In silico methods

Drug Discovery and Evaluation: Safety and Pharmacokinetic Assays, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1273-1296

  Amberg, Alexander ^a  

^a Sanofi Deutschland GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923354974     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25240-2_55     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Ames BN, Durston WE, Yamasaki E, Lee FD (1973) Carcinogens are mutagens: a simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:2281-2285
2. Arvidson KB (2008) FDA toxicity databases and real-time data entry. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 233:17-19
3. Barratt MD, Rodford RA (2001) The computational prediction of toxicity. Curr Opin Chem Biol 5:383-388
4. Barratt MD, Castell JV, Miranda MA, Langowski JJ (2000) Development of an expert system rulebase for the prospective identification of photoallergens. J Photochem Photobiol B 58:54-61
5. Benfenati E, Gini G (1997) Computational predictive programs (expert systems) in toxicology. Toxicology 119:213-225
6. Benigni R, Giuliani A (1996) Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies of mutagens and carcinogens. Med Res Rev 16:267-284
7. Benigni R, Giuliani A, Franke R, Gruska A (2000) Quantitative structure-activity relationships of mutagenic and carcinogenic aromatic amines. Chem Rev 100:3697-3714
8. Blower PE, Cross KP (2006) Decision tree methods in pharmaceutical research. Curr Top Med Chem 6:31-39
9. Blower PE, Cross KP, Eichler GS, Myatt GJ, Weinstein JN, Yang C (2006) Comparison of methods for sequential screening of large compound sets. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 9:115-122
10. Boehm HJ, Klebe G, Kubinyi H (1996) Wirkstoffdesign. Der Weg zum Arzneimittel. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg/Berlin/Oxford
11. Cariello NF, Wilson JD, Britt BH, Wedd DJ, Burlinson B, Gombar V (2002) Comparison of the computer programs DEREK and TOPKAT to predict bacterial mutagenicity. Deductive estimation of risk from existing knowledge. Toxicity prediction by komputer assisted technology. Mutagenesis 17:321-329
12. CCRIS database: Chemical Carcinogenesis Research Info System. Http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/
13. Cross KP, Myatt G, Yang C, Fligner MA, Verducci JS, Blower PE Jr (2003) Finding discriminating structural features by reassembling common building blocks. J Med Chem 46:4770-4775
14. Cunningham AR, Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS (1998) Identification of structural features and associated mechanisms of action for carcinogens in rats. Mutat Res 405:9-27
15. Dearden JC (2003) In silico prediction of drug toxicity. J Comput Aided Mol Des 17:119-127
16. Debnath AK, Debnath G, Shusterman AJ, Hansch C (1992) QSAR investigation of the role of hydrophobicity in regulating mutagenicity in the Ames test: 1. Mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100. Environ Mol Mutagen 19:37-52
17. Durham SK, Pearl GM (2001) Computational methods to predict drug safety liabilities. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 4:110-115
18. Enslein K, Gombar VK, Blake BW (1994) International commission for protection against environmental mutagens and carcinogens. Use of SAR in computer-assisted prediction of carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chemicals by the TOPKAT program. Mutat Res 305:47-61
19. Fellows MD, Boyer S, O’Donovan MR (2011) The incidence of positive results in the mouse lymphoma TK assay (MLA) in pharmaceutical screening and their prediction by MultiCase MC4PC. Mutagenesis 26:529-532
20. Fostel JM (2008) Towards standards for data exchange and integration and their impact on a public database such as CEBS (Chemical Effects in Biological Systems). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 233:54-62
21. Free SM Jr, Wilson JW (1964) A mathematical contribution to structure activity studies. J Med Chem 7:395-399
22. Frid AA, Matthews EJ (2010) Prediction of drug-related cardiac adverse effects in humans-B: use of QSAR programs for early detection of drug-induced cardiac toxicities. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 56:276-289
23. Gombar VK, Enslein K (1996) Assessment of n-octanol/water partition coefficient: when is the assessment reliable? J Chem Inf Comput Sci 36:1127-1134
24. Greene N (2002) Computer systems for the prediction of toxicity: an update. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54:417-431
25. Greene N, Judson PN, Langowski JJ, Marchant CA (1999) Knowledge-based expert systems for toxicity and metabolism prediction: DEREK, StAR and METEOR. Sar QSAR Environ Res 10:299-314
26. Hansch C (1969) A quantitative approach to biochemical struc-ture-activity relationships. Acc Chem Res 2:232-239
27. Hansch C, Fujita T (1964) p-o-p- analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure. J Am Chem Soc 86:1616-1626
28. Hansch C, Maloney PP, Fujita T, Muir RM (1962) Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients. Nature 194:178-180
29. Hillebrecht A, Muster W, Brigo A, Kansy M, Weiser T, Singer T (2011) Comparative evaluation of in silico systems for Ames test mutagenicity prediction: scope and limitations. Chem Res Toxicol 24:843-854
30. Klopman G (1984) Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies: computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 106:7315-7321
31. Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS (1994) Approaches to SAR in carcinogenesis and mutagenesis. Prediction of carcinogenicity/mutagenicity using MULTI-Case. Mutat Res 305:33-46
32. Kubinyi H (2002) From narcosis to hyperspace: the history of QSAR. Quant Struct Act Relat 21:348-356
33. Langton K, Patlewicz GY, Long A, Marchant CA, Basketter DA (2006) Structure-activity relationships for skin sensitization: recent improvements to Derek for Windows. Contact Dermatitis 55:342-347
34. Leadscope homepage. Www.leadscope.com Lemont KB, Lowell H (1999) Molecular structure description: the electrotopological state. Academic, San Diego Lhasa homepage. Https://www.lhasalimited.org/
35. Marchant CA (1996) Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity using the DEREK system for 30 chemicals currently being tested by the national toxicology program. Environ Health Perspect 1048:1065-1073
36. Marchant CA, Briggs KA, Long A (2008) In silico tools for sharing data and knowledge on toxicity and metabolism: Derek for Windows, Meteor, and Vitic. Toxicol Mech Methods 18:177-187
37. Matthews EJ, Contrera JF (1998) A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software. Regul Tox Pharmacol 28:242-264
38. Matthews EJ, Kruhlak NL, Benz RD, Contrera JF, Marchant CA, Yang C (2008) Combined use of MC4PC, MDL-QSAR, BioEpisteme, Leadscope PDM, and Derek for Windows software to achieve high-performance, high-confidence, mode of action-based predictions of chemical carcinogenesis in rodents. Toxicol Mech Methods 18:189-206
39. Mombelli E (2008) An evaluation of the predictive ability of the QSAR software packages, DEREK, HAZARDEXPERT and TOPKAT, to describe chemically-induced skin irritation. Altern Lab Anim 36:15-24
40. MultiCase homepage. Www.multicase.com Patlewicz G, Rodford R, Walker JD (2003) Quantitative struc-ture-activity relationships for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1885-1893
41. Perkins R, Fang H, Tong W, Welsh WJ (2003) Quantitative structure-activity relationship methods: perspectives on drug discovery and toxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1666-1679
42. Richard AM (1998) Structure-based methods for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity: are we there yet? Mutat Res 400:493-507
43. Richardt AM, Benigni R (2002) AI and SAR approaches for predicting chemical carcinogenicity: survey and status report. Sar QSAR Environ Res 13:1-19
44. Ringsted T, Nikolov N, Jensen GE, Wedebye EB, Niemela J (2009) QSAR models for P450 (2D6) substrate activity. Sar QSAR Environ Res 20:309-325
45. Roberts G, Myatt GJ, Johnson WP, Cross KP, Blower PE Jr (2000) LeadScope: software for exploring large sets of screening data. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40:1302-1314
46. Rosenkranz HS, Cunningham AR, Zhang YP, Claycamp HG, Macina OT, Sussman NB, Grant SG, Klopman G (1999) Development, characterization and application of predic-tive-toxicology models. Sar QSAR Environ Res 10:277-298
47. Saiakhov RD, Klopman G (2008) MultiCASE expert systems and the REACH initiative. Toxicol Mech Methods 18:159-175
48. Saiakhov RD, Klopman G (2010) Benchmark performance of MultiCASE Inc. Software in Ames mutagenicity set. J Chem Inf Model 50:1521
49. Sanderson DM, Earnshaw CG (1991) Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure; the DEREK system. Hum Exp Toxicol 10:261-273
50. Smith Pease CK, Basketter DA, Patlewicz GY (2003) Contact allergy: the role of skin chemistry and metabolism. Clin Exp Dermatol 28:177-183
51. Snyder RD, Pearl GS, Mandakas G, Choy WN, Goodsaid F, Rosenblum IY (2004) Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT, and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules. Environ Mol Mutagen 43:143-158
52. Synder RD, Pearl GS, Mandakas G, Choy WN, Goodsaid F, Rosenblum IY (2004) Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules. Environ Mol Mutagen 43:143-158
53. Todeschini R, Consonni V (2000) Handbook of molecular descriptors, vol 11, Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry. Wiley VCH, Weinheim TOPKAT-homepage. Http://www.accelrys.com/products/topkat/
54. Tuppurainen K (1999) Frontier orbital energies, hydrophobicity and steric factors as physical QSAR descriptors of molecular mutagenicity. A review with a case study: MX compounds. Chemosphere 38:3015-3030
55. Valerio LG, Yang C, Arvidson KB, Kruhlak NL (2010) A structural feature-based computational approach for toxicology predictions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 6:505-518
56. Yang C, Hasselgren CH, Boyer S, Arvidson K, Aveston S, Dierkes P, Benigni R, Benz RD, Contrera J, Kruhlak NL, Matthews EJ, Han X, Jaworska J, Kemper RA, Rathman JF, Richard AM (2008) Understanding genetic toxicity through data mining: the process of building knowledge by integrating multiple genetic toxicity databases. Toxicol Mech Methods 18:277-295