Edge density imaging: Mapping the anatomic embedding of the structural connectome within the white matter of the human brain

NeuroImage

Volumn 109, Issue , 2015, Pages 402-417

  Owen, Julia P ^a   Chang, Yi Shin ^a   Mukherjee, Pratik ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CONNECTOME; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DISPERSION; EDGE DENSITY IMAGING; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; WHITE MATTER; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BRAIN; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; CONNECTOME; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WHITE MATTER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923031889     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alstott J., et al. Modeling the impact of lesions in the human brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5(6):e1000408.
2. Anwander A., et al. Connectivity-based parcellation of Broca's area. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17(4):816-825.
3. Beckmann M., Johansen-Berg H., Rushworth M.F. Connectivity-based parcellation of human cingulate cortex and its relation to functional specialization. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(4):1175-1190.
4. Behrens T.E.J., et al. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain?. NeuroImage 2007, 34(1):144-155.
5. Besseling R., et al. Tract specific reproducibility of tractography based morphology and diffusion metrics. PLoS One 2012, 7(4):e34125.
6. Blondel V., et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. 2008, 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.
7. Calamante F., et al. Track-density imaging (TDI): super-resolution white matter imaging using whole-brain tract-density imaging. NeuroImage 2010, 53(4):1233-1243.
8. Calamante F., et al. A generalized framework for super-resolution track-weighted imaging. NeuroImage 2012, 59(3):2494-2503.
9. Cammoun L., et al. Mapping the human connectome at multiple scales with diffusion spectrum MRI. J. Neurosci. Methods 2012, 203:386-397.
10. Chang Y.S., et al. Autism and sensory processing disorders: shared white matter disruption in sensory pathways but divergent connectivity in social-emotional pathways. PLoS One 2014, 9(7):e103038.
11. Collin G., et al. Structural and functional aspects relating to cost and benefit of rich club organization in the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 24(9):2258-2267.
12. Crossley N.A., et al. The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders. Brain 2014, 137:2382-2395.
13. Cummings J.L. Hemispheric asymmetries in visual-perceptual and visual-spatial function. The Dual Brain: Hemispheric Specialization in Humans 1985, 233-246. Guilford, New York. D.F. Benson, E. Zaidel (Eds.).
14. de Reus M.A., van den Heuvel M.P. Simulated rich club lesioning in brain networks: a scaffold for communication and integration?. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00647.
15. de Reus M.A., et al. An edge-centric perspective on the human connectome: link communities of the brain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2014, 3609:20130527.
16. Desikan R.S., et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 2006, 31(3):968-980.
17. Fazekas F., et al. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1987, 149(2):351-356.
18. Fischl B., et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14(1):11-22.
19. Fleiss J.L. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments 1986, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1st ed.
20. Ge Y. Multiple sclerosis: the role of MR imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006, 27(6):1165-1176.
21. Geschwind N., Levitsky W. Human brain: left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region. Science 1968, 161:186-187.
22. Gordon E., et al. Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 10.1093/cercor/bhu239.
23. Hagmann P., et al. Mapping human whole-brain structural networks with diffusion MRI. PLoS One 2007, 2(7):e597.
24. Hagmann P., et al. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6(7):e159.
25. Irimia A., Van Horn J.D. Systematic network lesioning reveals the core white matter scaffold of the human brain. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:51.
26. Jenkinson M., et al. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 2002, 17(2):825-884.
27. Judas M., et al. Structural, immunocytochemical, and MR imaging properties of periventricular crossroads of growing cortical pathways in preterm infants. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005, 26(10):2671-2684.
28. Kennedy D.N., et al. Gyri of the human neocortex: an MRI-based analysis of volume and variance. Cereb. Cortex 1998, 8:372-384.
29. Khwaja O., Volpe J.J. Pathogenesis of cerebral white matter injury of prematurity. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008, 93(2):F153-F161.
30. Klein J.C., et al. Connectivity-based parcellation of human cortex using diffusion MRI: establishing reproducibility, validity and observer independence in BA 44/45 and SMA/pre-SMA. NeuroImage 2007, 34(1):204-211.
31. Kuceyeski A., et al. The generation and validation of white matter connectivity importance maps. NeuroImage 2011, 58(1):109-121.
32. Kuceyeski A., et al. The Network Modification (NeMo) Tool: elucidating the effect of white matter integrity changes on cortical and subcortical structural connectivity. Brain Connect. 2013, 3(5):451-463.
33. Lachin J. The role of measurement reliability in clinical trials. Clin. Trials 2004, 1:553-566.
34. Lawrence A.J., et al. Structural network efficiency is associated with cognitive impairment in small-vessel disease. Neurology 2014, 83(4):304-311.
35. Mori S., et al. Stereotaxic white matter atlas on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. NeuroImage 2008, 40(2):570-582.
36. Owen J., et al. Test-retest reliability of computational network measurements derived from the structural connectome of the human brain. Brain Connect. 2013, 3(2):160-176.
37. Owen J., et al. Abnormal white matter microstructure in children with sensory processing disorders. Neuroimage: Clin. 2013, 2:844-853.
38. Owen J., et al. The structural connectome of the human brain in agenesis of the corpus callosum. NeuroImage 2013, 70:340-355.
39. Pannek K., et al. Assessment of the structural brain network reveals altered connectivity in children with unilateral cerebral palsy due to periventricular white matter lesions. Neuroimage Clin. 2014, 4(5):84-92.
40. Pantoni L., Garcia J.H. Pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis: a review. Stroke 1997, 28(3):652-659.
41. Paul L.K., et al. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8(4):287-299.
42. Pierpaoli C., et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996, 201(3):637-648.
43. Rubinov M., Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage 2010, 52(3):1059-1069.
44. Shu N., et al. Diffusion tensor tractography reveals disrupted topological efficiency in white matter structural networks in multiple sclerosis. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21(11):2565-2577.
45. Smith S. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 17:143-155.
46. Sporns O. The human connectome: a complex network. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1224(1):109-125.
47. Tooth L. Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Data. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 161(3):280-288.
48. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 2002, 15(1):273-289.
49. Vaessen M.J., et al. The effect and reproducibility of different clinical DTI gradient sets on small world brain connectivity measures. NeuroImage 2010, 51(3):1106-1116.
50. van den Heuvel M.P., Sporns O. Rich-club organization of the human connectome. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31(44):15775-15786.
51. van den Heuvel M.P., Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17(12):683-696.
52. van den Heuvel M.P., et al. High-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication. PNAS 2012, 109(28):11372-11377.
53. Vollmar C., et al. Identical, but not the same: intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners. Neuroimage 2010, 51(4):1384-1394.
54. Wakana S., et al. Fiber tract-based atlas of human white matter anatomy. Radiology 2004, 230(1):77-87.
55. Welker K.M., Patton A. Assessment of normal myelination with magnetic resonance imaging. Semin. Neurol. 2012, 32(1):15-28.
56. Zhang H., et al. Axon diameter mapping in the presence of orientation dispersion with diffusion MRI. NeuroImage 2011, 56(3):1301-1315.
57. Zhang H., et al. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in the human brain. NeuroImage 2012, 61(4):1000-1016.