Epitope analysis of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6: Characteristic patterns of IgE-binding fingerprints among individuals with similar clinical histories

Clinical and Experimental Allergy

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 471-484

  Otsu, K ^a   Guo, R ^b   Dreskin, S C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b Food Science and Human Nutrition   (United States)

Author keywords

Allergens; Ara h 2; Ara h 6; IgE; Microarrays; Peanut; Peptides

Indexed keywords

ARA H 2 PEPTIDE; ARA H 6 PEPTIDE; EPITOPE; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; PEPTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ARA H 2 ALLERGEN, ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; ARA H 6 ALLERGEN, ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; GLYCOPROTEIN; NAPIN; PLANT ANTIGEN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANAPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FINGER DERMATOGLYPHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL HISTORY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PEANUT ALLERGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; EPITOPE MAPPING; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; RAT; YOUNG ADULT;

2S ALBUMINS, PLANT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, PLANT; CELL LINE; CHILD; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EPITOPE MAPPING; EPITOPES; GLYCOPROTEINS; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEANUT HYPERSENSITIVITY; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RATS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923071895     PISSN: 09547894     EISSN: 13652222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cea.12407     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Sicherer SH, Munoz-Furlong A, Godbold JH, Sampson HA. US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:1322-6.
2. Venter C, Arshad SH. Epidemiology of food allergy. Pediatr Clin North Am 2011; 58:327-49, ix.
3. Sampson HA. Update on food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113:805-19; quiz 820.
4. Wainstein BK, Yee A, Jelley D, Ziegler M, Ziegler JB. Combining skin prick, immediate skin application and specific-IgE testing in the diagnosis of peanut allergy in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2007; 18:231-9.
5. Maloney JM, Rudengren M, Ahlstedt S, Bock SA, Sampson HA. The use of serum-specific IgE measurements for the diagnosis of peanut, tree nut, and seed allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 122:145-51.
6. Lin J, Sampson HA. The role of immunoglobulin E-binding epitopes in the characterization of food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 9:357-63.
7. Nicolaou N, Poorafshar M, Murray C et al. Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:191-7 e191-113.
8. Dang TD, Tang M, Choo S et al. Increasing the accuracy of peanut allergy diagnosis by using Ara h 2. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129:1056-63.
9. Flinterman AE, van Hoffen E, den Hartog Jager CF et al. Children with peanut allergy recognize predominantly Ara h2 and Ara h6, which remains stable over time. Clin Exp Allergy 2007; 37:1221-8.
10. Koid AE, Chapman MD, Hamilton RG et al. Ara h 6 Complements Ara h 2 as an Important Marker for IgE Reactivity to Peanut. J Agric Food Chem 2013; 62:206-13.
11. Koppelman SJ, Wensing M, Ertmann M, Knulst AC, Knol EF. Relevance of Ara h1, Ara h2 and Ara h3 in peanut-allergic patients, as determined by immunoglobulin E Western blotting, basophil-histamine release and intracutaneous testing: Ara h2 is the most important peanut allergen. Clin Exp Allergy 2004; 34:583-90.
12. Palmer GW, Dibbern DA, Burks AW et al. Comparative Potency of Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 in immunochemical and functional assays of allergenicity. Clin Immunol 2005; 115:301-12.
13. Lehmann K, Schweimer K, Reese G et al. Structure and stability of 2S albumin-type peanut allergens: implications for the severity of peanut allergic reactions. Biochem J 2006; 395:463-72.
14. McDermott RA, Porterfield HS, El-Mezayan R et al. Contribution of Ara h 2 to peanut-specific immunoglobulin E-mediated, cell activation. Clin Exp Allergy 2007; 37:752-63.
15. Porterfield HS, Murray KS, Schlichting DG et al. Effector activity of peanut allergens: a critical role for Ara h 2, Ara h 6, and their variants. Clin Exp Allergy 2009; 39:1099-108.
16. Blanc F, Adel-Patient K, Drumare MF, Paty E, Wal JM, Bernard H. Capacity of purified peanut allergens to induce degranulation in a functional in vitro assay: Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 are the most efficient elicitors. Clin Exp Allergy 2009; 39:1277-85.
17. Krause S, Latendorf T, Schmidt H et al. Peanut varieties with reduced Ara h 1 content indicating no reduced allergenicity. Mol Nutr Food Res 2010; 54:381-7.
18. Kulis M, Chen X, Lew J et al. The 2S albumin allergens of Arachis hypogaea, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6, are the major elicitors of anaphylaxis and can effectively desensitize peanut-allergic mice. Clin Exp Allergy 2012; 42:326-36.
19. Chen X, Zhuang Y, Wang Q et al. Analysis of the Effector Activity of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 by Selective Depletion from a Crude Peanut Extract. J Immunol Methods 2011; 372:65-70.
20. Chen X, Wang Q, El-Mezayen R, Zhuang Y, Dreskin SC. Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 have similar allergenic activity and are substantially redundant. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2013; 160:251-8.
21. Zhuang Y, Dreskin SC. Redefining the major peanut allergens. Immunol Res 2013; 55:125-34.
22. Chatchatee P, Jarvinen KM, Bardina L, Vila L, Beyer K, Sampson HA. Identification of IgE and IgG binding epitopes on beta- and kappa-casein in cow's milk allergic patients. Clin Exp Allergy 2001; 31:1256-62.
23. Chatchatee P, Jarvinen KM, Bardina L, Beyer K, Sampson HA. Identification of IgE- and IgG-binding epitopes on alpha(s1)-casein: differences in patients with persistent and transient cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 107:379-83.
24. Busse PJ, Jarvinen KM, Vila L, Beyer K, Sampson HA. Identification of sequential IgE-binding epitopes on bovine alpha(s2)-casein in cow's milk allergic patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2002; 129:93-6.
25. Jarvinen KM, Chatchatee P, Bardina L, Beyer K, Sampson HA. IgE and IgG binding epitopes on alpha-lactalbumin and beta-lactoglobulin in cow's milk allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2001; 126:111-8.
26. Shreffler WG, Beyer K, Chu TH, Burks AW, Sampson HA. Microarray immunoassay: association of clinical history, in vitro IgE function, and heterogeneity of allergenic peanut epitopes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113:776-82.
27. Beyer K, Jarvinen KM, Bardina L et al. IgE-binding peptides coupled to a commercial matrix as a diagnostic instrument for persistent cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 116:704-5.
28. Untersmayr E, Szalai K, Riemer AB et al. Mimotopes identify conformational epitopes on parvalbumin, the major fish allergen. Mol Immunol 2006; 43:1454-61.
29. Flinterman AE, Knol EF, Lencer DA et al. Peanut epitopes for IgE and IgG4 in peanut-sensitized children in relation to severity of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 121:737-43 e710.
30. Cerecedo I, Zamora J, Shreffler WG et al. Mapping of the IgE and IgG4 sequential epitopes of milk allergens with a peptide microarray-based immunoassay. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 122:589-94.
31. Ayuso R, Sanchez-Garcia S, Lin J et al. Greater epitope recognition of shrimp allergens by children than by adults suggests that shrimp sensitization decreases with age. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:1286-93 e1283.
32. Wang J, Lin J, Bardina L et al. Correlation of IgE/IgG4 milk epitopes and affinity of milk-specific IgE antibodies with different phenotypes of clinical milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:695-702, 702 e691-702 e696.
33. Vereda A, van Hage M, Ahlstedt S et al. Peanut allergy: clinical and immunologic differences among patients from 3 different geographic regions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127:603-7.
34. Shreffler WG. Microarrayed recombinant allergens for diagnostic testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127:843-9; quiz 850-841.
35. Sanz ML, Blazquez AB, Garcia BE. Microarray of allergenic component-based diagnosis in food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 11:204-9.
36. Fiocchi A, Nowak-Wegrzyn A. The fascinating world of molecular diagnosis in the management of food allergy: nondum matura est. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 11:200-3.
37. Lin J, Bruni FM, Fu Z et al. A bioinformatics approach to identify patients with symptomatic peanut allergy using peptide microarray immunoassay. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129:1321-1328 e1325.
38. Shreffler WG, Lencer DA, Bardina L, Sampson HA. IgE and IgG4 epitope mapping by microarray immunoassay reveals the diversity of immune response to the peanut allergen, Ara h 2. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 116:893-9.
39. Vereda A, Andreae DA, Lin J et al. Identification of IgE sequential epitopes of lentil (Len c 1) by means of peptide microarray immunoassay. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 126:596-601 e591.
40. Willumsen N, Holm J, Christensen LH, Wurtzen PA, Lund K. The complexity of allergic patients' IgE repertoire correlates with serum concentration of allergen-specific IgE. Clin Exp Allergy 2012; 42:1227-36.
41. Cox L, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lockey RF, Passalacqua G. Speaking the same language: The World Allergy Organization Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Systemic Reaction Grading System. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:569-74, 574 e561-574 e567.
42. Panse S, Dong L, Burian A et al. Profiling of generic anti-phosphopeptide antibodies and kinases with peptide microarrays using radioactive and fluorescence-based assays. Mol Divers 2004; 8:291-9.
43. Lin J, Bardina L, Shreffler WG et al. Development of a novel peptide microarray for large-scale epitope mapping of food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124:315-22, 322 e311-313.
44. Burks AW, Cockrell G, Stanley JS, Helm RM, Bannon GA. Recombinant peanut allergen Ara h I expression and IgE binding in patients with peanut hypersensitivity. J Clin Invest 1995; 96:1715-21.
45. Clarke MC, Kilburn SA, Hourihane JO, Dean KR, Warner JO, Dean TP. Serological characteristics of peanut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 1998; 28:1251-7.
46. Stanley JS, King N, Burks AW et al. Identification and mutational analysis of the immunodominant IgE binding epitopes of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2. Arch Biochem Biophys 1997; 342:244-53.
47. Christensen LH, Holm J, Lund G, Riise E, Lund K. Several distinct properties of the IgE repertoire determine effector cell degranulation in response to allergen challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 122:298-304.
48. Albrecht M, Kuhne Y, Ballmer-Weber BK et al. Relevance of IgE binding to short peptides for the allergenic activity of food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124:328-36, 336 e321-326.
49. Bublin M, Kostadinova M, Radauer C et al. IgE cross-reactivity between the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 and the nonhomologous allergens Ara h 1 and Ara h 3. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 132:118-24.
50. Matsumoto N, Okochi M, Matsushima M et al. Peptide array-based analysis of the specific IgE and IgG4 in cow's milk allergens and its use in allergy evaluation. Peptides 2009; 30:1840-7.
51. Starkl P, Felix F, Krishnamurthy D et al. An unfolded variant of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 with decreased anaphylactic potential. Clin Exp Allergy 2012; 42:1801-12.
52. Apostolovic D, Luykx D, Warmenhoven H et al. Reduction and alkylation of peanut allergen isoforms Ara h 2 and Ara h 6; characterization of intermediate- and end products. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013; 1834:2832-42.