Pavlovian-instrumental transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and ethanol in rats

Psychological Record

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 499-512

  Troisi II, Joseph R ^a  

^a SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846166388     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03396030     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BEARDSLEY, P. M., ANTHONY, E. W., & LOPEZ, O. T. (1992). Phencyclidine established as a discriminative stimulus using ethanol as a reinforcer. Behavioural Pharmacology, 3, 497-505.
2. BESHEER, J., PALMATIER, M. I., METSCHKE, D. M., & BEVINS, R. A. (2004). Nicotine as a signal for the presence and absence of sucrose reward: a Pavlovian drug appetitive conditioning preparation in rats. Psychopharmacology, 172, 108-117.
3. BEVINS, R. A., WILKINSON, J. L., PALMATIER, M. I., SIEBERT, H. L., & WILTGEN, S. M. (2005). Characterization of nicotine's ability to serve as a negative feature in a Pavlovian appetitive conditioning task in rats. Psychopharmacology, July 27 (ahead of print), 1-12.
4. BOUTON, M. E., & BROOKS, D. C. (1993). Time and context effects on performance in a Pavlovian discrimination reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 165-179.
5. BORMANN, N. M., & OVERTON, D. A. (1993). Morphine as a conditioned stimulus in a conditioned emotional response paradigm. Psychopharmacology, 112, 277-284.
6. CAPALDI, E. J., & STEVENSON, H. W. (1957). Response reversal following different amounts of training. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 50, 195-198.
7. CATANIA, A. C. (1971). Discriminative stimulus functions of drugs: Interpretations. In T. Thompson & R. Pickens (Eds.) Stimulus properties of drugs (pp. 149-155). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
8. COLPAERT, F. C. (1977). Drug produced cues and states: Some theoretical and methodological inferences. In H. Lal (Ed.), Discriminative stimulus properties of drugs (pp. 5-21). New York: Plenum.
9. COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1990). Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 71-82.
10. CONKLIN, C. A., & TIFFANY, S. (2002). Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. Addiction, 97, 155-167.
11. ESTES, W. K., & SKINNER, B. F. (1941). Some quantitative properties of anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 390-400.
12. GARNER, H. R., WESSINGER, W. D., & MCMILLAN, D. E. (1996). Effect of multiple discrimination reversals on acquisition of a drug discrimination task in rats. Behavioural Pharmacology, 7, 200-204.
13. HARLOW, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51-65.
14. HOLLAND, P. E. (2004). Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 107-114.
15. JARBE, T. U. C., HILTUNEN, A. J., & SWEDBERG, M. D. B. (1989). Compound drug discrimination learning. Drug Development Research, 16, 111-122.
16. MAES, J. H. R., & VOSSEN J. M. H. (1997). Conditional control by midazolam and amphetamine in a rapid appetitive discrimination procedure. European Journal of Pharmacology, 319, 5-11.
17. MCMILLAN, D. E., WESSINGER, W. D., PAULE, M. G., & WENGER, G. R. (1989). A comparison on interoceptive and exteroceptive discriminations in the pigeon. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 34, 641-647.
18. NORTH, A. J. (1950). Improvement in successive discrimination reversals. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 43, 442-460.
19. OVERTON, D. A., SHEN, C. F., & TATHAM, T. A. (1993). Centrally acting drugs act as conditioned stimuli in a conditioned suppression of drinking task. Psychopharmacology, 112, 270-276.
20. PALMATIER, M. I., WILKINSON, J. L., METSCHKE, D. M., & BEVINS, R. A. (2004). Stimulus properties of nicotine, amphetamine, and chlordiazepoxide as positive features in a pavlovian appetitive discrimination task in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology, 30, 731-741.
21. RESCORLA, R. A. (1994). Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 44-50.
22. RIJNDERS, H. J., JARBE, T. U. C., & SLANGEN, J. L. (1991). Reversal of a drug versus drug discrimination task with different exteroceptive conditions. Behavioural Pharmacology, 2, 429-435.
23. SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
24. SPEAR, N. E., SMITH, G. J., SHERR, A., & BRYAN, R. G. (1979). Forgetting of a drug-conditional discrimination. Physiology & Behavior, 22, 851-854.
25. STOLERMAN, I. P. (2006). Drug discrimination bibliography, http://www.dd-database.org/
26. THOMAS, D. R., MCKELVIE, A. R., & MAH, W. L. (1985). Context as a conditional cue in operant discrimination reversal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 317-330.
27. TROISI, J. R., II. (2003a). Nicotine vs. ethanol discrimination: Extinction and spontaneous recovery of responding. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Sciences, 38, 104-123.
28. TROISI, J. R., II. (2003b). Spontaneous recovery during, but not following, extinction of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats: Reinstatement of stimulus control. The Psychological Record, 53, 579-592.
29. TROISI, J. R., II, & AKINS, C. (2004). The discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in a Pavlovian sexual approach paradigm in male Japanese quail. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 237-242.
30. TROISI, J. R., & LEBEAU, J. (2006). Failure of transfer of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and ethanol across a topographically distinct operant (R2): Retention of R1 discriminative control. Manuscript in preparation.
31. TURNER, E. G., & ALTSHULER, H. L. (1976). Conditioned suppression of an operant response using d-amphetamine as the conditioned stimulus. Psychopharmacology, 50, 139-143.