Is Consumer Response to Plain/Standardised Tobacco Packaging Consistent with Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Guidelines? A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Stead, Martine ^a   Moodie, Crawford ^a   Angus, Kathryn ^a   Bauld, Linda ^a   McNeill, Ann ^b   Thomas, James ^c   Hastings, Gerard ^a   Hinds, Kate ^c   O'Mara Eves, Alison ^c   Kwan, Irene ^c   Purves, Richard I ^a   Bryce, Stuart L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE; TAR;

AGE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLOR; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; ETHNICITY; HUMAN; PACKAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRODUCT SAFETY; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING REGULATION; SOCIAL STATUS; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TASTE; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MARKETING; MOTIVATION; PRODUCT LABELING; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 84885821762     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075919     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. World Health Organization (2008) WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008: The MPOWER package. Geneva: World Health Organization.
2. Eriksen M, Mackay J, Ross H (2012) The tobacco atlas (4th Edition). Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society.
3. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL (2006) Global burden of disease and risk factors. New York: The World Bank and Oxford University Press.
4. US Department of Health and Human Services (2004) The health consequences of smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
5. Öberg M, Jaakola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Prüss-Ustün A, (2011) Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet 377: 139-146 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61388-8.
6. European Commission (2012) Executive summary of the impact assessment accompanying the document proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/docs/com_2012_788_summary_ia_en.pdf. Accessed 2013 January 27.
7. World Health Organization (2005) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: World Health Organization.
8. World Health Organization (2009) History of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
9. World Health Organization (2011) WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic. Warning about the dangers of tobacco. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
10. World Health Organization (2008) Elaboration of guidelines for implementation of Article 11 of the Convention. Third session of the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Durban, South Africa, 17-22 November 2008. Available: http://www.who.int/fctc/guidelines/article_11.pdf. Accessed 2013 January 21.
11. World Health Organization (2008) Elaboration of guidelines for implementation of Article 13 of the Convention. Third session of the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Durban, South Africa, 17-22 November 2008. Available: http://apps.who.int/gb/fctc/PDF/cop3/FCTC_COP3_9-en.pdf. Accessed 2013 January 21.
12. Freeman B, Chapman S, Rimmer M, (2008) The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products. Addiction 103: 580-590 doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02145.x.
13. International Union Against Lung and Tuberculosis Disease (2009) Tobacco packaging and labelling. Technical guide. Available: http://www.tobaccofreeunion.org/assets/Technical%20Resources/Tobacco-free%20Futures%20Action%20Guide/Tobacco%20Packaging%20and%20Labelling/Tobacco%20Packaging%20and%20Labelling%20-%20EN.pdf. Accessed 2012 February 2.
14. Devinney TM (2010) Analysis of consumer research evidence on the impact of plain packaging for tobacco products. Available: http://www.jti.com/documents/corp_reponsibility/16e56b87d2814d84acdd3a75e9d7e689/Devinney.pdf. Accessed 2012 July 7.
15. Hammond D, (2010) "Plain packaging" regulations for tobacco products: the impact of standardardizing the color and design of cigarette packs. Salud Púb de México 52 (Suppl.2):: S226-232 doi:10.1590/S0036-36342010000800018.
16. Padilla J, Watson N (2010) A critical review of the literature on generic packaging for cigarettes. A report for PMI. Brussels, Belgium: LECG Consulting Belgium.
17. Quit Victoria (2011) Plain packaging of tobacco products: a review of the evidence. Quit Victoria, Cancer Council Victoria. Available: http://www.cancer.org.au/content/pdf/CancerControlPolicy/PositionStatements/TCUCCVBkgrndResrchPlainPak270511ReEnd_FINAL_May27.pdf. Accessed 2012 July 7.
18. Moodie C, Hastings G, Thomas J, Stead M, Angus K, et al. (2011) Protocol for plain tobacco packaging: a systematic review. Available: http://phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/papers/PHRC_006_Protocol.pdf. Accessed 2013 February 25.
19. Moodie C, Stead M, Bauld L, McNeill A, Angus K, et al. (2012) Plain tobacco packaging: a systematic review. Available: http://phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/papers/PHRC_006_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed 2013 April 8.
20. Thomas J, Brunton J, Graziosi S (2010) EPPI-Reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis. EPPI-Centre Software. London: Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
21. Peersman G, Oliver S, Oakley A (1997) Review guidelines: Data collection for the EPIC database. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
22. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, England: Wiley.
23. Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, et al. (2004) Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health 58: 794-800 doi:10.1136/jech.2003.014829.
24. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009) Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York.
25. Wong W, Cheung C, Hart G, (2008) Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviors. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 5: 23-26 doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-23.
26. Shepherd J, White I, Rees R, Thomas J, Brunton G, et al. (2003) A systematic comparison of different sets of quality assessment criteria in systematic reviews of effectiveness in health promotion. Paper presented at: XI Cochrane Colloquium, Barcelona, 26-31 October 2003.
27. Thomas J, Harden A, Newman M (2012) Synthesis: combining results systematically and appropriately. In: Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J: An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. London: Sage. pp. 179-226.
28. Cooper HM, Rosenthal R, (1980) Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. Psychol Bull 87: 442-449 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.3.442.
29. Bansal-Travers M, Hammond D, Smith P, Cummings KM, (2011) The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 40: 674-682 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.021.
30. Bondy SJ, Paglia A, Kaiserman MJ (1996) Tobacco purchasing and marketing. In: Stephens T, Morin M, editors (Health Canada). Youth Smoking Survey, 1994: Technical Report. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Supply and Services Canada (Catalogue No. H49-98/1-1994E). pp.153-179. Available: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/pubs/tobac-tabac/yss-etj-1994/yss_ch-8_1994-eng.pdf. Accessed 2013 April 8.
31. Centre for Health Promotion (1993) Effects of plain packaging on the image of tobacco products among youth. Toronto, ON: Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto. Available: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fuf13d00. Accessed 2013 April 8.
32. Donovan R (1993) Smokers' and non-smokers' reactions to standard packaging of cigarettes. Perth: University of Western Australia. Available: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/stl70g00/pdf. Accessed 2013 April 8.
33. Doxey J, Hammond D, (2011) Deadly in pink: The impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging among young women. Tob Control 20: 353-360 doi:10.1136/tc.2010.038315.
34. Gallopel-Morvan K, Moodie C, Rey JM (2010) Demarketing cigarettes through plain cigarette packaging. In: Actes du Congrès International de l'AFM (Association Française du Marketing) 2010, Université du Mans, Le Mans, France, 6-7 May. p. 17.
35. Gallopel-Morvan K, Moodie C, Hammond D, Eker F, Béguinot E, et al. (2012) Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design: A comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging. Tob Control 21: 502-506 doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079.
36. Germain D, Wakefield MA, Durkin SJ, (2010) Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: Does plain packaging make a difference. J Adolesc Health 46: 385-392 doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.08.009.
37. Goldberg ME, Liefeld J, Kindra G, Madill-Marshall J, Lefebvre J, et al. (1995) When Packages Can't Speak: Possible impacts of plain and generic packaging of tobacco products. Expert Panel Report Prepared for Health Canada. Ottawa: Health Canada. Available: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/rce50d00. Accessed 2013 April 8.
38. Hammond D, Dockrell M, Arnott D, Lee A, McNeill A, (2009) Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth. Eur J Public Health 19: 631-637 doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckp122.
39. Hammond D, Daniel S, White CM, (2013) The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom. J Adolesc Health 52: 151-157 doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.003.
40. Hammond D, Doxey J, Daniel S, Bansal-Travers M, (2011) Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res 13: 579-588 doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr045.
41. Hoek J, Gendall P, Louviere J (2009) Tobacco branding and plain packaging: the new frontier in tobacco control? In: American Marketing Association 20th Anniversary Marketing and Public Policy Conference, Madison Hotel, Washington DC, May 28-30.
42. Hoek J, Wong C, Gendall P, Louviere J, Cong K, (2011) Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers. Tob Control 20: 183-188 doi:10.1136/tc.2010.037861.
43. Moodie C, MacKintosh AM, Hastings G, Ford A, (2011) Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study. Tob Control 20: 367-373 doi:10.1136/tc.2011.042911.
44. Moodie C, Ford A, MacKintosh AM, Hastings G, (2012) Young people's perceptions of cigarette packaging and plain packaging: an online survey. Nicotine Tob Res 14: 98-105 doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr136.
45. Rootman I, Flay BR (Principal Investigators), Northrup D, Foster MK, Burton D,et al. (Co-Investigators) (1995) A study on youth smoking: Plain packaging, health warnings, event marketing and price reductions. Toronto, ON: Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto. Available: http://www.utoronto.ca/chp/download/RptsandPresents/youthsmoking.pdf. Accessed 2013 April 8.
46. Swanson M (1997) Generic Packaging of Cigarettes. Thesis for Master of Public Health, University of Western Australia, Perth.
47. Thrasher JF, Rousu M, Hammond D, Navarro A, Corrigan J, (2011) Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and "plain" cigarette packaging: Evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States. Health Policy 102: 41-48 doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.06.003.
48. Wakefield M, Germain D, Durkin SJ, (2008) How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study Tob Control 17: 416-421 doi:10.1136/tc.2008.026732.
49. White C (2011) The impact of cigarette package design on young women in brazil: brand appeal and perceptions of health risk. Thesis for Master of Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON.
50. Beede P, Lawson R, Shepherd M (1990) The promotional impact of cigarette packaging: a study of adolescent responses to cigarette plain-packs. Dunedin: Department of Marketing, University of Otago. Available: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/enu22e00. Accessed 2013 April 8.
51. Munafò M, Roberts N, Bauld L, Ute L, (2011) Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction 106: 1505-1510 doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03430.x.
52. Environics Research Group (2008a) Consumer research on the size of health warning messages - quantitative study of Canadian youth. Prepared for Health Canada. Toronto, ON: Environics Research Group.
53. Environics Research Group (2008b) Consumer research on the size of health warning messages - quantitative study of Canadian adult smokers. Prepared for Health Canada. Toronto, ON: Environics Research Group.
54. Ford A, Moodie C, Hastings G, (2012) The role of packaging for consumer products: Understanding the move towards 'plain' tobacco packaging. Addict Res Theory 20: 339-347 doi:10.3109/16066359.2011.632700.
55. Klimchuk MR, Krasovec SA (2012) Packaging design: successful product branding from concept to shelf. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
56. Meyers HM, Lubliner MJ (1998) The Marketer's Guide to Successful Packaging Design. Lincolnwood: NTC Business Books.
57. Sara R, (1990) Packaging as a retail marketing tool. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manag 20: 29-30 doi:10.1108/EUM0000000000372.
58. Grossman G, (2006) Case study: Success in the deodorant category. Admap 41: 38-39.
59. Mitreva M, (2011) Happy 150th!. Tob Reporter July: 78-80.
60. Neman (2011) Japan Tobacco International & JSC Grodno Tobacco Factory «Neman» ceremonially implemented new production line. Available: http://www.tabak.by/en/news/135-05072011.html. Accessed 2013 April 8.
61. Moodie C, Angus K, Ford A, (2012) The importance of cigarette packaging in a 'dark' market: the 'Silk Cut' experience. Tob Control doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050681.
62. Moodie C, Hastings GB, (2010) Tobacco packaging as promotion. Tob Control 19: 168-170 doi:10.1136/tc.2009.033449.
63. Kotnowski K, Hammond D, (2013) The impact of cigarette pack shape, size and opening: Evidence from tobacco company documents. Addiction doi:10.1111/add.12183.
64. Elliott C, (2009) "Healthy food looks serious": How children interpret packaged food products. Can J Commun 34: 359-380.
65. Finco FDBA, Deliza R, Rosenthal A, Silva CHO, (2010) The effect of extrinsic product attributes of pineapple juice on consumer intention to purchase. J Int Food Agribusiness Marketing 22: 125-142 doi:10.1080/08974430903372963.
66. Ogba I-E, Johnson R, (2010) How packaging affects the product preferences of children and the buyer behaviour of their parents in the food industry. Young Consumers 11: 77-89 doi:10.1108/17473611011026037.
67. Cavalcante TM (2003) Labelling and Packaging in Brazil. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available: http://www.who.int/tobacco/training/success_stories/en/best_practices_brazil_labelling.pdf. Accessed 2013 April 8.
68. Wilkenfeld J, Henningfield J, Slade J, Burns D, Pinney J, (2000) It's time for a change: cigarette smokers deserve meaningful information about their cigarettes. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 90-92 doi:10.1093/jnci/92.2.90.
69. PhilipMorris (1990) Marketing new products in a restrictive environment. June 1990. Bates No. 2044762173-2364. Available: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/yhs55e00. Accessed 2013 April 8.
70. The Research Business (1996) Qualitative research into the UK potential for Marlboro Medium. Available: http://www.tobaccopapers.com/PDFs/0500-0599/0597.pdf. Accessed 2011 February 17.
71. Pollay RW, Dewhirst T (2001) Marketing cigarettes with low machine-measured yields. In: Smoking and tobacco control. Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute. Monograph 13. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. pp. 199-235.
72. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK, Cummings KM, (2002) The cigarette pack as image: New evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 11: i73-i80 doi:_10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73.
73. Jarvis MJ, Boreham R, Primatesta P, Feyerabend C, Byrant A, Nicotine yield from machine-smoked cigarettes and nicotine intakes in smokers: evidence from a representative population survey. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 93: 134-138 doi:10.1093/jnci/93.2.134.
74. Simms C, Trott P, (2010) Packaging development: A conceptual framework for identifying new product opportunities. Marketing Theory 10: 397-415 doi:10.1177/1470593110382826.
75. Canadian Cancer Society (2012) Cigarette Package Health Warnings: International Status Report (3rd edition). Available: http://www.cancer.ca/~/media/cancer.ca/CW/get%20involved/take%20action/Tobacco%20control/CCS-intl-warnings-report_2012.pdf. Accessed 2013 April 8.
76. Hammond D, (2011) Health warning messages on tobacco products: A review. Tob Control 20: 327-337 doi:10.1136/tc.2010.037630.
77. Gartner C, Hall W, (2011) Beware of allowing the ideal to be the enemy of the good. Addiction 106: 1555-1556 doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03478.x.
78. WHO (2012) WHO global report: Mortality attributable to tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2012/9789241564434_eng.pdf. Accessed 2013 April 8.