Managing growth with priority funding areas: A good idea whose time has yet to come

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 457-478

  Lewis, Rebecca ^a   Knaap, Gerrit Jan ^a   Sohn, Jungyul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Growth management; Maryland; Priority funding areas; Targeted state spending; Urban containment

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LAND USE PLANNING; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; PUBLIC SPENDING; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

MARYLAND; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70350348923     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360903192560     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Bae, C. (2006). Searching for solutions to sprawl. In G. J. Knaap, H. Haccou, K. Clifton, & J. Frece (Eds.), Incentives, regulations, and plans: The role of states and nation-states in land use planning (pp. 36-53). London: Edward Elgar.
2. Baum-Snow, N. (2007). Did highways cause suburbanization? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 775-805.
3. Boarnet, M. G. (2001). Enterprise zones and job creation: Linking evaluation and practice. Economic Development Quarterly, 15 (3), 242-254.
4. Boarnet, M. G., & Haughwout, A. (2000). Do highways matter? Evidence and policy implications of highways' influence on metropolitan development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5. Cohen, J. R. (2002). Maryland's "smart growth": Using incentives to combat sprawl. In G. D. Squires (Ed.), Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences, and policy responses (pp. 293-324). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
6. DeGrove, J. M. (2005). Planning policy and politics: Smart growth and the states. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
7. Development Capacity Task Force. (2004). Final report of the Development Capacity Task Force. Retrieved July 16, 2009 from http://www.mdp.state.md.us/pdf/dctf/DCTF-Final.pdf
8. Duranton, G., & Turner, M. (2007). Urban growth and transportation (Working Paper 305). Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Department of Economics.
9. Felbinger, C. L., & Langbein, L. (2006). Public program evaluation: A statistical guide. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
10. Frece, J. (2008). Sprawl and politics: The inside story of smart growth in Maryland. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
11. Funderburg, R. G., Nixon, H., Boarnet, M. G. & Ferguson, G. (2008). New highways and land use change: Results from a quasi-experimental research design (Unpublished working paper). Retrieved April 6, 2009, from https://xythos.uiowa.edu/rfunderb/Public/ WP2008c.pdf
12. General Statutes of Connecticut, Chapter 297A (2008). Retrieved July 23, 2008, from http://search.cga.state.ct.us/surs/Chap297a.htm
13. Gleeson, M. (1979). Effect of urban growth management system on land values. Land Economics, 55(3), 350-365.
14. Green, R. E. (1991). Enterprise zones: New directions in economic development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Guiliano, G. (1989). New directions for understanding transportation and land use. Environment and Planning A, 21 (2), 145-159.
16. Handy, S. (2002). Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: What does the research tell us? Paper presented at New Urbanism and Smart Growth: A Research Symposium, College Park, MD. Retrieved July 7, 2009, from http://www.smartgrowth.umd.edu/events/pdf/ HandyPaper2.pdf
17. Hanley, P. F., & Hopkins, L. D. (2007). Do sewer extension plans affect urban development? Environment and Planning B, 34(1), 6-27.
18. Hanlon, B., Howland, M., & McGuire, M. (2009). Hotspots for growth: Land use change in a transitional county in the U.S. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland.
19. Howland, M., & Sohn, J. (2007). Will Maryland's priority funding areas initiative contain urban sprawl? Land Use Policy, 24 (1), 175-186.
20. Ingram, G. K., Carbonell, A., Hong, Y. H., & Flint, A. (Eds.). (2009). Smart growth policies: An evaluation of programs and outcomes Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
21. Knaap, G. J. (2001). The urban growth boundary in Metropolitan Portland, Oregon: Research, rhetoric, and reality (PAS Memo 2000). Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
22. Knaap, G. J., & Frece, J. (2007). Smart growth in Maryland: Looking forward and looking back. Idaho Law Review, 43 (2), 445-473.
23. Knaap, G. J. & Lewis, R. (2007). State agency spending under Maryland's Smart Growth Areas Act: Who's tracking, who's spending how much, and where? College Park, MD: National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education.
24. Knaap, G. J., & Talen, E. (2003). Infrastructure finance and urban development in Illinois: Does negotiation exacerbate sprawl? In F. Ennis (Eds.), Infrastructure provision and the negotiating process (pp.155-174). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
25. Maryland Department of Budget and Management. (2007). Capital improvements authorized by the General Assembly 1998 through 2007. Baltimore, MD: Author.
26. Maryland Department of Planning. (1997). Managing Maryland's growth: Models and guidelines: Smart growth: Designating Priority Funding Areas. Retrieved January 31, 2009, from http://www.mdp.state.md.us/smartgrowth/pdf/PFA.PDF
27. Maryland Department of Planning. (2002). Priority funding areas boundaries data. Baltimore, MD: Author.
28. Maryland Department of Planning. (2006). Tracking residential growth: Priority funding areas (PFAs) and residential single-family development in Maryland, 1987-2006. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved July 16, 2009, from http://www.mdp.state.md.us/msdc/PFA/Resid_Growth/ dw_PFA_resid_growth_idx.htm
29. Maryland Department of Planning. (2007). Priority funding areas boundaries data. Baltimore, MD: Author.
30. Maryland Department of Planning. (2008). Where do we grow from here? A report of the Task Force on the Future for Growth and Development in Maryland. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved January 29, 2009, from http://www.mdp.state.md.us/pdf/TFReport.pdf
31. Maryland Department of Planning. (2009a). Smart Growth Priority Funding Areas Act of 1997. Retrieved January 5, 2009, from http://www.mdp.state.md.us/fundingact.htm
32. Maryland Department of Planning. (2009b). Maryland comprehensive plans. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://www.mdp.state.md.us/comp_plans/web/towns.htm
33. Maryland Department of Transportation. (1998). Consolidated transportation program, FY 1999. Hanover, MD: Author.
34. Maryland Department of Transportation. (1999). Consolidated transportation program, FY 2000. Hanover, MD: Author.
35. Maryland Department of Transportation. (2000). Consolidated transportation program, FY 2001. Hanover, MD: Author.
36. Maryland Department of Transportation. (2001). Consolidated transportation program, FY 2002. Hanover, MD: Author.
37. Maryland Department of Transportation. (2002). Consolidated transportation program, FY 2003. Hanover, MD: Author.
38. Maryland Department of Transportation. (2003). Consolidated transportation program, FY 2004. Hanover, MD: Author.
39. Maryland Department of Transportation. (2004). Consolidated transportation program, FY 2005. Hanover, MD: Author.
40. Maryland Department of Transportation. (2005). Consolidated transportation program, FY 2006. Hanover, MD: Author.
41. Maryland Department of Transportation. (2006). Consolidated transportation program, FY 2007. Hanover, MD: Author.
42. Maryland Department of Transportation. (2007). Consolidated transportation program, FY 2008. Hanover, MD: Author.
43. Maryland State Archives. (1998). Budget of state government appropriations summary. Annapolis, MD: Author. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/34bud/html/00list.html# appropriations
44. Maryland State Archives. (1999). Budget of state government appropriations summary. Annapolis, MD: Author. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/34bud/html/00list.html# appropriations
45. Maryland State Archives. (2000). Budget of state government appropriations summary. Annapolis, MD: Author. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/34bud/html/00list.html# appropriations
46. Maryland State Archives. (2001). Budget of state government appropriations summary. Annapolis, MD: Author. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/34bud/html/00list.html# appropriations
47. Maryland State Archives. (2002). Budget of state government appropriations summary. Annapolis, MD: Author. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/34bud/html/00list.html# appropriations
48. Maryland State Archives. (2003). Budget of state government appropriations summary. Annapolis, MD: Author. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/34bud/html/00list.html# appropriations
49. Maryland State Archives. (2004). Budget of state government appropriations summary. Annapolis, MD: Author. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/34bud/html/00list.html# appropriations
50. Maryland State Archives. (2005). Budget of state government appropriations summary. Annapolis, MD: Author. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/34bud/html/00list.html# appropriations
51. Maryland State Archives. (2006). Budget of state government appropriations summary. Annapolis, MD: Author. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/34bud/html/00list.html# appropriations
52. National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education and Resources for the Future. (2007) Smart Growth at 10: A critical examination of Maryland's landmark land use program (Conference webpage). Retrieved August 18, 2009, from http://www.rff.org/Events/ Pages/Smart-Growth-at-10.aspx
53. Nelson, A. C., & Dawkins, C. J. (2004). Urban containment in the United States: History, models, and techniques for regional and metropolitan growth management (PAS Report Number 520). Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
54. Pendall, R., Martin, J., & Fulton, W. (2002). Holding the line: Urban containment in the United States.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
55. Persky, J., Kurban, J., & Lester, T. (2000). The impact of federal and state expenditures on residential land absorption: A quantitative case study - Chicago. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Chicago.
56. Porter, D. R. (2008). Managing growth in America's communities (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
57. Priority Funding Areas. State Finance and Procurement Article, Maryland State Code Ann., Title 5 State Planning, Subtitle 7B (2009). Retrieved July 16, 2009, from http://www.dsd.state.md.us/comar/ Annot_Code_Idx/StateFinProcIndex.htm
58. Sen, A., Sööt, S., & Thakuriah, V. (1998). Highways and urban decentralization. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
59. Shen, Q., Liao, J., & Zhang, F. (2005). Changing urban growth patterns in a pro-smart growth state: The case of Maryland, 1973-2000 Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland.
60. Shen, Q., & Zhang, F. (2007). Land use changes in a pro-smart growth state: Maryland, USA. Environment and Planning A, 39 (6), 457-477.
61. Smart Growth and Neighborhood Conservation Policy. Maryland Executive Order No. 01.01.1998.04 (January 23, 1998). Retrieved May, 30, 2008, from http://www.dnr.state.md.us/education/growfromhere/LESSON15/ MDP/EXECORDER.HTM
62. Sohn, J., & Knaap, G. J. (2005). Does the job creation tax credit program in Maryland help concentrate employment growth? Economic Development Quarterly, 19(4), 313-326.
63. Tabors, R. D., Shapiro, M. H., & Rogers, P. P. (1976). Land use and the pipe. Lexington, MA: D.C. Health.
64. Task Force on the Future for Growth and Development in Maryland. (2008). Where do we grow from here? Retrieved July 9, 2009, from http://www.mdp.state.md.us/pdf/TFReport.pdf
65. U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). 2002 Census of governments, Vol. 1, No. 2: Individual state descriptions (2002 GC02(1)-2). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
66. Weitz, J. (1999). From quiet revolution to smart growth: State growth management programs, 1960 to 1999. Journal of Planning Literature 14(2), 266-337.
67. Wilder, M. G., & Rubin, B. M. (1996). Rhetoric versus reality: A review of studies on state enterprise zone programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 473-491.