Self-controlled KR schedules: Does repetition order matter?

Human Movement Science

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 567-579

  Patterson, Jae T ^a   Carter, Michael J ^b   Hansen, Steve ^c  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c NIPISSING UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Feedback; Knowledge of results; Learning; Practice schedule; Self control

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; SELF CONTROL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; WORKING MEMORY;

2330; 2340; 2343; FEEDBACK; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS; LEARNING; PRACTICE SCHEDULE; SELF-CONTROL;

ATTENTION; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SERIAL LEARNING; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880285361     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: 18727646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ali A., Fawver B., Kim J., Fairbrother J., Janelle C. Too much of a good thing: random practice scheduling and self-control of feedback lead to unique but not additive learning benefits. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:1-9.
2. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?. Research Quarterly Exercise and Sport 2002, 73:408-415.
3. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly Exercise and Sport 2005, 76:42-48.
4. Del Rey P., Shewokis P. Appropriate summary KR for learning timing tasks under conditions of high and low contextual interference. Acta Psychologica 1993, 83:1-12.
5. Guadagnoli M.A., Lee T.D. Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 2004, 36:212-224.
6. Hansen S., Pfeiffer J., Patterson J.T. Self-control of feedback during motor learning: Accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior 2011, 43:113-119.
7. Hodges N.J., Edwards C., Luttin S., Bowcock A. Learning from the experts: Gaining insights into best practice during the acquisition of three novel motor skills. Research Quarterly Exercise and Sport 2011, 82:178-187.
8. Kantak S.S., Winstein C.J. Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioral Brain Research 2012, 228:219-231.
9. Keetch K.M., Lee T.D. The effect of self-regulated and experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning tasks of varying difficulty. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2007, 78:476-486.
10. Koehn J.D., Dickenson J., Goodman D. Cognitive demands of error processing. Psychological Reports 2008, 102:532-538.
11. Lee T.D. Contextual interference: Generalizability and limitations. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice 2012, 79-93. Routledge, New York, NY. N.J. Hodges, M.A. Williams (Eds.).
12. Lee T.D., Magill R.A. The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1983, 9:730-746.
13. Lee T.D., Magill R.A. Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition?. Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control 1985, 3-21. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, North-Holland. D. Goodman, R.B. Wilberg, I.M. Franks (Eds.).
14. Lee T.D., Simon D. Contextual interference. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice 2004, 29-44. Routledge, London, UK. A.M. Williams, N.J. Hodges (Eds.).
15. Lee T.D., Swinnen S.P., Serrien D.J. Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 1994, 46:328-344.
16. Lewthwaite R., Wulf G. Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:738-749.
17. Patterson J.T., Carter M. Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Human Movement Science 2010, 29:214-227.
18. Patterson J.T., Carter M., Sanli E. Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context. Research Quarterly Exercise and Sport 2011, 82:624-633.
19. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Active human nature: Self-determination theory and the promotion and maintenance of sport, exercise, and health. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport 2007, 8. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. M.S. Hagger, N.L.D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.).
20. Salmoni A.W., Schmidt R.A., Walter C.B. Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 1984, 95:355-386.
21. Sanli E.A., Patterson J.T., Bray S.R., Lee T.D. Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology: Movement Science and Sport Psychology 2013, 3:1-17.
22. Schmidt R.A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 1975, 82:225-260.
23. Schmidt R.A., Bjork R.A. New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science 1992, 3:207-217.
24. Shea J.B., Morgan R.L. Contextual interference effect on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1979, 5:179-187.
25. Shea J.B., Zimny S.T. Context effects in memory and learning movement information. Memory and control of action 1983, 345-366. Elsevier, Amsterdam. R.A. Magill (Ed.).
26. Shea J.B., Zimny S.T. Knowledge incorporation in motor representation. Complex movement behaviour: The motor-action controversy 1988, 289-314. North-Holland, Amsterdam. O.G. Meijer, K. Roth (Eds.).
27. Simon D.A., Bjork R.A. Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:907-912.
28. Simon D.A., Bjork R.A. Models of performance in learning multisegment movement tasks: Consequences for acquisition, retention, and judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2002, 8:222-232.
29. Winstein C.J., Schmidt R.A. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:677-691.
30. Wu W.F.W., Magill R.A. Allowing learnings to choose: Self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Research Quarterly Exercise and Sport 2011, 82:449-457.
31. Wu W.F.W., Young D.E., Schandler S.L., Meir G., Judy R.L.M., Perez J., et al. Contextual interference and augmented feedback: Is there an additive effect for motor learning?. Human Movement Science 2011, 30:1092-1101.
32. Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 2007, 93:96-101.
33. Wulf G., Schmidt R.A. Feedback-induced variability and the learning of generalized motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior 1994, 26:348-361.
34. Wulf G., Shea C.H. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:185-211.
35. Wulf G., Shea C.H. Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice 2004, 121-144. Routledge, London. A.M. Williams, N.J. Hodges (Eds.).