Kinetic modulation of a disordered protein domain by phosphorylation

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Stanley, Nathaniel ^a   Esteban Martín, Santiago ^b   De Fabritiis, Gianni ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

^c INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC AMP RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING PROTEIN; GLUTAMIC ACID; PHOSPHATE; AMINO ACID;

ENERGETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PHOSPHATE; PROTEIN; REACTION KINETICS;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY TRANSFER; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SIMULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; CYCLIC AMP RESPONSE ELEMENT-BINDING PROTEIN; HUMANS; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84923345528     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6272     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Grotenbreg, G. & Ploegh, H. Chemical biology: dressed-up proteins. Nature 446, 993-995 (2007).
2. Geiss-Friedlander, R. & Melchior, F. Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 947-956 (2007).
3. Morrison, R. S. et al. Proteomic analysis in the neurosciences. Mol. Cell Proteomics MCP 1, 553-560 (2002).
4. Xie, H. et al. Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 3 Ligands, posttranslational modifications, and diseases associated with intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Proteome Res. 6, 1917-1932 (2007).
5. Iakoucheva, L. M. et al. The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1037-1049 (2004).
6. Hubbard, M. J. & Cohen, P. On target with a new mechanism for the regulation of protein phosphorylation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 172-177 (1993).
7. Pawson, T. & Scott, J. D. Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. Science 278, 2075-2080 (1997).
8. Hunter, T. & Karin, M. The regulation of transcription by phosphorylation. Cell 70, 375-387 (1992).
9. Wright, P. E. & Dyson, H. J. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 321-331 (1999).
10. Dunker, A. K., Obradovic, Z., Romero, P., Garner, E. C. & Brown, C. J. Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes. Genome Inform. 11, 161-171 (2000).
11. Oldfield, C. J. et al. Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins. Biochemistry 44, 1989-2000 (2005).
12. Dunker, A. K., Brown, C. J., Lawson, J. D., Iakoucheva, L. M. & Obradović, Z. Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Function. Biochemistry 41, 6573-6582 (2002).
13. Dyson, H. J. & Wright, P. E. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 197-208 (2005).
14. Dyson, H. J. Expanding the proteome: disordered and alternatively folded proteins. Q. Rev. Biophys. 44, 467-518 (2011).
15. Iakoucheva, L. M., Brown, C. J., Lawson, J. D., Obradović, Z. & Dunker, A. K. Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 323, 573-584 (2002).
16. Cheng, Y., LeGall, T., Oldfield, C. J., Dunker, A. K. & Uversky, V. N. Abundance of intrinsic disorder in protein associated with cardiovascular disease. Biochemistry 45, 10448-10460 (2006).
17. Raychaudhuri, S., Dey, S., Bhattacharyya, N. P. & Mukhopadhyay, D. The role of intrinsically unstructured proteins in neurodegenerative diseases. PLoS ONE 4, e5566 (2009).
18. Uversky, V. N. et al. Unfoldomics of human diseases: linking protein intrinsic disorder with diseases. BMC Genomics 10(Suppl 1): S7 (2009).
19. Jiang, Z. G. & McKnight, C. J. A phosphorylation-induced conformation change in dematin headpiece. Structure 14, 379-387 (2006).
20. Volkman, B. F., Lipson, D., Wemmer, D. E. & Kern, D. Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. Science 291, 2429-2433 (2001).
21. Lubman, O. Y. & Waksman, G. Dissection of the energetic coupling across the Src SH2 domain-tyrosyl phosphopeptide interface. J. Mol. Biol. 316, 291-304 (2002).
22. Chrivia, J. C. et al. Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP. Nature 365, 855-859 (1993).
23. Radhakrishnan, I. et al. Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of creb: a model for activator:coactivator interactions. Cell 91, 741-752 (1997).
24. Sugase, K., Dyson, H. J. & Wright, P. E. Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Nature 447, 1021-1025 (2007).
25. Zor, T., Mayr, B. M., Dyson, H. J., Montminy, M. R. & Wright, P. E. Roles of phosphorylation and helix propensity in the binding of the KIX domain of CREB-binding protein by constitutive (c-Myb) and inducible (CREB) activators. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 42241-42248 (2002).
26. Radhakrishnan, I., Pérez-Alvarado, G. C., Dyson, H. J. & Wright, P. E. Conformational preferences in the Ser133-phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of the kinase inducible transactivation domain of CREB. FEBS Lett. 430, 317-322 (1998).
27. Mandell, D. J. et al. Strengths of hydrogen bonds involving phosphorylated amino acid side chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 820-827 (2007).
28. Parker, D. et al. Analysis of an activator:coactivator complex reveals an essential role for secondary structure in transcriptional activation. Mol. Cell 2, 353-359 (1998).
29. Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O. & Shaw, D. E. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 334, 517-520 (2011).
30. Piana, S., Lindorff-Larsen, K. & Shaw, D. E. Atomic-level description of ubiquitin folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 5915-5920 (2013).
31. Lindorff-Larsen, K., Trbovic, N., Maragakis, P., Piana, S. & Shaw, D. E. Structure and dynamics of an unfolded protein examined by molecular dynamics simulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 3787-3791 (2012).
32. Best, R. B., Hummer, G. & Eaton, W. A. Native contacts determine protein folding mechanisms in atomistic simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17874-17879 (2013).
33. Henry, E. R., Best, R. B. & Eaton, W. A. Comparing a simple theoretical model for protein folding with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17880-17885 (2013).
34. Ganguly, D. & Chen, J. Atomistic details of the disordered states of KID and pKID. Implications in coupled binding and folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 5214-5223 (2009).
35. Chen, H.-F. Molecular dynamics simulation of phosphorylated KID posttranslational modification. PLoS ONE 4, e6516 (2009).
36. Turjanski, A. G., Gutkind, J. S., Best, R. B. & Hummer, G. Binding-induced folding of a natively unstructured transcription factor. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000060 (2008).
37. Ganguly, D. & Chen, J. Topology-based modeling of intrinsically disordered proteins: balancing intrinsic folding and intermolecular interactions. Proteins 79, 1251-1266 (2011).
38. Umezawa, K., Ikebe, J., Takano, M., Nakamura, H. & Higo, J. Conformational ensembles of an intrinsically disordered protein pKID with and without a KIX domain in explicit solvent investigated by all-atom multicanonical molecular dynamics. Biomolecules 2, 104-121 (2012).
39. Buch, I., Harvey, M. J., Giorgino, T., Anderson, D. P. & De Fabritiis, G. Highthroughput all-atom molecular dynamics simulations using distributed computing. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 397-403 (2010).
40. Harvey, M. J., Giupponi, G. & Fabritiis, G. D. ACEMD: accelerating biomolecular dynamics in the microsecond time scale. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 1632-1639 (2009).
41. Sadiq, S. K., Noé, F. & Fabritiis, G. D. Kinetic characterization of the critical step in HIV-1 protease maturation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 109, 20449-20454 (2012).
42. Huang, X. et al. Constructing multi-resolution markov state models (msms) to elucidate RNA hairpin folding mechanisms. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 15, 228-239 (2010).
43. Noé, F. et al. Dynamical fingerprints for probing individual relaxation processes in biomolecular dynamics with simulations and kinetic experiments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4822-4827 (2011).
44. Pan, A. C. & Roux, B. Building Markov state models along pathways to determine free energies and rates of transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 064107 (2008).
45. Bowman, G. R., Huang, X. & Pande, V. S. Using generalized ensemble simulations and Markov state models to identify conformational states. Methods 49, 197-201 (2009).
46. Pérez-Hernández, G., Paul, F., Giorgino, T., De Fabritiis, G. & Noé, F. Identification of slow molecular order parameters for Markov model construction. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 015102 (2013).
47. Deuflhard, P. & Weber, M. Robust Perron cluster analysis in conformation dynamics. Linear Algebra Appl. 398, 161-184 (2005).
48. Han, B., Liu, Y., Ginzinger, S. W. & Wishart, D. S. SHIFTX2: significantly improved protein chemical shift prediction. J. Biomol. NMR 50, 43-57 (2011).
49. Shen, Y. & Bax, A. SPARTA\+: a modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by means of an artificial neural network. J. Biomol. NMR 48, 13-22 (2010).
50. Hua, Q. X., Jia, W. H., Bullock, B. P., Habener, J. F. & Weiss, M. A. Transcriptional activator-coactivator recognition: nascent folding of a kinaseinducible transactivation domain predicts its structure on coactivator binding. Biochemistry 37, 5858-5866 (1998).
51. Ban, D., Sabo, T. M., Griesinger, C. & Lee, D. Measuring dynamic and kinetic information in the previously inaccessible Supra-tc window of nanoseconds to microseconds by solution nmr spectroscopy. Molecules 18, 11904-11937 (2013).
52. Volkman, H. M., Rutledge, S. E. & Schepartz, A. Binding mode and transcriptional activation potential of high affinity ligands for the CBP KIX domain. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 4649-4658 (2005).
53. Solt, I., Magyar, C., Simon, I., Tompa, P. & Fuxreiter, M. Phosphorylationinduced transient intrinsic structure in the kinase-inducible domain of CREB facilitates its recognition by the KIX domain of CBP. Proteins 64, 749-757 (2006).
54. Dunker, A. K., Silman, I., Uversky, V. N. & Sussman, J. L. Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 756-764 (2008).
55. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33-38 (1996).
56. Piana, S., Lindorff-Larsen, K. & Shaw, D. E. How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization Biophys. J. 100, L47-L49 (2011).
57. Mackerell, Jr A. D., Feig, M. & Brooks, III C. L. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1400-1415 (2004).
58. Harvey, M. J. & De Fabritiis, G. An Implementation of the Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method on GPU Hardware. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 2371-2377 (2009).
59. Feenstra, K. A., Hess, B. & Berendsen, H. J. C. Improving efficiency of large time-scale molecular dynamics simulations of hydrogen-rich systems. J. Comput. Chem. 20, 786-798 (1999).
60. Buchete, N.-V. & Hummer, G. Peptide folding kinetics from replica exchange molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 77, 030902 (2008).
61. Buch, I., Giorgino, T. & De Fabritiis, G. Complete reconstruction of an enzymeinhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10184-10189 (2011).
62. Prinz, J.-H. et al. Markov models of molecular kinetics: Generation and validation. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 174105 (2011).
63. Bowman, G. R., Beauchamp, K. A., Boxer, G. & Pande, V. S. Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 124101 (2009).
64. Singhal, N., Snow, C. D. & Pande, V. S. Using path sampling to build better Markovian state models: predicting the folding rate and mechanism of a tryptophan zipper beta hairpin. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 415-425 (2004).