Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance: A replication and extension of chiviacowsky and wulf (2005)

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue NOV, 2014, Pages

  Carter, Michael J ^a   Carlsen, Anthony N ^a   Ste Marie, Diane M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Error estimation; Knowledge of results; Learner controlled; Motor learning; Self control

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923328228     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01325     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., and Morris, C. D. (1979). "Some general constraints on learning and memory research," in Levels of Processing in Human Memory, eds L. S. Cermak and F. I. M. Craik (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 331-354.
2. Buekers, M. J. A., Magill, R. A., and Hall, K. G. (1992). The effect of erroneous knowledge of results on skill acquisition when augmented information is redundant. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A Hum. Exp. Psychol. 44, 105-117. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401285
3. Carter, M. J., and Patterson, J. T. (2012). Self-controlled knowledge of results: age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection. Hum. Mov. Sci. 31, 1459-1472. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.07.008
4. Chiviacowsky, S. (2014). Self-controlled practice: autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 15, 505-510. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.003
5. Chiviacowsky, S., and Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 73, 408-415. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040
6. Chiviacowsky, S., and Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 76, 42-48. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260
7. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., and Lewthwaite, R. (2012a). Self-controlled learning: the importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Front. Psychol. 3:458. doi: 10.3389/Fpsyg.2012.00458
8. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., and Campos, T. (2012b). Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture 35, 601-605. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003
9. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Machado, C., and Rydberg, N. (2012c). Self-controlled feedback enhances learning in adults with Down syndrome. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 16, 191-196. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000019
10. Dyal, J. A. (1966). Effects of delay of knowledge of results and subject response bias on extinction of a simple motor skill. J. Exp. Psychol. 71, 559-563. doi: 10.1037/h0022969
11. Dyal, J. A., Wilson, W. J., and Berry, K. K. (1965). Acquisition and extinction of a simple motor skill as a function of delay of knowledge of results. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 17, 158-162. doi: 10.1080/17470216508416425
12. Fitts, P. M., and Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
13. Goh, H. T., Sullivan, K. J., Gordon, J., Wulf, G., and Winstein, C. J. (2012). Dual-task practice enhances motor learning: a preliminary investigation. Exp. Brain Res. 222, 201-210. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3206-5
14. Guadagnoli, M. A., and Kohl, R. M. (2001). Knowledge of results for motor learning: relationship between error estimation and knowledge of results frequency. J. Mot. Behav. 33, 217-224. doi: 10.1080/00222890109603152
15. Guadagnoli, M. A., and Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J. Mot. Behav. 36, 212-224. doi: 10.3200/Jmbr.36.2.212-224
16. Hale, T., and Franks, I. M. (1998). A comparison between graphic and numeric forms of summary KR in a movement reproduction task. J. Hum. Mov. Stud. 35, 1-19.
17. Hansen, S., Pfeiffer, J., and Patterson, J. T. (2011). Self-control of feedback during motor learning: accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback. J. Mot. Behav. 43, 113-119. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2010.548421
18. Kantak, S. S., and Winstein, C. J. (2012). Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: a focused review and perspective. Behav. Brain Res. 228, 219-231. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.028
19. Kernodle, M. W., Johnson, R., and Arnold, D. R. (2001). Verbal instruction for correcting errors versus such instructions plus videotape replay on learning the overhand throw. Percept. Mot. Skills 92, 1039-1051. doi: 10.2466/pms.92.4.1039-1051
20. Lee, T. D. (1988). "Transfer-appropriate processing: a framework for conceptualizing practice effects in motor learning," in Complex Movement Behaviour: The Motor-Action Controversy, eds O. G. Meijer and K. Roth (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 201-215.
21. Lin, C. H., Fisher, B. E., Winstein, C. J., Wu, A. D., and Gordon, J. (2008). Contextual interference effect: elaborative processing or forgetting-reconstruction? A post hoc analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced effects on motor learning. J. Mot. Behav. 40, 578-586. doi: 10.3200/Jmbr.40.6.578-586
22. Magill, R. A., Chamberlin, C. J., and Hall, K. G. (1991). Verbal knowledge of results as redundant information for learning an anticipation timing skill. Hum. Mov. Sci. 10, 485-507. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(91)90016-Q
23. Marteniuk, R. G. (1976). Information Processing in Motor Skills. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
24. McAuley, E., Duncan, T., and Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor-analysis. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 60, 48-58. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
25. McGuigan, F. J. (1959). The effect of precision, delay, and schedule of knowledge of results on performance. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 79-84. doi: 10.1037/h0048775
26. McGuigan, F. J., Crockett, F., and Bolton, C. (1960). The effect of knowledge of results before and after a response. J. Gen. Psychol. 63, 51-55. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1960.9711797
27. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 16, 519-533. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9
28. Newell, K. M. (1976). Motor learning without knowledge of results through development of a response recognition mechanism. J. Mot. Behav. 8, 209-217. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1976.10735074
29. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
30. Patterson, J. T., and Carter, M. (2010). Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Hum. Mov. Sci. 29, 214-227. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.12.003
31. Patterson, J. T., Carter, M. J., and Hansen, S. (2013). Self-controlled KR schedules: does repetition order matter? Hum. Mov. Sci. 32, 567-579. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.03.005
32. Patterson, J. T., Carter, M., and Sanli, E. (2011). Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 82, 624-633. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599799
33. Robertson, E. M. (2009). From creation to consolidation: a novel framework for memory processing. PLoS Biol. 7:e19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000019
34. Robertson, E. M., Pascual-Leone, A., and Miall, R. C. (2004). Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 576-582. doi: 10.1038/nrn1426
35. Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68-78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
36. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., and Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol. Bull. 95, 355-386. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.95.3.355
37. Sanli, E. A., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., and Lee, T. D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Front. Psychol. 3:611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00611
38. Schmidt, R. A., and Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 5th Edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
39. Ste-Marie, D. M., Vertes, K. A., Law, B., and Rymal, A. M. (2013). Learner-controlled self-observation is advantageous for motor skill acquisition. Front. Psychol. 3:556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00556
40. Swinnen, S. P. (1988). "Post-performance activities and skill learning," in Complex Motor Behaviour: The Motor-Action Controversy, eds O. G. Meijer and K. Roth (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 315-338.
41. Swinnen, S. P., Nicholson, D. E., Schmidt, R. A., and Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 16, 706-716. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.706
42. Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Morgan, A., Hobson, J. A., and Stickgold, R. (2002). Practice with sleep makes perfect: sleep-dependent motor skill learning. Neuron 35, 205-211. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00746-8
43. Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Seidman, J., Morgan, A., Hobson, J. A., and Stickgold, R. (2003). Sleep and the time course of motor skill learning. Learn. Mem. 10, 275-284. doi: 10.1101/Lm.58503
44. Walker, M. P., and Stickgold, R. (2004). Sleep-dependent learning and memory consolidation. Neuron 44, 121-133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.031
45. Wulf, G. (2007). Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 93, 96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2006.08.005
46. Wulf, G., Shea, C., and Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med. Educ. 44, 75-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x