Self-controlled knowledge of results: Age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection

Human Movement Science

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1459-1472

  Carter, Michael J ^a   Patterson, Jae T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Error detection; Feedback; Older adults; Performance estimation; Practice

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF REPORT; SKILL RETENTION;

AGED; AGING; APTITUDE; AWARENESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; MOTOR SKILLS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870251242     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: 18727646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adamo D.E., Martin B.J., Brown S.H. Age-related differences in upper limb proprioceptive acuity. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2007, 104:1297-1309.
2. Adams J.A. A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 1971, 3:11-150.
3. Anderson D.I., Magill R.A., Sekiya H. Motor learning as a function of KR schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior 2001, 33:59-66.
4. Bäckman L., Ginovart N., Dixon R.A., Wahlin T.B.R., Wahlin A., Halldin C., et al. Age-related cognitive deficits mediated by changes in the striatal dopamine system. American Journal of Psychiartry 2000, 157:635-637.
5. Bäckman L., Lindenberger U., Li S.C., Nyberg L. Linking cognitive aging to alterations in dopamine neurotransmitter functioning: Recent data and future avenues. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews 2010, 34:670-677.
6. Boekaerts M. Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist 1996, 1:100-112.
7. Boekaerts M., Corno L. Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review 2005, 54:199-231.
8. Carnahan H., Vandervoort A.A., Swanson L.R. The influence of summary knowledge of results and aging on motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1996, 67:280-287.
9. Chen D.D., Hendrick J.L., Lidor R. Enhancing self-controlled learning environments: The use of self-regulated feedback information. Journal of Human Movement Studies 2002, 43:69-86.
10. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback. Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2002, 73:408-415.
11. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2005, 76:42-48.
12. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G., Laroque de Medeiros F., Kaefer A., Tani G. Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2008, 79:405-410.
13. D'Eredita M.A., Hoyer W.J. Transfer of instances in cognitive skill learning: Adult age differences. Experimental Aging Research 2010, 36:23-39.
14. Drag L.L., Bielauskas L.A. Contemporary Review 2009: Cognitive aging. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 2010, 23:75-93.
15. Fitts P.M., Posner M.I. Human Performance 1967, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
16. Fjell A.M., Walhovd K.B. Structural brain changes in aging: Courses, causes and cognitive consequences. Reviews in the Neurosciences 2010, 21:187-221.
17. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975, 12:189-198.
18. Guadagnoli M.A., Lee T.D. Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 2004, 33:217-224.
19. Guadagnoli M.A., Leis B., van Gemmert A.W.A., Stelmach G.E. The relationship between knowledge of results and motor learning in Parkinsonian patients. Parkinsonian & Related Disorders 2002, 9:89-95.
20. Hansen S., Pfeiffer J., Patterson J.T. Self-control of feedback during motor learning: Accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior 2011, 42:113-199.
21. Hertzog C., Touron D.R., Hines J.C. Does a time-monitoring deficit influence older adults' delayed retrieval shift during skill acquisition?. Psychology and Aging 2007, 22:607-624.
22. Huet M., Jacobs D.M., Camachon C., Goulon C., Montagne G. Self-controlled concurrent feedback facilitates the learning of the final approach phase in a fixed-base flight simulator. Human Factors 2009, 51:858-871.
23. Jamieson B.A., Rogers W.A. Age-related effects of blocked and random practice schedules on learning a new technology. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 2000, 55:343-353.
24. Kanfer R., Ackerman P.L. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74:657-690.
25. Keetch K.M., Lee T.D. The effect of self-regulated and experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning for tasks of varying difficulty. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2007, 78:476-486.
26. Koehen J.D., Dickinson J., Goodman D. Cognitive demands of error processing. Psychological Reports 2008, 102:532-538.
27. Lee T.D., Swinnen S.P., Serrien D.J. Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 1994, 46:328-344.
28. Lin C.-H.J., Wu A.D., Udompholkul P., Knowlton B.J. Contextual interference effects in sequence learning for younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 2010, 4:929-939.
29. Luo L., Craik F.I.M. Aging and memory: A cognitive approach. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 2008, 53:346-353.
30. Meeuwsen H.J., Sawicki T.M., Stelmach G.E. Improved foot position sense as a result of repetitions in older adults. Journal of Gerontology 1993, 48:P137-P141.
31. Patterson J.T., Carter M. Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Human Movement Science 2010, 29:214-227.
32. Patterson J.T., Carter M., Sanli E. Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2011, 82:624-633.
33. Patterson, J. T., Sanli, E., & Adkin, A. (2008). Effects of age on performer controlled augmented feedback schedules while practicing a two-part timing task. Unpublished manuscript.
34. Rogers W.A., Gilbert D.K. Do performance strategies mediate age-related differences in associative learning?. Psychology and Aging 1997, 12:620-633.
35. Rogers W.A., Hertzog C., Fisk A.D. An individual differences analysis of ability and strategy influences: Age-related differences in associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:359-394.
36. Salmoni A.W., Schmidt R.A., Walter C.B. Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 1984, 95:355-386.
37. Salthouse T.A. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review 1996, 103:403-428.
38. Schmidt R.A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 1975, 82:225-260.
39. Shah S., Vanclay F., Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. Occupational Therapy 1989, 42:703-709.
40. Touron D.R., Hertzog C. Distinguishing age differences in knowledge, strategy use, and confidence during strategic skill acquisition. Psychology and Aging 2004, 19:452-466.
41. Touron D.R., Hertzog C. Strategy shift affordance and strategy choice in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:298-310.
42. Touron D.R., Hoyer W.J., Cerella J. Age-related differences in the component processes of cognitive skill learning. Psychology and Aging 2004, 19:565-580.
43. van Dijk H., Mulder T., Hermens H.J. Effects of age and content of augmented feedback on learning an isometric force-production task. Experimental Aging Research 2007, 33:341-353.
44. Winne P.H. Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 1995, 30:173-187.
45. Winne P.H. Key issues in modeling and applying research on self-regulated learning. Applied Psychology: An International Review 2005, 54:232-238.
46. Wishart L.R., Lee T.D., Cunningham S.J., Murdoch J.E. Age-related differences and the role of augmented visual feedback in learning a bimanual coordination pattern. Acta Psychologica 2002, 110:247-263.
47. Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implication for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 2007, 93:96-101.
48. Wulf G., Shea C.H. Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad and the ugly. Skill acquisition in sport: Research theory and practice 2004, 121-144. Routledge, New York, NY. A.M. Williams, N.J. Hodges (Eds.).
49. Zimmerman B.J. A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 1989, 81:329-339.