A comparison between graphic and numeric forms of summary KR in a movement reproduction task

Journal of Human Movement Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-19

  Hale, T ^a   Franks, I M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044505439     PISSN: 03067297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ADAMS, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3(2): 111-149.
2. BRISSON, T. A. AND ALAIN, C. (1996). Should common optimal movement patterns be identified as the criterion to be achieved? Journal of Motor Behavior, 28(2): 211-223.
3. CAURAUGH, J. H, CHEN, D. AND SINGER R. N. (1993). Graphic versus numeric knowledge of results: Which mode. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(2): 213-216.
4. GUAY, M., SALMONI, A. AND LAJOIE, Y. (1997). Summary knowledge of results and task processing load. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(2): 167-171.
5. GUAY, M., A. SALMONI AND MCILWAIN, J. (1992). Summary Knowledge of results of skill acquisition: beyond Livery and Schmidt. Human Movement Science, 11: 653-673.
6. MAGILL, R. A. AND WOOD, C. A. (1986). Knowledge of results precision as a learning variable in motor skill acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57(2): 170-173.
7. MAGILL, R. A., CHAMBERLIN, C. J. AND HALL, K. G. (1991). Verbal knowledge of results as redundant information for learning an anticipation timing skill. Human Movement Science, 10: 485-507.
8. NEWELL, K. M. AND CARLTON, M. J. (1987) Augmented information and the acquisition of isometric tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(1): 4-12.
9. NEWELL, K. M., SPARROW, W. A. AND QUINN, J. T., JR. (1985). Kinetic information feedback for learning isometric tasks. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 11: 113-123.
10. REEVE, T, G., DORNIER, L. A. AND WEEKS, D. J. (1990). Precision of knowledge of results: consideration of the accuracy requirements imposed by the task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61(3): 284-290.
11. ROSS, D., BIRD. A. M., DOODY, S. G. AND ZOELLER, M. (1985). Effects of modeling and videotape feedback with knowledge of results on motor performance. Human Movement Science, 4: 149-157.
12. SALMONI, A. W., R. A. SCHMIDT AND WALTER, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95: 355-386.
13. SCHMIDT, R. A. AND WHITE, J. L. (1972). Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills: A test of Adams' closed loop theory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4(3): 143-153.
14. SCHMIDT, R. A., D. E. YOUNG, S. SWINNEN AND SHAPIRO, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15: 352-359.
15. SCHMIDT, R. A., LANGE, C. AND YOUNG, D. E. (1990). Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning. Human Movement Science, 9: 325-348.
16. SHERWOOD, D. E. (1996). The benefits of random variable practice for spatial accuracy and error detection in a rapid aiming task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(1): 35-43.
17. SIDAWAY, B., FAIRWEATHER, M., POWELL, J. AND HALL, G. (1992). The acquisition and retention of a timing task: Effects of summery KR and movement time. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(3): 328-334.
18. SWINNEN, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In Advances in Motor Learning and Control Human Kinetics, (Edited by H. N. Zelaznik), Windsor, Ont., pp. 37-66.
19. WEEKS, W. L. AND SHERWOOD, D. E. (1994). A comparison of knowledge of results scheduling methods for promoting motor skill acquisition and retention. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65(2): 136-142.
20. WULF, G. AND SCHMIDT, R. A. (1994). Feedback-induced variability and the learning of generalized motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26(4): 348-361.
21. WULF, G. SCHMIDT, R., A. AND DEUBEL, H., (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 19(5): 1134-1150.
22. WRISBERG, C. A AND WULF, G. (1997). Diminishing the effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results on generalized motor program learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29(1): 17-26.
23. YAO, W., FISCHMAN, M. G. AND WANG, Y. T. (1994). Augmented kinematic feedback for motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24: 261-273.