Plain cigarette packs do not exert Pavlovian to instrumental transfer of control over tobacco-seeking

Addiction

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 174-182

  Hogarth, Lee ^a,b   Maynard, Olivia M ^c   Munafò, Marcus R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cue reactivity; Pavlovian to instrumental transfer; Plain packaging; Public health; Smoking cessation; Tobacco seeking

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DRUG SEEKING BEHAVIOR; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; MALE; PACKAGING; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOBACCO; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DRUG-SEEKING BEHAVIOR; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MALE; PRODUCT PACKAGING; SMOKING; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923201073     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/add.12756     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Stead M., Moodie C., Angus K., Bauld L., McNeill A., Thomas J. etal. Is consumer response to plain/standardised tobacco packaging consistent with framework convention on tobacco control guidelines? A systematic review of quantitative studies, PLoS One 2013; 8: e75919.
2. Brose L. S., Chong C. B., Aspinall E., Michie S., McEwen A. Effects of standardised cigarette packaging on craving, motivation to stop and perceptions of cigarettes and packs. Psychol Health 2014; 29: 849-860.
3. Moodie C., Mackintosh A. M., Hastings G., Ford A. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study. Tob Control 2011; 20: 367-373.
4. Moodie C. S., Mackintosh A. M. Young adult women smokers' response to using plain cigarette packaging: a naturalistic approach. BMJ Open 2013; 3.
5. Munafò M. R., Roberts N., Bauld L., Leonards U. Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction 2011; 106: 1505-1510.
6. Maynard O. M., Munafò M. R., Leonards U. Visual attention to health warnings on plain tobacco packaging in adolescent smokers and non-smokers. Addiction 2013; 108: 413-419.
7. Di Ciano P., Everitt B. J. Differential control over drug-seeking behavior by drug-associated conditioned reinforcers and discriminative stimuli predictive of drug availability. Behav Neurosci 2003; 117: 952-960.
8. Colwill R. M., Rescorla R. A. Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1988; 14: 155-164.
9. Gámez M., Rosas J. M. Associations in human instrumental conditioning. Learn Motiv 2007; 38: 242-261.
10. Hogarth L., Balleine B. W., Corbit L. H., Killcross S. Associative learning mechanisms underpinning the transition from recreational drug use to addiction. Ann NY Acad Sci 2013; 1282: 12-24.
11. Hogarth L., Chase H. W. Parallel goal-directed and habitual control of human drug-seeking: implications for dependence vulnerability. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2011; 37: 261-276.
12. Hogarth L. Goal-directed and transfer-cue-elicited drug-seeking are dissociated by pharmacotherapy: evidence for independent additive controllers. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2012; 38: 266-278.
13. Hogarth L., Chase H. W. Evaluating psychological markers for human nicotine dependence: tobacco choice, extinction, and Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2012; 20: 213-224.
14. Hogarth L., Dickinson A., Wright A., Kouvaraki M., Duka T. The role of drug expectancy in the control of human drug seeking. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2007; 33: 484-496.
15. Hogarth L., Field M., Rose A. K. Phasic transition from goal-directed to habitual control over drug-seeking produced by conflicting reinforcer expectancy. Addict Biol 2013; 18: 88-97.
16. Hogarth L., Retzler C., Munafò M. R., Tran D. M. D., Troisi Ii J. R., Rose A. K. etal. Extinction of cue-evoked drug-seeking relies on degrading hierarchical instrumental expectancies, Behav Res Ther 2014; 59: 61-70.
17. Martinovic J., Jones A., Christiansen P., Rose A. K., Hogarth L., Field M. Electrophysiological responses to alcohol cues are not associated with Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in social drinkers. PLoS One 2014; 9: e94605.
18. Garbusow M., Schad D. J., Sommer C., Jünger E., Sebold M., Friedel E. etal. Pavlovian-to-instrumental-transfer in alcohol dependence-a pilot study. Neuropsychobiology in press.
19. Rescorla R. A. Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1994; 20: 44-50.
20. Troisi J. R. I. Pavlovian-instrumental transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and ethanol in rats. Psychol Rec 2006; 56: 499-512.
21. Delamater A. R. Effects of several extinction treatments upon the integrity of Pavlovian stimulus-outcome associations. Learn Behav 1996; 24: 437-449.
22. Rescorla R. A. Associations between an instrumental discriminative stimulus and multiple outcomes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 1992; 18: 95-104.
23. Gámez A. M., Rosas J. M. Transfer of stimulus control across instrumental responses is attenuated by extinction in human instrumental conditioning. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther 2005; 5: 207-222.
24. Rosas J. M., Paredes-Olay M. C., García-Gutiérrez A., Espinosa J. J., Abad M. J. F. Outcome-specific transfer between predictive and instrumental learning is unaffected by extinction but reversed by counterconditioning in human participants. Learn Motiv 2010; 41: 48-66.
25. Rescorla R. A. Associative relations in instrumental learning-the 18 Bartlett memorial lecture. Q J Exp Psychol B 1991; 43: 1-23.
26. Cohen-Hatton S. R., Haddon J. E., George D. N., Honey R. C. Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer: paradoxical effects of the Pavlovian relationship explained. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2013; 39: 14-23.
27. Perkins K. A. Does smoking cue-induced craving tell us anything important about nicotine dependence? Addiction 2009; 104: 1610-1616.
28. Hitsman B., Hogarth L., Tseng L.-J., Teige J. C., Shadel W. G., Dibenedetti D. B. etal. Dissociable effect of acute varenicline on tonic versus cue-provoked craving in non-treatment-motivated heavy smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013; 130: 135-141.
29. Holland P. C. Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2004; 30: 258-258.
30. Maynard O. M., Leonards U., Attwood A. S., Bauld L., Hogarth L., Munafò M. R. Plain packaging of cigarettes and smoking behavior: study protocol for a randomized controlled study. Trials 2014; 15: 252-259.
31. Trapold M. A. Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different? Learn Motiv 1970; 1: 129-140.
32. McLaren I. P. L., Mackintosh N. J. Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination. Anim Learn Behav 2002; 30: 177-200.
33. Wagner A. R., Logan F. A., Haberlandt K., Price T. Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. J Exp Psychol 1968; 79: 171-180.
34. Gunther L. M., Cole R. P., Miller R. R. Overshadowing of occasion setting. Learn Motiv 1998; 29: 323-344.
35. Hogarth L., Dickinson A., Duka T. Selective attention to conditioned stimuli in human discrimination learning: untangling the effect of outcome prediction, valence, arousal and uncertainty. In: Mitchell C. J., Le Pelley M. E., editors. Attention and Associative Learning: From Brain to Behaviour, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010, pp. 71-98.
36. Freeman T. P., Morgan C. J. A., Beesley T., Curran H. V. Drug cue induced overshadowing: selective disruption of natural reward processing by cigarette cues amongst abstinent but not satiated smokers. Psychol Med 2012; 42: 161-171.
37. Le Pelley M. E., Beesley T., Griffiths O. Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2011; 37: 220-229.
38. Urcuioli P. J. Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning. Anim Learn Behav 2005; 33: 1-21.
39. Koch I., Kunde W. Verbal response-effect compatibility. Mem Cognit 2002; 30: 1297-1303.
40. Eder A., Müsseler J., Hommel B. The structure of affective action representations: temporal binding of affective response codes. Psychol Res 2012; 76: 111-118.