peter Mieszkowski. 1980. "The Effects of Nonresidential Land Use on the Prices of Adjacent Housing: Some Estimates of Proximity Effects." Journal of Urban Economics 8:1-15.
29. Harris, David R. 1999. "Property Values Drop When Blacks Move in, Because...: Racial and Socioeconomic Determinants of Neighborhood Desirability." American Sociological Review 64:461-479.
30. Haughey, Richard M. 2001. Urban Infill Housing: Myth and Fact. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
31. Humstone, Elizabeth. 2004. "Sprawl vs. Smart Growth: The Power of the Purse." Communities and Banking 15 (Summer):10-15.
32. Ihlanfeldt, Keith R. 2004. "Exclusionary Land-Use Regulations within Suburban Communities: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Prescriptions." Urban Studies 41:261-281.
33. Johnston, Robert A., Seymour I. Schwartz, and Steve Tracy. 1984. "Growth Phasing and Resistance to Infill Development in Sacramento County." Journal of American Planning Association 50:434-446.
34. Judd, Dennis R., and Todd Swanstrom. 2006. City Politics: The Political Economy of Urban America. 5th ed. New York: Pearson Longman Press.
35. Jun, Myung-Jin. 2004. "The Effects of Portland's Urban Growth Boundary on Urban Development Patterns and Commuting." Urban Studies 41:1333-1348.
36. Knaap, Gerrit, and Terry Moore. 2000. "Land Supply and Infrastructure Capacity Monitoring for Smart Urban Growth." Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper WP00GKI.
37. Kopits, Elizabeth, Virginia McConnell, and Daniel Miles. 2009. Lot Size, Zoning, and Household Preferences: Impediments to Smart Growth? Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 09-15, Washington, DC.
38. Ladd, Helen F. 1992. "Population Growth, Density and the Costs of Providing Pubic Services." Urban Studies 29:273-295.
39. Landis, John D., Heather Hood, Guangyu Li, Michael Reilly, Thomas Rogers, and Charles Warren. 2006a. The Future of Infill Housing in California: Opportunities, Potential, Feasibility, and Demand, Vols. I-II. Sacramento, CA: California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency.
40. Landis, John, Heather Hood, Guangyu Li, Thomas Rogers, and Charles Warren. 2006b. "The Future of Infill Housing in California: Opportunities, Potential, and Feasibility." Housing Policy Debate 17:681-726.
41. Lee, Chang-Moo, and Kun-Hyuck Ahn. 2003. "Is Kentlands Better Than Radburn?" Journal of the American Planning Association 69:50-71.
42. Levine, Jonathan. 2006. Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land-Use. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
43. Lewis, Rebecca, Gerrit-Jan Knaap, and Jungyul Sohn. 2009. "Managing Growth with Priority Funding Areas: A Good Idea Whose Time Has Yet to Come." Journal of the American Planning Association 75:457-478.
44. Lichtenberg, Erik, Constant Tra, and Ian Hardie. 2007. "Impacts of Land Use Regulation on the Provision of Open Space in Residential Subdivisions." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54:199-213.
45. Malpezzi, Stephen. 1996. "Housing Prices, Externalities, and Regulation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas." Journal of Housing Research 7:209-241.
46. Malpezzi, Stephen, and Richard K. Green. 2003. A Primer on U.S. Housing Markets and Housing Policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
47. Maryland Department of Planning (MDP). 2001. Models and Guidelines for Infill Development. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Department of Planning.
48. McConnell, Virginia, and Matthias Cinyabuguma. 2009. "Urban Growth Externalities and Neighborhood Incentives: Another Cause of Urban Sprawl?" UMBC Department of Economics Department Working Papers 09-106.
49. McConnell, Virginia, Elizabeth Kopits, and Margaret Walls. 2005. "Farmland Preservation and Residential Density: Can Development Rights Markets Affect Land Use?" Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 34:131-144.
50. McConnell, Virginia, Margaret Walls, and Francis Kelly. 2007. Markets for Preserving Farmland in Maryland: Making TDR Programs Work Better. Report prepared for the Maryland Center for Agroecology, Queenstown, MD.
51. Meyers, Dowell, and Elizabeth Gearin. 2004. "Current Preferences and Future Demand for Denser Residential Environments." Housing Policy Debate 12:633-660.
52. Meyers, Dowell, and Alicia Kitsuse. 1999. "The Debate over Future Density of Development: An Interpretive Review." Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper WP99DMI.
53. Mills, Edwin S. 2002. Why Do We Have Urban Density Controls? Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Conference Papers CP02A04.
54. Moudon, Anne Vernez. 2001. "Estimating and Analyzing Land Supply and Development Capacity: The Case of Southeast Seattle." Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper WP01AM1.
55. Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington. 1997. Infill Development Strategies for Shaping Livable Neighborhoods. Report 38.
56. Muro, Mark, and Robert Puentes. 2004. "Investing in a Better Future: A Review of the Fiscal and Competitive Advantages of Smarter Growth Development Patterns." Brookings Institute Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy Discussion Paper.
57. National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland. 2005. "Estimating Residential Development Capacity: A Guidebook for Analysis and Implementation in Maryland." Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Report.
58. Norris, Donald F. 2001. "Prospects for Regional Governance under New Regionalism: Economic Imperatives versus Political Impediments." Journal of Urban Affairs 23:557-571.
59. Northeast Midwest Institute. 2001. Strategies for Successful Infill Development. Washington, DC: Northeast-Midwest Institute Congress for New Urbanism.
60. Ohls, J. C., and David Pines. 1975. "Discontinuous Urban Development and Economic Efficiency." Land Economics 51:306-316.
61. Ottensmann, John R. 1977. "Urban Sprawl, Land Values and the Density of Development." Land Economics 53:389-400.
62. Peiser, Richard B. 1989. "Density and Urban Sprawl." Land Economics 65:193-204.
63. Pendall, Rolf. 1999. "Opposition to Housing NIMBY and Beyond." Urban Affairs Review 35:112-136.
64. Pollakowski, Henry O., David Ritchay, and Zoe Weinrobe. 2005. Effects of Mixed-Income, Multi-family Rental Housing Developments on Single-Family Housing Values. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute for Technology-Center for Real Estate.
65. Rabiega, William A., Ta-Win Lin, and Linda M. Robinson. 1984. "The Property Value Impacts of Public Housing Projects in Low and Moderate Density Residential Neighborhoods." Land Economics 60:174-179.
66. Robinson and Cole LLP. 2002. "Best Practices to Encourage Infill Development." White paper prepared for the National Association of Realtors.
67. Shen, Q., and F. Zhang. 2007 "Land Use Changes in a Pro-Smart Growth State: Maryland, USA." Environment and Planning A 39:457-477.
68. Simons, Robert A., Roberto G. Quercia, and Ivan Maric. 1998. "The Value of New Residential Construction and Neighborhood Disinvestment on Residential Sales Prices." Journal of Real Estate Research 15:147-163.
69. Song, Yan, and Gerrit-Jan Knaap. 2004. "Measuring Urban Form: Is Portland Winning the War on Sprawl?" Journal of the American Planning Association 70:210-225.
70. Steinacker, Annette. 2003. "Infill Development and Affordable Housing: Patterns from 1996-2000." Urban Affairs Review 38:492-509.
71. Suchman, Diane R., and Margaret B. Sowell. 1997. Developing Infill Housing in Inner-City Neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute Press.
72. Thibodeau, Thomas G. 1990. "Estimating the Effect of High-Rise Office Buildings on Residential Property Values." Land Economics 66:402-408.
73. Urban Land Institute. 2001. Urban Infill Housing: Myth and Fact. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute Press.
74. Urban Land Institute. 2005. High-Density Development: Myth and Fact. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute Press.
75. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2009. "Incentives to Promote Infill." Breakthroughs 8 (1). ENews Letter url: http://www.huduser.org/portal/rbc/newsletter/index.html.
76. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2010. HUD-DOT-EPA Interagency Partnership for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/dced/partnership/index.html. Accessed February 10, 2010.
77. Wang, Ko, Terry V. Grissom, James R. Webb, and Lewis Spellman. 1991. "The Impact of Rental Properties on the Value of Single Family Residences." Journal of Urban Economics 30:152-166.
78. Wheeler, Stephen. 2002. Smart Infill. San Francisco: Greenbelt Alliance.
79. Wiley, Keith. 2007. "An Exploration of the Impact of Suburban In-Fill: Is Perception Reality?" Paper presented at the Smart Growth 10 Conference, College Park, Maryland, October 3-5.
80. Wiley, Keith. 2009. "An Exploration of the Impact of Infill on Neighborhood Property Values." Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore County. 10221.
81. Young, Dwight. 1995. Alternatives to Sprawl. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.