Another look at mutations in ribosomal protein S4 lends strong support to the domain closure model

Journal of Bacteriology

Volumn 197, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1014-1016

  Fredrick, Kurt ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME PROTEIN; RIBOSOME PROTEIN S4; RNA 16S; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN S4; RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN S5;

ALLELE; ALPHA HELIX; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE MUTATION; NONHUMAN; NONSENSE MUTATION; NOTE; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIBOSOME; METABOLISM;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS;

EID: 84923295310     PISSN: 00219193     EISSN: 10985530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JB.02579-14     Document Type: Note

References (33)

1. Wohlgemuth I, Pohl C, Mittelstaet J, Konevega AL, Rodnina MV. 2011. Evolutionary optimization of speed and accuracy of decoding on the ribosome. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:2979-2986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0138.
2. Zaher HS, Green R. 2009. Fidelity at the molecular level: lessons from protein synthesis. Cell 136:746-762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.036.
3. Hopfield JJ. 1974. Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 71:4135-4139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.10.4135.
4. Ninio J. 1975. Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination. Biochimie 57:587-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9084(75)80139-8.
5. Ruusala T, Ehrenberg M, Kurland CG. 1982. Is there proofreading during polypeptide synthesis? EMBO J 1:741-745.
6. Johansson M, Zhang J, Ehrenberg M. 2012. Genetic code translation displays a linear trade-off between efficiency and accuracy of tRNA selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:131-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116480109.
7. Gromadski KB, Daviter T, Rodnina MV. 2006. A uniform response to mismatches in codon-anticodon complexes ensures ribosomal fidelity. Mol Cell 21:369-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.018.
8. Gromadski KB, Rodnina MV. 2004. Kinetic determinants of high-fidelity tRNA discrimination on the ribosome. Mol Cell 13:191-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00005-X.
9. Pape T, Wintermeyer W, Rodnina M. 1999. Induced fit in initial selection and proofreading of aminoacyl-tRNA on the ribosome. EMBO J 18:3800-3807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.13.3800.
10. Geggier P, Dave R, Feldman MB, Terry DS, Altman RB, Munro JB, Blanchard SC. 2010. Conformational sampling of aminoacyl-tRNA during selection on the bacterial ribosome. J Mol Biol 399:576-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.038.
11. Ogle JM, Brodersen DE, Clemons WM, Jr, Tarry MJ, Carter AP, Ramakrishnan V. 2001. Recognition of cognate transfer RNA by the 30S ribosomal subunit. Science 292:897-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1060612.
12. Ogle JM, Murphy FV, Tarry MJ, Ramakrishnan V. 2002. Selection of tRNA by the ribosome requires a transition from an open to a closed form. Cell 111:721-732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01086-3.
13. Valle M, Sengupta J, Swami NK, Grassucci RA, Burkhardt N, Nierhaus KH, Agrawal RK, Frank J. 2002. Cryo-EM reveals an active role for aminoacyl-tRNA in the accommodation process. EMBO J 21:3557-3567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf326.
14. Schmeing TM, Voorhees RM, Kelley AC, Gao YG, Murphy FV, 4th, Weir JR, Ramakrishnan V. 2009. The crystal structure of the ribosome bound to EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA. Science 326:688-694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1179700.
15. Voorhees RM, Schmeing TM, Kelley AC, Ramakrishnan V. 2010. The mechanism for activation of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome. Science 330:835-838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1194460.
16. Ogle JM, Carter AP, Ramakrishnan V. 2003. Insights into the decoding mechanism from recent ribosome structures. Trends Biochem Sci 28:259-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00066-5.
17. Ogle JM, Ramakrishnan V. 2005. Structural insights into translational fidelity. Annu Rev Biochem 74:129-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.061903.155440.
18. Björkman J, Samuelsson P, Andersson DI, Hughes D. 1999. Novel ribosomal mutations affecting translational accuracy, antibiotic resistance and virulence of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 31:53-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01142.x.
19. Kurland CG, Hughes D, Ehrenberg M. 1996. Limitations of translational accuracy, p. 979-1004. In Neidhardt FC, Curtiss R, III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE (ed), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: molecular and cellular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
20. Maisnier-Patin S, Paulander W, Pennhag A, Andersson DI. 2007. Compensatory evolution reveals functional interactions between ribosomal proteins S12, L14 and L19. J Mol Biol 366:207-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.047.
21. Maisnier-Patin S, Berg OG, Liljas L, Andersson DI. 2002. Compensatory adaptation to the deleterious effect of antibiotic resistance in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 46:355-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03173.x.
22. Olsson MO. 1979. Analysis of rpsD mutations in Escherichia coli. II. Physiology of some representative mutants. Mol Gen Genet 169:259-269.
23. Olsson MO, Isaksson LA. 1979. Analysis of rpsD mutations in Escherichia coli. I. Comparison of mutants with various alterations in ribosomal protein S4. Mol Gen Genet 169:251-257.
24. Dahlgren A, Ryden-Aulin M. 2000. A novel mutation in ribosomal protein S4 that affects the function of a mutated RF1. Biochimie 82:683-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9084(00)01160-3.
25. Andersson DI, Bohman K, Isaksson LA, Kurland CG. 1982. Translation rates and misreading characteristics of rpsD mutants in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet 187:467-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00332630.
26. Zaher HS, Green R. 2010. Hyperaccurate and error-prone ribosomes exploit distinct mechanisms during tRNA selection. Mol Cell 39:110-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.009.
27. Agarwal D, Kamath D, Gregory ST, O'Connor M. 2015. Modulation of decoding fidelity by ribosomal proteins S4 and S5. J Bacteriol 197:1017-1025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.02485-14.
28. Gregory ST, Cate JH, Dahlberg AE. 2001. Streptomycin-resistant and streptomycin-dependent mutants of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus. J Mol Biol 309:333-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2001.4676.
29. Inaoka T, Kasai K, Ochi K. 2001. Construction of an in vivo nonsense readthrough assay system and functional analysis of ribosomal proteins S12, S4, and S5 in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 183:4958-4963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.17.4958-4963.2001.
30. Synetos D, Frantziou CP, Alksne LE. 1996. Mutations in yeast ribosomal proteins S28 and S4 affect the accuracy of translation and alter the sensitivity of the ribosomes to paromomycin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1309:156-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4781(96)00128-5.
31. Fagan CE, Dunkle JA, Maehigashi T, Dang MN, Devaraj A, Miles SJ, Qin D, Fredrick K, Dunham CM. 2013. Reorganization of an intersubunit bridge induced by disparate 16S ribosomal ambiguity mutations mimics an EF-Tu-bound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:9716-9721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301585110.
32. McClory SP, Leisring JM, Qin D, Fredrick K. 2010. Missense suppressor mutations in 16S rRNA reveal the importance of helices h8 and h14 in aminoacyl-tRNA selection. RNA 16:1925-1934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.2228510.
33. McClory SP, Devaraj A, Fredrick K. 2014. Distinct functional classes of ram mutations in 16S rRNA. RNA 20:496-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.043331.113.