Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-21

  Urcuioli, Peter J ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICIPATION; ASSOCIATION; AUTISM; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CONDITIONING; DIFFERENTIAL OUTCOME PARADIGM; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; DOG; HUMAN; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 22844450565     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196047     Document Type: Review

References (130)

1. ALLING, K., NICKEL, M., & POLING, A. (1991a). The effects of differential and nondifferential outcomes on response rates and accuracy under a delayed-matching-to-sample procedure. Psychological Record, 41, 537-549.
2. ALLING, K., NICKEL, M., & POLING, A. (1991b). The effects of phenobarbital on responding under delayed-matching-to-sample procedures with differential and nondifferential outcomes. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, & Behavior, 39, 817-820.
3. ASRATYAN, E. A. (1974). Conditioned reflex theory and motivational behavior. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 34, 15-31.
4. ASTLEY, S. L., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (1999). Superordinate category formation in pigeons: Association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 413-432.
5. ASTLEY, S. L., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (2001). Superordinate categorization via learned stimulus equivalence: Quantity of reinforcement, hedonic value, and the nature of the mediator. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 252-268.
6. BLUNDELL, P., HALL, G., & KILLCROSS, S. (2001). Lesions of the basolateral amygdala disrupt selective aspects of reinforcer representation in rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 9018-9026.
7. BOVET, D., & VAUCLAIR, J. (1998). Functional categorization of objects and of their pictures in baboons (Papio anubis). Learning & Motivation, 29, 309-322.
8. BRODIGAN, D. L., & PETERSON, G. B. (1976). Two-choice conditional discrimination performance of pigeons as a function of reward expectancy, prechoice delay, and domesticity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 121-124.
9. CARLSON, J. G., & WIELKIEWICZ, R. M. (1972). Delay of reinforcement in instrumental discrimination learning of rats. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 81, 365-370.
10. CARLSON, J. G., & WIELKIEWICZ, R. M. (1976). Mediators of the effects of magnitude of reinforcement. Learning & Motivation, 1, 184-196.
11. CHATLOSH, D. L., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (1992). Memory and expectancy in delayed discrimination procedures. In I. Gormezano & E. A. Wasserman (Eds.), Learning and memory: The behavioral and biological substrates (pp. 61-79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. COLWILL, R. M. (1994). Associative representations of instrumental contingencies. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 31, pp. 1-72). New York: Academic Press.
13. COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1985). Post-conditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 120-132.
14. COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1986). Associative structures in instrumental learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 20, pp. 55-104). New York: Academic Press.
15. COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1988). Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 155-164.
16. COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1990). Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 71-82.
17. CORBIT, L. H., & BALLEINE, B. W. (2003). Instrumental and Pavlovian incentive processes have dissociable effects on components of a heterogeneous instrumental chain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 99-106.
18. DAVIDSON, T. L. (1998). Hunger cues as modulatory stimuli. In N. A. Schmajuk & P. C. Holland (Eds.), Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals (pp. 223-248). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. DELONG, R. E., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (1981). Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 394-412.
20. DEMARSE, T. B. (1997). Differential expectancies produced by stimuli followed by nondifferential outcomes: A serial-compound view. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
21. DEMARSE, T. B., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1993). Enhancement of matching acquisition by differential comparison-outcome associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 317-326.
22. DE ROSE. J. C., MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., GALPIN, V. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1988). Emergent sample discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 1-20.
23. DICKINSON, A., & DE WIT, S. (2003). The interaction between discriminative stimuli and outcomes during instrumental learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 127-139.
24. DONAHOE, J. W., & BURGOS, J. E. (2000). Behavior analysis and revaluation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 331-346.
25. DOUGHER, M. J., & MARKHAM, M. R. (1994). Stimulus equivalence, functional equivalence, and the transfer of function. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 71-90). Reno, NV: Context Press.
26. DUBE, W. V., & MCILVANE, W. J. (1995). Stimulus-reinforcer relations and emergent matching to sample. Psychological Record, 45, 591-612.
27. DUBE, W. V., MCILVANE, W. J., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1987). Stimulus class membership established by stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 159-175.
28. DUBE, W. V., MCILVANE, W. J., MAGUIRE, R. W., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1989). Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 65-76.
29. EDWARDS, C. A., JAGIELO, J. A., ZENTALL, T. R., & HOGAN, D. E. (1982). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in matching to sample by pigeons: Mediation by reinforcer-specific expectancies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 244-259.
30. ESTÉVEZ, A. F., FUENTES, L. J., OVERMIER, J. B., & GONZÁLEZ, C. (2003). Differential outcomes effect in children and adults with Down syndrome. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 108, 108-116.
31. ESTÉVEZ, A. F., OVERMIER, B., & FUENTES, L. J. (2003). Differential outcomes effect in children: Demonstration and mechanisms. Learning & Motivation, 34, 148-167.
32. FEDORCHAK, P. M., & BOLLES, R. C. (1986). Differential outcome effect using a biologically neutral outcome difference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 125-130.
33. FRIEDMAN, G. J., & CARLSON, J. G. (1973). Effects of a stimulus correlated with positive reinforcement upon discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 281-286.
34. FRIEDRICH, A. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (2004, May). A differential outcomes effect using two different feeder locations. Paper presented at the 76th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
35. GOLDIAMOND, I. (1962). Perception. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.), Experimental foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 280-340). New York: Basic Books.
36. GOODWIN, A. K., & BAKER, L. E. (2002). An analysis of the utility of differential outcome procedures in drug discrimination research. Behavioural Pharmacology, 13, 271-278.
37. GORMEZANO, I., & TAIT, R. W. (1976). The Pavlovian analysis of instrumental conditioning. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 11, 37-55.
38. GUTHRIE, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper.
39. HALL, G. (1996). Learning about associatively activated stimulus representations: Implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 233-255.
40. HOCHHALTER, A. K., & JOSEPH, B. (2001). Differential outcomes training facilitates memory in people with Korsakoff and Prader-Willi syndromes. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 36, 196-204.
41. HOCHHALTER, A. K., SWEENEY, W. A., BAKKE, B. L., HOLUB, R. J., & OVERMIER, J. B. (2000). Improving face recognition in alcohol dementia. Clinical Gerontologist, 22, 3-18.
42. HONEY, R. C., & HALL, G. (1989). The acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 338-346.
43. HONIG, W. K., & DODD, P. W. D. (1986). Anticipation and intention in working memory. In D. F. Kendrick, M. E. Rilling, & M. R. Denny (Eds.), Theories of animal memory (pp. 77-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. HONIG, W. K., MATHESON, W. R., & DODD, P. W. D. (1984). Outcome expectancies as mediators for discriminative responding. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 196-217.
45. HONIG, W. K., & URCUIOLI, P. J. (1981). The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 405-445.
46. HULL, C. L. (1930). Knowledge and purpose as habit mechanisms. Psychological Review, 37, 511-525.
47. HULL, C. L. (1931). Goal attraction and directing ideas conceived as habit phenomena. Psychological Review, 38, 487-506.
48. HULL, C. L. (1939). The problem of stimulus equivalence in behavior theory. Psychological Review, 46, 9-30.
49. HULL, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
50. HULL, C. L. (1952). A behavior system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51. JENKINS, H. M. (1965). The measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning. Psychological Review, 38, 487-506.
52. JENKINS, H. M., & MOORE, B. R. (1973). The form of the auto-shaped response with food and water reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 163-181.
53. JONES, B. M., & WHITE, K. G. (1994). An investigation of the effect of differential-outcomes effect within sessions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 389-406.
54. JONES, B. M., WHITE, K. G., & ALSOP, B. L. (1995). On two effects of signaling the consequences for remembering. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 256-272.
55. JOSEPH, B., OVERMIER, J. B., & THOMPSON, T. (1997). Food-and nonfood-related differential outcomes in equivalence learning by adults with Prader-Willi syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 374-386.
56. KASTAK, C. R., SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., & KASTAK, D. (2001). Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131-158.
57. KELLY, R., & GRANT, D. S. (2001). A differential outcomes effect using biologically neutral outcomes in delayed matching-to-sample with pigeons. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 69-79.
58. KRUSE, J. M., OVERMIER, J. B., KONZ, W. A., & ROKKE, E. (1983). Pavlovian conditioned stimulus effects on instrumental choice behavior are reinforcer specific. Learning & Motivation, 14, 165-181.
59. LITT, M. D., & SCHREIBMAN, L. (1981). Stimulus-specific reinforcement in the acquisition of receptive labels by autistic children. Analysis & Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1, 171-186.
60. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1977). Stimulus control: Attentional factors. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 481-513). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
61. MACUDA, T., & ROBERTS, W. A. (1995). Further evidence for hierarchical chunking in rat spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 20-32.
62. MAKI, P., OVERMIER, J. B., DELOS, S., & GUTMANN, A. J. (1995). Expectancies as factors influencing conditional discrimination performance of children. Psychological Record, 45, 45-71.
63. MALANGA, P., & POLING, A. (1992). Letter recognition by adults with mental handicaps: Improving performance through differential outcomes. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 20, 39-48.
64. MEEHAN, E. F. (1999). Class-consistent differential reinforcement and stimulus class formation in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 97-115.
65. MILES, C. G., & JENKINS, H. M. (1973). Overshadowing in operant conditioning as a function of discriminability. Learning & Motivation, 4, 11-27.
66. MILLER, O., WAUGH, K. M., & CHAMBERS, K. (2002). Differential outcomes effect: Increased accuracy in adults learning Kanji with stimulus-specific rewards. Psychological Record, 52, 315-324.
67. MIYASHITA, Y., NAKAJIMA, S., & IMADA, H. (2000). Differential outcome effect in the horse. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 245-253.
68. MORGAN, T. B., & BAKER, L. E. (1997). The application of differential outcomes to a cocaine-saline discrimination procedure. Behavioural Pharmacology, 8, 31-36.
69. NAKAJIMA, S., & KOBAYASHI, H. (2000). Differential outcomes effect on instrumental serial feature-ambiguous discrimination in rats. Psychological Record, 50, 189-198.
70. OVERMIER, J. B., BULL, J. A., III, & TRAPOLD, M. A. (1971). Discriminative cue properties of different fears and their role in response selection in dogs. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 76, 478-482.
71. OVERMIER, J. B., & LAWRY, J. A. (1979). Pavlovian conditioning and the mediation of behavior. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 1-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. OVERMIER, J. B., & LINWICK, D. (2001). Conditional choice-unique outcomes establish expectancies that mediate choice behavior, integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 36, 173-181.
73. OVERMIER, J. B., SAVAGE, L. M., & SWEENEY, W. A. (1999). Behavioral and pharmacological analyses of memory: New behavioral options for remediation. In M. Haug & R. E. Whalen (Eds.), Animal models of human emotion and cognition (pp. 231-245). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
74. PAPINI, M. R., & SILINGARDI, C. A. (1989). Mechanisms of acquisition of behavioral sequences in rats. Learning & Motivation, 20, 73-86.
75. PETERSON, G. B. (1984). How expectancies guide behavior. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 135-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. PETERSON, G. B., LINWICK, D., & OVERMIER, J. B. (1987). On the comparative efficacy of memories and expectancies as cues for choice behavior in pigeons. Learning & Motivation, 18, 1-20.
77. PETERSON, G. B., & TRAPOLD, M. A. (1980). Effects of altering outcome expectancies on pigeons' delayed conditional discrimination performance. Learning & Motivation, 11, 267-288.
78. PETERSON, G. B., & TRAPOLD, M. A. (1982). Expectancy mediation of concurrent conditional discriminations. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 371-380.
79. PETERSON, G. B., WHEELER, R. L., & ARMSTRONG, G. D. (1978). Expectancies as mediators in the differential-reward conditional discrimination performance of pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 6, 279-285.
80. PETERSON, G. B., WHEELER, R. L., & TRAPOLD, M. A. (1980). Enhancement of pigeons' conditional discrimination performances by expectancies of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 22-30.
81. RAMOS, R., & SAVAGE, L. M. (2003). The differential outcomes procedure can interfere or enhance operant rule learning. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 38, 17-35.
82. RESCORLA, R. A. (1992). Response-outcome and outcome-response associations in instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 223-232.
83. RESCORLA, R. A. (1994). Transfer of instrumental control mediated by a devalued outcome. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 27-33.
84. RESCORLA, R. A., & COLWILL, R. M. (1989). Associations with anticipated and obtained outcomes in instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 291-303.
85. RESCORLA, R. A., & SOLOMON, R. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74, 151-182.
86. SANTI, A., & ROBERTS, W. A. (1985a). Prospective representation: The effects of varied mapping of sample stimuli to comparison stimuli and differential trial outcomes on pigeons' working memory. Animal Learning & Behavior, 13, 103-108.
87. SANTI, A., & ROBERTS, W. A. (1985b). Reinforcement expectancy and trial spacing effects in delayed matching-to-sample by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 13, 274-284.
88. SAUNDERS, R. R., & SAILOR, W. (1979). A comparison of three strategies of reinforcement on two-choice learning problems with severely retarded children. AAESPH Review, 4, 323-333.
89. SAVAGE, L. M. (2001). In search of the neurobiological underpinnings of the differential outcomes effect. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science. 36, 182-195.
90. SAVAGE, L. M., & PARSONS, J. (1997). The effects of delay interval, intertrial interval, amnestic drugs, and differential outcomes on matching-to-position in rats. Psychobiology, 25, 303-312.
91. SAVAGE, L. M., PITKIN, S. R., & CARERI, J. M. (1999). Memory enhancement in aged rats: The differential outcomes effect. Developmental Psychobiology, 35, 318-327.
92. SAVAGE, L. M., PITKIN, S. R., & KNITOWSKI, K. M. (1999). Rats exposed to acute pyrithiamine-induced thiamine deficiency are more sensitive to the amnestic effects of scopolamine and MK-801: Examination of working memory, response selection, and reinforcement contingencies. Behavioural Brain Research, 104, 13-26.
93. SCHENK, J. J. (1994). Emergent relations of equivalence generated by outcome-specific consequences in conditional discrimination. Psychological Record, 44, 537-558.
94. SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., REICHMUTH, C. J., & KASTAK, D. (2000). How animals classify friends and foes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 1-6.
95. SHEPP, B. E. (1962). Some cue properties of anticipated rewards indiscrimination learning of retardates. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 55, 856-859.
96. SHEPP, B. E. (1964). Some cue properties of rewards in simultaneous object-discriminations of retardates. Child Development, 35, 587-592.
97. SHERBURNE, L. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1995). Pigeons transfer between conditional discriminations with differential outcomes in the absence of differential-sample-responding cues. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 273-279.
98. SHERBURNE, L. M., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1998). The differential outcomes effect in pigeons is not reduced by eliminating response-outcome associations: Support for a two-process account. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 378-387.
99. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
100. SIDMAN, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
101. SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
102. SPENCE, K. (1956). Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
103. SPRADLIN, J. E., COTTER, V. W., & BAXLEY, N. (1973). Establishing conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556-566.
104. TERRACE, H. S. (1966). Stimulus control. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 271 -344). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
105. THORNDIKE, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.
106. TOLMAN, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century.
107. TOLMAN, E. C. (1933). Sign-Gestalt or conditioned reflex? Psychological Review, 40, 246-255.
108. TRAPOLD, M. A. (1970). Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different? Learning & Motivation, 1, 129-140.
109. TRAPOLD, M. A., & OVERMIER, J. B. (1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 427-452). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
110. URCUIOLI, P. J. (1984). Overshadowing in matching-to-sample: Reduction in sample-stimulus control by differential sample behaviors. Animal Learning & Behavior, 12, 256-264.
111. URCUIOLI, P. J. (1990a). Differential outcomes and many-to-one matching: Effects of correlation with correct choice. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 410-422.
112. URCUIOLI, P. J. (1990b). Some relationships between outcome expectancies and sample stimuli in pigeons' delayed matching. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 302-314.
113. URCUIOLI, P. J. (1991). Retardation and facilitation of matching acquisition by differential outcomes. Animal Learning & Behavior, 19, 29-36.
114. URCUIOLI, P. J. (1996). Acquired equivalences and mediated generalization in pigeon's matching-to-sample. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 55-70). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
115. URCUIOLI, P. J., & DEMARSE, T. B. (1994). On the relationship between differential outcomes and differential sample responding in matching-to-sample. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 249-263.
116. URCUIOLI, P. J., & DEMARSE, T. B. (1996). Associative processes in differential outcome discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 192-204.
117. URCUIOLI, P. J., & DEMARSE, T. B. (1997). Further tests of response-outcome associations in differential-outcome matching-to-sample. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 171-182.
118. URCUIOLI, P. J., DEMARSE, T. B., & LIONELLO, K. M. (1998). Transfer of performance to new comparison choices following differential outcome matching-to-sample. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 139-153.
119. URCUIOLI, P. J., DEMARSE, T. B., & LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M. (2001). Assessing the contributions of S-O and R-O associations to differential-outcome matching through outcome reversals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 239-251.
120. URCUIOLI, P. J., DEMARSE, T. B., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1998). Transfer across delayed discriminations: II. Differences in the substitutability of initial versus test stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 47-59.
121. URCUIOLI, P. J., & HONIG, W. K. (1980). Control of choice in conditional discriminations by sample-specific behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 251-277.
122. URCUIOLI, P. J., & LIONELLO-DENOLF, K. M. (2001). Some tests of the anticipatory mediated generalization model of acquired sample equivalence in pigeons' many-to-one matching. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 265-280.
123. URCUIOLI, P. J., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1990). On the role of trial outcomes in delayed discriminations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 141-150.
124. URCUIOLI, P. J., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1992). Transfer across delayed discriminations: Evidence regarding the nature of prospective working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 154-173.
125. WAGNER, A. R., LOGAN, F. A., HABERLANDT, K., & PRICE, T. (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 171-180.
126. WASSERMAN, E. A., DEVOLDER, C. L., & COPPAGE, D. J. (1992). Non-similarity-based conceptualization in pigeons. Psychological Science, 3, 374-379.
127. WILLIAMS, D. A., BUTLER, M. M., & OVERMIER, J. B. (1990). Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 3-13.
128. ZENTALL, T. R. (1998). Symbolic representation in animals: Emergent stimulus relations in conditional discrimination learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 363-377.
129. ZENTALL, T. R., CLEMENT, T. S., BHATT, R. S., & ALLEN, J. (2001). Episodic-like memory in pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 685-690.
130. ZENTALL, T. R., & SHERBURNE, L. M. (1994). Role of differential sample responding in the differential outcomes effects involving delayed matching by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 390-401.