Epigenetic memory of the first cell fate decision prevents complete ES cell reprogramming into trophoblast

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Cambuli, Francesco ^a,b   Murray, Alexander ^a,b   Dean, Wendy ^a   Dudzinska, Dominika ^a,b   Krueger, Felix ^a   Andrews, Simon ^a   Senner, Claire E ^a,b   Cook, Simon J ^a   Hemberger, Myriam ^a,b,c  

^a BABRAHAM INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 1; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 3; CDX2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

CELL ORGANELLE; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENETICS; MEMORY; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CDX2 GENE; CELL FATE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL TRANSDIFFERENTIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; ENZYME ACTIVATION; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OCT4 GENE; PHENOTYPE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSGENE; TROPHOBLAST; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

ANIMALS; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; MICE; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TROPHOBLASTS;

EID: 84923323220     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6538     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Zernicka-Goetz, M., Morris, S. A. & Bruce, A. W. Making a firm decision: multifaceted regulation of cell fate in the early mouse embryo. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 467-477 (2009).
2. Hemberger, M., Dean, W. & Reik, W. Epigenetic dynamics of stem cells and cell lineage commitment: digging Waddington's canal. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 526-537 (2009).
3. Arnold, S. J. & Robertson, E. J.Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 91-103 (2009).
4. Waddington, C. H. Organisers and Genes (Cambridge University Press, 1940).
5. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-676 (2006).
6. Cahan, P. & Daley, G. Q. Origins and implications of pluripotent stem cell variability and heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 357-368 (2013).
7. Cunningham, J. J., Ulbright, T. M., Pera, M. F. & Looijenga, L. H. Lessons from human teratomas to guide development of safe stem cell therapies. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 849-857 (2012).
8. Rossant, J. Stem cells and early lineage development. Cell 132, 527-531 (2008).
9. Dyce, J., George, M., Goodall, H. & Fleming, T. P. Do trophectoderm and inner cell mass cells in the mouse blastocyst maintain discrete lineages? Development 100, 685-698 (1987).
10. Grabarek, J. B. et al. Differential plasticity of epiblast and primitive endoderm precursors within the ICM of the early mouse embryo. Development 139, 129-139 (2012).
11. Beddington, R. S. & Robertson, E. J. An assessment of the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells in the midgestation mouse embryo. Development 105, 733-737 (1989).
12. Nagy, A. et al. Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Development 110, 815-821 (1990).
13. Tanaka, S., Kunath, T., Hadjantonakis, A. K., Nagy, A. & Rossant, J. Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF4. Science 282, 2072-2075 (1998).
14. Popp, C. et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463, 1101-1105 (2010).
15. Ng, R. K. et al. Epigenetic restriction of embryonic cell lineage fate by methylation of Elf5. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1280-1290 (2008).
16. Senner, C. E., Krueger, F., Oxley, D., Andrews, S. & Hemberger, M. DNA methylation profiles define stem cell identity and reveal a tight embryonicextraembryonic lineage boundary. Stem Cells 30, 2732-2745 (2012).
17. Nishioka, N. et al. The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev. Cell 16, 398-410 (2009).
18. Niwa, H. et al. Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 123, 917-929 (2005).
19. Kuckenberg, P. et al. The transcription factor TCFAP2C/AP-2gamma cooperates with CDX2 to maintain trophectoderm formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 3310-3320 (2010).
20. Ralston, A. et al. Gata3 regulates trophoblast development downstream of Tead4 and in parallel to Cdx2. Development 137, 395-403 (2010).
21. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J. & Smith, A. G. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells [see comments]. Nat. Genet. 24, 372-376 (2000).
22. Kuckenberg, P. et al. Lineage conversion of murine extraembryonic trophoblast stem cells to pluripotent stem cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 31, 1748-1756 (2011).
23. Leitch, H. G. et al. Naive pluripotency is associated with global DNA hypomethylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 311-316 (2013).
24. Ficz, G. et al. FGF signaling inhibition in ESCs drives rapid genome-wide demethylation to the epigenetic ground state of pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 13, 351-359 (2013).
25. Lu, C. W. et al. Ras-MAPK signaling promotes trophectoderm formation from embryonic stem cells and mouse embryos. Nat. Genet. 40, 921-926 (2008).
26. Cook, S. J., Beltman, J., Cadwallader, K. A., McMahon, M. & McCormick, F. Regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 expression by extracellular signal-related kinase-dependent and Ca2+-dependent signal pathways in Rat-1 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13309-13319 (1997).
27. Weston, C. R. et al. Activation of ERK1/2 by deltaRaf-1:ER∗ represses Bim expression independently of the JNK or PI3K pathways. Oncogene 22, 1281-1293 (2003).
28. Hailesellasse Sene, K. et al. Gene function in early mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation. BMC Genomics 8, 85 (2007).
29. Pankov, R., Neznanov, N., Umezawa, A. & Oshima, R. G. AP-1, ETS, and transcriptional silencers regulate retinoic acid-dependent induction of keratin 18 in embryonic cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 7744-7757 (1994).
30. Beck, F., Erler, T., Russell, A. & James, R. Expression of Cdx-2 in the mouse embryo and placenta: possible role in patterning of the extra-embryonic membranes. Dev. Dyn. 204, 219-227 (1995).
31. Russ, A. P. et al. Eomesodermin is required for mouse trophoblast development and mesoderm formation. Nature 404, 95-99 (2000).
32. Weber, S. et al. Critical function of AP-2 gamma/TCFAP2C in mouse embryonic germ cell maintenance. Biol. Reprod. 82, 214-223 (2010).
33. Yamamoto, H. et al. Defective trophoblast function in mice with a targeted mutation of Ets2. Genes Dev. 12, 1315-1326 (1998).
34. Adachi, K. et al. Context-dependent wiring of Sox2 regulatory networks for self-renewal of embryonic and trophoblast stem cells. Mol. Cell 52, 380-392 (2013).
35. Rugg-Gunn, P. J. et al. Cell-surface proteomics identifies lineage-specific markers of embryo-derived stem cells. Dev. Cell 22, 887-901 (2012).
36. Habibi, E. et al. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of two distinct interconvertible DNA methylomes of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 13, 360-369 (2013).
37. Rugg-Gunn, P. J., Cox, B. J., Ralston, A. & Rossant, J. Distinct histone modifications in stem cell lines and tissue lineages from the early mouse embryo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10783-10790 (2010).
38. Riley, P., Anson-Cartwright, L. & Cross, J. C. The Hand1 bHLH transcription factor is essential for placentation and cardiac morphogenesis. Nat. Genet. 18, 271-275 (1998).
39. Donnison, M. et al. Loss of the extraembryonic ectoderm in Elf5 mutants leads to defects in embryonic patterning. Development 132, 2299-2308 (2005).
40. Nishioka, N. et al. Tead4 is required for specification of trophectoderm in preimplantation mouse embryos. Mech. Dev. 125, 270-283 (2008).
41. Frankenberg, S., Smith, L., Greenfield, A. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Novel gene expression patterns along the proximo-distal axis of the mouse embryo before gastrulation. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 8 (2007).
42. Johnson, M. H. From mouse egg to mouse embryo: polarities, axes, and tissues. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25, 483-512 (2009).
43. Johannessen, C. M. et al. COT drives resistance to RAF inhibition through MAP kinase pathway reactivation. Nature 468, 968-972 (2010).
44. Cross, J. C. et al. Hxt encodes a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor that regulates trophoblast cell development. Development 121, 2513-2523 (1995).
45. Blelloch, R. et al. Reprogramming efficiency following somatic cell nuclear transfer is influenced by the differentiation and methylation state of the donor nucleus. Stem Cells 24, 2007-2013 (2006).
46. Macfarlan, T. S. et al. Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity. Nature 487, 57-63 (2012).
47. Morgani, S. M. et al. Totipotent embryonic stem cells arise in ground-state culture conditions. Cell Rep. 3, 1945-1957 (2013).
48. Stadtfeld, M. et al. Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 465, 175-181 (2010).
49. Lister, R. et al. Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471, 68-73 (2011).
50. Zwaka, T. P. Stem cells: troublesome memories. Nature 467, 280-281 (2010).
51. Ohi, Y. et al. Incomplete DNA methylation underlies a transcriptional memory of somatic cells in human iPS cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 541-549 (2011).
52. Vitaloni, M. et al. MicroRNAs contribute to iPSC-somatic donor memory. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 2084-2098 (2013).
53. Metivier, R. et al. Cyclical DNA methylation of a transcriptionally active promoter. Nature 452, 45-50 (2008).
54. Kangaspeska, S. et al. Transient cyclical methylation of promoter DNA. Nature 452, 112-115 (2008).
55. Song, M. R. & Ghosh, A. FGF2-induced chromatin remodeling regulates CNTF-mediated gene expression and astrocyte differentiation. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 229-235 (2004).
56. Ludwig, G. et al. Aberrant DNA methylation in ES cells. PLoS ONE 9, e96090 (2014).
57. Abad, M. et al. Reprogramming in vivo produces teratomas and iPS cells with totipotency features. Nature 502, 340-345 (2013).
58. Aiba, K. et al. Defining developmental potency and cell lineage trajectories by expression profiling of differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. DNA Res. 16, 73-80 (2009).
59. Hemberger, M., Udayashankar, R., Tesar, P., Moore, H. & Burton, G. J. ELF5-enforced transcriptional networks define an epigenetically regulated trophoblast stem cell compartment in the human placenta. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 2456-2467 (2010).
60. Hemberger, M. Genetic-epigenetic intersection in trophoblast differentiation: implications for extraembryonic tissue function. Epigenetics 5, 24-29 (2010).
61. Wang, W. et al. Rapid and efficient reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells by retinoic acid receptor gamma and liver receptor homolog 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18283-18288 (2011).
62. Farthing, C. R. et al. Global mapping of DNA methylation in mouse promoters reveals epigenetic reprogramming of pluripotency genes. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000116 (2008).
63. Weber, M. et al. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat. Genet. 37, 853-862 (2005).
64. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memoryefficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
65. Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44-57 (2009).