The effect of dyad versus individual simulation-based ultrasound training on skills transfer

Medical Education

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 286-295

  Tolsgaard, Martin G ^a   Madsen, Mette E ^a   Ringsted, Charlotte ^b,c   Oxlund, Birgitte S ^a   Oldenburg, Anna ^a   Sorensen, Jette L ^a   Ottesen, Bent ^a   Tabor, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; ECHOGRAPHY; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84923030140     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12624     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Zendejas B, Wang AT, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA. Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review. Surgery 2013;153:160-76.
2. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ 2010;44:50-63.
3. Shea CH, Wulf G, Whitacre C. Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. J Mot Behav 1999;31:119-25.
4. Sanchez-Ku ML, Arthur W Jr. A dyadic protocol for training complex skills: a replication using female participants. Hum Factors 2000;42:512-20.
5. Arthur W Jr, Day EA, Bennett W Jr. Dyadic versus individual training protocols: loss and reacquisition of a complex skill. J Appl Psychol 1997;82:783-91.
6. Granados C, Wulf G. Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue. Res Q Exerc Sport 2007;78:197-203.
7. Topping KJ. Trends in peer learning. Educ Psychol 2005;25:631-45.
8. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004;27:169-92.
9. Mattar AAG, Gribble PL. Motor learning by observing. Neuron 2005;46:153-60.
10. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving. Cogn Sci 1988;12:257-85.
11. Topping KJ, Ehly SW. Peer-assisted learning: a framework for consultation. J Educ Psychol Consult 2001;12:113-32.
12. Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ 2010;44:85-93.
13. Kirschner F, Paas F, Kirschner PA. A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: united brains for complex tasks. Educ Psychol Rev 2009;21:31-42.
14. Kirschner F, Paas F, Kirschner PA. Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: the collective working-memory effect. Appl Cognit Psychol 2011;25:615-24.
15. Tolsgaard MG, Bjørck S, Rasmussen MB, Gustafsson A, Ringsted C. Improving efficiency of clinical skills training: a randomised trial. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:1072-7.
16. Shanks D, Brydges R, den Brok W, Nair P, Hatala R. Are two heads better than one? Comparing dyad and self-regulated learning in simulation training. Med Educ 2013;47:1215-22.
17. Räder SB, Henriksen A-H, Butrymovich V, Sander M, Jørgensen E, Lönn L, Ringsted CV. A study of the effect of dyad practice versus that of individual practice on simulation-based complex skills learning. Acad Med 2014;89:1287-94.
18. Kulasegaram K, Min C, Ames K, Howey E, Neville A, Norman G. The effect of conceptual and contextual familiarity on transfer performance. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012;17:489-99.
19. Burke LA, Hutchins HM. Training transfer: an integrative literature review. Hum Resource Dev Rev 2007;6:263-96.
20. Shea JB, Morgan RL. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. J Exp Psychol 1979;5:179-87.
21. Cook DA, West CP. Perspective: reconsidering the focus on 'outcomes research' in medical education: a cautionary note. Acad Med 2013;88:162-7.
22. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman 1997.
23. Magill RA. Motor Learning and Control. Concepts and Applications. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill College 2007.
24. Stefanidis D, Scerbo MW, Montero PN, Acker CE, Smith WD. Simulator training to automaticity leads to improved skill transfer compared with traditional proficiency-based training: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Surg 2012;255:30-7.
25. Tolsgaard MG, Ringsted C. Using equivalence designs to improve methodological rigor in medical education trials. Med Educ 2014;48:220-1.
26. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJW, Altman DG, CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 Statement. JAMA 2012;308:2594-604.
27. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:726-32.
28. Tolsgaard MG, Todsen T, Sorensen JL, Ringsted C, Lorentzen T, Ottesen B, Tabor A. International multispecialty consensus on how to evaluate ultrasound competence: a Delphi consensus survey. PLoS ONE 2013;8 (2):e57687.
29. Todsen T, Tolsgaard MG, Olsen BH, Henriksen BM, Hillingsø JG, Konge L, Jensen ML, Ringsted C. Reliable and valid assessment of point-of-care ultrasonography. Ann Surg 2014;261:309-15.
30. Tolsgaard MG, Ringsted C, Dreisler E, Klemmensen A, Loft A, Sorensen JL, Ottesen B, Tabor A. Reliable and valid assessment of ultrasound operator competence in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:437-43.
31. Tolsgaard MG, Rasmussen MB, Tappert C, Sundler M, Sorensen JL, Ottesen B, Ringsted C, Tabor A. Which factors are associated with trainees' confidence in performing obstetric and gynecological ultrasound examinations? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:444-51.
32. Madsen ME, Konge L, Nørgaard LN, Tabor A, Ringsted C, Klemmensen AK, Ottesen B, Tolsgaard MG. Assessment of performance and learning curves on a virtual reality ultrasound simulator. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:693-99.
33. Julious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med 2004;23:1921-86.
34. Walsh CM, Rose DN, Dubrowski A, Ling SC, Grierson LEM, Backstein D, Carnahan H. Learning in the simulated setting: a comparison of expert-, peer-, and computer-assisted learning. Acad Med 2011;86:12-6.
35. Konge L, Annema J, Clementsen P, Minddal V, Vilmann P, Ringsted C. Using virtual-reality simulation to assess performance in endobronchial ultrasound. Respiration 2013;86:59-65.
36. Bjerrum AS, Eika B, Charles P, Hilberg O. Dyad practice is efficient practice: a randomised bronchoscopy simulation study. Med Educ 2014;48:705-12.